Does fluffy cheerleading put you off a wg?

[Marmalade]

The fluffy ones have also created a new problem, at least for me anyway. If I genuinely have a good experience, then I am now hesitant to put in a report of equal standing for fear of unintentional fluffing.

Plus the fluffies will sometimes try to ridicule it. If it happens I suggest you report it if it gets bad. Just post your own experiences honestly.

Ps some fluffies honestly can't tell the difference. If she smiled at him and her boyfriend didn't trash his car they somehow think she's a wonderful human being and that her floppy tits, face like her fat hairy arse and her bucket fanny flaps mean she is a genuine 'girl next door' type, i.e. "very attractive."

[Marmalade]

I am perhaps slightly 'prejudiced': I don't really like paying good money to fat old mingers with dusty phones who think I should be 'grateful'.  They are, as some fluffies will point out, "not my type"!

[Eiltedongster]

Plus the fluffies will sometimes try to ridicule it. If it happens I suggest you report it if it gets bad. Just post your own experiences honestly.

Ps some fluffies honestly can't tell the difference. If she smiled at him and her boyfriend didn't trash his car they somehow think she's a wonderful human being and that her floppy tits, face like her fat hairy arse and her bucket fanny flaps mean she is a genuine 'girl next door' type, i.e. "very attractive."

LOL ! So true, where do they get these muppets from ? I mean were they mollycoddled all their life by their mommies ?

I know what you mean about the reports, the thing is I don't want to contribute to overinflating a WG's ego, already far too much of that going on, that's why even though I may have had a good time , if the girl has a big following I maintain a certain descriptive discipline.

[NightKid]

They serve one purpose and one purpose only: trimming one's HL.

[nervyfooker]

the cheerleading itself puts me more off the poster than the girl,but i was never gonna fuck
him anyway.
the problem is girls with many reviews (often with 3 or more by the same poster)
become harder to book,and can develop screening procedures eg minimum adultwork feedback,
no phone number displayed...and i can't be arsed with all of that.

[shagbambi]

Fluffies do put me off as their reviews tend to focus on a specific group of girls, forum darlings. I am put off by the stampede of punters and the traffic control system that means punters are then stacked like jets at heathrow. Unlike heathrow though, the "landing slot" can be months away.  Not for me, though I have no doubt that some of these girls may be very good.

[Eiltedongster]

Fluffies do put me off as their reviews tend to focus on a specific group of girls, forum darlings. I am put off by the stampede of punters and the traffic control system that means punters are then stacked like jets at heathrow. Unlike heathrow though, the "landing slot" can be months away.

Yep that's what happens when girls get hyped up.

[squeezebox]

I've found when the dust settles on the more popular WG's, as it has for a while now, and their prices are within budget, that's the time to try and see them. You can then form your own opinion.

With UKE, there are a few interesting ones that don't seem to post on UKP, so that provides a good starting point for a fresh hotlist, mind you, will have to factor in the extra travelling or wait for them to tour nearby.

[Marmalade]

I think it lowers the tone on UKP to have a lot of fluffy reviews. The site was created to get away from that crap and with a lot of hard work.

[Marmalade]

With UKE, there are a few interesting ones

What's UKE?

[hendrix]

What's UKE?

Admins other site ukescorting.com

Fluffy paradise

[Marmalade]

Admins other site ukescorting.com

Fluffy paradise

Hummmm how oozy. A little bit  no? But if that's really another site run by admin then good luck. Maybe he can offer fluffies a free fucking transfer.

[hendrix]

Hummmm how oozy. A little bit  no? But if that's really another site run by admin then good luck. Maybe he can offer fluffies a free fucking transfer.

I think that's the idea. Flirting, touting etc is all fine on there, that's what it was created for. Hopefully, it'll drive that type of traffic in that direction and away from UKP.

[uutarn]

Bit late to the party...

Fluffies don't put me off at all because i have a skeptical personality in everything i do and the people i see. Infact i don't even watch the news or read newspapers because i don't believe in half of the bullshit they peddle out.
I take everything at face value myself and judge accordingly. As others have said, if i fancy the girl, i will go for it and only take cues from other revered members here.

