Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Gobsmacked! any observations?  (Read 7528 times)

Gordo987

  • Guest
I have occasionally seen AW profiles that offer sex with a pregnant woman, something that certainly does not appeal to me. Casually browsing today, I came across this:

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

It left me gobsmacked.  :thumbsdown:

herelonely

  • Guest
Blimey!

Pregnant and bareback AND £90 p/h

dear oh dear  :scare:

Online finn5555

Get used to it boys plenty of others out there  :hi:

Aphrodite

  • Guest
Hardsports too........just because the baby won't have a shit enough time when it gets out  :diablo:

password02

  • Guest
Very worrying for AW to allow this?  should AW not take this profile down?

Should not be allowed anywhere near a punter

GlasgowTanya

  • Guest
That is awful :/

Social services should be involved. Glad to see you guys don't go near that. Interesting to see who does though.

Yuck!

Online finn5555

That is awful :/

Social services should be involved. Glad to see you guys don't go near that. Interesting to see who does though.

Yuck!

Report her then  :hi:

Gordo987

  • Guest
Never thought about the legal side of this. Anybody know anything?  :unknown:

Online finn5555

Never thought about the legal side of this. Anybody know anything?  :unknown:

Can't see where she is breaking the law  :unknown:

new2game

  • Guest
Very worrying for AW to allow this?  should AW not take this profile down?

Should not be allowed anywhere near a punter

AW is just a 3rd party connection service. The official advertisement is for companionship and time spent together, anything that happens is between the people that meet.

MasterfulBob

  • Guest
Gobsmacked? Really? What exactly is the issue?

Gordo987

  • Guest
Gobsmacked? Really? What exactly is the issue?

Er, the issue is "gobsmacked"  :bomb:

RandyF

  • Guest
Whoring industry attracts some desperate & mental people  :wackogirl:

MidlandsEscortxo

  • Guest
I'm not one to judge but REALLY?! how someone can do that with their child inside them is unbelievable

Online finn5555

I'm not one to judge but REALLY?! how someone can do that with their child inside them is unbelievable

Many pro$$ies are desperate for the money so will do anything  :wackogirl:

Gordo987

  • Guest
I'm not one to judge but REALLY?! how someone can do that with their child inside them is unbelievable

And I can't understand how some people (men I guess) find it at all attractive, let alone morally justifiable.  :unknown:

MasterfulBob

  • Guest
It's hardly child abuse, can pregnant women not have sex?

Offline CoolTiger

  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 15,030
  • Likes: 6
  • Reviews: 10
Prob a PG Scam.

Pic has been nicked from the net.


Gordo987

  • Guest
Prob a PG Scam.

Pic has been nicked from the net.


It's what I thought too - and it's what I hope!

Reverse image search only shows the pic as part of an escort profile.
« Last Edit: January 07, 2014, 04:58:42 pm by Gordo987 »

Offline Dani

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 2,603
  • Likes: 1
It's hardly child abuse, can pregnant women not have sex?

Of course they can the issue was she is putting her childs life in the line by offering bareback sex.  Aside from HIV many STIs can cause blindness and deafness and mental retardation in unborn children.  Hardly an advert for a mother who loves her child is it.  People are shocked she is willing to risk her child for the sake of money.  If you don't get that then perhaps you need to look at yourself not everyone else

password02

  • Guest

Online Reiver

There was an aw profile for Edinburgh last week for a pregnant lady also .

MasterfulBob

  • Guest
Of course they can the issue was she is putting her childs life in the line by offering bareback sex.  Aside from HIV many STIs can cause blindness and deafness and mental retardation in unborn children.  Hardly an advert for a mother who loves her child is it.  People are shocked she is willing to risk her child for the sake of money.  If you don't get that then perhaps you need to look at yourself not everyone else
I'm not going to judge all working girls as the same, but are you really surprised that some don't care about/understand the risks?

vorian

  • Guest

It's what I thought too - and it's what I hope!

Reverse image search only shows the pic as part of an escort profile.

Lets hope so, yes I support punters 100% they can buy what they like it is their choice, as long as everyone is consenting, in my mind that means no children, no animals and no one who is being forced. As none of those can consent to sexual activities.

If this profile is real and I doubt it, the question then is about consent as the mother is putting the unborn child at risk undoubtedly. Mothers who smoke or drink to excess during pregnancy also do this. I also find that disgusting. How and when the rights of the mother over her own body are more important than the rights of the unborn child is a debate that has been made for many years in many countries. Roe vs Wade for example. Even if this profile is fake I bet you could find a similar that has been active in the past or is active today.

