Reassuringly expensive.

[broksonic]

This might be a bit more honest:

External Link/Members Only

Can't post direct as it has bewbies in

She has got more wrinkles on her face than my grandma has 

[tom269u001]

This might be a bit more honest:

External Link/Members Only

Can't post direct as it has bewbies in

And how many years ago was the picture taken!

Reassuringly dishonest, misleading, deceitful...

Shouldn't charge more than £60 per hour

[tom269u001]

She has got more wrinkles on her face than my grandma has

Exactly... a G(randma)ILF - but I wouldn't

[broksonic]

She is probably about the same age as milf mrs robinson .  The big difference is that Morgan does not lie about her age ,and has no air brushed pictures or either does she charge a ridiculous £200 per hour

[ik8133]

External Link/Members Only

Would that reassure you guys?

I've watched her intro movie and I wasn't impressed!

[munterhunter]

I've watched her intro movie and I wasn't impressed!

Yes I'd be reassured that my decision to pass her by was the right one.

Judging by her feedback she's obviously doing reasonably well in her 'preferred' sector of the marketplace and good luck to her. I wouldn't pass her by purely on price considerations though there are a large number of other ladies on AW and elsewhere with more reasonable fees.

The photos on the profile look like they've been photo shopped within an inch of their life, and the absolute 'deal breaker' for me with this woman is in her FAQ.

Q. Do you offer 'bareback' sex?   A. Not generally no. The ONLY way I would consider this is if you are willing to comply with the standard health screening requirements as practiced by all performers in the adult film industry. I would therefore require you to provide an original full STD screening certificate (photocopies are NOT acceptable) dated no more than 28 days prior to the booking date along with corresponding photo' ID. If you do have full certification (as do I) and I agree to offer it (at my dicretion having met you) there is an additional charge of £100 per appointment. Please note that certification from on-line clinics are NOT acceptable, as their screening is not comprehensive to include all STDs.

ANY WG who will entertain the idea of BB sex under any circumstances with a punting client doesn't 'reassure' me at all!! A GUM certificate dated within the last 28 days means that when the bearer was tested 7 to 14 days prior to the certificate being issued he/she was clear of STIs.  It doesn't guarantee that they haven't picked up a STI in the time since the test!
 

[dilettante]

Am I seeing double?

I am happy to consider bookings from younger guys (21+) but will not meet with Chavs or 'Jack the lads' who think they are God's gift to women (I find them to be mind-numbingly boring!) nor will I meet guys who just want a non-stop marathon 'shag-fest' - that's not what I'm about. I am also happy to meet with older gents with no upper age-limit.

I am happy to consider bookings from younger guys (24+) but will not meet with Chavs or 'Jack the lads' who think they are God's gift to women (I find them to be mind-numbingly boring!) neither will I meet guys who just want a non-stop marathon 'shag-fest' - that's not what I'm about. I am also happy to meet with older gents with no upper age-limit.

[smiths]

Yes I'd be reassured that my decision to pass her by was the right one.

Judging by her feedback she's obviously doing reasonably well in her 'preferred' sector of the marketplace and good luck to her. I wouldn't pass her by purely on price considerations though there are a large number of other ladies on AW and elsewhere with more reasonable fees.

The photos on the profile look like they've been photo shopped within an inch of their life, and the absolute 'deal breaker' for me with this woman is in her FAQ.

Q. Do you offer 'bareback' sex?   A. Not generally no. The ONLY way I would consider this is if you are willing to comply with the standard health screening requirements as practiced by all performers in the adult film industry. I would therefore require you to provide an original full STD screening certificate (photocopies are NOT acceptable) dated no more than 28 days prior to the booking date along with corresponding photo' ID. If you do have full certification (as do I) and I agree to offer it (at my dicretion having met you) there is an additional charge of £100 per appointment. Please note that certification from on-line clinics are NOT acceptable, as their screening is not comprehensive to include all STDs.

ANY WG who will entertain the idea of BB sex under any circumstances with a punting client doesn't 'reassure' me at all!! A GUM certificate dated within the last 28 days means that when the bearer was tested 7 to 14 days prior to the certificate being issued he/she was clear of STIs.  It doesn't guarantee that they haven't picked up a STI in the time since the test!

Indeed so. A certificate is only any good for definite up until the tests were done, as soon as those tests are done she has NO idea whatsoever whether the punter might of been infected since.

