Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: T-Girl working at Sheridans  (Read 2476 times)

Online TomTank

I can't find the thread where someone was asking about T-girls working in parlours - but I just spotted that one is working at Sheridans today.

External Link/Members Only


Offline NigelF

Interesting. IMO, she doesn't look very good though (especially when you click on the images to make them full size). I think this is indicative of the recent standards at Sheridan's, especially in terms of looks, i.e. appalling.

Nonetheless, I feel sorry for her and her dick, I'm sure it'd be worn out at the end of a day in a parlour!
« Last Edit: October 13, 2018, 03:04:09 pm by NigelF »

Online Moby Dick

WTF
Can you imagine if you turned up and she/he was the only one available.
Would you or would you walk?

Offline NigelF

WTF
Can you imagine if you turned up and she/he was the only one available.
Would you or would you walk?

I've walked before when there's been multiple girls available (I say girls but really I mean old women) so I'd definitely walk if the TS was the only one available.

Online TomTank

Interesting. IMO, she doesn't look very good though (especially when you click on the images to make them full size). I think this is indicative of the recent standards at Sheridan's, especially in terms of looks, i.e. appalling.

Nonetheless, I feel sorry for her and her dick, I'm sure it'd be worn out at the end of a day in a parlour!

I think it's more indicative of the type of T-girl who will work in a parlour at parlour rates.
Still think Sheridans have some good 'uns too .....

Offline northwales69

I think it's more indicative of the type of T-girl who will work in a parlour at parlour rates.
Still think Sheridans have some good 'uns too .....

Dionne is fantastic!

goldwing1

  • Guest
I've walked before when there's been multiple girls available (I say girls but really I mean old women) so I'd definitely walk if the TS was the only one available.

Sure i`ve seen a review by you about someone who is half man half woman, TV TS trans gender, non assigned gender identity, reassigned  gender  identity, lady boy  or whatever the bloody hell it`s called these days.

Online Moby Dick

Please elaborate, otherwise your post is a bit pointless.
I am left wondering "why is she fantastic, and does she have a cock?" :scare:
Dionne is fantastic!

Offline wilburs horse

Dionne is a girl well reported. Lacy is the t girl. Silly comment about walking if the t girl the only one available. Wait or walk. Not for me but not a problem sitting talking to a t girl while waiting. Was quite popular at tjs and Aphrodites.
Banned reason: Bypassing rules to name another forum.
Banned by: daviemac

Online Moby Dick

I've searched Dionne and see 4 reviews from Sheridans. I would like to know why dam86 says she is fantastic.

Dionne is a girl well reported. Lacy is the t girl. Silly comment about walking if the t girl the only one available. Wait or walk. Not for me but not a problem sitting talking to a t girl while waiting. Was quite popular at tjs and Aphrodites.
« Last Edit: October 14, 2018, 10:56:00 am by Moby Dick »

Online TomTank

I've searched Dionne and see 4 reviews from Sheridans. I would like to know why dam86 says she is fantastic.

I've not read the reports, but I've seen her and she is pretty good - fit looking scouse girl with great body and horny service.

goldwing1

  • Guest
I've not read the reports, but I've seen her and she is pretty good - fit looking scouse girl with great body and horny service.

I`ve had her in a threesome at Sheridans

Offline NigelF

Still think Sheridans have some good 'uns too .....

Who?

On the current rota, Sienna is the only one who I'd say is "good", the others have too many flaws IMO. Molly is pretty good but rather big, I've found her service to be good/very good (but some reviewers have experienced otherwise). Charlotte is big and not great facially (I was a bit generous with my review but it's still pretty accurate) but does provide a great service. Most of the rest are too old/not great looking IMO. I've not seen everyone in the flesh though.

Sheridan's was way better when it had the likes of Lauren, Tyra, Daisy, Alice, Cindy etc.