For the record I consider this a form of child abuse, I am very firm in my beliefs that society and the law should protect children. Even if that limits free choice. However that belief has so many grey areas and counter arguments that a consensus will never be reached. 

Offline daviemac

  • Board Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 25,027
  • Likes: 369
  • Reviews: 24

Offline myothernameis

There was an aw profile for Edinburgh last week for a pregnant lady also .

There also been one for Glasgow as well, but as I believe, having sex when pregnant is more fun for the girl, they get some buzz from it, and don't think it does any harm

vorian

  • Guest
There also been one for Glasgow as well, but as I believe, having sex when pregnant is more fun for the girl, they get some buzz from it, and don't think it does any harm

Sex with a pregnant prossie is one thing. I am no expert in the risks involved. Sex that is unprotected with a prossie who is pregnant for me is more of the issue.

Offline myothernameis

For the record I consider this a form of child abuse, I am very firm in my beliefs that society and the law should protect children.

How exactly, if it was considered child abuse, don't  you think there would have been loads of court cases by now, father charged with child abuse, and mother as well, as they were caught while she was 8 months pregnant

vorian

  • Guest
How exactly, if it was considered child abuse, don't  you think there would have been loads of court cases by now, father charged with child abuse, and mother as well, as they were caught while she was 8 months pregnant

Sorry my apologies I was not clear. I'm not talking about the law, only it is my opinion that it is child abuse. Also I am specifically talking about a prossie who is offering BB sex whilst heavily pregnant which I believe maybe I am wrong is inherently more dangerous than a couple in a monogamous relationship having sex whilst pregnant.

I also believe smoking, drinking or taking drugs during pregnancy does harm the unborn child's health. Now I am no expert but I believe there is scientific evidence to back this view up. If parents had a toddler and gave them tobacco or alcohol then yes the parents would be guilty of child abuse in my opinion. 

MasterfulBob

  • Guest
So the profile probably isn't real or even offering those services. Does OP still find pregnant women repulsive?

Gordo987

  • Guest
So the profile probably isn't real or even offering those services. Does OP still find pregnant women repulsive?

I am the OP. Where does it say that I find pregnant women repulsive?

Site Rules

- No touting
- No multiple accounts
- No excessive abuse towards other members
- No implied violent threats towards any other person
- No avatars or embedded images of hardcore pornography

Apologize please.


Online finn5555

I am the OP. Where does it say that I find pregnant women repulsive?

Site Rules

- No touting
- No multiple accounts
- No excessive abuse towards other members
- No implied violent threats towards any other person
- No avatars or embedded images of hardcore pornography

Apologize please.

I think you mean apologise  :hi:

vorian

  • Guest
I am the OP. Where does it say that I find pregnant women repulsive?

Site Rules

- No touting
- No multiple accounts
- No excessive abuse towards other members
- No implied violent threats towards any other person
- No avatars or embedded images of hardcore pornography

Apologize please.

I must admit when I saw the "pregnant women repulsive" comment I did skip back and look and saw at no point did the OP write that. However you were misquoted, not "excessively abused" and you put the record straight. I don't believe it is a breach of the rules. After all I have seen, far far worse than misquoting on this forum. You have the right to ask for an apology but I very much doubt you will get one. In my opinion not one for the mods/admin to get involved in and certainly not worth a ban.

tony allen

  • Guest
nothing wrong with pregnant WGs, but bareback is risky.


Gordo987

  • Guest
I think you mean apologise  :hi:

No you fucking retarded (is that your name or your title?) I mean apologize.  :bomb:


Mystique46m

  • Guest
No you fucking retarded (is that your name or your title?) I mean apologize.  :bomb:

Now THAT'S a bit more like the abuse we are sposed to avoid, Gordo old chap!!!!!!!

Gordo987

  • Guest
I must admit when I saw the "pregnant women repulsive" comment I did skip back and look and saw at no point did the OP write that. However you were misquoted, not "excessively abused" and you put the record straight. I don't believe it is a breach of the rules. After all I have seen, far far worse than misquoting on this forum. You have the right to ask for an apology but I very much doubt you will get one. In my opinion not one for the mods/admin to get involved in and certainly not worth a ban.

I cases such as this, misquoted is the same as abused.  :angry:

MasterfulBob

  • Guest
I've nothing to apologise for. If OP doesn't like or agree with how a woman works, he should steer clear and avoid, not take some moral battle against it. What if this forum was invaded with people who thought the entire prostitution industry was disgusting, immoral, wrong etc? How about I find every profile which I think is 'wrong' and tell everyone about it?

edit: and you DID say you don't know how ANY guy can find 'it' attractive. I took that to mean pregnant women, so from that comment, I extrapolated your dislike of the pregnant female figure.
« Last Edit: January 07, 2014, 09:08:56 pm by MasterfulBob »

vorian

  • Guest
I cases such as this, misquoted is the same as abused.  :angry:

Well that's your opinion and of course you are entitled to your opinion.

My opinion is no misquoted is not the same as abused.

Offline daviemac

  • Board Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 25,027
  • Likes: 369
  • Reviews: 24
No you fucking retarded (is that your name or your title?) I mean apologize.  :bomb:

Are you in the USA?

Apologise is the British English spelling of the verb apologize. So if you need to say you're sorry for something you did in London, you should apologise.

Gordo987

  • Guest
I've nothing to apologise for. If OP doesn't like or agree with how a woman works, he should steer clear and avoid, not take some moral battle against it. What if this forum was invaded with people who thought the entire prostitution industry was disgusting, immoral, wrong etc? How about I find every profile which I think is 'wrong' and tell everyone about it?

edit: and you DID say you don't know how ANY guy can find 'it' attractive. I took that to mean pregnant women, so from that comment, I extrapolated your dislike of the pregnant female figure.

The original post:

I have occasionally seen AW profiles that offer sex with a pregnant woman, something that certainly does not appeal to me. Casually browsing today, I came across this:

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

It left me gobsmacked.  :thumbsdown:

What the fuck are you talking about?  :dash: :dash: :dash: :dash:

MasterfulBob

  • Guest
And I can't understand how some people (men I guess) find it at all attractive, let alone morally justifiable.  :unknown:
You're a bit slow, aren't you?

vorian

  • Guest
No you fucking retarded (is that your name or your title?) I mean apologize.  :bomb:

Now calling someone a "Fucking retarded" imho is abuse now if that is classed as excessive is not up to me to decide. I would have suggested a response along these lines instead of quoting the rules and demanding an apology.

"Thanks for your feedback, I am somewhat confused as I don't believe I used the phrase "Pregnant Women Repulsive" I would be delighted if you would be so kind as to point out to me where this phrase was used by myself so I can refresh my memory. Just to put the record Straight these are my thoughts on the subject xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx".

I believe a much more powerful statement.

Gordo987

  • Guest
Now calling someone a "Fucking retarded" imho is abuse now if that is classed as excessive is not up to me to decide. I would have suggested a response along these lines instead of quoting the rules and demanding an apology.

"Thanks for your feedback, I am somewhat confused as I don't believe I used the phrase "Pregnant Women Repulsive" I would be delighted if you would be so kind as to point out to me where this phrase was used by myself so I can refresh my memory. Just to put the record Straight these are my thoughts on the subject xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx".

I believe a much more powerful statement.

I would be delighted if you would be so kind as to observe the following:

Hidden Image/Members Only

This being the avatar of the person in question. Perhaps you would be so kind as to read things properly before you start making judgements. Who are you anyway?    :thumbsdown:

Gordo987

  • Guest
Are you in the USA?

Apologise is the British English spelling of the verb apologize. So if you need to say you're sorry for something you did in London, you should apologise.

No, you are wrong. Either spelling is acceptable in both the US and the UK. Are you always so fucking pedantic?  :dash:

Gordo987

  • Guest

Offline Pauluk1

I would be delighted if you would be so kind as to observe the following:

Hidden Image/Members Only

This being the avatar of the person in question. Perhaps you would be so kind as to read things properly before you start making judgements. Who are you anyway?    :thumbsdown:

He was correcting the spelling in your post.  Maybe a bit pedantic, but nothing wrong with that.

Gordo987

  • Guest
He was correcting the spelling in your post.  Maybe a bit pedantic, but nothing wrong with that.

No, the spelling was already correct - he was being a pedantic t**t and making himself look stupid at the same time.  :rolleyes:

Mystique46m

  • Guest
So, nobody fancies a bit of hardsports BB then.......

Nice calming cup of tea instead? Bourbon? (dunking is at discretion)

:)

Online finn5555

Now calling someone a "Fucking retarded" imho is abuse now if that is classed as excessive is not up to me to decide. I would have suggested a response along these lines instead of quoting the rules and demanding an apology.

"Thanks for your feedback, I am somewhat confused as I don't believe I used the phrase "Pregnant Women Repulsive" I would be delighted if you would be so kind as to point out to me where this phrase was used by myself so I can refresh my memory. Just to put the record Straight these are my thoughts on the subject xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx".

I believe a much more powerful statement.

He can call me a retard as soon as the dopey cunt learns how to spell  :crazy: