Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Little_Miss_Moreish - Gloucester  (Read 3160 times)


7 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 5576305) (4 positive, 1 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by Goldfinch]

Offline Bigjay

External Link/Members Only

Logistics; started messaging on the website before being passed her number. Didn't seem to be as straight forward as others and too much back and forth. Still under current climate I didn't let this put me off.

Location; A small, however cluttered housing estate, did not feel at ease and felt like someone was watching me from a house across the road. Once inside, the house is definitely lived in and felt like a family home, I did feel more at ease and.comfortable however Its obvious that others live in this house, judging by shoes/coats I could see. One of the main reasons for this review being negative is that during the meet I was certain I could hear somebody moving about, which put me off during the meet.

Looks; Petite as advertised, with an ok body. Certainly not a head turner, with her fees being what they are I expected more to be honest. I can't say unattractive but no features I'll remember or keep in mind. Decent arse when bent over, not a bad view of her in her little outfit when going up the stairs but that's about it. Age, I would say late 20s.so maybe a bit older than advertised but only just. Photos are mostly accurate, but outfits/angles make breasts look a lot better than the real life experience. Definitely British, fairly well spoken. Hygeine; to look at she seemed clean, however not sure if she had seen someone just before me but I don't think she smelt "fresh".

So paid the 100 for half hour, which is at the higher end of prices but I thought I'd give it a go. Definitely won't be returning. On top of the things listed above I felt she was trying a bit too hard on occasions with little skill. OWO as advertised was ok.. but just ok. I couldn't feel a great amount during the sex itself and had to cum by hand (myself) in the end.

This was a few weeks ago but for the price / the safety / sure someone else was present I won't be returning and felt negative was a fairn outcome.

Offline Cheltclient

Wow. That felt a little like reading an identical review of my own experience (especially with the comment about freshness)

I can see why you’ve gone negative. I personally went with Neutral - as she was friendly and did everything as advertised. It was just all a bit on the dull side. Nothing bad, nothing good, middle of the road all the way for me.  I think the pricing for what is a mediocre service may, in hindsight, generate a few more negatives. I guess it’s not really value for money.

I recall seeing an escort a few years back (used to be callled Pixie and was quite small) and she openly said her husband was in the next room. Found it strangely hot/taboo

« Last Edit: January 13, 2021, 07:37:06 pm by Cheltclient »

Offline Bigjay

I think I could of put this to neutral if that was the case but without knowing the truth it can be a bit worrying.

If there was somebody there for safety reasons I could understand, but having some one knocking about and not knowing, it can be a bit uneasy.

Offline Cheltclient

Absolutely. Don’t worry, I wasn’t questioning your rating - sounds fairly stated to me.

The location may become an issue. With how things are evolving it really is smack bang in the middle of an estate (not her fault obviously) I’ve seen she’s been ‘available’ quite often recently and do wonder whether a neighbour may blow the whistle. That would be awkward.

Offline Jonlove69

Your review proves how important this site is for us. Comments on AW are:

Beautiful young lady
Absolutely fantastic
A little nymph
The perfect GFE
Wow one of the best

Anyone got the number for trading standards ?

Offline pythondan

Your review proves how important this site is for us. Comments on AW are:

Beautiful young lady
Absolutely fantastic
A little nymph
The perfect GFE
Wow one of the best

Anyone got the number for trading standards ?

Why? - going to report yourself for leeching?  :lol:

Offline lamboman

You should have read my review and saved yourself a few quid.
Banned reason: Shit stirrer and blocking moderator's PMs
Banned by: daviemac

Offline pythondan

Just looked at this this girl's profile and noticed a couple of recent changes.

First she has dropped rates but now OWO is now £30 extra. 30 minutes was previously £100 and is now £80 so effectively a price rise.  :(

Second she is only offering outcalls "For Now" - I guess that the concerns about nosey neighbours may have been well founded and maybe she has been reported for breaching lockdown.

« Last Edit: February 14, 2021, 03:52:12 pm by pythondan »

Offline lamboman

Just looked at this this girl's profile and noticed a couple of recent changes.

First she has dropped rates but now OWO is now £30 extra. 30 minutes was previously £100 and is now £80 so effectively a price rise.  :(

Second she is only offering outcalls "For Now" - I guess that the concerns about nosey neighbours may have been well founded and maybe she has been reported for breaching lockdown.


No doubt if her place had a neon sign with whore house on it it wouldn't be any more conspicuous than it is now.
Banned reason: Shit stirrer and blocking moderator's PMs
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Cheltclient

She has been showing as available often lately so yep, I reckon she may have been pulled up about her numerous gentlemen callers. Even if it wasn’t for escort bookings, could be grassed up for breaking the rules with frequent visitors.

Strange new pricing structure. It seems just the same but you can have the same average service for £30 less. Tempting (not)

Offline Bigjay

So after leaving my review I've been around on the site and looking at the fairly limited options at the moment.

This person is now throwing up some serious red flags, I thought about giving LMM one more try (limited options).. had a look at her profile over a weekend and she seemed available to work for the coming week. Then all of a sudden away.. Ok that in itself is not that suspicious. However when I checked her profile again recently I noticed the 30 pound increase for OWO, with all the discussions around her offering BB and connecting the dots I suspect she probably caught something and the comments around this may of been true. Secondly she is now offering outcalls only, suggesting to me that she has been reported, well even after all of these restrictions I wouldn't feel safe visiting the premises again. So now if you want one hours outcall with OWO it's 210!?... Far overpriced. Maybe capitalising on the current situation. Who knows. I expect she's the type of person who would do whatever if the price is right.

Offline lamboman

No doubt somebody must have had a quiet word with her or reported her that house is so conspicuous.
Banned reason: Shit stirrer and blocking moderator's PMs
Banned by: daviemac

Offline pythondan

The last time I looked at her profile she was advertising gangbangs - up to 7 guys for two hours - cannot remember the exact price she wanted but is was more than £100 per punter.

I thought at the time this was reckless but did not share on here as I had previously highlighted her price changes - £30 for owo lol - and did not want to seem to be being vindictive.


Offline Bigjay

It appears the extra charge has gone. She's clearly modifying her profile everytime a post goes up here.

BB - No I don't
Extra charges - no...

Trying to tailor and write it to what she thinks people want to hear/read as opposed to anything else.

Offline pythondan

If she is listening to us here's a message for her.

Stop taking the piss with your price increases. You were pushing it asking £100 for 30 minutes but raising it to £120 is just silly!

Offline lamboman

If she is listening to us here's a message for her.

Stop taking the piss with your price increases. You were pushing it asking £100 for 30 minutes but raising it to £120 is just silly!

I wouldn't get angry she's not worth seeing at £60.
Banned reason: Shit stirrer and blocking moderator's PMs
Banned by: daviemac