Private galleries question from a WG

[JV547845]

The movies are not priced by me, but by aw who allocate the price based on the length and also size of the video.

You must be able to change that.  Some WGs have free intro videos.

[Wowgeek]

You must be able to change that.  Some WGs have free intro videos.

AW set the rate based on the file size of the video, they claim it's bandwidth costs, so a profile can have a 10 min video for £1 as long as you don't mind it looking like you're watching it through a chicken wire fence 

A profile can also have one free to view video and an intro one, but that only plays in Windows media format.

[Daffodil]

AW set the rate based on the file size of the video, they claim it's bandwidth costs, so a profile can have a 10 min video for £1 as long as you don't mind it looking like you're watching it through a chicken wire fence 

A profile can also have one free to view video and an intro one, but that only plays in Windows media format.

All new information to me, interesting to hear.

[JV547845]

All new information to me, interesting to hear.

Yeah new to me too.  Thanks wowgeek.  I'm pretty sure if millions of free porn sites can afford it than adultwork could find a way to cheaply host videos if they wanted to.  It's 2014 FFS.

[CatBBW]

DELETED

[wristjob]

Personally I was reluctant to have my face pic out there when I first joined, and still am somewhat so... obviously  many people get why some WGs feel this way.

In my first week or two on AW, there were no face pics and no PG (my public photos are hi-res, accurate and recent and give a good idea of me overall)... I ended up naively swapping my face pic with someone who ended up to be a total timewaster ("I don't find you attractive, but want to get your services for free" was the sum of the interaction lol). For now, this leaves me reluctant to provide face pics free of charge or at a particularly low price as I do ideally only want the people I meet to know my face.
However I've had some longer bookings from people who specifically suggested I put my face pics on private, at up to 5 credits for the day. As my intention isn't to generate an additional source of income, rather to discourage timewasters and fantasists (who in my limited experience are less likely to spend money in their strange long-winded efforts) I have 5 non-nude face pictures in my PG for 3 credits for 3 days (plainly stated on my profile and in the captions). Some may consider this too high, I understand it limits me somewhat, but not having it limited me even more and it works well for me. I make between 9 and 15 credits a day, fund my number/availability/local search from this and most of my longer and advance bookings come from people who paid to view them.

Some guy sees your face pic and decides not to book so he's a timewaster?? Ever considered he might not fancy you? Purely up to you how you want to do it but face pics are important for some people and looks more like some girl making the punter jump through hoops or pay a ridiculous £3 to see them is the timewaster.

[Jason]

Personally I was reluctant to have my face pic out there when I first joined, and still am somewhat so... obviously  many people get why some WGs feel this way.

In my first week or two on AW, there were no face pics and no PG (my public photos are hi-res, accurate and recent and give a good idea of me overall)... I ended up naively swapping my face pic with someone who ended up to be a total timewaster ("I don't find you attractive, but want to get your services for free" was the sum of the interaction lol). For now, this leaves me reluctant to provide face pics free of charge or at a particularly low price as I do ideally only want the people I meet to know my face.
However I've had some longer bookings from people who specifically suggested I put my face pics on private, at up to 5 credits for the day. As my intention isn't to generate an additional source of income, rather to discourage timewasters and fantasists (who in my limited experience are less likely to spend money in their strange long-winded efforts) I have 5 non-nude face pictures in my PG for 3 credits for 3 days (plainly stated on my profile and in the captions). Some may consider this too high, I understand it limits me somewhat, but not having it limited me even more and it works well for me. I make between 9 and 15 credits a day, fund my number/availability/local search from this and most of my longer and advance bookings come from people who paid to view them.

Anyway, I think so long as you're honest about what's in your gallery on your profile, have decent accurate and obviously unedited photos... and you're not trying to be a shyster constantly directing people to your PG, you will make enough to fund your daily AW expenses and probably transfer a bit out each month too. I can manage this with non-nude, if you have nude ones I'm sure you can make more and get a better response.

Prossie logic at its best (or at rather its worst?). But let me dispel some of the bullocks you say:
(i)The additional discretion of Private Galleries primarily comes from the fact that only a small percentage of punters will bother to buy AW credits (even by untraceable methods such as UKASH) in order to buy PG pics. The difference in the price between £1.5 and the £3 is the prossie greed.

