Asked not to post review on UKP

[Bornslippy325]

At a recent punt UKP came up in conversation and the WG specifically asked that I don’t put a review on the forum. She said she finds it an invasion of her privacy, and also punters typically think if she’s done something with one she’ll do it with everyone.

Now some things to point out:

1 punt was great, definitely would have been a positive
2 she is well reviewed on here and overwhelmingly positive reviews
3 not sure my review would have added anything not mentioned in previous reviews.

So I agreed.

I guess I want to check if anyone else has has come across this type of thing? I can understand not wanting bad reviews, but this seemed strange to me.

[Briddy]

If you don't want to post your review that's your choice, but the whole point is to share and as has been said many times although she may have numerous positives already your review will show that she still provides a good service.

[southcoastpunter]

op - suggest you also see a very similar thread on the national/general board

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=336829.0

[Steely Dan]

1) Of course you should agree with her request.  No point in upsetting a good escort.  Say 'not really heard of that site much, so no interest in it' or similar.
2) Then post the review after a few weeks with enough details changed so she wont know it was you.

All reviews add value.  We all need to give back.  We certainly can't stop reviewing because escorts tell us.

The one thing I can agree is not mentioning extra services.  If, say, she does not offer anal on her likes, and did anal with you, it could be wise to not mention that.  If for no other reason than maybe this would identify you.

Oh and clearly if the next time you meet, she asks you if you reviewed her, here are three things to do: deny, deny, deny.

[Atrueyorkie]

Did she just randomly mention the site or was it you who brought it up? Nobody needs to know the details to a T when you review just a summary. Just make sure you never gave any real details or number and you’re good.

I’ve said so many fake names it’s hard to keep track 

[FiveKnuckles]

perhaps she sold you short and felt you didn't have a good time?  don't let the SP influence your decision to review.

never had UKP mentioned and would deny knowledge. 

personally I wouldn't have asked the question if it were already decided not to review.  gloating like you've found some top notch pussy 

[Liverpool]

The old chestnut of "not sure my review will add anything" 

Every review adds something. Decline in service, continued good service etc.

Makes me wonder how many reviews the OP has held out on us in your 4 years on the site.

[Atrueyorkie]

The old chestnut of "not sure my review will add anything" 

Every review adds something. Decline in service, continued good service etc.

Makes me wonder how many reviews the OP has held out on us in your 4 years on the site.

Wow I thought he was a new member that’s why I responded. One review per year!

[Bornslippy325]

Wow I thought he was a new member that’s why I responded. One review per year!

I rarely punt more than two or three times a year. When I do I tend to stick to who I’ve seen before, and I’m sure you don’t want multiple “fan boy” reviews for a WG from the same punter.

Unfortunately my go to (Amazing Amy) has semi retired so I’m exploring again, hence recent activity.

[Bornslippy325]

Did she just randomly mention the site or was it you who brought it up? Nobody needs to know the details to a T when you review just a summary. Just make sure you never gave any real details or number and you’re good.

I’ve said so many fake names it’s hard to keep track 

Thinking about it she brought it up….

I know for next time.

[LLPunting]

If nothing else you identify an SP manipulating punters to her benefit.  For instance it allows her to reduce service  levels and refuse services because of "temporary conditions" that are quoted to every customer; time of month etc.  How would we know if every simp simply did what he was asked to.
If she's moved to tell you not to, what's to say she isn't bribing/pressuring her fanbois to write favourable ones?

If she has issue with lies in reviews then she can engage management here for a correction or come in and calmly post her truth about what happened. It may not resolve to her liking but it's the honest thing to do and fair minded punters may chalk it to her credit, whilst the bigots may simply be put off in which case she wins anyway.

Whilst it may've been a positive encounter were there any hiccups?
Did she express any relevant prejudices?
Did she refuse before or withhold during any agreed services?
If she gave you more mileage than you paid for or she advertises then you need only reveal that she seems open to enjoying herself with a punter she clicks with and no detail is compromised.  If punters subsequently barrage you with PMs about what extras you got DO NOT tell them because the person most likely to fuck up your future prospects is one of those punters due to your indiscretion  not the SP.   If they badger you repeatedly then report them to Mods and they will be dealt with.

