Let's look at the evidence. My review - for Mel - was suspected by many as being a 'tout'. Now we both know it wasn't a tout. Ditto subsequent reviews.
Then by Review #9 for Dee, I am suspected of having a link to said girl. Doesn't matter I have met her once - as per the review - and had no contact since.
It would seem to me - prime facie - that there are a few 'forum favorites'. That's understandable and usual for most forums.
What is not undestandable is why, no matter who I review or in what format, the same few folks like to trash the reviews and divert the topic of the lady at hand.
So, well done for doing that on this occasion Dave - and thereby pushing your negative back into public view - where you want it. Well played that man.
As for stunning Julie - who I posted elsewhere I intended to meet this week, why do you think I asked your opinion?
BECAUSE YOU HAVE ADULTWORK FEEDBACK FOR BOTH DEE AND JULIE. DUH ....Stunning Julie
« Sent to: mrhappypants on: Yesterday at 11:32:54 pm »
Reply
Quote
Delete
Evening Dave,
Going to go and check out SJ one evening this week. I noticed you've seen her from her AW feedback.
How hot is her face and body? eg compared to Dee?
Any negatives? I did read she smells a bit like a chimney .. ?
Cheers
Hi West, not sure she takes bookings that late so check in advance. The responses to my review of her give a balanced well rounded view eg very attractive but could try harder. She had cut down the cigarettes and looked better for it on my last visit but that was at the start of the summer. By way of reciprocation who would you rate as the best money no object blowjob working London now?
Dave
Happy now?
I wonder when some bright spark is going to wake up and suggest I am actually Platinum Cindy's Social Media / PR agent ....
Am I the only one -without- a fucking agenda is what I'm genuinely beginning to wonder.