Adultwork Alternative? Can someone direct me to some other trustworthy sites?

[B.Safe]

Hi guys,

Can someone direct me to some other trustworthy sites where I can look for decent escort girls please?

Regards,
B. Safe

[vorian]

Try this one, I find it trustworthy and the review section is excellent. 

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php

[grandmaster-ram-rod]

Try this one, I find it trustworthy and the review section is excellent. 

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php

+1

[yorkshire123]

Try this one, I find it trustworthy and the review section is excellent. 

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php

 

[vorian]

Hi guys,

Can someone direct me to some other trustworthy sites where I can look for decent escort girls please?

Regards,
B. Safe

Joking apart, AW is the best contact site for punters/prossies. Some regional or specialist sites may exist but nothing comes close to AW. However it is intrinsically corrupt so the best option is to use UKP and AW together.   

[Matium]

You can try Cherry Girls.

They've cut out a niche market for themselves by appealing to businessmen but be careful, though, some of the girls are on Cherry Girls and Adultwork and maintain two price structures, you can really get peeved off, it has happened to me, where you get a girl on Cherry Girls only to later find out that the exact same girl with the exact same services is on Adultwork at a lower price.

Basically, Adultwork is a monopoly and the other sites like Cherry Girls are far behind.

[m8uwot]

There are no other good sites. I can't wait till someone with a decent fucking frontend team comes along and knocks AW off it's pedestal.

[nigel4498]

Joking apart, AW is the best contact site for punters/prossies. Some regional or specialist sites may exist but nothing comes close to AW. However it is intrinsically corrupt so the best option is to use UKP and AW together.

The best advice a punter can get.

[Rochdull lad]

Try this one, I find it trustworthy and the review section is excellent. 

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php

Brilliant, vorian.    I was about to click on that link and then I saw what you'd done there!

[CBPaul]

Brilliant, vorian.    I was about to click on that link and then I saw what you'd done there!

You're not the only one who nearly clicked it Rochdull.

Can't really add anything, there are other site out there but are small in comparison to AW, have even worse search capabilities and most of the prossies are on AW anyway. We desperately need an alternative to AW - it's the only way that AW will start to offer a decent service and clean up on the scammers and fakes.

[hendrix]

Yep, at the moment, the combination of UKP and Adultwork is the best way to succeed at punting.

[Sedlmayer]

Yep, at the moment, the combination of UKP and Adultwork is the best way to succeed at punting.

Definitely. I also thoroughly agree that we desperately need some good young forward-thinking IT guys to come along and create a better alternative to AW. Come on guys - it's a no-brain golden opportunity. Think Myspace and Facebook. (Or %%% and UKP  ) We only use AW because that's all there is - it's shit on so many levels.

[wristjob]

Hi guys,

Can someone direct me to some other trustworthy sites where I can look for decent escort girls please?

Regards,
B. Safe

Trustworthy - are you for real. AW is autotrader for WGs - they don't validate quality or much of anything really. There are other sites where girls advertise, but trustworthy doesn't figure in any of their business plans.

[wristjob]

Definitely. I also thoroughly agree that we desperately need some good young forward-thinking IT guys to come along and create a better alternative to AW. Come on guys - it's a no-brain golden opportunity. Think Myspace and Facebook. (Or %%% and UKP  ) We only use AW because that's all there is - it's shit on so many levels.

To make it better than AW you need to make it harder for scammy girls. Lets say 80% of girls on AW are either not real or crap then you are only going to have 20% of the girls on the site - so everyone will still use AW. If you want to make a more successful site than AW you need to make the quality much lower - loads more fake profiles of really hot girls to draw punters in. If you have any competition at all, an especially if there is already a market leader, then you have no scope to impose quality control.

Now if you live in London especially you could probably use UKP reviews exclusively and pretty much forget AW or anywhere else exists.

[Rochdull lad]

We only use AW because that's all there is - it's shit on so many levels.

Spot on, Sedlmayer; I'd rather think of it as the least bad [rather than "the best"] way to access WGs.

[vorian]

To make it better than AW you need to make it harder for scammy girls. Lets say 80% of girls on AW are either not real or crap then you are only going to have 20% of the girls on the site - so everyone will still use AW. If you want to make a more successful site than AW you need to make the quality much lower - loads more fake profiles of really hot girls to draw punters in. If you have any competition at all, an especially if there is already a market leader, then you have no scope to impose quality control.

Now if you live in London especially you could probably use UKP reviews exclusively and pretty much forget AW or anywhere else exists.

Totally agree, any real competition for AW would also run at a loss as a start up for a considerable amount of time. The measure of success for AW is the amount of profit they make and in that regard they do very well for themselves. Without any controls in place and an unwillingness to legislate positively for the consumer, I cannot see a time when AW will lose the monopoly, the best and only option is an independent site like UKP, all other punting forums are either run directly to generate revenue through advertising (Pimp/Prossie controlled) or have been started to promote the agenda (Tout) of a small group of prossies.

