Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: AW Negative Feedback  (Read 1562 times)

Online signy

OK, so we all know AW feedback is pretty useless, but I have become strangely fascinated by escorts who manage to achieve negative overall AW feedback. How absolutely useless must they be if even their pimp/mate gives them a negative AW review?

At any time there seem to be about a dozen with negative reviews, but unfortunately most keep their feedback hidden. The present leader in this category at -3 is hungreypussy.

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

I doubt this thread will go far, but I don't think it's been covered before and if anyone has any examples or additional information post it here.

Offline freeze44


Offline EnglishRebecca121

  • Banned
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 3,924
  • Likes: 0
This little darling got a mixed bag...of feedback  :wackogirl:

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

And I thought my spelling was bad ( her reply’s to the negs )
Banned reason: Ex sex worker with zero useful contribution to make
Banned by: Head1

Offline Vice Admiral

And I thought my spelling was bad ( her reply’s to the negs )

Replies.

Offline freeze44


Offline DipsyDoodle

If you hover over her feedback, you'll see that she has had 7 feedbacks; 2 positive and 5 negative for a score of -3.  So she actually has 5 negative feedbacks, which is a lot.

Offline Vice Admiral

Hungreypussy's pricing structure isn't up to much, either:
£50 for half-an-hour
£130 for an hour (so, £80 for the second half-hour – nearly 40% more than for the first half-hour)
£180 for an hour and a half (so, £50 for the third half-hour)
£200 for two hours (so, £20 for the fourth half-hour)

However "naughty and wet" she's feeling, I'd be astonished if she's getting much business – above all because of her truly shocking feedback score.

She's probably a scammer, and that's what the feedback is saying.

Offline millbush

Hungreypussy's pricing structure isn't up to much, either:
£50 for half-an-hour
£130 for an hour (so, £80 for the second half-hour – nearly 40% more than for the first half-hour)
£180 for an hour and a half (so, £50 for the third half-hour)
£200 for two hours (so, £20 for the fourth half-hour)

However "naughty and wet" she's feeling, I'd be astonished if she's getting much business – above all because of her truly shocking feedback score.

She's probably a scammer, and that's what the feedback is saying.

You'd be surprised how many here can't work out good value pricing though even if hers is not.
Banned reason: Troll.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline freeze44

You'd be surprised how many here can't work out good value pricing though even if hers is not.

Please enlighten us then milkbrush...your vast experience be welcome.... :sarcastic:

Offline finn5555


Offline king tarzan

I see it's hidden

SIMPLETTO


MOVE ON 🏃🏃🏃🏃🏃🏃
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline millbush

Please enlighten us then milkbrush...your vast experience be welcome.... :sarcastic:

Very much doubt you can count beyond 2 so wouldn't be any use to you  :lol: ;)
« Last Edit: January 24, 2020, 10:06:22 am by millbush »
Banned reason: Troll.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline freeze44

Very much doubt you can count beyond 2 so wouldn't be any use to you  :lol: ;)


You right there Muffbrush I bow to your superiority (btw think we all got the message so chill on telling us all the time  :crazy:)

Better than the hilarious one liners you post, if you string a few sentences together that are of some value, there will be some clever folk here who will benefit  :thumbsup:

 :kiss:

Offline millbush

Banned reason: Troll.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline freeze44

Blocked  :P can't see you.

Who you speaking to girlbush? Everyone or?

Sure be tears before bedtime but if it makes you feel better my little daffodil good luck, hugs and wet kisses for the future  :dancegirl:

Offline John Johnson

Hungreypussy is a known theif and scammer.

Offline sunnyj

IMO, positive AW feedbacks are worthless and negative ones are like gold dust.  :hi:
Here's one interesting AW feedback
Willow_20_Australian
External Link/Members Only

Has a bad AW Feedback that seems to alert about bait & switch  + mention of a pimp

Feedback
Only   ********** (3)   12/07/2017 16:22   Seeking Services
    This girl was not the one advertised and turned up with a f*cking massive bloke at my hotel room door.... avoid.
   
Response:   WHAT THE FUCK? Motherfucker who was in the hotel room? Was it your mother or its me in the photos the 100% same girl. You fucking time waster!

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Offline Adoniron

You can't always trust positive AW feedback but I never ignore negative feedback.

Offline Dogfather

You can't always trust positive AW feedback but I never ignore negative feedback.

This. TOFTT with an AW negative feedback means a high risk of a rubbish punt.

Online David50

Aw feedback maybe useless but it does give you a good indication that the escort Wouk does prefer not to see you again if she leaves her other clients feedback but not you

Offline Steely Dan

Aw feedback maybe useless but it does give you a good indication that the escort Wouk does prefer not to see you again if she leaves her other clients feedback but not you
Every now and then I use it to tip me over the edge - particularly on a TOFTT or with one few UKP reviews (that don't give me the full picture).  I look at the AW reviewers with lots of positives (unlikely to be made up sock puppets) but then look to see who has reviewed them.  Recently, I saw one guy who had comments from both Platinum Cindy and Hazel Kitty (Honey Bell) so decided he was most likely real.  Still didn't believe his rating exactly, but I believed she was not a B&S chancer and this helped me to think, 'might be worth a go'.  It is all a probability game. I don't believe AW review per se, but it can be evidence to consider.
« Last Edit: February 04, 2020, 09:35:48 pm by Steely Dan »