Escorts that have high number of clients

[Punter115]

When I am trawling through Adult Work I can be put off with those females that have seen 100 plus clients in a reasonably short time .....I know I am being daft but I sometimes think to myself when the fuck did they ever go to the Gum Clinic or don't they ever go and given the numbers they are going through is this a sensible risk n matter how sexy they look!
Am I being silly or do other punters ever have these concerns?

[EnglishRebecca121]

as someone with almost 600 feedback i think you are totally wrong. I get tested regularly and have never had an issue...

[Titti Tatti]

When I am trawling through Adult Work I can be put off with those females that have seen 100 plus clients in a reasonably short time .....I know I am being daft but I sometimes think to myself when the fuck did they ever go to the Gum Clinic or don't they ever go and given the numbers they are going through is this a sensible risk n matter how sexy they look!
Am I being silly or do other punters ever have these concerns?

You are using evidence of the no of REVIEWS to tell you how many clients they've seen. It may be accurate or it may not.


 I find it time wasting to book through AW and go to WG who post Tele no, so no review. I think the ease of booking means these girls are likely the busier ones. But again that's not a statistically reliable predictor.

Also as the lovely Rebecca (still hoping to get to Bristol😀) points out, its how long since the latest test t h acts the most important, and there's no way of knowing.

Don't worry, be happy.

[Midori]

I have just over 100 feedback and I get tested every 3-4 weeks, which is the minimum amount of time my local clinic allows. I also work part time rather than full time, it just so happens that because I take nearly every booking through AW, I have a higher amount of feedback.

[Zeusthedoc]

When I am trawling through Adult Work I can be put off with those females that have seen 100 plus clients in a reasonably short time .....I know I am being daft but I sometimes think to myself when the fuck did they ever go to the Gum Clinic or don't they ever go and given the numbers they are going through is this a sensible risk n matter how sexy they look!
Am I being silly or do other punters ever have these concerns?

Said it before will say it again - this game isn't for the faint hearted.

Understand the risks and be measured in ur approach. If you're so bothered by it, then you need to question whether this is the game for you!

[bigmanbigman]

If it doesn't work for you dont punt

[Trenlover]

i have to say i find it a turn off if an escort is seeing 3+ guys everyday. i also genuinely believe youll get a better service when the escort is more "fresh" and hasnt already sucked 3 different cocks that day

I also agree escorts with tons of feedback is a turn off, because it presents her as being more "used"

concisely we all know these girls are fucking tons of guys but subconsciously i think most guys still want a feeling of more exclusivity.

[James999]

as someone with almost 600 feedback i think you are totally wrong. I get tested regularly and have never had an issue...

Pro$$ies being tested on a regular basis is another myth they run, along with paying tax and not drawing benefits 

[Blackpool Rock]

When I first started punting I had an issue with it and would often try to book a girl as her 1st punt of the day however over time i've adjusted and frankly i'm not bothered about it now.
If a girl has had paid sex with 1000 different men then I don't see any difference as to whether that is over 1 year or 5 years.
A few years ago I actually went through a phase of getting more turned on when seeing a girl late in the day once she had already seen loads of guys, YMMV

[Hertsgent]

To the OP, this is a fundamentally flawed approach to determining how many punters a WG sees - some insist on AW bookings, some encourage..... both actions would significantly increase the AW feedback number. STD tests are also easy to state on a profile , but rarely proven to have occurred

If you do any sort of maths then a WG will be seeing large numbers of clients a year - as others have said, punters that have an issue with this need to deal with it or presumably they stop...

[Jeff_withpetersen]

You'll never know how many people a lady sees so why bother thinking about it. AW feedback and reviews are no real indication - e.g. one regular I've seen maybe five times but ahe only asked for an AW booking once.

[threechilliman]

You'll never know how many people a lady sees so why bother thinking about it.

Yep, agreed. As long as she provides a decent service when I'm there, who gives a fuck?

tcm

[Dreamweaver1]

As for going for an early punt so she's fresher, how do you know she's not just done an overnighter. Only one cock maybe, but i doubt she's very fresh.