Real punters should appreciate what a fantastic resource UKP is. Of course it is not perfect but used in conjunction with the admin strengths and search facilities of AW it is possible to reduce the risk of a bad punt to a relatively low level.

[Sedlmayer]

To make it better than AW you need to make it harder for scammy girls. Lets say 80% of girls on AW are either not real or crap then you are only going to have 20% of the girls on the site - so everyone will still use AW. If you want to make a more successful site than AW you need to make the quality much lower - loads more fake profiles of really hot girls to draw punters in. If you have any competition at all, an especially if there is already a market leader, then you have no scope to impose quality control.

Now if you live in London especially you could probably use UKP reviews exclusively and pretty much forget AW or anywhere else exists.

from a money-making point of view what you say makes sense, but there are so many things about AW that could so easily be improved on - the search facility for example  possibly the world's worst.
Personally, I'd settle for a site with just as many scammers etc ('cos we can weed 'em out here on UKP) that actually worked, allowed you to have multiple tabs open, etc etc   

[pleasure]

from a money-making point of view what you say makes sense, but there are so many things about AW that could so easily be improved on - the search facility for example  possibly the world's worst.
Personally, I'd settle for a site with just as many scammers etc ('cos we can weed 'em out here on UKP) that actually worked, allowed you to have multiple tabs open, etc etc   

I'm curious, what do you find wrong with the search facility on AW? It's about the best and most comprehensive I've ever used. It's not perfect by any means, but it's pretty great compared to the piss-poor, barely functional efforts on most sites.

You can have multiple tabs open BTW, you just need to CTRL+Click the profile name instead of doing the usual right-click menu or middle-click. A bit of a weird quirk, but at least they listened to user feedback and implemented it at all, it didn't used to be there.

[Garden69]

It depends upon what you want but for reviews of girls in your area you could try %%%.com . Been around ages and fairly recently went through a revamp of sorts which has improved it slightly IMHO.

Other sources for nationwide parlours/escorts but without reviews are:

External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only

hope this helps. You can also simply do some searches using google or a similar search engine

[Illya Kurakin]

It depends upon what you want but for reviews of girls in your area you could try %%%.com . Been around ages and fairly recently went through a revamp of sorts which has improved it slightly IMHO.

Other sources for nationwide parlours/escorts but without reviews are:

External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only

hope this helps. You can also simply do some searches using google or a similar search engine

I always thought Acemassage just half a step up from the cards in the telephone boxes.

[vorian]

It depends upon what you want but for reviews of girls in your area you could try %%%.com . Been around ages and fairly recently went through a revamp of sorts which has improved it slightly IMHO.

Other sources for nationwide parlours/escorts but without reviews are:

External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only

hope this helps. You can also simply do some searches using google or a similar search engine

I should point out that "%%%" is funded by advertising revenue from escorts and agency owners and thus controlled by them. I would not put much faith in their reviews (About as much as AW reviews) as bad ones can get removed by prossies and pimps. Also many, many fake reviews are posted on there. Many threads discuss PN on here in Off-topic if you want more information.

[Garden69]

I should point out that "%%%" is funded by advertising revenue from escorts and agency owners and thus controlled by them. I would not put much faith in their reviews (About as much as AW reviews) as bad ones can get removed by prossies and pimps. Also many, many fake reviews are posted on there. Many threads discuss PN on here in Off-topic if you want more information.

Thanks for that Vorian. I'm not a prolific punter by any means but I have used the sites to good effect. I take your point however. Guess everyone just has to use a bit of judgement and common sense to sort out the fake from the real. A bit of pot luck may be involved before the real treasures are found.

[vorian]

Thanks for that Vorian. I'm not a prolific punter by any means but I have used the sites to good effect. I take your point however. Guess everyone just has to use a bit of judgement and common sense to sort out the fake from the real. A bit of pot luck may be involved before the real treasures are found.

True that luck is involved but the risk can be reduced. I would hold more faith in a UKP review by an established member than a hundred reviews on PN or AW. Of course punters all have different criteria for what makes a good punt but at least on here if "Joe Bloggs" writes she looks like her pictures and does do OWO you will be pretty sure that is the case. AW reviews are tainted by fear of repercussions and PN reviews are tainted by the intellectual ownership of the site by prossies and pimps. 

[wristjob]

from a money-making point of view what you say makes sense, but there are so many things about AW that could so easily be improved on - the search facility for example  possibly the world's worst.

I've seen people say that before and I have no clue what people mean. Maybe it's a London thing with a massive density and 500 girls appearing on every search?

I want a female aged between 18-29 within 10 miles of postcode X1 and upto £110/hour. Sure it's not great on searching dress sizes or the like but you can blacklist the ones you don't like.