Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: What does TOFTT mean?  (Read 1701 times)

Offline WinterNight

Sorry, couldn't find any info on the forum about it. The closest I could think of was The Escort Of The Day on AW?

Thanks

Offline isreally


Offline Count Duckula

take one for the team

go boldly go where no one has gone before

to be the first to visit a new or unreviewed sp

Offline RandomGuy99

External Link/Members Only

"TOFTT : Take One For The Team - A punter takes the financial sacrifice to see a new or unknown escort for the purpose of reporting on her. Clearly, he does this for himself, but says it is for others"
« Last Edit: November 03, 2023, 12:02:50 am by RandomGuy99 »

Online daviemac

  • Board Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 25,271
  • Likes: 382
  • Reviews: 24
Sorry, couldn't find any info on the forum about it. The closest I could think of was The Escort Of The Day on AW?

Thanks
External Link/Members Only

External Link/Members Only

Online Dylanbob

He who TOFTT is a noble gentleman

Offline WinterNight

Thank you all, that makes sense. Not sure how I couldn't see the full list in the glossary  :(
« Last Edit: November 03, 2023, 12:55:59 am by WinterNight »

Online mr.bluesky

Thank you all, that makes sense. Not sure how I couldn't see the full list in the glossary  :(

Perhaps after being a member here for over 2 years you will TOFTT and post your 1st review   :unknown:

Online daviemac

  • Board Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 25,271
  • Likes: 382
  • Reviews: 24
Perhaps after being a member here for over 2 years you will TOFTT and post your 1st review   :unknown:
What has another member's contributions got to do with you? or have I missed you being made a mod?   :unknown:

Have you not seen rule #32 Wannabe Mods and/or not heeding mods/admins warnings will result in a ban.

Member pulling others up about their contributions is something we are clamping down on. It's been made very clear numerous times if you have an issue with any other members then report it and the mods will look into it.

Offline Fuzzyduck

take one for the team

go boldly go where no one has gone before

to be the first to visit a new or unreviewed sp, and left a review

Who cares who saw her first? The first to leave a review gets to say TOFTT.

Offline petermisc

Surely, you are TOFT if at the time you visit an SP, she is unreviewed?  Basically, you are going in blind.  Just because someone else then posts a review before you do, doesn't change that.  Particularly if that someone else has waited umpteen months before posting their review.



Offline Andywb

Surely, you are TOFT if at the time you visit an SP, she is unreviewed?  Basically, you are going in blind.  Just because someone else then posts a review before you do, doesn't change that.  Particularly if that someone else has waited umpteen months before posting their review.

It's two parts. A) taking one, B) for the team

If you don't post a review it's not for the Team, but I take your point you need to be first posting the review

Offline houseboot

Surely, you are TOFT if at the time you visit an SP, she is unreviewed?  Basically, you are going in blind.  Just because someone else then posts a review before you do, doesn't change that.  Particularly if that someone else has waited umpteen months before posting their review.

You can't claim you are "taking one for the team" if you don't share the information.

The whole point is that you let "the team" know whether, albeit in your opinion, the previously un-Reviewed SP is good, bad or indifferent.

Offline Fuzzyduck

Surely, you are TOFT if at the time you visit an SP, she is unreviewed?  Basically, you are going in blind.  Just because someone else then posts a review before you do, doesn't change that.  Particularly if that someone else has waited umpteen months before posting their review.

Not a team player, huh?

Offline petermisc

Not a team player, huh?
I would say it is the person who waits umpteen months before posting their review that isn't the team player.

I do get a bit annoyed by the tail-end Charlie's, who after someone has posted a review, chime in with "oh yes, I saw her umpteen months before you did and had pretty much the same experience.  Will review when I get time".  Particularly when they never actually do.


Offline Fuzzyduck

I would say it is the person who waits umpteen months before posting their review that isn't the team player.

I do get a bit annoyed by the tail-end Charlie's, who after someone has posted a review, chime in with "oh yes, I saw her umpteen months before you did and had pretty much the same experience.  Will review when I get time".  Particularly when they never actually do.

Wholeheartedly agree. The worst is when someone reports on a shitshow with an unreviewed SP, and the Charlie chips in with "saw her X months ago and she was terrible then".

Offline Blackpool Rock

Wholeheartedly agree. The worst is when someone reports on a shitshow with an unreviewed SP, and the Charlie chips in with "saw her X months ago and she was terrible then".
Yeah i've had a few of them, Wankers  :diablo: