BillieBlue, Chelmsford

[norwichfunseeker]

I will be coming back to him later when I get a bit more time, he does need to change his attitude.

 

[ToggyD]

Point noted Daviemac, however the 5pms were not hassling, and were part of a discussion which stopped on the 20th jan. I have no intention of behaving in a way to get banned, and certainly  not for someone who leeches off others. You yourself have even given assistance/ guidance in this thread as to how to review which has repeatedly been ignored.
Anways so as not to threaten  my membership ill say no more and leave it to the mods.

I tried to cut the conversation each time but you kept sending another and another.

[ToggyD]

I will be coming back to him later when I get a bit more time, he does need to change his attitude.

If being forced by other members into doing reviews is a condition then I would rather be banned.

Not sure what the attitude comment is in reference to?

[norwichfunseeker]

I tried to cut the conversation each time but you kept sending another and another.

As advised I'm leaving this to the mods.

[Kev40ish]

I tried to cut the conversation each time but you kept sending another and another.

I am not sure why you felt the need to comment again??
Why push it? You just don’t to seem to know when to leave it?

[Kev40ish]

If being forced by other members into doing reviews is a condition then I would rather be banned.

Not sure what the attitude comment is in reference to?

I am sure Davie will make your wish to be banned come true..

[ToggyD]

As advised I'm leaving this to the mods.

right, but they weren’t ‘part of a discussion’

[ToggyD]

I am sure Davie will make your wish to be banned come true..

I don’t wish to be banned in the slightest. I said if I had a choice between that and being forced into reviews.

[Fuggedaboutit]

I don’t wish to be banned in the slightest. I said if I had a choice between that and being forced into reviews.

It's not a case of "forcing" you into doing a review, it's wanting you to do your bit for a community that relies on reviews (and sticking to the rules you agreed to when you joined). It's also to do with the fact that you've seemingly promoted a WG who you admit to having seen in the last 12 months. To promote without the presence of a review does seem a little suspect both in terms of you not following the rules and in the eyes of more experienced/senior community members. I just don't see why you find it so difficult to do the review.

Just meant as a bit of neutral advice.

[CoolTiger]

If being forced by other members into doing reviews is a condition then I would rather be banned.

Not sure what the attitude comment is in reference to?

Without treading on Daviemac's post, who has explained he will come back on this issue, here is some guidance for you from the Site Rules:

27 Lurking / Dormant Accounts
Members that do not contribute Reviews or where their accounts become dormant may have their membership revoked.

[daviemac]

If being forced by other members into doing reviews is a condition then I would rather be banned.

Not sure what the attitude comment is in reference to?

The attitude referred to is you general attitude to the ethos of the site, something you seem to have difficulty understanding. This is primarily a review site where members share their experiences of paid for sex to benefit other members.

You did not get off to the best start when you dragged up a post from 9 months ago and called an established member a misogynist because you misunderstood his post. He posted a quote from the book NIGGALATIONS and you took it literally.

As far as the current situation is concerned and the SP in this thread, I fully understand people being frustrated with you, and I think it is very unfortunate that a valued members has to be reminded of the rules because of the frustration you have caused.

I will remind you of one of my earlier posts and point out if you wish to stay a member you need to make some kind of useful contribution.
 

Why do you think you should be the exception to the whole ethos of the site. This is primarily a review site and members are expected to post reviews in order to help fellow punters.

If you check the rules, the rules you agreed to abide by when you singed up, you will find that those who don't contribute may have their membership terminated.

There's a guide here to help you, along with further information so you get the best out of the site - External Link/Members Only

 External Link/Members Only

And the rules -

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=252680.0

The section for you to post a review is here - https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?board=19.0

[ToggyD]

The attitude referred to is you general attitude to the ethos of the site, something you seem to have difficulty understanding. This is primarily a review site where members share their experiences of paid for sex to benefit other members.

You did not get off to the best start when you dragged up a post from 9 months ago and called an established member a misogynist because you misunderstood his post. He posted a quote from the book NIGGALATIONS and you took it literally.

As far as the current situation is concerned and the SP in this thread, I fully understand people being frustrated with you, and I think it is very unfortunate that a valued members has to be reminded of the rules because of the frustration you have caused.

I will remind you of one of my earlier posts and point out if you wish to stay a member you need to make some kind of useful contribution.
 The section for you to post a review is here - https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?board=19.0

So in simple terms if I don’t post a review I’m going to be banned?

[pepsicolaboy]

So in simple terms if I don’t post a review I’m going to be banned?

You have got to be trolling now

[ToggyD]

You have got to be trolling now

If you mean on the wind up then no I am not.

Not sure what I’m doing so wrong but I just won’t post at all then.

[Fuggedaboutit]

So in simple terms if I don’t post a review I’m going to be banned?

 

[Fuggedaboutit]

If you mean on the wind up then no I am not.

Not sure what I’m doing so wrong but I just won’t post at all then.

Really?? Really???? C'mon, seriously?

Reviewing is piss easy....

1. I saw this WG (add AW link)
2. Her communications were good/bad
3. The venue was incall (give very rough idea) or outcall
4. She is/isn't the girl in her pictures
5. How long you spent with her and how much it was
6. Can she suck a golfball through a 20ft length of hosepipe or was her technique shite
7. Did you fuck her/what position
8. Would you go again...?

Not "guys, guys, I've seen this brass, she's great".

Is that really so difficult? I'm guessing that you've got to be a student given your complete inability to process simple instructions...

Why did you join this site if you're not going to follow the ethos of the site...?

[norwichfunseeker]

If you mean on the wind up then no I am not.

Not sure what I’m doing so wrong but I just won’t post at all then.

Try listening to the mods and other members who have given you advice and guidance on what to do. It really couldn't be simpler. Most others manage it.

[daviemac]

So in simple terms if I don’t post a review I’m going to be banned?

That is a possibility, however it also depends on what other useful contributions you make. There are loads of members who, for one reason or another, seldom punt but they do make other valuable contributions.

Looking at your previous posts you do not fall into that category. You tend to jump around the site posting spurious comments on things you know nothing about, that coupled with the accusations you have made to other members and the white knighting of escorts who want a deposit does not endear you to others.

Make some kind of useful contributions and if you are going to state you have seen an escort then be prepared to be asked for a review, that is what the site is all about.