In porn the deal is its assumed the performer wishes to get regular work which means regular tests so knowing they have to have regular tests they dont practice unsafe sex outside porn where they hope those they are shagging think the same. As there have been cases of STIs in porn and HIV in the States its clearly not 100%, but its certainly more rigorous than punting with a guy who has a cert dated up to 28 days before. This woman is a complete idiot in my view like all her fellow barebackers in punting irrespective of the rules they lay down. It will ALWAYS come done to luck if they get infected or not or their BB loving punters.

[Jerboa]

In her Q&A she can't make up her mind If she's 34 or 35, add 20 yrs on to that and you'd be In the right ball park.

[aspire]

why not watch her in action, if you want... External Link/Members Only

lots of AW videos on there for free.....

[Taggart]

While still whinging about the lack of escorts in Lincolnshire, last night I found the profile of a 20 year old from Mablethorpe (well someone has to live there), has a feedback of 1, and wanted £300 hour incall, £500 hour outcall. And no bum sex either.

WTF?  This is Lincolnshire, land of turnips and spuds, not bloody Bond Street.

I thought about emailing her to ask why she had such an overinflated view of herself, and I thought bollocks, more to do in life. She's clearly not serious, deluded or both.

[Riprock]

As much as you want to, don't do it!

She'll leave negative notes on your AW profile.

If you're contacting her through her own site, then by all means.
Sounds like one of those 'cos i'm worfit WG's'.

I thought about emailing her to ask why she had such an overinflated view of herself, and I thought bollocks, more to do in life. She's clearly not serious, deluded or both.

[Clanger]

False advertising! She's got to be in her 40s now!

I really hate that. These days I am not embarrassed to turn my heels and walk away, if she's offended then that's her fault for being a faker. I expect the photos to be no more than 3 or 4 years old and preferably be true-to-life photos rather than photo studio pix.

[smiths]

I really hate that. These days I am not embarrassed to turn my heels and walk away, if she's offended then that's her fault for being a faker. I expect the photos to be no more than 3 or 4 years old and preferably be true-to-life photos rather than photo studio pix.

Whereas i expect photos to be of how the WG looks now in the present when i am booking her, in 3-4 years a WG can go from looking attractive to looking ugly and put on many stones in weight. If a WG looks exactly the same 3-4 years later then fair enough though.

[Wiltsboy01]

This might be a bit more honest:

External Link/Members Only

Can't post direct as it has bewbies in

Fucking funny, its gone

PS Hi Carly x

[broksonic]

Fucking funny, its gone

PS Hi Carly x

Too  late Carly because  everyone  already  knows you  are far older  than  you claim  to be

[aerofan5]

Judging by the sheer volume of her reviews on AW and the dozens of videos she must have a fanny like a mouses ear - a Hippopotamouse!

It would likely be akin to chucking a tennis ball down a corridor.

Has anyone on the forum been there?

[James999]

Has anyone on the forum been there?

She's like Bangladesh, everyone knows it's there but  no one wants to go there 

[seeker]

Many go , but few are ever seen again 
Her fannies like the Bermuda triangle.

[seeker]

Looks like a old heavy metal dude 

[nylonnobby]

Have to agree with james999 she is a lot lot older then she says saw a vid of her on killergram a few months  ago dogging looked rough as shit photos on a/w are so old am surprised they ain't faded also known as cum on carly

[Gigabyte]

I guess I was pretty lucky that she turned me down cos of the aliases. Originally I was unhappy that those were added due to me letting a WG use my PC, seems it actually did me a favour.

[portable]

Just realised how old this post is, and while I have to agree with most about her seemingly snobbish nature, lying about her age, and high fees etc, surely this is all just flogging a dead horse, so to speak.

[broksonic]

Judging by the sheer volume of her reviews on AW and the dozens of videos she must have a fanny like a mouses ear - a Hippopotamouse!

It would likely be akin to chucking a tennis ball down a corridor.

Has anyone on the forum been there?

I suspect  a lot  of  the  old  woman's feedback  is from members  of External Link/Members Only.  Who  registered  on adultwork  to  leave  the old bag  some feedback

[Steviethestud]

Carly G seems to pride herself in being "reassuringly expensive" and offers this as some kino of guarantee.

Now  Christmas is the season for goodwill and miracles so we shouldn't be surprised that one has happened with  Carly G WWW.Adultwork.Com/64385 as she is now only 30!!!

Santa must have brought her a time machine but at least she has only knocked about 20 years off . If she only looked at how long she has been on Adultwork just  how stupid does she think we are?