Sure i`ve seen a review by you about someone who is half man half woman, TV TS trans gender, non assigned gender identity, reassigned  gender  identity, lady boy  or whatever the bloody hell it`s called these days.

I've done multiple reviews of TS escorts and I've got more to come. Just because I like a few of them, does not mean I like all of them. I know that's a hard concept for you to get your head round because you love the looks of literally every escort you see, regardless of of how accurate their pictures/profiles actually are (as per your reviews) but I'm a bit more discerning than you (which is actually mostly a bad thing for me). I think the vast majority of TS and all TV escorts don't look very good and the one in this thread is no exception.

A TV (transvestite) is just someone who dresses up and puts some make up on, a TS (trans-sexual) is someone who does that but also takes female hormones (and probably male hormone blockers), many also have boob jobs and sometimes other cosmetic surgeries. Pre-Op TS means they still have a dick and Post-Op means they've had it removed and turned into a "makeshift" vagina (actually a lot better than you might think due to biology/our embryological development but it's still not as good as the real thing hence I personally don't bother with Post Ops).

Silly comment about walking if the t girl the only one available. Wait or walk. Not for me but not a problem sitting talking to a t girl while waiting.

What are you on about? What silly comment and who said they'd have a problem talking to her?

I've not read the reports, but I've seen her and she is pretty good - fit looking scouse girl with great body and horny service.

She's decent looking but not great. Definitely looks quite a bit older than her claimed age (as with most girls at Sheridan's). Unlike the claim on her profile, she certainly doesn't look like Kim Kardashian. Her service is decent for a parlour but again nothing special and she doesn't deliver proper DFK. I'm OK with the punt I did have but I wouldn't bother seeing her again.
« Last Edit: October 14, 2018, 03:40:17 pm by NigelF »

Online TomTank

Who?

On the current rota, Sienna is the only one who I'd say is "good", the others have too many flaws IMO. Molly is pretty good but rather big, I've found her service to be good/very good (but some reviewers have experienced otherwise). Charlotte is big and not great facially (I was a bit generous with my review but it's still pretty accurate) but does provide a great service. Most of the rest are too old/not great looking IMO. I've not seen everyone in the flesh though.

Sheridan's was way better when it had the likes of Lauren, Tyra, Daisy, Alice, Cindy etc.

Re Dionne: She's decent looking but not great. Definitely looks quite a bit older than her claimed age (as with most girls at Sheridan's). Unlike the claim on her profile, she certainly doesn't look like Kim Kardashian. Her service is decent for a parlour but again nothing special and she doesn't deliver proper DFK. I'm OK with the punt I did have but I wouldn't bother seeing her again.

Sienna isn't my type at all.
I guess it just shows it takes all tastes.

I agree Lauren, Tyra, and Daisy are sadly missed, but Alice was an awful punt for me - again takes all tastes.

I don't think any parlour puts accurate descriptions, and often stretch it with look-a-like suggestions.
I can see why someone would think Dionne is fantastic, and I personally also like Molly (who has lost a lot of weight), Leah, Kimberley, Celeste, Becky, Bailey, and Porsha. Also, not seen Lisa, but she looks decent on the profile.

Offline NigelF

Sienna isn't my type at all.
I guess it just shows it takes all tastes.

I agree Lauren, Tyra, and Daisy are sadly missed, but Alice was an awful punt for me - again takes all tastes.

I don't think any parlour puts accurate descriptions, and often stretch it with look-a-like suggestions.
I can see why someone would think Dionne is fantastic, and I personally also like Molly (who has lost a lot of weight), Leah, Kimberley, Celeste, Becky, Bailey, and Porsha. Also, not seen Lisa, but she looks decent on the profile.

Yes, unfortunately inaccurate descriptions is a problem with all parlours. Cheers for the update about Molly, it's been a while since I last saw her. I forgot about Kimberley, she's pretty good. Celeste and Porsha are a bit too old for my usual tastes although occasionally I do fancy a MILF but there's plenty of options for that out there, including better looking (IMO). Leah, just looks like an older, "poor man's" version of Daisy, she's also probably a bit too thin for me (although Daisy was right on the edge).