A review is not an obligation to tell every detail of what happened. We just need to know what she looked like at the time, whether she delivered services as advertised and what her attitude was like.  Anything more is a punter risking exposure through indiscretion for the sake of posturing, fantasising or fabricating.

[smiths]

At a recent punt UKP came up in conversation and the WG specifically asked that I don’t put a review on the forum. She said she finds it an invasion of her privacy, and also punters typically think if she’s done something with one she’ll do it with everyone.

Now some things to point out:

1 punt was great, definitely would have been a positive
2 she is well reviewed on here and overwhelmingly positive reviews
3 not sure my review would have added anything not mentioned in previous reviews.

So I agreed.

I guess I want to check if anyone else has has come across this type of thing? I can understand not wanting bad reviews, but this seemed strange to me.

Simple to me, i do a review that other punters might find helpful not for a WG. So IF she advertises clearly as a WG then i will decide whether to do a review or not, and always do a negative to warn others. What the WG thinks is irrelevant to me.

For many years i have never mentioned UKP to WGs and if any have mentioned it i have moved the conversation back to sex which i was their for. Bad luck if she finds it an invasion of her privacy, she is a WG advertising as such and review and posts on here may occur.

[Sperminator22]

It happened to me that an escort (whom I have met more than once) confidentially told me that her agency doesn't like (actually hates) UKP reviews because they bring the wrong types of clients.
That did not stop me from releasing further reviews in the future... Days later, without going too much into details

[Heph]

The old chestnut of "not sure my review will add anything" 

Every review adds something. Decline in service, continued good service etc.

Makes me wonder how many reviews the OP has held out on us in your 4 years on the site.

Are we expected to believe you've had 26 punts since 2015?

We review when it strikes us a good thing to do, and for lots of different reasons: many of which are fine judgement calls. We needn't worry about him, you or me holding back.

[Liverpool]

Are we expected to believe you've had 26 punts since 2015?

We review when it strikes us a good thing to do, and for lots of different reasons: many of which are fine judgement calls. We needn't worry about him, you or me holding back.

As I've stated before, every new person I see gets reviewed. I see regulars a lot.

[Heph]

As I've stated before, every new person I see gets reviewed. I see regulars a lot.

Good for you. That's your call, and his judgement on which of his to post, is from him to make.

It doesn't take much imagination to see that someone taking an ultra interpretation of 'every review adds something', might see a policy of only posting "every NEW person I see gets reviewed" as 'holding out'. Clearly that proposition would be most unreasonable.

[LLPunting]

It happened to me that an escort (whom I have met more than once) confidentially told me that her agency doesn't like (actually hates) UKP reviews because they bring the wrong types of clients.
That did not stop me from releasing further reviews in the future... Days later, without going too much into details

Hope this revelation was quite some time back and you've moved on from her as you've likely just outed yourself to her.  Perhaps you could've called the agency and asked them "what's UKP and what's wrong with the clients it leads to the agency?"
Missed a chance to find out something useful.

[Sperminator22]

Hope this revelation was quite some time back and you've moved on from her as you've likely just outed yourself to her.  Perhaps you could've called the agency and asked them "what's UKP and what's wrong with the clients it leads to the agency?"
Missed a chance to find out something useful.

I didn't mention neither the lady nor the agency. The revelation happened months ago, It's going to be unlikely tracking it back to me or to her.

[Hobbit]

Why are you discussing UKP with a hooker?

Rule number 1 – you do not talk about UKP.

Rule number 2 – you do not talk about UKP.

[stevedave]

Why are you discussing UKP with a hooker?

Rule number 1 – you do not talk about UKP.

Rule number 2 – you do not talk about UKP.

This 

[RedKettle]

1) Of course you should agree with her request.  No point in upsetting a good escort.  Say 'not really heard of that site much, so no interest in it' or similar.
2) Then post the review after a few weeks with enough details changed so she wont know it was you.

