Using protection with a BB escort?

[Milansky]

Hi guys, sorry if this is a stupid question. I did search but the results didn't come up with much. There's a load of decent looking WG's in my city I'm looking at but they offer BB. I should be safe so long as I use a condom, right? I've seen in a lot of comments/reviews that a lot of people here flat out avoid BB escorts even with protection being an option. Is there some risk even going protected?

[WelshClipper]

To me the answer is simple. Why would you take the risk. If she is willing to take a strangers spunk into her pussy, what other things is she doing.

Up to you at the end of the day. For me its always safety first. There is enough dodgy stuff in this life without adding risk unnecessarily.

 

[daviemac]

Hi guys, sorry if this is a stupid question. I did search but the results didn't come up with much. There's a load of decent looking WG's in my city I'm looking at but they offer BB. I should be safe so long as I use a condom, right? I've seen in a lot of comments/reviews that a lot of people here flat out avoid BB escorts even with protection being an option. Is there some risk even going protected?

If an escort barebacks all comers then the chance of her carrying something are infinitely higher than one that practises safe sex. If you go with an escort who has something the chances of you contracting it are therefore infinitely higher. Not a risk I'm prepared to take, condoms can split and do not protect against everything.

[RobT22]

There are also loads of decent girls out there who refuse to do BB. Surely they are the ones you should be looking at. That way we are all kept safer.

[Taggart]

Another reason to avoid girls who offer BB is girls you may want to see in the future can, with a couple of clicks, see who you’ve seen before and very likely to refuse a booking if your past shows a meeting with a barebacker.

Yes you can conceal your feedback and previous conquests, but this is likely to meet with a refusal, the same way 99% of forum members won’t see a WG who conceals her feedback.

Girls offering BB is a red flag. No ifs or buts. Move on.

[Picti]

1/ There is no absolute certainly about who does / doesn't offer BB but there will always be more not offering it. You shouldn't have a problem identifying non BB WGs.

2/ Wearing a condom with a BB WG still means a very limited service, unless you fancy RO, etc cappuccino style. Furthermore, condoms when intact offer good but not absolute protection, and don't protect against all STIs eg herpes. If the condom fails then you've basically gone BB with a BBer.

3/ You'll incur reputational damage as non BB WGs will not automatically believe that you wore a condom with a BB WG. After all why would you be punting with BBers?

[Rochelle]

Another reason to avoid girls who offer BB is girls you may want to see in the future can, with a couple of clicks, see who you’ve seen before and very likely to refuse a booking if your past shows a meeting with a barebacker.

Yes you can conceal your feedback and previous conquests, but this is likely to meet with a refusal, the same way 99% of forum members won’t see a WG who conceals her feedback.

3/ You'll incur reputational damage as non BB WGs will not automatically believe that you wore a condom with a BB WG. After all why would you be punting with BBers?

How exactly would anyone know? It's not possible to use the booking system at the moment so no feedback can be left. Even before, many bookings weren't made via the site anyway.

[Picti]

How exactly would anyone know? It's not possible to use the booking system at the moment so no feedback can be left. Even before, many bookings weren't made via the site anyway.

They wouldn't necessarily know, although several WGs say they check feedback and exclude those who've met a BB WG. That may be genuine or it may be marketing, and not all BBers announce themselves.

I check WG feedback to identify any BB punters. I don’t pretend it's a perfect or infallible system, but I protect myself as much as I can.

[Home Alone]

Given the caveat that many, if not all, SPs bareback in their private lives, why would you want to shorten the odds of catching something by seeing some woman who, in her *professional* life also does so?

Even if you book one of those SPs but insist on wearing a condom, what if that condom breaks?

It may not happen often but,...

[Watts.E.Dunn]

Its quite intresting to see "who" in a given area offers BB anyway! In Cambridge my backyard, did a seach for BB'ers the results that came back were a few girls were on Cam only! a couple never seemed avaiable and a further few wanted £350 and hour and around the only one or two who did well, i think my boner would be gone if i saw one in the flesh and yes!, one that HP, who seems to find them anyway"!, would delight in at 63 years old so she said!