As you say, Sienna is a great example of subjectivity. She has a bit of extra weight and isn't young but I do like her big natural tits (not the firmest but I don't care and they're shown accurately in her pics) and her service is definitely good (in my experience).

What are Bailey and Becky like? Each have a review on here (Becky - https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?msg=2230396, Bailey - https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=190271) but both reviewers are banned/not the most reliable. Do they both offer DFK? Thanks in advance.

Online TomTank

Nige
It's ages since I saw Bailey or Becky so can't remember if they DFK'd.
I don't think Becky would be your type because she's also skinny, which is something I do like - but she's always on when I can't make it.
I do like kissing, but it doesn't bother me if they don't DFK, so maybe that's where our subjectiveness takes a different path, along with the skinny thing.
I should say I think Leah was a bit of a DFK-er though ....

Offline NigelF

Nige
It's ages since I saw Bailey or Becky so can't remember if they DFK'd.
I don't think Becky would be your type because she's also skinny, which is something I do like - but she's always on when I can't make it.
I do like kissing, but it doesn't bother me if they don't DFK, so maybe that's where our subjectiveness takes a different path, along with the skinny thing.
I should say I think Leah was a bit of a DFK-er though ....

Yeah, you're probably right about Becky (for me), as that's basically what the other reviewer suggested too. Anyway, cheers for the info.

goldwing1

  • Guest
Who?

On the current rota, Sienna is the only one who I'd say is "good", the others have too many flaws IMO. Molly is pretty good but rather big, I've found her service to be good/very good (but some reviewers have experienced otherwise). Charlotte is big and not great facially (I was a bit generous with my review but it's still pretty accurate) but does provide a great service. Most of the rest are too old/not great looking IMO. I've not seen everyone in the flesh though.

Sheridan's was way better when it had the likes of Lauren, Tyra, Daisy, Alice, Cindy etc.

I've done multiple reviews of TS escorts and I've got more to come. Just because I like a few of them, does not mean I like all of them. I know that's a hard concept for you to get your head round because you love the looks of literally every escort you see, regardless of of how accurate their pictures/profiles actually are (as per your reviews) but I'm a bit more discerning than you (which is actually mostly a bad thing for me). I think the vast majority of TS and all TV escorts don't look very good and the one in this thread is no exception.

A TV (transvestite) is just someone who dresses up and puts some make up on, a TS (trans-sexual) is someone who does that but also takes female hormones (and probably male hormone blockers), many also have boob jobs and sometimes other cosmetic surgeries. Pre-Op TS means they still have a dick and Post-Op means they've had it removed and turned into a "makeshift" vagina (actually a lot better than you might think due to biology/our embryological development but it's still not as good as the real thing hence I personally don't bother with Post Ops).

What are you on about? What silly comment and who said they'd have a problem talking to her?

She's decent looking but not great. Definitely looks quite a bit older than her claimed age (as with most girls at Sheridan's). Unlike the claim on her profile, she certainly doesn't look like Kim Kardashian. Her service is decent for a parlour but again nothing special and she doesn't deliver proper DFK. I'm OK with the punt I did have but I wouldn't bother seeing her again.

Just with you saying  you would walk if the TS was the only one available.
Just got the impression you didn`t see them

Offline Spurt

« Last Edit: October 21, 2018, 12:03:02 pm by Spurt »

Offline Georgedaviesok

In answer to Nigel F I totally agree, Sienna is great and is the only girl at Sheridans I have continually seen over the years even though she disappears for months on end. Great Tits and fantastic oral skills. I also rate Charlotte, very rude and up for it lady.

I rarely go to sheridans now,  most of the good girls have gone plus although it works for some, I really don't like how mad the reception area gets.