Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Info request: Akina of Admiral Escorts  (Read 560 times)

adambright

  • Guest
Hey guys,

Does anyone have any experience with the following girl?

External Link/Members Only

She has a few reviews online, but no mention yet on this respectable forum.

Thanks in advance.
A

Offline The Film Director

on this respectable forum.



I see what you did there.  Best to at least offer some info, in the form of a review maybe, before asking for info on here.

Offline Billy no mates

in the form of a review

A) I haven’t seen anyone yet
B) The girls I’ve seen have retired/no longer working
C) The girls I’ve seen are already well reviewed here

It’s going to be one of those, want to take a wager on which one ?

Offline Fuzzyduck

A) I haven’t seen anyone yet
B) The girls I’ve seen have retired/no longer working
C) The girls I’ve seen are already well reviewed here

It’s going to be one of those, want to take a wager on which one ?

D) None of the above. Actually I'm Akina/touting/trolling/bored

Offline hw189

Where exactly online does she have have these few reviews you mention? I've checked several other sites and can't find any reviews on her, nor does she have any reviews on Admirals site either.

As the above poster mentioned, I suspect you are a tout. Strongly suspect you may even the same 'Adam' that gives 10/10 ratings for every other escort on Admirals site.

Offline Liverpool


Offline hw189

Well that's one review on her, what about the 'few' that the OP talks about?

I searched just about every popular EE agency (barring Babylongirls) and couldn't find a single review on her. She is known as Akina on just about every site she is listed on which should make searching easy. She doesn't have any reviews on prossienet either (which is popular touting grounds for these EE agencies).

Still suspect this guy is a tout / agent, probably the same Adam that gives every escort on Admirals site a glowing positive review.

adambright

  • Guest
 :timeout: Wow, you guys are quite paranoid, aren't you? I've seen a fair few replies like this to other posts; it's a little sad. Anyway, forget I asked, and, I suppose, thanks for your help.

(P.s. I don't know the statistics, but I imagine Adam is a common name - nevermind the fact that most names here are pseudonyms. Also, the assumption that a contributor, one that is so prolifically a tout, would use the same name here when trying to promote the same girl is achingly stupid.)

Offline king tarzan

has minor appeal for me, but certainly not at £250.. far better hotter women at that price range.

overpriced by at least £100 in my opinion.
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline NigelF

:timeout: Wow, you guys are quite paranoid, aren't you? I've seen a fair few replies like this to other posts; it's a little sad.

Nope, you just clearly don't understand why. We get lots of useless touts, fluffies, prossies etc on here and it's pretty much the only way to weed them out. A common tactic is to post if anyone has seen her, thus advertising her. Sometimes they'll also do a "review" later.

If you actually bother contribute a few reviews then people can judge your reliability much more accurately and you'll come across very little scepticism, if any (most posters, including new people don't actually get any).

The reason this is the best and most reliable punting forum by far is precisely because we weed out the dodgy, if you can't handle some initial healthy scrutiny then your only option is to stick to the significantly inferior "respectable forums" you mentioned.