I suspect that most all girls even the good ones are barebacking someone somewhere, the Rom's their pimps some their boyfriend, partner, husband some that special custmomer or regular...

Just assume that ALL girls are BB'ers despite what they say, and rubber up ALL and everytime....

[NelsonH]

Over the years I've had quite a few long term "regulars". 

Nearly all of them wound up offering BB after a while.  Never asked any of them to do it.

British MILFs, 40-60, been on the game for years.

[Punterperson1971]

Been seeing a regular now for 2 years wouldn’t even dream of doing BB with her no way everything is always protected and it’s never been suggested,though she has offered  me protected anal before and we’ve had anal play too.
I have made the mistake before though with 2 escorts(both reviewed)where they advertised it at some point but never noticed myself.

[Kelgon85]

When I started punting, I set myself one main rule: never to see a girl who offers BB, even with protection. Personally, I wouldn't do it.

[LLPunting]

They wouldn't necessarily know, although several WGs say they check feedback and exclude those who've met a BB WG. That may be genuine or it may be marketing, and not all BBers announce themselves.

I check WG feedback to identify any BB punters. I don’t pretend it's a perfect or infallible system, but I protect myself as much as I can.

Relying on SP AW filings is pointless since profiles are traded on and SPs "reset" themselves by starting new ones.
Thinking AW is some kind of gospel accounting is genuinely foolish unless the punter openly admits in his filed reviews or comments that he barebacked an SP recently. 

[signy]

I do sympathise with the OP. It is very frustrating when reading an escort's profile and she ticks all my boxes, including no BB or unPP in the "likes", only to find something tucked away in the extras or FAQ that says (eg) BB £XX extra. So close, and then a massive fail.

We can only do as much research as practicable, but there is always going to be some risk involved. It is up to the individual to minimise this, which most on here do by avoiding the explicit BB escorts, whilst recognising that they are probably BBing with someone outside the work environment. Don't make it riskier than necessary.

[Spencer Fobby]

Whether a girl states she does BB or not is no guarantee she doesn't BB.  You can't calculate this kind of risk because you don't have information on her activities, regardless of what she may state on her profile. 

[smiths]

Hi guys, sorry if this is a stupid question. I did search but the results didn't come up with much. There's a load of decent looking WG's in my city I'm looking at but they offer BB. I should be safe so long as I use a condom, right? I've seen in a lot of comments/reviews that a lot of people here flat out avoid BB escorts even with protection being an option. Is there some risk even going protected?

Simple for me, I avoid WGs I know advertise they offer BB to punters, I wouldn't find it fun to do RO on them, or fuck them with a condom. All about reducing my risks as much as I can, I KNOW a WG who advertises she offers BB is a skank so why on earth would I want to punt with her. I also view such WGs as brain dead morons taking stupid risks, and maybe some already have something and want to pass it on. Whatever the actual risk is its to high for my liking.

Now ANY WG may be offering BB to her partner or pimp, or to some of her punters on the sly, the difference is I don't know that as fact as she doesn't advertise it so avoiding such a WG isn't as easy.

I see WGs who offer BB to punters as filthy skanks and wouldn't do business with them which to me just encourages them, the fact I wouldn't be doing BB with them doesn't change the fact they would be getting my cash. But it would mean they were aware them offering BB didn't put me off booking them.

[Daiawn]

Hi guys, sorry if this is a stupid question. I did search but the results didn't come up with much. There's a load of decent looking WG's in my city I'm looking at but they offer BB. I should be safe so long as I use a condom, right? I've seen in a lot of comments/reviews that a lot of people here flat out avoid BB escorts even with protection being an option. Is there some risk even going protected?

I suppose you can rationalize it to yourself that you are being careful but for me its an extra risk I would not be prepared to take.

[mrfishyfoo]

Whether a girl states she does BB or not is no guarantee she doesn't BB.  You can't calculate this kind of risk because you don't have information on her activities, regardless of what she may state on her profile.

^^^ this. 

[Picti]

Relying on SP AW filings is pointless since profiles are traded on and SPs "reset" themselves by starting new ones.
Thinking AW is some kind of gospel accounting is genuinely foolish unless the punter openly admits in his filed reviews or comments that he barebacked an SP recently. 

