Girls with no pics

[sharpshoes78]

I get emails all the time of new WG's in my area with no pics.
Have you ever risked a blind punt?

[Daffodil]

No, I've always asked girls with no pictures to email me a couple.

If they don't oblige I look elsewhere.

[Brumish]

Prossies a without pics is quite a clear admission that they aren't the oil paintings that punters dream of spunking everyday.

Don't buy all this bullshit about keeping identity safe etc.
The best looking ones will always find a way of showing what you will be missing out on.
The worst looking ones will always find an excuse to stop you from missing them out.

[Andre 3000]

Prossies a without pics is quite a clear admission that they aren't the oil paintings that punters dream of spunking everyday.

Don't buy all this bullshit about keeping identity safe etc.
The best looking ones will always find a way of showing what you will be missing out on.
The worst looking ones will always find an excuse to stop you from missing them out.

Pretty much this.

There should be absolutely no excuse why a WG can't send you a non nude picture of herself.

A face pic is something I will always ask for and if they can't provide one I won't see them. A refusal to send one or have one on their profile usually tells me all I need to know about the WG's attitude.

Face pics have also saved me a lot of grief in the past, as there are a lot of 'butterfaces' on AW, good bodies but ugly faces. Some punters may overlook that but I need a woman to have a pretty face and a good body. I'm paying for the pleasure after all.

[Daffodil]

There is an anonymity issue to having pictures on an AW profile, however I see absolutely no reason why a prossie can't email a face/clothed one.

[nigel4498]

Had an RB and it was between two girls, one with pics and one without.
Emailed for a pic but she came back with the security card so she lost out on the bid.
Not that concerned what they look like but more interested in body type as size 6 to 12 is what I like.

[CBPaul]

Once, my 2nd punt through AW. As it happens she was good looking with a cracking body, to my tastes anyway, and gave great service.

I thought it was no different to the days of picking a number out of the personal services section of the local rag, bugger all to go on apart from the voice at the other end of the phone.  Then  again punting brain had taken over and I had clearly forgotten about the times I had traveled to meet the sexy 25 year old seductress I'd spoken to on the phone only to be presented with her highly unattractive granny.

Now I won't consider profiles with no pics. But add to that profiles with one or two useless pics of a pair of feet or some girls bum. Hiding identity is understandable but it is possible to do so and still provide something for the punter to go on, just takes some thought and more effort than randomly positioning an iPhone.

To me the ones with no pics or crap pics are easy to pass by. The heavily airbrushed or out and out bait n switch pictures cause more problems. Worse are those with a few genuine pics and one or two of someone completely different which are included because they show a bigger pair of tits or a more shapely arse.

[Jimmyredcab]

Have you ever risked a blind punt?

Yes, a few times but the girl has to tick all the other boxes such as location, price, services and age.

Not showing their face does not always mean they are an ugly bitch, I saw a girl recently and she explained that she has a daughter and does not want to risk her being shown the profile.   

If I had to choose between two girls I would always go for the one with the face picture wherever possible.

[doc14]

I's never see a girl without a pic, even if face is slightly obscured for their "security" you have got to have some idea of who you are going to see.  We all know some photos are slightly older and show girls in the best light but if they are too dated they are not doing themselves any favours.

It's not blind date we are paying for a service

[Jimmyredcab]

I's never see a girl without a pic, even if face is slightly obscured for their "security" you have got to have some idea of who you are going to see.  We all know some photos are slightly older and show girls in the best light but if they are too dated they are not doing themselves any favours.

It's not blind date we are paying for a service

That is true.
Whenever I try a reverse booking I state that a face picture is essential -------------- my request is nearly always ignored by most of the girls who bid, they simply get deleted. 

[smiths]

I get emails all the time of new WG's in my area with no pics.
Have you ever risked a blind punt?

Yes, i punted for years pre-net where i had no idea what a WG would look like until she opened her door to me.

Now with the net i require some pics on profiles but have and will consider punting with WGs that dont show clear face pics which are of course preferable. If i had refused to do this i would of missed out on punting with some good WGs over the years. For me being flexible on this can pay off. If i dont fancy a WG when she opens her door to me i will walk as unlike in my younger punting days i have to fancy a WG nowadays or its a soft cock guaranteed so no point in punting with her.

[Roland D Hay]

Taking this a stage further, how many guys punt with girls who show nothing but a cleavage shot or a pair of tits? There's plenty of profiles on AW like this so someone is booking them and I bet they ain't all asking for face shots. I've always been a sucker for a big pair of natural tits and to be honest I admit to doing this myself in my earlier days, fucking nuts when I think about it, but one of my golden rules now is to never book a punt with a pair of tits!

[cockneybstrd]

Its an interesting question..

One of the most well reviewed prossie's on UK Punting has no photos on their profile.

I like too see a face pic and a full body shot these days. I have been hoodwinked in the past by giant pairs of tits like Ronald. 

often if you place a RB they will often volunteer to send you a face pic even when they say on the profile they dont reveal it for privacy reasons.