Cheerleading will only cause me to question the integrity of the fluffy himself, and thus take everything he says with a pinch of salt.

 

[Justanotheruser]

Pretty much in agreement with the above.

I don't really listen to cheerleaders or care about accusations of being one myself (which has kind of happened once).

If I see a review that matches up with my likes then I'll try and find a way to see the girl and make up my own mind. Once I get it in my head to see someone it's unlikely that I'll be put off.

[Malvolio]

If it's for a WG I've already seen that I had a good punt with, then it wouldn't put me off at all. 

If it's for a WG I haven't seen but who has had good reviews from credible (in my view) posters on here, it still wouldn't put me off.

If it's for a WG with only a couple of reviews from people who haven't reviewed anyone else, it starts to look like touting and I would avoid.

[squeezebox]

Hummmm how oozy. A little bit  no? But if that's really another site run by admin then good luck. Maybe he can offer fluffies a free fucking transfer.

There are some real nice scottish lassies that post on UKE. Their personality wouldn't have come out like that on AW for sure. IMO it offers an interesting alternative and opens discussions on specific punter subjects with a bit if banter too. 

Admin is quite strict on their too, and allows the flirting/touting/advertising that's not allowed on here.

[Third Man]

Puts me off  for sure. One I was going to see that fits my criteria has one mills and boon love story written, nothing about what happened sexually , all crap, so if I went all id be thinking about would be that. Ok I do like to get on with a girl, and do with some more that others, but Im there for sex not for love. I dont mind well reviewed girls as such, its the cringeworthy nonsense  written.

[Marmalade]

It's a fact that if certain people only post positive reviews, there is no barometer for what they write. I've seen several girls with glowing reports, only to come away thinking that the reviewers clearly weren't very fussy.

For some, the thrill of getting a shag with a woman who doesn't have a face like a garbage bin is so exciting that they can't stop jizzing when they hit the keyboard. They've been brainwashed by AW or prossie site reviews into a certain writing style, or feel it is 'respectful to the woman' to only say nice things, or simply want to boast about what for them was a great time.

All it says to me is, "she exists". Not realising it is a fluffywank review can be confusing; but I suppose that ("knowing she exists") can be more helpful than nothing. 

[willmo1]

It's a fact that if certain people only post positive reviews, there is no barometer for what they write. I've seen several girls with glowing reports, only to come away thinking that the reviewers clearly weren't very fussy.

For some, the thrill of getting a shag with a woman who doesn't have a face like a garbage bin is so exciting that they can't stop jizzing when they hit the keyboard. They've been brainwashed by AW or prossie site reviews into a certain writing style, or feel it is 'respectful to the woman' to only say nice things, or simply want to boast about what for them was a great time.

All it says to me is, "she exists". Not realising it is a fluffywank review can be confusing; but I suppose that ("knowing she exists") can be more helpful than nothing. 

Thats all I take from fback. The rest is down to me as I might want different stuff out of a punt to other guys.

[SamLP]

It doesn't necessarily put me off. I will be put off the review and won't really read the reviewers future reviews. If I like the WG and can communicate with her in my chosen method and the price is right then I may try and book her. It's the incessant cheerleading that often leads to a price hike and a girl suddenly hiding her number, wanting to be booked on AW and sometimes even requiring a certain amount of fb that puts me off. I just move along and find another girl to book.

[Sonny Crockett]

I couldn't care less. I would consider seeing a well reviewed lady, however I try not to think too much about the details in the reviews as that make my punt more likely to be underwhelming. I go to the punt to seek my own experience and pleasure.

[Marmalade]

Thats all I take from fback. The rest is down to me as I might want different stuff out of a punt to other guys.

As you get to know the reviewers in your area, you may find some that a)seem to have tastes closer to your tastes than others, and most importantly b)seem to be more reliable than others.

I tend to get a look at whether firstly a person's reviews cover some sort of understandable range from crap to pretty good and several shades inbetween. I don't believe all the crap about "I do my research and all my punts are good." Secondly I look for their comments about prossies I've been with. They might have had different luck on that day and time but I still look for some recognizability of their reviews generally if they are going to be any good to me.

