Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: What do you like about adultwork and what sucks ??  (Read 4078 times)

Offline Ahalfa Carling

I also don't like how I can't open pages in a new tab, just opens a blank screen or the search function.

on my laptop I just press Ctrl +left mouse button to open in new tab

Offline Milansky

on my laptop I just press Ctrl +left mouse button to open in new tab

Learn something new everyday, Thanks! :thumbsup:

Offline A Decent Fist

on my laptop I just press Ctrl +left mouse button to open in new tab

One of the features in Kuck's add-on for Chrome (see my post on the previous page in this thread) is that the AW profiles you click on in search results open in a new tab/window and you don't have to remember to do that.

If installing it is not a security risk for individual punters I cannot recommend it enough.

Offline Murray Mint

When Adultwork started in summer 2003 I’d been punting for about a year, and it was hard work seeking out independents if you didn’t want to use an agency or the back page of the local paper. Fortunately, I’d joined that other punting site and generally used its reviews to determine who I should see. Although Adultwork has been full of scams of one kind or another since the day it started (including many likely generated by themselves, as smiths points out), it was, and is still, the best single resource available to us.

I think one of its great contributions was that it allowed would-be prostitutes to dip their toe in the water, so to speak, with none of the initial outlay otherwise associated with a web site or agency fees. Some found they then quite liked the job and went on to greatness; others found it wasn’t for them and quietly slipped away. I think that we punters benefited greatly from this.

As to selecting a prostitute from Adultwork, their review system is almost useless, so what do you do to search out a good SP? Negative reviews don’t exist, and you’re brave if you choose to  visit an SP with zero or very few reviews (although I accept that somebody’s got to do that!), but if you choose a well-reviewed SP, and check that the bulk of her reviewers have also reviewed many others, then, in my experience, you’re pretty safe in having a good punt.

As to booking that punt, I avoid the Adultwork booking system and unless the SP gives a telephone number or email address, I move on.
 
Of course, nothing quite beats taking advice from the reviews here  :)

Offline justanotherinch

 Chat is a rip off and expensive. Given no or little regulation, their vetting is atrocious - they should be doing similar to agencies. Needs a competitor. I will only be using agencies going forward if and when as the odds of finding someone decent on AW without positive review (plural) is a nervous lottery. On agencies you get excited for most, on AW you get excited if you find on decent one locally.
« Last Edit: November 22, 2020, 10:40:54 pm by justanotherinch »

Offline ollielon

The biggest gripe I have is with the ones I've come to call "Webscammers". The ones who are basically web cammers only, yet say they escort, but clearly don't. A big giveaway is when they have a lot of feedback, but none of it is for escorting, yet they have the "Escort" box ticked. I don't know how exactly, but AW should try and crackdown on "escorts" like that. I find them incredibly annoying.

As a principle if an escort ask for cam before meet I avoid .. if they want to talk on the phone or even video chat to be comfortable I don't see why I should be the one paying for that service.

Offline advent2016

I like the way the site has evolved over time adding features. They've added new criteria like fingering.  Security is much better. Previously it was quite easy to look at any PG for free or browse user data.

I wish there was a more standardised meaning for some of the terms e.g. snowballing. Does it it mean cum kissing, cum swapping or just dribbling. Some providers are actually shocked when I explain what I expect. The same goes for rimming - one provider thought it meant anal fingering.

I'd like extra search terms like facefucking, ballsucking and more granular BDSM like caning in addition to spanking. Maybe a separate domain for dominatrices.

I think the reason why AW succeeds is partly it is the free tier for users (punters) still gives most of what they want. There are some very good paid for alternatives, but you have to pay to view basic info.
 

Offline chadpitt

Adult work sucks.

Face photos should be mandatory and the ages are always a lie.

More and more the prices are just ridiculous. Over 50s expecting £100 an hour and they're fat and scrawled in tattoos.

It's become a site for cucks now.


Online Bonker

But it's the only game in town for most of us.
Isn't it?

Offline Jimmyredcab

Adult work sucks.


More and more the prices are just ridiculous. Over 50s expecting £100 an hour and they're fat and scrawled in tattoos.


Adultwork are not to blame for fat old women charging ridiculous fees. ????

Offline Tomi91

One thing what I will never understand:

Many girls has 0 feedback on AW, but 10+ feedback on UKP.

Many girls has 100+ rating and 10+ field report on AW (all positive), but 0 or only negative reviews on UKP.


How can this happens?

Offline ollielon

One thing what I will never understand:

Many girls has 0 feedback on AW, but 10+ feedback on UKP.

Many girls has 100+ rating and 10+ field report on AW (all positive), but 0 or only negative reviews on UKP.


How can this happens?

We just love to discover new talents and TOFTT ?!

Offline signy

One thing what I will never understand:

Many girls has 0 feedback on AW, but 10+ feedback on UKP.

Many girls has 100+ rating and 10+ field report on AW (all positive), but 0 or only negative reviews on UKP.


How can this happens?

On the first point, there are many escorts who don't use the AW booking system, but just take bookings by phone, and so never get any AW ratings. A UKP trusted member TOFTT, has a great time, reviews on here, and others go and see her as a result; so the UKP positive reviews add up in a virtuous circle.

