AdultWork Hardsports

[maxxblue]

I screen out WG's who offer hardsports, but notice that AW have taken hardsports from the 'likes/dislikes' list.

What's going on here?

[Londonpunter30]

No idea but if they are going to update the likes list I wish they would either remove bareback so you only had unprotected sex or put "bareback (unprotected sex)". There would be no confusion then

[Randy Mcknob]

That's a bit shit.

[CatBBW]

Probably due to the new porn laws that will be enforced from April.

[NIK]

I screen out WG's who offer hardsports, but notice that AW have taken hardsports from the 'likes/dislikes' list.

What's going on here?

Many of them who offer it whether giving or receiving don’t actually. Same with bb.
Some don’t even know what it is. I once tested this by calling a London agency where every other girl offered hs. When I enquirered Sergei replied, ‘please sir, what is ‘hardsport?’
 
Similarly when I asked a local girl on the phone about water sports she advertised she thought it was sharing a bath! 

[Goldfinch]

Similarly when I asked a local girl on the phone about water sports she advertised she thought it was sharing a bath! 

 💦💦 💦💦

[vw]

I screen out WG's who offer hardsports, but notice that AW have taken hardsports from the 'likes/dislikes' list.

What's going on here?

Takes taboo and adult baby minding off in the recent past too

Suspect is is to do with what is allowed to be broadcast on cam in this  as not to offend the censorship department of the government.

[Lizzie_Lockhart]

I agree with those who mentioned the upcoming change to laws regarding online porn.

I had a "dislikes" list which included BB, hardsports, age play and incest role play and got a note from AW stating that these words are not allowed even in the context of saying they're not on offer.

They've also added the following info to the part of the profile editor where you select your likes

xx

Hidden Image/Members Only

[JonasG]

Good.

It's bloody disgusting.

[Trapperjohn]

Similarly when I asked a local girl on the phone about water sports she advertised she thought it was sharing a bath! 

That's quite sweet really  Reminded me of Harry Carpenter's famous comment:  ''Ah, isn't that nice, the wife of the Cambridge president is kissing the cox of the Oxford crew'' - After the University Boat Race 1977. Best read aloud! 

[Lacumba01]

Noticed it as well on AW. well, we will have to go to twitter to find the mistresses then

[Londonpunter30]

Used to be a good way of filtering out the girls who tick every service going

[vw]

Good.

It's bloody disgusting.

taking it off a list wont stop it happening

[wilbers]

Similarly when I asked a local girl on the phone about water sports she advertised she thought it was sharing a bath! 

Bless her!  I've never done (or particularly wanted to try) watersports, but sharing a bath is nice.

[hustling01]

id like to try hardsports tho

[Davey Dykes]

Then take a shit in a bag then drop it over yourself.

[jimtaranis]

Oh dear. Pathetic, judgy whining about fetishes you're not into is really going to get a forum everywhere. The point this post raises about changes to porn laws and making life difficult for sex workers and punters alike is a valid one.  The net result of removing these even from a dislikes list is that people after the service will most likely ring up and ask so they can rule it out, leading to a waste of time for everyone. All to satisy this nanny state notion that we should only be allowed to participate in vanilla sex no matter who we choose as a partner.  It's fucking stupid.

[Tallchris]

It always interests me when they say allow 24 hours notice for hardsports.  I wouldn't be able to keep turtles head for that long.

[G.Raff]

That's rather surprising, I didn't think AW took much notice of UK laws.

[Spencer Fobby]

Funny how we judge one another so quickly... personally I prefer anal. And have no issue if there’s a bit of ‘evidence’ on my dick after. On one (rather messy) occasion I had the girl suck me clean and than was a lot of fun. Shit happens - so if a girl wants to advertise she’s happy with that then that’s up to her. I hate all this nanny state bullshit telling me what I can or can’t enjoy (consensually). AW getting censorious about bodily functions seems a bit hypocritical to me.

[CatBBW]

AW getting censorious about bodily functions seems a bit hypocritical to me.

It's not AW's fault. It's the new laws that AW are being forced to comply with (and not just UK ones, they've updated across the world) otherwise they will be blocked from being viewed. AW has removed Adult Baby Minding, Lactation, Period Play, Hardsports, they've updated the guidlines as to what "acceptable" BDSM is as well as giving clear definitions as to what's allowed, all people accessing the site will need to be age verified, and all pics that are available to see for free SHOULD be non-nude (they're taking their time cleaning up the site in this respect, but it's coming, slowly).

AW was pretty much the only site you could offer period and poo services, but now they've had no choice but to toe the line.


(I work other sites (camming and clips) and they're all scrabbling to get their rules tightened up. One of them has just banned dolls.)

[finn5555]

Funny how we judge one another so quickly... personally I prefer anal. And have no issue if there’s a bit of ‘evidence’ on my dick after. On one (rather messy) occasion I had the girl suck me clean and than was a lot of fun.

Sounds a lovely lady 

[arrow0404]

That's a bit shit.

+1

[Plan R]

I agree with those who mentioned the upcoming change to laws regarding online porn.

I had a "dislikes" list which included BB, hardsports, age play and incest role play and got a note from AW stating that these words are not allowed even in the context of saying they're not on offer.

They've also added the following info to the part of the profile editor where you select your likes

xx

Hidden Image/Members Only

I wonder if SPs will be able to use the terms 'gagging' or 'throat fucking' in their profiles anymore then..?

Either term could conceivably imply the act of forcing cock down a throat deeper than the SP intends..
and the 'Role Play & Fantasy'  section of the new AW guidelines page you link too, says that suggesting any thing 'against the will' (even as 'Role Play') is verboten !

So it will soon be verboten to even state you are happy to pretend to do something against your will ??   

[Plan R]

Come to think of it, it is the nature of the internet to always route around restrictions (physical rerouting, and overcoming imposed rules).

So, for instance  (((deep sucking))) could be stated, the parentheses used to indicate something rougher - while not violating the above restrictions
 

[banquet1]

Funny how we judge one another so quickly... personally I prefer anal. And have no issue if there’s a bit of ‘evidence’ on my dick after. On one (rather messy) occasion I had the girl suck me clean and than was a lot of fun. Shit happens - so if a girl wants to advertise she’s happy with that then that’s up to her. I hate all this nanny state bullshit telling me what I can or can’t enjoy (consensually). AW getting censorious about bodily functions seems a bit hypocritical to me.

Was that a WG? If so, what was her name? Erm... asking for a friend...

[Lizzie_Lockhart]

I wonder if SPs will be able to use the terms 'gagging' or 'throat fucking' in their profiles anymore then..?

Either term could conceivably imply the act of forcing cock down a throat deeper than the SP intends..
and the 'Role Play & Fantasy'  section of the new AW guidelines page you link too, says that suggesting any thing 'against the will' (even as 'Role Play') is verboten !

So it will soon be verboten to even state you are happy to pretend to do something against your will ??   

So far most of my BDSM related services haven't been censored, though who knows how it will be after April... Maybe we'll all be working under the US guise of time for companionship only and we'll have to pretend we're having tea and scones?

You're right about the role play though, non-con play was taken off my couples profile though strangely they left the field report up describing it 

xx

[Plan R]

who knows how it will be after April... Maybe we'll all be working under the US guise of time for companionship only and we'll have to pretend we're having tea and scones?

At 120GBP an hour I'd not be happy if tea and scones were the only things on the menu  !

Hidden Image/Members Only