Anyone else feel strange with the influx of TS reviews?

[InstaPunt]

To each his own and not judging what people do, but just wondering if any of the other long timers feel strange going on reviews page and seeing 3-4 reviews marked as TS, suppose it’s just this place used to feel like a proper straight lads club so feels odd seeing TS reviews becoming so common.

[tidytuz]

yes there should be a separate section on the forum for it IMO.

[-misternobody-]

I share your thought.

[Putin]

Same here.

[marcello]

I'm pretty new to UKP, nonetheless strange as fuck for me as well.

[jason_152]

Believe one of the TS review forums was closed down, hence the influx of review here.

[nigel4498]

Believe one of the TS review forums was closed down, hence the influx of review here.

That probably accounts for it then.
Not my thing so I just don't read the reviews.
 each to his own I suppose.

It's the same with massages now too.

[ladiesman020]

Tranys are just men with boobs

[jimbocimil]

Tranys are just men with boobs

not really. men with gynecomastia don't consider themselves as TS.  Just don't read the TS reviews. I don't mind them being reviewed here either.

[Jonestown]

Tranys are just men with boobs

Or, Cocks in frocks

[nigel4498]

Or, Cocks in frocks

Knobs to that 

[Muff licker]

gives me the willies   

[Waterhouse]

Not my thing at all.  I just ignore the reviews here, although in my honest opinion, they should be farmed off elsewhere to dedicated/specialist area/site since this is a Punting review site, not a frotting review site.

I have nothing against genuine gay folk at all, but I just don't understand or get why a hetro bloke would want to do anything sexual or intimate with another geezer, gay, bi or straight, not even to tick off a bucket-list item.

[LLPunting]

I'd rather have the TS SPs outted here than on some specialist site I wouldn't go to.  Been more than a few debates about SPs being cis-gendered.
As long as the TSs are being identified respectfully then there's no harm either way, they are acknowledged how they want to be and those interested can find them more readily.  This way I can avoid any encounters with "suspiciously too pretty women" that just set your senses chiming.

[InstaPunt]

I'd rather have the TS SPs outted here than on some specialist site I wouldn't go to.  Been more than a few debates about SPs being cis-gendered.
As long as the TSs are being identified respectfully then there's no harm either way, they are acknowledged how they want to be and those interested can find them more readily.  This way I can avoid any encounters with "suspiciously too pretty women" that just set your senses chiming.

Dude, I ignore most but one review I clicked on the TS had a cock...really doubt there would be any doubt about gender. This is completely different to post ops not advertising as post op and deceiving punters.

[InstaPunt]

yes there should be a separate section on the forum for it IMO.

That would be a good idea because it is a completely different area of punting.

[vw]

To each his own and not judging what people do, but just wondering if any of the other long timers feel strange going on reviews page and seeing 3-4 reviews marked as TS, suppose it’s just this place used to feel like a proper straight lads club so feels odd seeing TS reviews becoming so common.

no issue with the reviews, have issue with the cry babies crying homophobia though. 

TS is not that common, the fanbois are just loud. 

[Dark_Gable]

I don't mind it at all, as long as TS is put in the review title

[InstaPunt]

no issue with the reviews, have issue with the cry babies crying homophobia though. 

TS is not that common, the fanbois are just loud.

Did not mean to offend the homesexuals on here, so sorry if you misunderstood and feel targeted, just initiating a debate to see if maybe a punting site primarily dedicated to punting women should stay like that and if enough agree maybe admin might consider a section specifically for TS reviews.Through sharing my thoughts and asking questions  others have expressed theirs, and now we know that a TS site was recently closed and that explains the recent increase of TS reviews on here. See a subject might be touchy for some but discussing it openly often leads to ideas and can lead to a better outcome.

[mh]

Tranys are just men with boobs

And not always with boobs!

I don't see a problem with the reviews being on here as they are. I can certainly understand why Admin would not want yet another set of regional boards to manage and having them by region must be useful. So having them tagged as now works, doesn't it?

[vw]

Did not mean to offend the homesexuals on here, so sorry if you misunderstood and feel targeted, just initiating a debate to see if maybe a punting site primarily dedicated to punting women should stay like that and if enough agree maybe admin might consider a section specifically for TS reviews.Through sharing my thoughts and asking questions  others have expressed theirs, and now we know that a TS site was recently closed and that explains the recent increase of TS reviews on here. See a subject might be touchy for some but discussing it openly often leads to ideas and can lead to a better outcome.

Maybe read again what i posted    , to clarify  am offended by the snowflakes that call those not interested a homophobic on a whim.

He has already locked the thread asking for the same thing.   

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=211549.0

Admins response

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=211549.msg2206313#msg2206313

I already added the categories, clearly visible on the frontpage and also this link: https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=categories;name=transsexual
This functions just as well as a dedicated "section".
I said years ago that I'm not a fan of creating dozens and dozens of sections like some forums have.
I've been told to create sections for everything from massage, to BBW, to domination, to gay, to IT-help, to politics section, and every single section to be broken down into regions, where does it stop exactly?

The option for each member to auto hide all TS threads is coming soon, I've already manually excluded a number of members because they asked for it.

[InstaPunt]

Maybe read again what i posted    , i am offended by the snowflakes that call those not interested a homophobe

He has already locked the thread asking for the same thing.   

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=211549.0

Admins response

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=211549.msg2206313#msg2206313

Hahahaha, yeah typed “you” instead of “they” and then just carried on in that way  so can see how that come across. Was supposed to be directed to the people you were referring to, not to you. My mistake.

By the looks of things Admin has added me to auto exclude list for TS topics, much better and easier then setting up new sections. Anyone else who wants to keep their review page female only can ask to be excluded too I’m guessing.

[bristolqwerty]

Nope, quite interesting to read, just amusing how many are a little highly strung as well as well hung   

[mh]

Did not mean to offend the homesexuals on here

Assuming we're talking about TS that have male genitalia but feminine attributes (e.g. boobs or other feminine traits such as a thin waist, minimal body hair, feminine facial features, then why would "homesexuals" be looking for men that have such feminine attributes along with their tackle?
 

I don't think for one moment that having TS reviews on here (and most do seem to be for the type I have described above) means their are gay men roaming this forum looking for a paid for fuck.

[JayEZ2K]

To each his own and not judging what people do, but just wondering if any of the other long timers feel strange going on reviews page and seeing 3-4 reviews marked as TS, suppose it’s just this place used to feel like a proper straight lads club so feels odd seeing TS reviews becoming so common.

Admin has already developed a solution: An anti-TS filter which will block your account from seeing TS threads. Simply report your own post or contact Admin with a request to block TS threads from being visible to your account. Problem solved.
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=211549.msg2206333#msg2206333

[MilleMiglia]

Tranys are just men with boobs

External Link/Members Only

[InstaPunt]

Assuming we're talking about TS that have male genitalia but feminine attributes (e.g. boobs or other feminine traits such as a thin waist, minimal body hair, feminine facial features, then why would "homesexuals" be looking for men that have such feminine attributes along with their tackle?
 

I don't think for one moment that having TS reviews on here (and most do seem to be for the type I have described above) means their are gay men roaming this forum looking for a paid for fuck.

When a baby is born gender is identified by genitalia and thus is the distinguishing feature between male and female. Anyways, if we went with your definition a man would be gay simply for fucking a flat chested short haired, gym going woman who has a pussy.

[claretandblue]

there very easy to avoid if not your cup of tea op, I am amazed so many punters take offence,the same arguments keep appearing on a lot of the reviews which is annoying

[mh]

When a baby is born gender is identified by genitalia and thus is the distinguishing feature between male and female. Anyways, if we went with your definition a man would be gay simply for fucking a flat chested short haired, gym going woman who has a pussy.

I didn't deny the TS I described was biologically "male", just that there's minimal chance of a gay man hunting on this forum for a ladyboy to pay to fuck...!

[Jonestown]

I didn't deny the TS I described was biologically "male", just that there's minimal chance of a gay man hunting on this forum for a ladyboy to pay to fuck...!

If you’re paying a pre-op TS for sex surely you have to be at least bisexual, i dont see how you can dodge that, bucket list or not.

Otherwise its as delusional as the guys who goto a massage shop and claim the girls are not prostitutes because they are only having a hand job.

[tantraman]

If you’re paying a pre-op TS for sex surely you have to be at least bisexual, i dont see how you can dodge that, bucket list or not.

I'm reminded of an Ali G interview, discussing bisexuality ...

"Me uncle, Jamal, he says he is trisexual ... he will try anything sexual!"

... I think there are many of us Jamals!

[magnetico]

I can't wait to be able to hide the TS threads (and massages)

Hidden Image/Members Only

[Jonestown]

On another thread we had hotdog88 waxing lyrical about having a cock jammed down his throat and spunking over his face, yesterday we had what i assume was the first post from a lesbian about receiving services. I tell you by 18 months time men with a penis looking for women with a vagina will be relegated to a subsection of other topics.

[dubs]

If you’re paying a pre-op TS for sex surely you have to be at least bisexual, i dont see how you can dodge that, bucket list or not.

Otherwise its as delusional as the guys who goto a massage shop and claim the girls are not prostitutes because they are only having a hand job.

Guys who like TS's are not gay or bi;  they do not fancy men.  If you opened your mind you would see that the most popular TS's are those that look more feminine.  In my view, a TS is a girl with an additional sex toy, if you don't agree that's fine but why should the 190,000 members of this site limit their sexual experiences to that which a minority on here deem to be normal?

[last_days_of_logan]

I don't mind it at all, as long as TS is put in the review title

This

[Kev40ish]

Guys who like TS's are not gay or bi;  they do not fancy men.  If you opened your mind you would see that the most popular TS's are those that look more feminine.  In my view, a TS is a girl with an additional sex toy, if you don't agree that's fine but why should the 190,000 members of this site limit their sexual experiences to that which a minority on here deem to be normal?

I think you do have to have Bi tendencies to go and see a TS, TV or feminine looking gay men who pretend to be TS. It’s only labels for males who like to be with other men.

Sucking a cock or letting them fuck you makes you at least Bi, even if you don’t want to accept the term.

