Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: And the winner of the prize for the most idiotic AW feedback of 2019 is …  (Read 3249 times)

Offline Vice Admiral

(Actually I don’t for a moment think this will be the winner, as I'm sure that others will be able to come up with much better.  But I spotted this a moment ago and thought I'd set the ball rolling.)

Louise_luscious00 has just one positive feedback, from 20 June, and it reads: “Wasn’t able to make booking.”
External Link/Members Only

Let’s hear it for Deviantkinkster!  Well done that man!


Offline Clattypats

(Actually I don’t for a moment think this will be the winner, as I'm sure that others will be able to come up with much better.  But I spotted this a moment ago and thought I'd set the ball rolling.)

Louise_luscious00 has just one positive feedback, from 20 June, and it reads: “Wasn’t able to make booking.”
External Link/Members Only

Let’s hear it for Deviantkinkster!  Well done that man!
There are plenty POS AW feedbbacks out there for bookings that didn't take pace, so it's nothing new...

I do agree however, it's Fucking stupid...  :thumbsup:

Offline hockogrockle

I had similar as my own feedback. She cancelled and then gave me a "neutral" rating, saying: "Didn't take place as I was under the weather." Completely pointless.

Offline Home Alone

 I've had one from an SP saying, and punctuated as follows,"Great Thank you".

We never met; I simply enquired about booking! :crazy:

Offline Clattypats

I had similar as my own feedback. She cancelled and then gave me a "neutral" rating, saying: "Didn't take place as I was under the weather." Completely pointless.
I would be none too chuffed if some arsehole WG gave me a "neutral" for a meet that didn't take place...  :dash:

Offline Vice Admiral

And here's another.

On 23 September BlueGent13 was left this positive feedback by Nicolejones31: “Didnt happen as was not around hope to meet soon x”

Offline Gordon Bennett

There are plenty POS AW feedbbacks out there for bookings that didn't take pace, so it's nothing new...

I do agree however, it's Fucking stupid...  :thumbsup:

Yeah, seen loads. The ones that really take the biscuit are the ones that say meeting never took place but I can tell from her comms she is gorgeous :dash:

Offline Mr Kent (Not AW)

Yes, read loads of dreadful AW feedback lines, but those that I have read will remain between me and the authors.   

Online myothernameis

Think this profile been hacked, and does the escort know of this

She a thieving junkie cunt

External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only

Offline Vice Admiral

No doubt there's a market for thieving junkie cunts.  (There's a market for almost anything...)

What there's not a market for is hookers who write literally thousands of words of badly laid out and all but incomprehensible rubbish on their profile, as the escort currently known as Thieving Junkie Cunt has done. 

No-one reads all that garbage.  No-one.

Any escort who writes more than about ten paragraphs on her profile is wasting her time.

Why do they do it?

Offline Clattypats

No doubt there's a market for thieving junkie cunts.  (There's a market for almost anything...)

What there's not a market for is hookers who write literally thousands of words of badly laid out and all but incomprehensible rubbish on their profile, as the escort currently known as Thieving Junkie Cunt has done. 

No-one reads all that garbage.  No-one.

Any escort who writes more than about ten paragraphs on her profile is wasting her time.

Why do they do it?
Yip, not keen on long winded profiles.. Short n sweet, clear & precise always works a treat....  :thumbsup:

Offline nbarnes

Think this profile been hacked, and does the escort know of this

She a thieving junkie cunt

External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only

Ah ha ha! That's Hilarious!

Offline Vice Admiral

This thread that I started a fortnight or so ago hasn’t really taken off, because most idiotic feedback is of similar character – positive feedback left for meetings that never took place.

However I thought I’d offer up this “double” that I've just spotted.

At 5.14 pm yesterday, apriljayne09 left positive feedback for Funtimesdanny as follows: “Had to cancel but was very understanding xx”

And Funtimesdanny, ever the gentleman, left this reciprocal positive feedback just before midnight: “April had to cancel but her comms were great, very apologetic and I will def try to rebook.”

I wonder if Apriljayne and Funtmes also leave positive feedback on eBay for goods that are never delivered...?

Offline Vice Admiral

Here's an odd one – a "feedback only" bit of feedback left on 10 November for Thot69 by Only Ray^_^:
"Well she was in contact but she didn't respond after and I am very disappointed. But I respect everyone and I had no issues with them who I met."

If I were being pedantic, I might suggest that "those whom I met" would be preferable to "them who I met".  But, either way, there's a mystery here.  Whom did Ray meet, having apparently been frustrated in his communications with Thot?

External Link/Members Only

Offline Vice Admiral

Oh, and I've just noticed that Ray does seem to have had issues with "them who he met", because only a few hours later he was left this negative feedback by hoteva69xox:
"Sometime I have time for me if I?m not answer at your call or massage was my time !!"

Not crystal clear either. 

And Ray responded:   
"Disputed: I am not satisfied as it's your problem to put available on the time slots. This is what you do with other members saying this which is inappropriate."

Which is even more incomprehensible than his feedback for Thot.

And Ray's previous bit of feedback is worth a read too!

All in all, Ray must be a candidate to be the Adult Work Punter of the Year.


« Last Edit: December 21, 2019, 07:05:52 pm by Vice Admiral »

Offline freeze44

Oh, and I've just noticed that Ray does seem to have had issues with "them who he met", because only a few hours later he was left this negative feedback by hoteva69xox:
"Sometime I have time for me if I?m not answer at your call or massage was my time !!"

Not crystal clear either. 

And Ray responded:   
"Disputed: I am not satisfied as it's your problem to put available on the time slots. This is what you do with other members saying this which is inappropriate."

Which is even more incomprehensible than his feedback for Thot.

And Ray's previous bit of feedback is worth a read too!

All in all, Ray must be a candidate to be the Adult Work Punter of the Year.

 :D Ray what a guy eh!!

Offline Vice Admiral

Ten days ago (see above), I commented on mutual positive feedback left by Apriljayne09 and Funtimesdanny following a booking that never took place.

Since then Apriljayne's feedback record has reached new levels of absurdity.  Here's the link to her profile:
External Link/Members Only

Four of Apriljayne's most recent five feedbacks – all of them scored positive – relate to bookings that never took place.  In three cases Apriljayne cancelled.  In one case the punter did.

It strikes me that in a well-configured world a hooker who cancels 60% of her bookings over a 12-day period would get negative rather than positive feedback.

But what do I know?

Offline Colston36

I would be none too chuffed if some arsehole WG gave me a "neutral" for a meet that didn't take place...  :dash:

Better than a negative.