Yep standard operating procedure!!

[daviemac]

Why are you discussing UKP with a hooker?

Rule number 1 – you do not talk about UKP.

Rule number 2 – you do not talk about UKP.

You've missed one.

Rule number 3 - read and note rules 1 & 2

[suttonporksword]

What is it with SPs and their views of this site? The few times they seem to post is to complain about an inaccurate review, get ranty, ruin their reputation and get banned. In my job we often ask for client feedback and if it's not good we try and up our game, I guess these ladies take it personally and dont have the intelligence to respond constructively.  If I saw a girl who had a couple of negatives followed by a load of positive reviews i would definitely see them

[pbrown355]

General comment only. Most WGs are WGs because they don't have the intellect to do anything else. Apologies to the bright ones.

[contentguy]

General comment only. Most WGs are WGs because they don't have the intellect to do anything else. Apologies to the bright ones.

Agree, there’s one on here that got arsy with me when I agreed with her on a thread she was passionate about!

I think it’s called prossie logic.

[lamboman]

Apologies to the bright ones.

I've only ever come across one and I'd never have guessed beforehand.

[Steely Dan]

General comment only. Most WGs are WGs because they don't have the intellect to do anything else. Apologies to the bright ones.

Most?  Really? They can't do ANTHING else? General comment = bullshit you made up based on the small number of escorts you have met.  And I suspect (and hope) that you spent more time fucking them than checking their IQ so you have no real data even on the few that you have met.

What does this un-true and offensive comment have to do with this thread anyway?

[lamboman]

Most?  Really? They can't do ANTHING else? General comment = bullshit you made up based on the small number of escorts you have met.  And I suspect (and hope) that you spent more time fucking them than checking their IQ so you have no real data even on the few that you have met.

What does this un-true and offensive comment have to do with this thread anyway?

Well he seems to have met more than you have.

[Lou2019]

General comment only. Most WGs are WGs because they don't have the intellect to do anything else. Apologies to the bright ones.

What a dick head comment (sorry mods) you’ll be surprised how many of us have professional qualifications but have taken time out from the rat race

[Lou2019]

Most?  Really? They can't do ANTHING else? General comment = bullshit you made up based on the small number of escorts you have met.  And I suspect (and hope) that you spent more time fucking them than checking their IQ so you have no real data even on the few that you have met.

What does this un-true and offensive comment have to do with this thread anyway?

This   

[contentguy]

What a dick head comment (sorry mods) you’ll be surprised how many of us have professional qualifications but have taken time out from the rat race

Whilst ‘most’ may have be harsh…… see my above comment 

[maxxblue]

Well he seems to have met more than you have.

How do you work that one out? 

[contentguy]

How do you work that one out? 

The 2 members politely disagreeing have significant review contributions.

 

[maxxblue]

The 2 members politely disagreeing have significant review contributions.

 

They do, hence my question. 

[contentguy]

They do, hence my question. 

Who has more reviews, hence Lamboman’s (probably tongue in cheek) comment?

[MissWolf]

General comment only. Most WGs are WGs because they don't have the intellect to do anything else. Apologies to the bright ones.

This line doesn't mitigate the rest of the post 

[maxxblue]

Who has more reviews, hence Lamboman’s (probably tongue in cheek) comment?

If it was tongue-in-cheek then fair enough, though such comments are usually accompanied by an appropriate emoji. I didn't read it as tongue-in-cheek - perhaps Lamboman can clarify - hence my post. 

[contentguy]

This line doesn't mitigate the rest of the post 

How would a punter’s comment made in a similar fashion be received on SAAFE?

[contentguy]

If it was tongue-in-cheek then fair enough, though such comments are usually accompanied by an appropriate emoji. I didn't read it as tongue-in-cheek - perhaps Lamboman can clarify - hence my post. 

Look at the review counts 

[maxxblue]

Look at the review counts 

Are you trolling?

Review counts: Steely Dan - 119; pbrown355 - 122

Lamboman states:

Well he seems to have met more than you have.

