Colchester man denies stalking escort worker and will face trial

[Cimex]

External Link/Members Only  Colchester man denies stalking escort worker and will face trial.

[The0neAnd0nly]

Brutal.... and then he outed her to her family members too. Wonder if the prick is a member on here!!

[teddyking]

Just type that idiots name on google and all his social media’s come up. He seems like one weird fuck

[Payyourwaymate]

Looking at those dates was there not a case here where an SP was getting stalked with a member fabricating a negative review of her around that time. What was her name Giaxo or something like that. I wonder if it's related to that.

[Thecunninglinguist]

Looking at those dates was there not a case here where an SP was getting stalked with a member fabricating a negative review of her around that time. What was her name Giaxo or something like that. I wonder if it's related to that.

This one? https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=286975.msg2989763#msg2989763

 External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

[finn5555]

I love the way they say she had to abandon her trading name 
Pro$$ies do that all the time 

[Dopedj]

Brutal.... and then he outed her to her family members too. Wonder if the prick is a member on here!!

I won’t be surprised if he is a member here. As the article indicated he made fake claims (fake reviews maybe) which made her abandon her business.
An prolific rapist was a member here ,posting fake negative reviews meanwhile he was actually raping them and trying to pimp the girls he raped via his fake reviews

[scutty brown]

I think it's pretty obvious which banned member he is.
However best not to ID him or speculate as it could affect the trial

Also best not to speculate over the girl's ID

[scutty brown]

Just type that idiots name on google and all his social media’s come up. He seems like one weird fuck

did you find these FOI requests?

External Link/Members Only

[Payyourwaymate]

I think it's pretty obvious which banned member he is.
However best not to ID him or speculate as it could affect the trial

Also best not to speculate over the girl's ID

I think I figured out who he was/likelihood of who it may be, oddily enough your post confirmed the likelihood of one of the candidates I thought it was by stating he was banned. I won't say anything further, did not realise it was that serious, it was all conjecture from my part.

[Rick2468]

did you find these FOI requests?

External Link/Members Only

I had a thought about who the guy might be, there was a guy on here talking about a colleague on Instagram. I'm really not sure. Telling the WG's family is such a scummy thing to do. I figure he must have gone out of his way to do that and taken a bit of time to work out who they were. I would love to see a custodial sentence handed out for this.

[scutty brown]

That links me to a photo on instagram of a lady. Can't work out what the connection is unless it was an incorrect link.

I had a thought about who the guy might be, there was a guy on here talking about a colleague on Instagram. I'm really not sure. Telling the WG's family is such a scummy thing to do. I figure he must have gone out of his way to do that and taken a bit of time to work out who they were. I would love to see a custodial sentence handed out for this.

Its an incorrect link, I fucked up
Should read External Link/Members Only

[lillythesavage]

Not really connected to this twat, but sitting in London traffic in the early hours, I saw two stunning young women. I guess on the way home from a night out, go into a 24 hour shop, and the bunch of undesirables following on foot, cycle or scooter, gather on the pavement staring into the shop. maybe 8 or 10 of them.

Not the London I remember.

[winkywanky]

Not really connected to this twat, but sitting in London traffic in the early hours, I saw two stunning young women. I guess on the way home from a night out, go into a 24 hour shop, and the bunch of undesirables following on foot, cycle or scooter, gather on the pavement staring into the shop. maybe 8 or 10 of them.

Not the London I remember.

Oh dear, that's not good 

At least there were two of them together, nevertheless that could quickly turn into something quite scary for them. WTF is wrong with so many young guys these days? 

[lillythesavage]

Oh dear, that's not good 

At least there were two of them together, nevertheless that could quickly turn into something quite scary for them. WTF is wrong with so many young guys these days? 

Some of them were not so young. It was seeing them following from a distance then gathering around the shop that was simply horrible, looked like the shop was just a refuge, to escape and arrange transport, probably heading for night bus stop, but not feeling safe enough to go there.

I was driving because I could not let an SB travel alone late at night, seeing that it was the right decision.

[arrow0404]

I think it's pretty obvious which banned member he is.
However best not to ID him or speculate as it could affect the trial

Also best not to speculate over the girl's ID

sB if i don’t think this punter has been banned.. Unless I’m thinking of someone else...? But I only did a little digging to find the fcuker who has been reported to SAAFE - either way he’s a scumbag he tried to out the girl but got him self burnt

Btw this should maybe moved to the London thread also as she’s a London WG mainly

[teddyking]

sB if i don’t think this punter has been banned.. Unless I’m thinking of someone else...? But I only did a little digging to find the fcuker who has been reported to SAAFE - either way he’s a scumbag he tried to out the girl but got him self burnt

Btw this should maybe moved to the London thread also as she’s a London WG mainly

Can you post the link of this 🤠

[scutty brown]

Can you post the link of this 🤠

Whether I'm right or wrong, trying to ID him or the girl could compromise the trial. Remember she will be entitled to anonymity as it's a sex related case

[funfungoodguy]

A man is on trial for 'Stalking' an escort and is said to have outed her. She claims he caused her to have to change her work name and was caused embarrassment and so on.

External Link/Members Only

Obviously be careful commenting about this news item, the thing is a current trial - starting next year - and i guess the guy may even be a member in here. i think i read in a different news clip that it happened in the Colchester area. It is said he caused her distress and damaged her business. He is also accused of contacting her family members to tell them she was an excort.

Point is - be careful spreading bad stuff about an escort or outing her - even if he is not found guilty it will be a lot of stress for him and the girl concerned and all that. What is said in the papers is maybe not accurate of course. 