(ii) A punter who is interested to see you and dismisses you when he sees your face picture or meets you in the flesh is not a timewaster. His previous decision was partial and conditional upon seeing your face. You have to accept that as long as your profile is incomplete (and not showing a FREE face pic does make it incomplete) a punter will most likely judge your attractiveness in person and has the right to walk (for incalls) or send you packing back home (for outcalls) if they don’t find you attractive enough for the price. Unless of course your faulty prossie logic tells you that everyone who is willing to see you MUST buy your worthless PG so by the time they book you they have looked at your PG face pics. No baby this is NOT how it works for everyone. But if this is what you expect then write it on your profile – “guys who are wishing to see me must buy my PG”.

(iii) Duration of PGs is pointless. You can save the pictures on your computer. This can be done either by pressing shift +right click on Firefox and then selecting “Save image as” OR just by doing a print screen or other equivalent screen capture method.

(iv) Many UKP members upload PG pictures on image hosts and post them here publicly. Posting PG pics of genuine girls is against my own principles so I either don't do it at all or I do for a time limited period – i.e. I remove the pics from the image host 24 hours later and never post them again. In any case be sure it is not only the ones who buy your pics that will see your face. As long as something is online it is accessible to everyone and it comes down to the morals of each individual whether they will protect you or not.

(v) Regarding pics, External Link/Members Only is shit. Three free profile pics (one of them photoshopped/professional) plus five worthless pics in the PG for £3 (btw 5 is the minimum you need to price your PG more than £0.5 – you know what you are doing…). No wonder you are begging for work in reverse bookings: https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=33175.0.

[brightperv]

I think you need more pictures in there, if pay a £1 i think at least 30 should be in there.

I checked out your private gallery and it would be enough to convince me to make a booking shame I am so far away!

Seems I am little different from my fellow posters as I definitely want explicit pictures.

I would want to see more pussy pictures you only have one.
Always nice to have picture where your bent over showing pussy and ass.
Using toys is a bonus.
Also if you offer facials your face covered in cum is bonus.

Basically I like to see porn.

If you take photos best do in during the day when can take advantage natural light that way you won't look so yellow.

Price is key never understood why some galleries are more than a £1.50

As I said you have enough images there to convince me to book but dfatly definitely need to see more pussy 

[thewonderingdick]

I will never understand why young men would pay for sex, thy have to be either very ugly or badly disabled in my opinion

[Daffodil]

I will never understand why young men would pay for sex, thy have to be either very ugly or badly disabled in my opinion

Well that just shows that you're a bit dim and narrow minded 

For me the attraction of prostitutes is that they offer as risk free sex to guys in relationships as you are likely to get. You turn up, pay your money, fuck them, and leave. That's it.

[smiths]

I will never understand why young men would pay for sex, thy have to be either very ugly or badly disabled in my opinion

What a load of old bollocks and very narrow minded. I started punting when i was 19 and was neither ugly or disabled, i liked the no strings, no hassle punting offered, i had girlfriends as well. One woman cant offer variety so if i couldnt be bothered to play the dating game bullshit i could just book a WG.

[smiths]

Well that just shows that you're a bit dim and narrow minded 

For me the attraction of prostitutes is that they offer as risk free sex to guys in relationships as you are likely to get. You turn up, pay your money, fuck them, and leave. That's it.

I missed this post Daff, but spot on.

[CatBBW]

I will never understand why young men would pay for sex, thy have to be either very ugly or badly disabled in my opinion

What has this got to do with Private Galleries?


To answer your OT post: As well as reading Daffodil's & Smiths' excellent posts above...read the rest of the forum. It's all there. If you're that interested, take time to read and understand.

How old are you, may I ask?

[wristjob]

I will never understand why young men would pay for sex, thy have to be either very ugly or badly disabled in my opinion

The same reasons they order take away Pizza.

[PuntingNoob]

I will never understand why young men would pay for sex, thy have to be either very ugly or badly disabled in my opinion

Seems like a bit of a troll? A quick scan through his posts shows he has offered no useful advice/information. All he talks about is how bad Romanian prossies are and how other girls are too expensive.