On the second point, if it's negative UKP reviews, then it might be that a UKP member (or two) had a poor experience, negatively reviewed and nobody gave her a second chance. If it's zero UKP reviews, probably just one of those things; I would certainly consider TOFTT in that case if the AW reviews look OK (varied punters with varied feedback themselves).



Offline Horizontal pleasures

Not being able to search for an escort with a specific dress size. It's 6 or 8, 10 or 12, or larger  :mad:

if you could they would be lying anyway!

Offline Horizontal pleasures


Lastly there should be a proper discreet mode cause the one they have is ridiculous any punter who also uses the discreet mode colour scheme will know what you're looking at.
please, what is the discreet mode?

Offline Horizontal pleasures

One thing what I will never understand:

Many girls has 0 feedback on AW, but 10+ feedback on UKP.

Many girls has 100+ rating and 10+ field report on AW (all positive), but 0 or only negative reviews on UKP.

How can this happens?
because to leave feedback on AW you have to book on AW and many of us prefer to book by phone and not leave  footprint on AW.

Offline A Decent Fist

please, what is the discreet mode?

A very necessary option on the Adultwork web app for phones (which is not a real, separate app) to avoid having pics of naked women all over your screen, which is the default.

Personally, I have no problem if a fellow punter recognises it from the colour scheme. No one else would.

Offline bobgobwick

An easier way to filter out certain certain likes.
Eg. Exclude escorts that like bareback and unprotected sex.

Also it would be good if massage providers were explicitly searchable (or filtered out), maybe under a separate service.

Offline JontyR

(if this is already possible I am grateful for someone who could enlighten me)

I'd like the search function to have an either or.  I don't want to do separate searches for french kissing or french kissing (at discretion).

Also the height criteria on the search. 6 foot or above is very tall, but to search for 5'9", 5'10" separately is a right ball ache.


Offline triggs91

When searching for TS escorts, you have to select Male or Female then the TS tick box.

Some will list themselves under male, some under female - it means I have to search twice for them

Offline advent2016

Another thing when it can't find profile XXXXXX it drops you into  a search that although in the general area it has all items deselected so I can browse men :scare: and other people that wouldn't be my first choice, but worst of all barebackers.

Offline A Decent Fist

When searching for TS escorts, you have to select Male or Female then the TS tick box.

Some will list themselves under male, some under female - it means I have to search twice for them

That only applies in certain circumstances.

For example, if you want to use the Proximity tab and search a certain number of miles from your postcode you do need to specify Male or Female as well as Trans. Same if you want to define height or dress size or anything else in the Interview tab.

But if you stay on the first tab and narrow your search using Country, Region then County/Area – in my case, for example, choosing United Kingdom (already selected), then London, then City of Westminster – you can just tick trans and don't need to tick another box. Try it.

There's absolutely no logic to these different rules, of course. But that's how it works.

Offline triggs91

That only applies in certain circumstances.

For example, if you want to use the Proximity tab and search a certain number of miles from your postcode you do need to specify Male or Female as well as Trans. Same if you want to define height or dress size or anything else in the Interview tab.

But if you stay on the first tab and narrow your search using Country, Region then County/Area – in my case, for example, choosing United Kingdom (already selected), then London, then City of Westminster – you can just tick trans and don't need to tick another box. Try it.

There's absolutely no logic to these different rules, of course. But that's how it works.
Ah cheers - will give that a go. Unfortunately I sort of live on a border between regions so like to use the postcode option instead but it might help  :hi:

Online Bonker

(if this is already possible I am grateful for someone who could enlighten me)

I'd like the search function to have an either or.  I don't want to do separate searches for french kissing or french kissing (at discretion).

Tick them both.

Offline JontyR

Tick them both.
But then it would only return providers who have ticked both as well.

Online Bonker

I think it returns ones that have ticked either 1 or both

Offline GingerNuts

I think it returns ones that have ticked either 1 or both

It only returns profiles which match all the boxes you've ticked.

Offline lvtpunt

My biggest gripe is something that might seem a bit dumb really, under the likes list's, why do they have some services listed as "at discretion" and a no at discretion option.  For example owo and owo at discretion, surely it goes without saying that all services are at discretion anyway.  I mean if you turn up like some smelly hobo off the street, she has as much right to say no and walk at the door step as we do.  In practice it means that you need to run two searches as some girls will only tag one option or the other.

Offline ollielon

My biggest gripe is something that might seem a bit dumb really, under the likes list's, why do they have some services listed as "at discretion" and a no at discretion option.  For example owo and owo at discretion, surely it goes without saying that all services are at discretion anyway.  I mean if you turn up like some smelly hobo off the street, she has as much right to say no and walk at the door step as we do.  In practice it means that you need to run two searches as some girls will only tag one option or the other.

I usually see (at discretion) as being extra or not guarantied .. usually for kissing or OWO or Anal (because of size) ... but yes it is inconsistent. Also if I want to look for girls with OWO included when I do the search, I am never sure if I should check OWO (at discretion) and OWO or only one and it might return different results depending on what the girl decided to select .. anyway I agree it is confusing ... I think a better way to index would be to identify services that are included versus services that require an extra.