[mcgee121]

If you are worried about stds chant 2 hail marys before the punt.  Firstly, demand that any WG you see wears a surgical face mask for the entire duration of the punt.  Stick to escorts that do only OW.  Don't do any pussy licking or rimming or any kissing whatsoever.  Avoid anal sex at all costs.  Use Durex Extra Strength or other very thick condoms (make sure you put the condom on yourself because the WG's nails could be contaminated).  Take a shower straight afterwards.  Then go to a sauna to sweat everything out.  Then just to be extra cautious take a long bath when you get home and throwaway the towels you use to dry yourself after use.  I guarantee you if you follow this advice you will have a 99% chance of being std free and won't have to worry about a WG's punter fuck rate.

Please refrain from making scaredy cat posts like this which do nothing but make WGs paranoid and encourages them to put stringent rules in place.  You alone are responsible for your sexual health not anyone else so don't trust or rely on WGs to keep you safe.

i have to say i find it a turn off if an escort is seeing 3+ guys everyday. i also genuinely believe youll get a better service when the escort is more "fresh" and hasnt already sucked 3 different cocks that day

The keyword is fresh.  I've been the first through the door and the WG is jaded from the night before and I didn't get a good service.  On the other hand, I've been the last through the door and the WG has bags of energy so got a great service.

I also agree escorts with tons of feedback is a turn off, because it presents her as being more "used"

By definition a WG is promiscuous.  We don't just see a WG to stick something in hole.  We want to experience them as a person.  A good WG behaves differently with different punters so we all experience unique things about her.

concisely we all know these girls are fucking tons of guys but subconsciously i think most guys still want a feeling of more exclusivity.

No I don't give a fuck who they see.  Just as long as I feel like they care about giving me maximum thrills and would do everything within their comfort level to achieve that.

[OakTree]

It honestly bemuses me that someone would visit a prostitute and be concerned that she's having far more fucks than the average woman.

The ridiculous notion that if you get there first thing in the morning her pussy is fresh and untouched. (As if eight hours sleep will magically revirginalise her) She could of just got back from an overnighter or had BB sex with her partner ten minutes before you arrive with the remains of your breakfast on the front of your shirt.

As for feedback just because one has hundreds and another has just ten, is no indicator at all of how many she fucks she has in a day, week or year. Take it for granted that she probably has fucked hundreds if not thousands of men.

I know it's obvious information but it does seem lost on many punters and an issue they seem to struggle with.

[RedKettle]

When I am trawling through Adult Work I can be put off with those females that have seen 100 plus clients in a reasonably short time .....I know I am being daft but I sometimes think to myself when the fuck did they ever go to the Gum Clinic or don't they ever go and given the numbers they are going through is this a sensible risk n matter how sexy they look!
Am I being silly or do other punters ever have these concerns?

This punting lark is a strange game and I suspect many of us have factors that put us off particular girls with no real rational basis.  Personally number of AW reviews (high or low) is pretty much irrelevant for many of the reasons others have set out above.  However if the AW profile has one of those large pictures of a curvy woman drawn with letters I am off.......

[Honolulu]

as someone with almost 600 feedback i think you are totally wrong. I get tested regularly and have never had an issue...

To be fair,  it's only a matter of time.

GUM testing doesn't prevent, just tells you when you got it. (Or not in your case).

Punters should also get themselves down the clinic to check for knob rot.

[cumreal]

Many ladies dont have reviews tho, lots of girls with higher number of bookings who just have their number on profiles. Dont think there is any point worrying about it so long as the girls are clean. 

[scutty brown]

Rather than worry about how many punters busy girls shag, you'd do better to look at the girls who stick needles in their arms.
Sharing needles is a bigger HIV/AIDs risk than barebacking....though obviously barebacking a needle user is not a good idea.
A busy girl is probably busy because she looks - and is - healthy and is likely to look after herself. The quiet girl who only pulls a client when she wants a fix is the bigger risk

[Lema]

I know one girl who is on AW  and has between five and ten Men a day, so she told me....  even though she has only about 25 feedback she takes most of her bookings buy phone.