I do my own 'research' by applying standard checks on the AW profiles (many of which are in the UKP tips section somewhere); then I paste the profile number into UKP in case there is some load of shit I've missed. So for me personally, the critical comments are more useful than the praise.

[Tony_Red]

Can be very off-putting. Respect to those who give balanced reviews and those who cover the basics  (how good looking face/body + did the girl offer fk/owo and how good was it etc.) for other members.

I tried booking 1 or 2 ladies on here with 25 - 40+ positive reviews on ukp and never got a response. So, now I just keep them as plan Bs and realistically, don't think I will ever see them.

[SamLP]

Then you have the fluffy cheerleading of reviewing the same girl every time you see her. I've seen many girls several times but only review them the one time. I will occasionally update my review, but the fluffies have to write a review for every meet, each time proclaiming she was better than the last, and then there's the back slapping and virtual high fives from other punters who rush to congratulate the reviewer on a "great" review.

[vw]

Then you have the fluffy cheerleading of reviewing the same girl every time you see her. I've seen many girls several times but only review them the one time. I will occasionally update my review, but the fluffies have to write a review for every meet, each time proclaiming she was better than the last, and then there's the back slapping and virtual high fives from other punters who rush to congratulate the reviewer on a "great" review.

These creep and creep into reviews of the punter in my eyes and go away knowing more about the reviewer then the reviewed, not quite what I needed but that's my preference.

[Jimmyredcab]

Then you have the fluffy cheerleading of reviewing the same girl every time you see her. I've seen many girls several times but only review them the one time.

I have reviewed the same girl twice ----------- which is not against the rules.   

Can't see why that is a problem as long as the reviews are a few months apart.   

[hendrix]

Then you have the fluffy cheerleading of reviewing the same girl every time you see her. I've seen many girls several times but only review them the one time. I will occasionally update my review, but the fluffies have to write a review for every meet, each time proclaiming she was better than the last, and then there's the back slapping and virtual high fives from other punters who rush to congratulate the reviewer on a "great" review.

One thing worth saying is that the extra fluffy detailed reviews have an impact on the the lunatics. Of course, that's not the intention of the reviewer (I hope), and they can't be responsible for the actions of the fucking idiots and stalkers, but it's just something to think about before declaring the mutual  love between you and your favourite prossie and stating that she made it quite clear that you were the best fuck she ever had.

[Marmalade]

I have reviewed the same girl twice ----------- which is not against the rules.   

Can't see why that is a problem as long as the reviews are a few months apart.   

After the first good ones when they've put their prices up, learned the conveyor belt, and forgot to wash for a week, they often deserve a rather different review.

They're not like volkswagens. More like a pretend can of Heineken that's been opened. Best to taste before every cunt has slobbered over them and they have as much fizz as a can of piss. Not all prossies of course. But there's very few that give the same level of service after a year or two.

Fluffy reviews can speed up the decay process: they think they don't need to try any more.

[Marmalade]

One thing worth saying is that the extra fluffy detailed reviews have an impact on the the lunatics. Of course, that's not the intention of the reviewer (I hope), and they can't be responsible for the actions of the fucking idiots and stalkers, but it's just something to think about before declaring the mutual  love between you and your favourite prossie and stating that she made it quite clear that you were the best fuck she ever had.

Not many fluffbags contributing to this thread. Maybe if it keeps going they'll at least read it.

I think some  of them actually compete with each other. Frustrated would-be Mills n Boon writers. Trying to out-superlative the last daft fluffycunt.

[Tony_Red]

Then you have the fluffy cheerleading of reviewing the same girl every time you see her. I've seen many girls several times but only review them the one time. I will occasionally update my review, but the fluffies have to write a review for every meet, each time proclaiming she was better than the last, and then there's the back slapping and virtual high fives from other punters who rush to congratulate the reviewer on a "great" review.

+1. If the visit/review of the same girl is several months apart then it's good to read both reviews to see if she is offering a consistent service. But, to issue another +ve within weeks let alone 2-3 months doesn't add much, unless reviewer is informing us of something new. For e.g., new services, look etc. Just my opinion.

[Marmalade]

These creep and creep into reviews of the punter in my eyes and go away knowing more about the reviewer then the reviewed, not quite what I needed but that's my preference.

