In fairness to the WG, OWO is listed at discretion on her profile so in that regard its at discretion to either not offer it or to add a fee to those who really want it. I would much prefer the option of paying a lower hourly rate ie: £80 and choosing whether to pay for additional services.
I agree it would be better for punters to have this explicitly listed on the profile with prices but not an issue for me personally. Its a basic rule of punting to confirm services before you punt to avoid surprises and if you ask, she seems upfront about it!
Overall, still a cracking punt, worthy enough to bring my first review in quite a while on UKP
I'm certainly not questioning your Review fl0atab1lity. And I appreciate she's reasonably priced compared to some. It's more about the deceptiveness.
She doesn't state in her profile that she charges extras for OWO & CIM which she has told me that she charges extra for.
If she made this clear, and put it on her profile, I personally wouldn't have a problem with that. But the way she's operating is, (like a lot of WGs do) a naïve punter shows up (which there are plenty of) for a booking with her, without asking her if she charges extra for anything, he hands over his dosh, (£80 for an hour) but when the action starts he's then told; Oh if you want OWO & CIM it's an extra £20. So this now turns into £100 for the hour. The punter may only take with him the amount she's asking in her profile £80, so he doesn't get the service that he wanted, and was expecting
Ok, we know that £100 for an hour is still very reasonable, as I say it's more about the deception. This is precisely why I hate the wording in escort girls profiles "At Discretion"
Having said all of that. I now know exactly what her rates are now, and what her extras are, as she's now explained exactly what I would pay her if, as, and when I see her. So I will keep her on my HL. But as I say she needs to clarify exactly what her charges are on her profile.