[myothernameis]

I dont think this topic is warranted, and maybe shouldnt have been posted

[alabama1]

A man is on trial for 'Stalking' an escort and is said to have outed her. She claims he caused her to have to change her work name and was caused embarrassment and so on.

External Link/Members Only

Obviously be careful commenting about this news item, the thing is a current trial - starting next year - and i guess the guy may even be a member in here. i think i read in a different news clip that it happened in the Colchester area. It is said he caused her distress and damaged her business. He is also accused of contacting her family members to tell them she was an excort.

Point is - be careful spreading bad stuff about an escort or outing her - even if he is not found guilty it will be a lot of stress for him and the girl concerned and all that. What is said in the papers is maybe not accurate of course.

Thanks for that 

[daviemac]

Thread here about it, https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=316858.msg3307871#msg3307871  don't think we need two.

It's even on page 1 of the section. 

[cotton]

delete

[winkywanky]

A man is on trial for 'Stalking' an escort and is said to have outed her. She claims he caused her to have to change her work name and was caused embarrassment and so on.

External Link/Members Only

Obviously be careful commenting about this news item, the thing is a current trial - starting next year - and i guess the guy may even be a member in here. i think i read in a different news clip that it happened in the Colchester area. It is said he caused her distress and damaged her business. He is also accused of contacting her family members to tell them she was an excort.

Point is - be careful spreading bad stuff about an escort or outing her - even if he is not found guilty it will be a lot of stress for him and the girl concerned and all that. What is said in the papers is maybe not accurate of course.

I think the thing to note here is that a WG should never, ever be outed by a punter, regardless of the circumstances.

She may have given you a shit service, she may have been nasty, perhaps you fell in love with her and your feelings were unrequited? Whatever.

By all means come on here and tell all about how bad she was or how you have EAS, but just as it is for punters, a WG's anonymity is sacrosanct. Even if you get the impression everyone would know already, or she has her face plastered all over her AW profile, you never, ever do that. It's just plain wrong.

[funfungoodguy]

didn't realize there was already a thread about it so delete mine if appropriate.

[funfungoodguy]

"By all means come on here and tell all about how bad she was or how you have EAS, but just as it is for punters, a WG's anonymity is sacrosanct. Even if you get the impression everyone would know already, or she has her face plastered all over her AW profile, you never, ever do that. It's just plain wrong."
--
Probably a justifiable one would be if she is convicted of a crime / scamming/ theft and her name is published already then the punting community might like to know?

[winkywanky]

"By all means come on here and tell all about how bad she was or how you have EAS, but just as it is for punters, a WG's anonymity is sacrosanct. Even if you get the impression everyone would know already, or she has her face plastered all over her AW profile, you never, ever do that. It's just plain wrong."
--
Probably a justifiable one would be if she is convicted of a crime / scamming/ theft and her name is published already then the punting community might like to know?

If a crime were committed then report her to the police.

Yes, if her name were already in the public domain (previous convictions etc, with link to newspaper report etc) then perhaps use her name. But of course if her name is already in the public domain then you are not outing her, are you?

[PunterNumber69]

I think the thing to note here is that a WG should never, ever be outed by a punter, regardless of the circumstances.

She may have given you a shit service, she may have been nasty, perhaps you fell in love with her and your feelings were unrequited? Whatever.

I think you're right, there is never any excuse to out a punter or a WG. Sure you can both leave reviews and feedback, but you can address them by doing better the next time. I've had a small number of run ins with SPs who haven't liked me leaving a negative review on here and was once threatened with being outed to my family for doing so. However, even though I could have blown the SP totally out of the water I didn't because it would be a dumb over reaction to the situation. She did a bad job with me but she might deliver a great service to the next punter.  I wrote a negative review and that's the end of it from my perspective  People should take reviews as an opportunity to learn and improve. Nobody is perfect and we all have our bad days in life and our jobs. Just read what has been said.  Think about it and see the situation from the punter's perspective. Does the reviewer have a point? If yes, do it better next time. If no, then take it on the chin and allow future positive reviews to negate the negative one. You can't please everyone all the time. Nobody can.

I think seeing how a business or sole trader handles complaints or issues is where you find out if they're good or not. If they listen and offer to fix it or learn from the situation then it's all good. If they don't listen or deny there's a problem then you know you have a bad company.

[myothernameis]

Whether I'm right or wrong, trying to ID him or the girl could compromise the trial. Remember she will be entitled to anonymity as it's a sex related case

Who ever he was, and if he was a member on here, there bound to be interest from the press, who might come nosing around on UKp

[daviemac]

As people can't take the hint about not needing 2 threads on the same topic, I've merged them. No doubt the replies will be harder to follow now but . . . .

[funfungoodguy]

The accused's name is widely published online

[houseboot]

Just type that idiots name on google and all his social media’s come up. He seems like one weird fuck

So why did you feel the need to look him up on social media?

And why are you asking for more information?

Doesn't that make you .....  a stalker too?

If you think he's "one weird fuck" .... then what are you? 

[lillythesavage]

I think the thing to note here is that a WG should never, ever be outed by a punter, regardless of the circumstances.

She may have given you a shit service, she may have been nasty, perhaps you fell in love with her and your feelings were unrequited? Whatever.

By all means come on here and tell all about how bad she was or how you have EAS, but just as it is for punters, a WG's anonymity is sacrosanct. Even if you get the impression everyone would know already, or she has her face plastered all over her AW profile, you never, ever do that. It's just plain wrong.

Agreed, it is a business transaction and should always be just that, I think possibly a lot of dormant accounts, log in and do not post I mean, are here to glean information, some address details on reviews just about reveal the exact location, not wise.