However, there is no evidence that pbrown has met more [escorts] than Steely Dan - he has simply reviewed 3 more, which is not a significant difference.

[contentguy]

Are you trolling?

Review counts: Steely Dan - 119; pbrown355 - 122

Lamboman states:

However, there is no evidence that pbrown has met more [escorts] than Steely Dan - he has simply reviewed 3 more, which is not a significant difference.

Am I trolling? WTF!
 
I’m going by the dialogue above.
There isn’t a significant difference between their review counts.  Who knows what their meet counts are!

A more relevant question is: what are you drinking / smoking / injecting, this evening?

[MissWolf]

How would a punter’s comment made in a similar fashion be received on SAAFE?

How would I know?

I don't read 90% of the site and definitely don't take notice of any negative type threads

Like this site I cherry pick what I look at 

[maxxblue]

Am I trolling? WTF!
 
I’m going by the dialogue above.
There isn’t a significant difference between their review counts.  Who knows what their meet counts are!

A more relevant question is: what are you drinking / smoking / injecting, this evening?

Sounds to me like you are trolling - your latter comment just reinforces this - just like you appear to be trolling MissWolf.

If you read your post, you are  making the same point as me - that review counts does not equate to how many escorts they have met.

[smiths]

Sounds to me like you are trolling - your latter comment just reinforces this - just like you appear to be trolling MissWolf.

If you read your post, you are  making the same point as me - that review counts does not equate to how many escorts they have met.

Indeed they dont equate neccassarily as who knows how many WGs punters on here have actually punted with. Since i joined i havent only punted with 284 WGs less reviewing the same WG more than once in all that time.

[smiths]

Most?  Really? They can't do ANTHING else? General comment = bullshit you made up based on the small number of escorts you have met.  And I suspect (and hope) that you spent more time fucking them than checking their IQ so you have no real data even on the few that you have met.

What does this un-true and offensive comment have to do with this thread anyway?

Well i have met around 3000 WGs over the decades give or take and most COULD do something else. The fact was for some being a WG was the quickest way to make good money very quickly, in fact virtually straight away. They COULD make hundreds a day but not have to train for years or otherwise to make the same money.

Some were as thick as two short planks, the same percentage as civvies i have met, yet despite being intellectually dim they were street smart enough to become an indoor WG and be able to make good money.

[lamboman]

How do you work that one out? 

I hold my hands up  as I worked it out whilst having a twighlight drink in my hot tub    and thought contentguy had 124 reviews.
Probably a drop of water on the screen

[Rapha]

At a recent punt UKP came up in conversation and the WG specifically asked that I don’t put a review on the forum. She said she finds it an invasion of her privacy, and also punters typically think if she’s done something with one she’ll do it with everyone.

Now some things to point out:

1 punt was great, definitely would have been a positive
2 she is well reviewed on here and overwhelmingly positive reviews
3 not sure my review would have added anything not mentioned in previous reviews.

So I agreed.

I guess I want to check if anyone else has has come across this type of thing? I can understand not wanting bad reviews, but this seemed strange to me.

Who is it?

[king tarzan]

Lots of whores hate this site..
They feel demeaned as I've read on a few sites..
It's there bread and butter but they are so thick and stupid to realise that..

Just because there shortcomings get exposed they get a big fat shit on there whore face and deservedly so..


Give a good service, be honest, mont the money nothing to worry about

So Simpletto 👍👍👌👌

[Whiteknight]

Why are you discussing UKP with a hooker?

Rule number 1 – you do not talk about UKP.

Rule number 2 – you do not talk about UKP.

+1 

[OakTree]

Lots of whores hate this site..
They feel demeaned as I've read on a few sites..
It's there bread and butter but they are so thick and stupid to realise that..

Just because there shortcomings get exposed they get a big fat shit on there whore face and deservedly so..


Give a good service, be honest, mont the money nothing to worry about

So Simpletto 👍👍👌👌

You really should check your grammar before calling out people for being thick and stupid.