[budz]

High or low feedback figures don't worry me. Most the girls I see request not to leave feedback everytime. I never ask why coz it's their business and they can run it however they chose to.

(Finally hit the 200 post count )

[timsussex]

Prefer to see ladies in the morning its good to be her first of the day

Theres a lot of fantasy in punting !

[Home Alone]

Prefer to see ladies in the morning its good to be her first of the day

Theres a lot of fantasy in punting !

Including the fantasy that she won't have fucked her OH before seeing 'her first of the day'! 

[nigel4498]

High feedback doesn't deter me from punting.
To me it's an indication how could the service she provides is.
More than likely a vast majority are from repeat custom.

[OakTree]

Prefer to see ladies in the morning its good to be her first of the day

Theres a lot of fantasy in punting !

Indeed there is.

The ridiculous notion that if you get there first thing in the morning her pussy is fresh and untouched. (As if eight hours sleep will magically revirginalise her) She could of just got back from an overnighter or had BB sex with her partner ten minutes before you arrive with the remains of your breakfast on the front of your shirt.

[DrConners]

High feedback doesn't deter me from punting.
To me it's an indication how could the service she provides is.
More than likely a vast majority are from repeat custom.

That's a good point, however I believe you have had very good service from UKP favourite "Hayley" from Portsmouth Nigel ? I had her in my HL for a while but never took the opportunity to arrange a meeting with her - purely because IMO she was a little - well - over subscribed?

I know you'll say I'm an idiot for missing out on her, I'm far from precious - but that level of activity is a turn off for me 

She does look hot as fuck though 

[timsussex]

Indeed there is.

I suppose you enjoy telling kids theres no Santa Claus   

[OakTree]

I suppose you enjoy telling kids theres no Santa Claus   

Hidden Image/Members Only


 

[Blackpool Rock]

Prefer to see ladies in the morning its good to be her first of the day

Theres a lot of fantasy in punting !

Mmmm 1st punt of the day = guaranteed to be eating the BF's / pimps porridge if you go down on her 
Like you say there's a lot of fantasy in punting 

[5th Musketeer]

Apart from my first WG, who I found on Backpage some 3 years ago before knowing about AW (it was she who told me about AW) or about UKP, the very few WGs I have seen since I have always contacted and arranged to meet via phone or email - never by AW booking, hence I have no AW FB of my own.  That has never been a problem for me, though if I punted more frequently I might come up against my first "no FB no service."  An AW profile is like a sales list - showing the merchandise - without which you would be flying blind.  A large number of FBs in their AW profile I think shows that they generally provide good service.  The content of their AW FB only gives an indication of whether they were satisfactory.  Now I know about UKP I would be unlikely to book a WG without checking here first when I next punt.

[mrfishyfoo]

IMHO high feedback equals a very high chance of having a good punt.

........I would be unlikely to book a WG without checking here first when I next punt.

I read this so many times on this site and think to myself thank fuck for those punters that are willing to TOFTT.

Don't get me wrong as "taking a walk on the wildside" can be very costly if I fuck it up and pick a wrongun....... BUT oh my the buzz of punting a lass that's got nothing about her online is something IMHO that can't be equalled.

[mediumjoe]

 Dead right Mr fish, am just sniffing around one  that's put her profile up  for the first time today, awaiting a reply  so that I can speak to her directly the anticipation is killing me.

[5th Musketeer]

IMHO high feedback equals a very high chance of having a good punt.

I read this so many times on this site and think to myself thank fuck for those punters that are willing to TOFTT.

Don't get me wrong as "taking a walk on the wildside" can be very costly if I fuck it up and pick a wrongun....... BUT oh my the buzz of punting a lass that's got nothing about her online is something IMHO that can't be equalled.

My first two reviews on here were with WGs who had no UKP reviews and who were comparatively new to the WG scene, so in effect I was TOFTT in each case.  The first had only 5 AW reviews when I saw her - now she has 110.  The second had only 4 AW reviews and now 7 (admittedly she's only part-time), but no other UKP member appears to have seen them since I did since mine are the only 2 UKP reviews. 

