Hi everyone, yes I was a lurker on this site and I now find that the information, and the activity on Ukpunting in general to be better then on %%%. Now they have really pissed me off because of what they have done, I spent at least an hour writing and editing my post. I normally use open office word to check for spelling etc. and I don't usually save it - is there anyone who has copies of my posts on Luna and Eva? I trusted %%% to not delete anything, then they do this to me, pathetic.
Below is a copy of a post to challenge them which I believe may be removed as I don't think they would be happy with what I have said:
I am very disappointed.
Why have my post, and Doughslayer's, been removed after so much time and effort has been put into composing them? I understand you have rules, but the rules themselves sometimes change. I find it ironic that three of my Soho field reports from 2010 on Paris, Victoria and Camilla are still online when at that time the “rules” allowed for Soho field reports. Then the “rules” changed and we were no longer allowed to do Soho field reports, so of course we resorted to posts on the message board.
And what is wrong with Luna posting on the message board? Why the complicated bureaucracy of these rules, when at the end of the day it all boils down to communication and useful information. If that communication takes place on the message board instead of the service provider announcements what difference does it make? Far better to have everything in the same place so we don't have to jump all over the site to find stuff.
Also, remember the time when Adult Work was as unmentionable as the Devil's name during a fifteenth century witch-hunt? And now we can mention it as if the “rule” did not exist. Like anything else on the internet one should proceed with caution, nonetheless there are many good service providers on AW that we punters meet so it is natural that we would want to write field reports on them, so the “rules” evolve and change to meet the new environment. That is what Darwin meant by “survival of the fittest”, he didn't mean just the physically stronger and more intelligent but the most suited to their environment, so an animal on land would evolve to grow legs etc. So now it is time to revise your rules and let us post what we want on the message board, otherwise you will lose our support. Without punters like Doughslayer and myself writing good quality reports your site traffic will start to go down and so will your advertising revenues as service providers, and punters, move to rival sites that are more user friendly. If %%% does not evolve with its punters then it will not survive.
Doing this act of vandalism to Doughslayer and me is wrong and you should reconsider your actions, do the decent thing and reinstate our posts.