That's not what I said.

As I said, it's not perfect. But it's one strand in the overall process of avoiding serial BBers, (and that means looking beyond AW). In my local area I've found it relatively easy to cross-reference several BB punters who also meet supposedly non-BB WGs. I'll play the percentages and avoid those, but again no system is perfect and there will be number of undeclared BBers on here too.

By diligence you remove as much risk as possible, simultaneously maintain optimal safety procedures, and you accept that neither is absolute. Otherwise stop punting!

[myothernameis]

Hi guys, sorry if this is a stupid question. I did search but the results didn't come up with much. There's a load of decent looking WG's in my city I'm looking at but they offer BB. I should be safe so long as I use a condom, right? I've seen in a lot of comments/reviews that a lot of people here flat out avoid BB escorts even with protection being an option. Is there some risk even going protected?

On the AW profile, you also need to check if Unprotected Sex is ticked, and some escorts, will tick bare back in reference to oral with out

[Home Alone]

Over the years I've had quite a few long term "regulars". 

Nearly all of them wound up offering BB after a while.  Never asked any of them to do it.

British MILFs, 40-60, been on the game for years.

Interesting, that; I, too, have had a number of Regular British MILFs over the years and only one has ever offered me BB - back in my mega-fluffy days in about 2009 - when she told me that it was our last appointment because she was retiring from The Industry. I guess that I was kind-of flattered.

It was only when I was on my train back north that I thought about the enormity of what had happened. I was on the phone to the Clinic as soon as they opened the next morning for the earliest appointment they could offer.

Fortunately, I hadn't caught anything and it was a salutary lesson. Not that I've ever been offered BB again; but the limited amount of sleep I got the night after that last appointment with my Midlands MILF ensured that I'd decline if I were ever offered BB again.

[Home Alone]

Over the years I've had quite a few long term "regulars". 

Nearly all of them wound up offering BB after a while.  Never asked any of them to do it.

British MILFs, 40-60, been on the game for years.

That's interesting. "British MILFs, aged 40+" have been my Specialist Subject for most of my time as a punter and I've only once been offered BB.

It was back in about 2009 - my mega-fluffy period - by a MILF, who'd become a kind-of friend and who 'sold' it to me on the grounds that it was our last meet, as her family circumstances meant she was having to retire from The Industry. As I say, I was mega-fluffy at that time and I guess I was kind-of flattered.

It was only when I switched my sensible head on during my train journey home that the enormity of what we'd done dawned properly dawned on me.    First thing the next morning, I was on the phone to the Clinic for the earliest appointment they could offer.

Fortunately, I hadn't caught anything, but it's been a salutary lesson ever since.

[OakTree]

As far as I'm concerned this is just bullshit.

There's a load of decent looking WG's in my city I'm looking at but they offer BB. I should be safe so long as I use a condom, right?

Where does he live, Bare back city?

Regardless of what some regulars might let you do or profiles that are nudge nudge wink wink, the vast majority of profiles are not openly offering BB in what ever city you search. If he's implying that most decent girls he looks for are offering BB I'd assume that must be what he's searching for. Besides the vast majority of profiles that offer BB are very rarely "decent looking WGS"

I don't believe his naivety either. In this day and age he must of been living in a cave to not really know the risks of fucking a woman who's profession is to fuck all day, nearly every day tom, dick, abdul and harry and not wear protection.

Who in their right mind would consider this?

[IAMBATMAN]

Its quite intresting to see "who" in a given area offers BB anyway! In Cambridge my backyard, did a seach for BB'ers the results that came back were a few girls were on Cam only! a couple never seemed avaiable and a further few wanted £350 and hour and around the only one or two who did well, i think my boner would be gone if i saw one in the flesh and yes!, one that HP, who seems to find them anyway"!, would delight in at 63 years old so she said!

I suspect that most all girls even the good ones are barebacking someone somewhere, the Rom's their pimps some their boyfriend, partner, husband some that special custmomer or regular...

Just assume that ALL girls are BB'ers despite what they say, and rubber up ALL and everytime....

it may be true that SP's bareback partners but fucking a partner BB is a lot different than BBing punters who BB SP's who also BB other punters. They are incomparable especially if that girls partner doesn't fuck around with other women as I suspect that not alot of SP's tell partners what they do.

[Acerimmer]

Every single punt is a risk, whether they do BB or not. But any sex with a girl who openly advertises BB is a risk too far.

[GingerNuts]

Every single punt is a risk, whether they do BB or not. But any sex with a girl who openly advertises BB is a risk too far.

Reviewing is low risk. You could have given it a go during the last five years.

[PepeMAGA]

If a group of girls in your area are all offering BB, it might be that they are not actually offering or, just ticked all the boxes or the pimp has control of the page.

Diseases etc aside, I guess you need to think about why she is offering bb in the first place, eg doesn't care because she is already infected with something , doesn't care because she is on drugs, doesn't care because she's dumb etc etc

[BillyBlueHat]

Over the years I've had quite a few long term "regulars". 

Nearly all of them wound up offering BB after a while.  Never asked any of them to do it.

British MILFs, 40-60, been on the game for years.

So then did you take up the offer of BB with them, as you seem to be on the level with them by being a regular?

[cambsguy]

It would not bother me - I tend to avoid OWO as a) not that fussed about it and b) lots of things can be passed through OWO and would be awkward at home if anything came back with me!

I do find it slightly hypocritical that some guys are shocked at BB but then happily engage in OWO. Ok, HIV is something that you can get from sex and not with OWO, but lots of other nasty things can be picked up with OWO.

Never had a condom burst on me in 20 odd years of punting (a lot more back then, than now) so would say that a covered fuck with a BB girl is pretty much as low risk as you can get.

[daviemac]

It would not bother me - I tend to avoid OWO as a) not that fussed about it and b) lots of things can be passed through OWO and would be awkward at home if anything came back with me!

I do find it slightly hypocritical that some guys are shocked at BB but then happily engage in OWO. Ok, HIV is something that you can get from sex and not with OWO, but lots of other nasty things can be picked up with OWO.

Never had a condom burst on me in 20 odd years of punting (a lot more back then, than now) so would say that a covered fuck with a BB girl is pretty much as low risk as you can get.

I think you really need to brush up on what STIs can be spread by different sexual activities. HIV can be transmitted orally, granted the risk is far lower than with penetrative sex, but the risk is still there. It's the same with OWO compared to unprotected penetration, the risk from oral is far lower. which is why it is readily acceptable to SPs and punters.

I have to admit I'm passed being surprised at how little knowledge people who partake in this hobby have, or at what they believe to be fact that is incorrect for that matter.   

External Link/Members Only

[Lou2019]

I think you need to put that link somewhere for others to access. The naivety of some is concerning, or is it a case of ignorance is bliss 

Actually ignore that comment Daviemac people really need to be responsible for their own actions!

[Kev40ish]

I think you need to put that link somewhere for others to access. The naivety of some is concerning, or is it a case of ignorance is bliss 

Actually ignore that comment Daviemac people really need to be responsible for their own actions!

Nothing amazes me anymore..,

It’s best to assume everyone is BBing someone and look after your own safety.. that’s always the sensible option

[daviemac]

I think you need to put that link somewhere for others to access. The naivety of some is concerning, or is it a case of ignorance is bliss 

Actually ignore that comment Daviemac people really need to be responsible for their own actions!

It really isn't difficult to find the relevant information regarding health or legal implications of any hobby, let alone the potential minefield that is punting. The link above tells me all I need to know about sexual health, my doctor tells me all I need to know about ED meds and this ↓ tells me all I need to know about the legalities of punting.

     External Link/Members Only

[paper7]

I think you need to put that link somewhere for others to access. The naivety of some is concerning, or is it a case of ignorance is bliss 

Actually ignore that comment Daviemac people really need to be responsible for their own actions!

The phrase, "Park here at your own risk" comes nicely to mind!