[Jimmyredcab]

I see absolutely no reason why a girl can't send a face picture by E-mail to a punter, as long as it does not have the Adultwork logo on it --------------------- they probably have dozens of photos on the facebook page.   

[akauya]

Yes, i punted for years pre-net where i had no idea what a WG would look like until she opened her door to me.

Now with the net i require some pics on profiles but have and will consider punting with WGs that dont show clear face pics which are of course preferable. If i had refused to do this i would of missed out on punting with some good WGs over the years. For me being flexible on this can pay off. If i dont fancy a WG when she opens her door to me i will walk as unlike in my younger punting days i have to fancy a WG nowadays or its a soft cock guaranteed so no point in punting with her.

This is very true. For years (before the internet) I also punted based on ads posted on telephone booths in London or local papers. Those days it was a real "punt" as it were, you just didn't know what you were going to get. It's so much easier nowadays with the internet and forums like UKP.

[Brumish]

Living outside of London meant that I did not have the luxury of using the phone booth cards. I did however start with the usual popular places around the M6.
I suppose that meant that we, outside of London, had the luxury of seeing before buying.
Even then, the experience I have honed out of dealing with potential punts means that I can read the whores from the start.
Although I have had some the worst punts with the modern day escorts too, the street ones didn't have such an impact as they were negligible in costs.

[Daffodil]

I see absolutely no reason why a girl can't send a face picture by E-mail to a punter, as long as it does not have the Adultwork logo on it --------------------- they probably have dozens of photos on the facebook page.   

Exactly my thoughts. One of her many FB pictures from an anonymous email poses no risk to her.

[Steve2]

Exactly my thoughts. One of her many FB pictures from an anonymous email poses no risk to her.

Except with reverse image search. 9 times out of 10 it would lead to her FB page

[Daffodil]

Except with reverse image search. 9 times out of 10 it would lead to her FB page

I don't think FB pictures come up on reverse image search?

[Neal69]

Interesting,

I knew I had punted more than one WG with no face pic but was surprised when I realised that out of the 20 WG's I have seen off AW 8 of them had no face pic.

One only had one profile pic of her arse covered in French Knickers.

In all fairness the majority have been pretty good looking and one or two really stunning.

The second worse punt I have had was with the prettiest WG I have booked.

As long as they are not a complete munter its the attitude and enthusiasm that makes it a great punt for me.

I do have a look in the PG to see if there is a face pic but its not a deal breaker if there is not one.

So the answer is yes I would punt a girl with no face pic.

[smiths]

Interesting,

I knew I had punted more than one WG with no face pic but was surprised when I realised that out of the 20 WG's I have seen off AW 8 of them had no face pic.

One only had one profile pic of her arse covered in French Knickers.

In all fairness the majority have been pretty good looking and one or two really stunning.

The second worse punt I have had was with the prettiest WG I have booked.

As long as they are not a complete munter its the attitude and enthusiasm that makes it a great punt for me.

I do have a look in the PG to see if there is a face pic but its not a deal breaker if there is not one.

So the answer is yes I would punt a girl with no face pic.

Its also a good attitude from the WG that makes or breaks all my punts.

[Gordo987]

Have you ever risked a blind punt?

Back in the days before AW, most punts were 'blind' and I have to say I very rarely walked. In fact, I've probably walked at least as often since because of either fake or very much out of date pics. 

[mcardle464]

I need a face pic to do the business.  If a WG won't send one or doesn't have one in the private gallery, then its a no-no for me.

[HS4000Kestral]

I contacted a girl the other day with no pics because the profile sounded genuine, she text'd back straight away and asked in I had WhatsApp an I phone app - I downloaded it there and then she then took some pics and sent them over straight away - she was actually really pretty and fit, but didn't want any chance of anyone finding out about her....

[Gordo987]

I contacted a girl the other day with no pics because the profile sounded genuine, she text'd back straight away and asked in I had WhatsApp an I phone app - I downloaded it there and then she then took some pics and sent them over straight away - she was actually really pretty and fit, but didn't want any chance of anyone finding out about her....

Oh go on, lets seem em then 

[GeeWiz]

Yeah and glad I did too.  This year I saw a girl sans face pic mainly due to her amazing knockers.  Turns out she has the cutest face of any WG I've seen for years.

I also saw a woman with pics looking like a young Kate Bush.  As she answered the door, I saw that she must have been the same age as Kate Bush now.

[smiths]

Yeah and glad I did too.  This year I saw a girl sans face pic mainly due to her amazing knockers.  Turns out she has the cutest face of any WG I've seen for years.

I also saw a woman with pics looking like a young Kate Bush.  As she answered the door, I saw that she must have been the same age as Kate Bush now.

Now thats what i call a piss take on lying about her age.

[Gordo987]

Yeah and glad I did too.  This year I saw a girl sans face pic mainly due to her amazing knockers.  Turns out she has the cutest face of any WG I've seen for years.

I also saw a woman with pics looking like a young Kate Bush.  As she answered the door, I saw that she must have been the same age as Kate Bush now.

I'd still give her one though  (Kate Bush that is)