[Michelle Independent]

That's a bit delusional.
I am close to hitting 1k feedbacks myself-95% of my work is done thru the system.
Now due to life getting in a way I don't have all that much spare time for escorting work.
I know a girl who has about 30 feedbacks but sees 7-10 people a day. So that's no indication at all.
If you like the look of her, checked her out on UKP than what's the problem?
 

[Zeusthedoc]

That's a bit delusional.
I am close to hitting 1k feedbacks myself-95% of my work is done thru the system.
Now due to life getting in a way I don't have all that much spare time for escorting work.
I know a girl who has about 30 feedbacks but sees 7-10 people a day. So that's no indication at all.
If you like the look of her, checked her out on UKP than what's the problem?
 

The problem is punter115 is questioning sexual health procedures of WGs on account of them having multiple sexual partners in a day.

It's a calculated risk. Noone can tell you if you should or shouldn't be comfortable with it. Thats your decision!!

[lonn]

That's a bit delusional.
I am close to hitting 1k feedbacks myself-95% of my work is done thru the system.
Now due to life getting in a way I don't have all that much spare time for escorting work.
I know a girl who has about 30 feedbacks but sees 7-10 people a day. So that's no indication at all.
If you like the look of her, checked her out on UKP than what's the problem?
 

Earlier in this thread someone mentioned tax, Michelle. One thing it's worth bearing in mind is that HMRC do compliance check escorts and one of their sources of information is AW. They are great fans of simple arithmetic and a look at your sign-up date and your feedback number will give them a ballpark figure of what you may (or not) be turning over.

Personally, if I was a SP I would want enough feedback to make me look reliable but not so much as to draw unwanted attention. Even people who are straight down the line with HMRC can do without the stress and inconvenience of the Tax Man getting in touch.

[dubs]

Earlier in this thread someone mentioned tax, Michelle. One thing it's worth bearing in mind is that HMRC do compliance check escorts and one of their sources of information is AW. They are great fans of simple arithmetic and a look at your sign-up date and your feedback number will give them a ballpark figure of what you may (or not) be turning over.

Personally, if I was a SP I would want enough feedback to make me look reliable but not so much as to draw unwanted attention. Even people who are straight down the line with HMRC can do without the stress and inconvenience of the Tax Man getting in touch.

That assumes that HMRC are able to correlate that the real name on the tax return is "Dirty Doris of Doncaster" on AW.  Do they do that?  Can they force a girl to disclose her AW profile name or, contact the "real" girl via AW?

[Dorsetpunter]

Does anyone believe that an sp who has been on aw for 6 months and only has less than 10 aw reviews has only seen a few people? Of course not.

They will all have as many punters as they can/they want they just choose not to use aw to book them. I have seen a few girls more than once but the second time it has been arranged by email and text.

All i ask is that they are clean and fresh for me, lack of hygiene and it kills the punt

[booter]

If they have high feedback, they must be doing something good, and I think most girls are pretty sensible and get checked regular these days

[Home Alone]

Can they . . . contact the "real" girl via AW?

Wonder if they've got any jobs going in that Department?! 

[lonn]

That assumes that HMRC are able to correlate that the real name on the tax return is "Dirty Doris of Doncaster" on AW.  Do they do that?  Can they force a girl to disclose her AW profile name or, contact the "real" girl via AW?

If they are interested they can get names from AW or simply make a booking and turn up. AW may protect a SP from nosy buggers but not from officialdom. Anyone signing up for AW - or any website offering services or goods for sale for that matter - needs to be aware that they are effectively 'in the system'. That's not to say that HMRC will automatically come knocking on your door as soon as you sign up for AW but the potential is there. I was talking to an HMRC Inspector last year who had recently visited an escort in the course of a compliance check and she told me escorting is a trade like any other as far as HMRC are concerned and if they feel they've come across a case of non/under declaration then they will look at it.