I would be delighted if you would be so kind as to observe the following:
Hidden Image/Members Only
This being the avatar of the person in question. Perhaps you would be so kind as to read things properly before you start making judgements. Who are you anyway? 
Hello
I am a person who has an opinion and wishes to comment on another person's posts on an open forum I might not always agree with other peoples opinions but I have the right to make comments as long as I follow the forums rules as I respect the rights of others to have and share their own opinions as long as they follow the aforementioned rules as well.
I enjoy an open debate on a number of subjects relating to the ethos of that forum. I understand that is the premiss of forums.
I am not concerned about spelling mistakes or the grammatical structure on a persons post, I find it irreverent as posting on a forum is fast paced and mistakes can happen.
My opinion regarding pregnant women who are offering BB sex has already been posted on this thread. Feel free to view.
I believe and of course I may be wrong. You intended to insult another member by indirectly refering to some wording in their avatar. I feel you would have known the name of that poster finn555 as it is clearly shown. Below is you post and I have ensured this time that it is not misquoted.
No you fucking retarded (is that your name or your title?) I mean apologize. 
As you can see you used the phrase "No you fucking retarded (is that your name or your title?)" I choose to believe that you knew that was not finn555 name or title but you wished to insult finn555 because he questioned you spelling of the word apologize/apologise. Even if this insult/abuse was not direct I believe that was your intent.
As I said before I am not concerned about spelling and feel it was unnecessary for him to correct you, but in an open forum he has the right to do so.
I assure you I did read things properly but concluded that was your intent.
I am not an expert on the graphical additions one can post on here so I accept this may be totally wrong but I see next to your post you use the "Bomb" one. Now again I am assuming that a bomb about to explode is a representation of an emotional state based around anger/frustration and aggression. I am happy to be corrected on this matter.
Thus I felt your response was one of abuse based on anger in response to another members post. I chose to post my opinion on the forum regarding this and suggested a way of phrasing your response in a manner which would result in your getting your point across without resorting to what could be seen as an over reaction and without demanding an apology from another member.
Now I fully support your right to post and of course you are under no obligation to take any advice of me at all. Now if your intention was to insult/abuse finn555 you could apologise for that or you choose not to apologies that is up to you I doubt that your insult/abuse is sufficient serious to be challenged by the mod/admin but as I said earlier that is not my call.
If however your intention was not to insult/abuse finn555 which you hinted at, then may I suggest your clarify the position and say what you did mean with your above statement. You may wish to include an apology that's up to you.
Moving forward I see the following options available.
1) You may attempt to insult me for this response to your question. I may respond or I may not depending on the contents of your post.
2) We can agree to disagree and have no further debate on this subject but can debate on any other subjects that may come up relating to this thread or others.
3) You can not respond to this post and avoid any further debate with me in the future.
I personally would like option 2 as I enjoy the debate, I expect you to take option 1 if you are still feeling angry or option 3 if you are feeling calm. Option 3 would be a real shame as I do enjoy debate.
As you said "Who are you anyway?
"
Well that is who I am.