[kirpNew]

Park here at your own risk

[munterhunter]

Hi guys, sorry if this is a stupid question. I did search but the results didn't come up with much. There's a load of decent looking WG's in my city I'm looking at but they offer BB. I should be safe so long as I use a condom, right? I've seen in a lot of comments/reviews that a lot of people here flat out avoid BB escorts even with protection being an option. Is there some risk even going protected?

There is ALWAYS risk involved having sex with a WG or even casual sex with someone you don't know intimately and trust.Using protection goes some way to limiting but not eliminating the risks involved.
What you need to decide is what level of risk is acceptable to you.
Let's be realistic, punting is a selfish hobby. When we choose to punt we put our needs above everything else so it's a bit optimistic to expect others to consider our sexual health and rubber up when punting in case others get infected.
There is enough information about sti infections, which working girls bb all cummers, who does bb gangbangs, who
does bb with individual punters and girls listed in the "girls who do bareback" threads on here listing girls who have ever offered bb.
Decide on the level of risk you are willing to take.
Research the girl you are going to punt with.
Take the necessary precautions to ptotect yourself when you punt.

[filthy.john]

There are also loads of decent girls out there who refuse to do BB. Surely they are the ones you should be looking at. That way we are all kept safer.

who publicly SAY they refuse to do BB

What they say on their profiles, over the phone, in replies to AW messages and emails is one thing, what they do in practice is quite another.

In my opinion you're better off taking the realistic view that they're all barebacking - because, of course, they almost certainly are! Whether it's a long-term partner, a regular fuck-buddy, random blokes they meet on a drunken night out, select punters, punters who make offers that are too good to turn down - the sooner we all take a step back from the pretence and accept the reality then the better.

Assume they're all at it and then decide whether you're comfortable with that and if not - just stick to Pornhub and a Fleshlight. For most of us, rubbering-up to make it as safe as we can whilst accepting there's an inevitable risk in any event is likely to be the best alternative.

[king tarzan]

I would never munch into a mouldy mango 

[lovemachine]

But how do you know it was not a cream pie not too recently.

[king tarzan]

But how do you know it was not a cream pie not too recently.

I examine before entry.... Anyways the Russians are so wary and rightly over cautious that I see it as a green light to dive in without any inhibitions and enjoy enjoy enjoy 👅👅👅👅👅👅👅👅👅👅😋😋😋😋😋😋😋😋😋😋😋😋👅👅👅👅👅👅😋😋😋😋😋

[Rochelle]

I examine before entry.... Anyways the Russians are so wary and rightly over cautious that I see it as a green light to dive in without any inhibitions and enjoy enjoy enjoy 👅👅👅👅👅👅👅👅👅👅😋😋😋😋😋😋😋😋😋😋😋😋👅👅👅👅👅👅😋😋😋😋😋

Sure, just look at it and you'll know if she just slept with someone without a condom.
How ridiculous.

[king tarzan]

Sure, just look at it and you'll know if she just slept with someone without a condom.
How ridiculous.

Nope.. I disagree... I have sixty senses...I'm still alive today STD free after 20+ years..
Must be doing something right 

[king tarzan]

Sure, just look at it and you'll know if she just slept with someone without a condom.
How ridiculous.

Of course I look goes without saying
I have radar eyes which are honing in

[Rochelle]

Nope.. I disagree... I have sixty senses...I'm still alive today STD free after 20+ years..
Must be doing something right 

Why do I even bother? You're stupid so there's no point.

[king tarzan]

Why do I even bother? You're stupid so there's no point.

Yes obviously a man that doesn't do BB and many other things I must be stupid.. gee thanks

[Doc Holliday]

Why do I even bother?

No idea. I gave up some time ago. 

That said there are now dogs who can sniff out many diseases, including some promising early results with Covid 19.

Perhaps KT takes an STI trained sniffer dog with him to his punts? 

[winkywanky]

No idea. I gave up some time ago. 

That said there are now dogs who can sniff out many diseases, including some promising early results with Covid 19.

Perhaps KT takes an STI trained sniffer dog with him to his punts?

I hope it's on a short leash, a dog is liable to just jump straight in and start eating

[king tarzan]

I hope it's on a short leash, a dog is liable to just jump straight in and start eating

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