Another proof is the amount of drama queens trying to deflect the truth  a definite gay trait.

[finn5555]

Guys who like TS's are not gay or bi;  they do not fancy men.  If you opened your mind you would see that the most popular TS's are those that look more feminine.  In my view, a TS is a girl with an additional sex toy, if you don't agree that's fine but why should the 190,000 members of this site limit their sexual experiences to that which a minority on here deem to be normal?

Can’t agree if you like sucking cock you are at the very least bi 

[LLPunting]

Dude, I ignore most but one review I clicked on the TS had a cock...really doubt there would be any doubt about gender. This is completely different to post ops not advertising as post op and deceiving punters.

"Dude", it's implicit in my post that my only interest is avoiding sexual encounters with re-assigned TSs,  I am perfectly capable of spotting a dick in a photo or reading about the presence of one on an SP.

My concern for the forum is that militants from all factions and interests start carping on and trolling threads leading to an intolerable disruption of the utility of this site.  Moderation will need to introduce or more widely apply the deletion of disruptive posts or else threads will become too tedious to be considered usefully concise and on point.  I already spend too much time here reading useful information.  I will not hang about if I'm wasting time wading past hate speech and bogus posts and reviews planted by saboteurs to mess with the credibility of reviews and reviewers.

[bcj666]

Guys who like TS's are not gay or bi;  they do not fancy men.  If you opened your mind you would see that the most popular TS's are those that look more feminine.  In my view, a TS is a girl with an additional sex toy, if you don't agree that's fine but why should the 190,000 members of this site limit their sexual experiences to that which a minority on here deem to be normal?

Of course they are gay or bi. YOU ARE SLEEPING WOTH A MAN FOR FUCK SAKE

[Kev40ish]

Of course they are gay or bi. YOU ARE SLEEPING WOTH A MAN FOR FUCK SAKE

There is no need to come across so aggressive your last few posts add no value.
If you don’t like the threads don’t read or post on them if you have nothing constructive to say.
Ask Admin to remove your access then you should be in your safe narrowmind world.

[mh]

Guys who like TS's are not gay or bi;  they do not fancy men.  If you opened your mind you would see that the most popular TS's are those that look more feminine.  In my view, a TS is a girl with an additional sex toy, if you don't agree that's fine but why should the 190,000 members of this site limit their sexual experiences to that which a minority on here deem to be normal?

I agree with most of this. A guy looking specifically for a feminine looking TS is not necessarily gay or bi. But a TS cannot be deemed to be a "girl" either, though some can look as good as if not better than a real WG.

Over the years I've seen many members openly stating that in their eyes a guy who likes anal with girls is gay. It's ridiculous. Would I want to fuck a man? No way. Would I consider a meeting with a feminine looking TS? Yes I would, out of interest as a bucket list entry because I am a sexual deviant!
 

[mh]

Of course they are gay or bi. YOU ARE SLEEPING WOTH A MAN FOR FUCK SAKE

Are you repressed? How coy! I think sleeping occurs in only a small fraction of the encounters reported on here.
 

[InstaPunt]

Guys who like TS's are not gay or bi;  they do not fancy men.  If you opened your mind you would see that the most popular TS's are those that look more feminine.  In my view, a TS is a girl with an additional sex toy, if you don't agree that's fine but why should the 190,000 members of this site limit their sexual experiences to that which a minority on here deem to be normal?

Ok... so fucking Serena Williams would turn me gay, but fucking Justin Bieber would keep me straight ... I get it now.

[tantric talents]

It does amuse me to see how many homophobes here can’t  wait to brag about their last anal conquest ... with a woman! Ah but it’s not the same I hear you say. He he really?
Arseholes here abound 

[InstaPunt]

It does amuse me to see how many homophobes here can’t  wait to brag about their last anal conquest ... with a woman! Ah but it’s not the same I hear you say. He he really?
Arseholes here abound 

The old anal argument.. then by that point if you French Kiss a girl you might as well French Kiss a guy, or what about oral?
This “homophobe” argument is bs, saying that a guy who likes cock, regardless of how pretty the TS looks, is gay/bi is not homophobic, in fact I think the ones in denial are homophobic or at the very least ashamed of it and don’t want their liking for TS linked to gay/bi sexuality when it clearly is.

[king tarzan]

there very easy to avoid if not your cup of tea op, I am amazed so many punters take offence,the same arguments keep appearing on a lot of the reviews which is annoying

Yeh because you love trannies!!

[king tarzan]

To myself  and my friends TS it's just gay.
Simple as that...

Hope they review elsewhere to be honest..

[magnetico]

In my view, a TS is a girl with an additional sex toy, if you don't agree that's fine but why should the 190,000 members of this site limit their sexual experiences to that which a minority on here deem to be normal?

If you think that only a minority of punters aren't into sucking trannie's cocks you're a bit delusional.

[mh]

If you think that only a minority of punters aren't into sucking trannie's cocks you're a bit delusional.

I read it as meaning only a minority of members are judgemental about what others choose to do.

[finn5555]

If you want to suck and fuck a bloke in a frock crack on 
But don’t ever deny you are bi or gay