WGs talking about UKP

[Rod trotter]

Im known to a couple but only cos i booked via uke.

Couldnt give a chuff, this is a site for punters not wg's.i use it for me.not them 

[Picti]

The worst is using the site as a bargaining chip.

Absolutely. If members remain honest, accurate, unbiased, etc, and prioritise their communal responsibilities to the forum within their posting and reviews, then it doesn't really matter whether a WG is aware of their membership as they would be unable to gain undue influence or advantage.

[Marmalade]

On ISG, punters who mention the site to prossies are known as "traitors."

On the stock market, anyone can look at the prices: but I understand that someone with information intended only for stockbrokers that discussed it with outsiders could be accused of "inside trading."

Not a perfect analogy but you get the picture.

[Cum_again]

Girls may not like the reviews, or may even disagree with them...
But if they want money, and repeated moment, they should read reviews of girls that are well liked and ask themselves why, and how they can do the same. 

Up to them.

[Malvolio]

I've had UKP mentioned by a few WGs whilst punting - safest to play dumb and say you've never heard of it.

[Marmalade]

Girls may not like the reviews, or may even disagree with them...
But if they want money, and repeated moment, they should read reviews of girls that are well liked and ask themselves why, and how they can do the same. 

Up to them.

Far too logical. Mostly they much prefer to bitch.

[Sonny Crockett]

As long as they respect the ethos of the site, do not tout for business and use their actual working name it's fine. WG's on here must be transparent.

It's in the site rules and works well.

Now to more pressing matters - I'm still waiting for you to have a great punt so I can read that review that puts this mess behind you. 

Not all of them disclose their working names. Some of them lurk the site. I know as it was a PM to me from the WG that started this event that still pisses me off. She didn't use her AW name on here (and still doesn't). That woman was certainly not transparent and was never genuine about what she said.

Anyway, on a more positive note, I shall return to punting some day.

[Marmalade]

One little cunt Romanian at a brothel -- who had actually given me quite good service, which reflected in my review, a long time later took umbrage at the review I'd given of another girl who was frankly pretty awful. The skanky I'd given a review to had possibly been using someone else's name that day, but my description was clear enough and I could only write about my experience and observed facts, including the name I was given. Neither the Romanian little cunt (who is maybe reading this) nor the establishment would give up the name of anyone answering the description so it simply remained as a review of some prossie or other at that establishment. The Romanian was also one that had "thanked me for my review" so presumably outed me to the establishment when she later took a dislike to me. A unpleasant incident and I only mention it to warn punters: do not tell them you are on UKP. Be careful about saying anything that could identify you. When it comes to a choice between helping punters and helping another prossie they will usually help another prossie. So their "thank you's" are worth dogshit.

[RedKettle]

When it comes to a choice between helping punters and helping another prossie they will usually help another prossie. So their "thank you's" are worth dogshit.

I think you can delete "usually"!

[Marmalade]

I think you can delete "usually"!

Being a gentleman, I assume an intelligent punter understands that "usually" is mere rhetoric 

[Gordon Bennett]

UKP has never been mentioned on my punts. I would NEVER admit to knowledge of UKP to an SP if she raised the subject. I've got a booking arranged via AW with a girl who is very active on UKE but she will never know that I'm "Gordon Bennett". Ultimately I want discretion and anonymity with my punting and I have no interest in having anything creep outside the 1 hour bookings I have every several weeks.. Getting involved with fawning and flirting on UKE just aint me and having some sort of conflab with an SP who has connected my UKP membership to my AW profile would be a real drag.

[Marmalade]

However you look at it, reviewing a prossie entails a certain amount of 'risk' -- but if one doesn't review at all, and comparatively, showing what -- on your scale of things -- is a negative and what is a positive punt (so giving an idea of your range) -- if punters don't do that, it means they don't contribute. Everyone is free to choose. Ultimately if no-one gave reviews like that it would mean the purpose of the site lost. The banter's a nice 'extra', but there's far too much work and hassle involved for UKP to exist just for banter. 

[pking_paul]

We can only guess how many lurkers of UKP are WGs but I think it will be a lot. It doesn't take a lot of effort to put together some aw reviews and comments on here to work out who may be who. I'm not kidding myself!

One experience with pms I've had on here even suggests it could have been a pimp pretending to be a punter who contacted me (multiple profiles and banned now).

We all know Sergie loves UKP as well don't we!

[cueball]

We all know Sergie loves UKP as well don't we!

Agreed, maybe the fully pimped foreign lasses might not know of here but their pimp certainly will.

I think you'll find that most of the indie lasses are on here one way or another, lurker, false name, active poster (proper name), active poster (false name).

They certainly get fed the info, like I said earlier, it's no surprise, it's testamount to the success and popularity of ukp.

They all google their aw links to read about themselves, ukp reviews and chatter would come up. They're women after all, they'd find it irresistible not to click the link 

But, it's primarily a punter site and that's why I'm still here and posting.

[stewpid]

I had a WG talk about UKP for the first time on a punt recently. TBH I didn't like that it was raised as any talk about the business or other clients ruins the small amount of illusion for me. I like GFE punts as a bit of fantasy relaxation away from the stress of the real world so don't really want the bubble burst during the session.

[Sonny Crockett]

I just think it is better if the WGs actually kept UKP to themselves at punts and not bother talking about it.  It just creates baggage. Focus more on giving the punter a good time.

[NIK]

I just think it is better if the WGs actually kept UKP to themselves at punts and not bother talking about it. It just creates baggage. Focus more on giving the punter a good time.

Agree.
I'd say you've no need to tell me about it, I started it! 

[Garden69]

what's a WG?
what's ukpunting?
what's ukescorting?
Me, I'm naive, know nothing, am almost a virgin.

that's funny but, given you know nothing, you've just given your identity away - see link below !!

External Link/Members Only

[Sonny Crockett]

Agree.
I'd say you've no need to tell me about it, I started it! 

  We know NIK.

[ramrodronnie]

That is exactly what they do. In reality WGs hate UKP.

To a degree, I agree Sonny Crockett. But I think not all WGs hate UKP. Some good SPs actually like UKP as they tend to realise that by providing a good service actually increases there clientele. And maybe, just maybe it will teach the not so good SPs to improve their services.

[flintstone]

I guess just one thing to add regarding lurking and reading reviews.   You don't need to be signed up to UKP to read them.  Maybe admin should change this?  I know this won't stop WGs signing up if they want to read review but may stop some bothering.  I know I used UKP for reading reviews for a while before signing up. 

[Sonny Crockett]

To a degree, I agree Sonny Crockett. But I think not all WGs hate UKP. Some good SPs actually like UKP as they tend to realise that by providing a good service actually increases there clientele. And maybe, just maybe it will teach the not so good SPs to improve their services.

I'm not sure. In my experience they just use it to fuck me about and whenever I report it in the form of a review, they just send nasty abuse.

[HorizontalFoxtrotLover]

I guess just one thing to add regarding lurking and reading reviews.   You don't need to be signed up to UKP to read them.  Maybe admin should change this?  I know this won't stop WGs signing up if they want to read review but may stop some bothering.  I know I used UKP for reading reviews for a while before signing up.

As did I

[Ben4454]

I can see their point but reviews on here take the guess work and risk out of punting.
I'd rather be blacklisted by the odd WG for being on here than walk into a con or B&S.

If you're traceable you will be blacklisted by a tiny minority of WG's. I wouldn't worry about it as it is mostly the ones who give bad service who do not want their bad service coming out publically that do it. Or the ones who spend too much time on forums/investigating which are the types you do not want to be seeing anyway.