Christmas competition

[DH]

Have you guys seen Cindy's Christmas competition yet?

"Only new clients can apply" i wonder what that means exactly. new as in never met Cindy before or the recent ones who met her once or twice?

That is a very interesting idea but we had something similar going on here on the forum and as far as i can remember it blew up  hopefully this wont be the case.

[JV547845]

Awesome!  I've seen her before and probably can't get to London for the date but I'll enter anyway.

[StevenS]

Having seen her, I suspect the competition for new members is a contest to see who can see her fit the first time in the run up to Xmas and can resist booking again in January..

[password02]

She did the same competition last year and the lucky SOB had a free 1+ hour with her just before Christmas. I think its for newbie clients that perhaps have not seen her or maybe seen once or twice, I assume she has up to 90% regulars looking at her feed back.

Not bad for an early Christmas present and its FREE

[DH]

She did the same competition last year and the lucky SOB had a free 1+ hour with her just before Christmas.

Oh ok i thought it's something new. I wonder what's the criteria on how she chooses the lucky SOD!!

[Steve2]

Oh ok i thought it's something new. I wonder what's the criteria on how she chooses the lucky SOD!!

Have a look at her profile, read the criteria ( In the tab "CHRISTMAS COMPETITION" )and enter

Looks like you failed miserably at the 1st hurdle

 

[Stealthshagger]

I wonder if West8 will enter? would need to be a fucking good mini essay for him to have a chance to see her free. That was not a suggestion, by the way.

[DH]

Have a look at her profile, read the criteria ( In the tab "CHRISTMAS COMPETITION" )and enter

Looks like you failed miserably at the 1st hurdle

 

Hello?? I started this thread you think i didn't read the whole thing?? I know the TERMS&CONDITIONS but that's not what i meant.

[Stealthshagger]

Hello?? I started this thread you think i didn't read the whole thing?? I know the TERMS&CONDITIONS but that's not what i meant.

I would assume she looks for someone nice (not mental or rough or disrespectful, etc), not too much effort, respectful and likely to be a regular and not looking for future discounts.

[Steve2]

Hello?? I started this thread you think i didn't read the whole thing?? I know the TERMS&CONDITIONS but that's not what i meant.

You come across as stupid

What did you meant?

[Stealthshagger]

I think he is asking what she is looking for when selecting the winning entry, so to speak.

[squeezebox]

"Only new clients can apply" i wonder what that means exactly. new as in never met Cindy before or the recent ones who met her once or twice?

I interpret that to be brand new clients who she hasn't seen before. A good gimmick as it's a win win for her any party involved.

I'll be entering for fun with no particular expectations.

[west8]

I just entered - AND I sent a picture.

Reckon I'm gonna win? 

[DH]

You come across as stupid

What did you meant?

What's with the attitude Steve?  Chill out. Not sure who the stupid one is but it seems everyone else got what i meant except you. I forgot why i stopped posting a long time ago, there has to be someone like you at every corner in this place.
All i wanted is to see everyone else opinion on this.

[password02]

I interpret that to be brand new clients who she hasn't seen before. A good gimmick as it's a win win for her any party involved.

I'll be entering for fun with no particular expectations.

No regulars allowed to enter as per her terms - So I assume either punters that have not seen her or perhaps seen only once?
You also need to have feed back on AW.

[DH]

No regulars allowed to enter as per her terms - So I assume either punters that have not seen her or perhaps seen only once?
You also need to have feed back on AW.

Yes that's what i thought also. I've only seen her once recently best to ask her directly for clarification.

[password02]

Yes that's what i thought also. I've only seen her once recently best to ask her directly for clarification.

I would give it a go - I would say a regular would be someone who has seen her several times - at least 4/5 session. Doing 1 or 2 visits IMO would not count as a regular

[Dani]

They never do I found that out a few years ago when I did the same sort of thing as no matter how hard you try to not to be biased you will.  Its common sense that if 100 guys she has never seen write in and one she has seen a lot fo and likes a lot and a few she has seen but didn't like that much then it is obvious the winner will be the one she really likes.

His email will be favourable as he already knows her so will know what she does and doesn't like so even without being biased he will have an advantage plus she will read his email with a smile as she already likes him so again it will make that email stand out

The fairest way is to say she will put all names into a hat and draw one out with a witness who will verify that is what she did otherwise many will think it just a big publicity stunt that they knew a favourite would win.  Some will also moan and feel hard done by and start bad mouthing the girl as well

Its a great idea in principle but it never works out properly not since AW stopped doing them as they used to pick a name for us so we couldn't cheat.  When you could do it through the AW system it worked out really well as AW would notify the winner and they had one month to take the booking and if the girl didn't uphold it they would remove her from that option so it couldn't be used again.  Pity they got rid of it really as it did work well, same as the £1 auctions until too many girls abused it so they got rid of it

[Goofy85]

I've seen her twice, but find it very unlikely that I'd be eligible. That said, I have too much pride to beg to shag an escort for free via what is essentially a love letter. It's also obviously clearly a publicity stunt (not saying someone won't win) to rope in more potential clients. I don't see how it can be anything else.