This is particularly true. If the girl's unable to make the sale from the initial interaction then she's failing in her seduction/marketing. Shitty, dismissive and/or perfunctory comms that doesn't always answer the simple questions asked does nothing to encourage a punter's sense of how the actual meet will go.
That is nonsense there are men who make a hobby out of contacting us for their amusement or to gain wank fodder. Timewasters are a thing nothing to do with out seduction/marketing.
Oh dear, you’re going to think I’m picking on you again Lou but I’m not. You have a point to be made but not as a reply to LLPunting who also has a point.
1. I imagine there are ‘wank fodder’ creatures you are plagued with as well as, potentially, abolitionists who want to make your life hell and sickos just ‘having a laugh’. They could even be police.
1a. Part of your job is clearly weeding out the shitrags as much as possible. Do you need tips on the screening process? Stay calm. Treat everyone the same. When you detect a shitrag simply say that you don’t think you would be suited. It’s a bit like a designer store refusing entrance to an ill-dressed character. Don’t lower yourself to their level, just concentrate on improving your screening skills, no matter how good they are already. As an incentive, remember the shitrag, if you pissed it off, might go away and write something nasty: so always act like ‘royalty’.
2.
Once you’ve done that then you have to switch on your marketing technique for the potentials that are left. Again, like a good store operator. Some designer stores have bouncers, others only unlock the door by remote when a client judged as a potential is standing there. Once you have decided to ‘let them in’ you can’t allow irritation from previous shitrags to cloud the welcome.
So you see LLPunting has a point, and so do you, and they are
not in conflict.
As a rule of thumb, unless you
want to pick arguments with people, try to see the good in what they post before leaping in with an attack or giving your reservations about what was written.