I don't mind reading two reviews that indicate recent changes rather than just bragging about their so-called wonder-fucks. The best prossie in the world is simply "quite good" in my opinion. They provided a needed service. So what. She's not your girlfriend. If someone else saw you with her, 99.9% of the time she'd be recognised as a prostitute. You'd feel sick to the teeth that your mate's average-attractive girlfriend was getting more respectful admiration and looks than your slut, whom everyone was trying to avoid looking at. That's why it's a private affair. The only reason for sharing on here is to provide some balanced info that might help another punter-in-need unload his spunk up her fanny, over her tits, or all over her "heavenly one of a kind" orifice on top of her neck.

You'd honestly think these twats had never actually been close to a truly beautiful woman in their pimply fucked-up life.

[hendrix]

Not many fluffbags contributing to this thread. Maybe if it keeps going they'll at least read it.

I think some  of them actually compete with each other. Frustrated would-be Mills n Boon writers. Trying to out-superlative the last daft fluffycunt.

I admit that I certainly wrote some explicit reviews. Whether they were "fluffy" is up to people to decide, I thought they were factual. Where I wrote multiple reviews on the same girl, they were all (I think) different situations, typically different MFF (or other) variations, overnights with other elements etc..so I thought they were useful. What I didn't do, was turn them into romance novels or make them too personal with lots of chat about "chat" and things that might happen during a punt that don't involve sex.

Obviously, people write as they want, and I can choose to read what I want, but the ultra detailed love letters certainly made some of the lunatics crazier. That, I know for a fact.

[smiths]

Then you have the fluffy cheerleading of reviewing the same girl every time you see her. I've seen many girls several times but only review them the one time. I will occasionally update my review, but the fluffies have to write a review for every meet, each time proclaiming she was better than the last, and then there's the back slapping and virtual high fives from other punters who rush to congratulate the reviewer on a "great" review.

Yes every time you punt with a WG is excessive to say the least in my view but I see nothing wrong with reviewing the same WG again after 6 months or a year if her service has been consistent during that period, and of course doing a negative at any time if you had previously given a positive or neutral, both scenarios that I have done.

What happens sometimes on the London review board is a punter punts with a WG 121 but then does a FFM or MMF with her and another WG/punter and maybe various other combinations and does another review that includes that WG, so as that's a different scenario to a 121 fair enough though as you know some punters DO rattle on and on in their reviews.

As I see it some punters cant resist bragging in their reviews and in their replies to others they know who have punted with the same WG, now for ME punting isn't pulling so as all is needed is the cash its not a bragging matter in my view. I am hoping this bragging and uber fluffy behaviour moves over to UKE asap, the brown nosing of WGs is in full swing on their so its an ideal place for punters like unclesnideheart who showed what he is like by trying to dig Mr Brightside because he did a negative review on Little Katie, a WG snideheart clearly put before Mr B, the fawning arselicker.

[yumyum3]

You'd honestly think these twats had never actually been close to a truly beautiful woman in their pimply fucked-up life.

Indeed. I doubt they've fucked with many women who aren't on the game. Any male or female who's experienced real intimacy will know that paying for it can't be much more than an expensive thrill. It's pretty sad really. They appear pretty desperate with low self-esteem and addictive traits 

[smiths]

I admit that I certainly wrote some explicit reviews. Whether they were "fluffy" is up to people to decide, I thought they were factual. Where I wrote multiple reviews on the same girl, they were all (I think) different situations, typically different MFF (or other) variations, overnights with other elements etc..so I thought they were useful. What I didn't do, was turn them into romance novels or make them too personal with lots of chat about "chat" and things that might happen during a punt that don't involve sex.

Obviously, people write as they want, and I can choose to read what I want, but the ultra detailed love letters certainly made some of the lunatics crazier. That, I know for a fact.

I don't think your a fluffy myself mate, you just liked it hardcore and as you have posted there was only a limited supply of such WGs available to you so it was good to have reviews on those punts which have helped others.

[yumyum3]

I admit that I certainly wrote some explicit reviews. Whether they were "fluffy" is up to people to decide

I never saw it like that, H. With your avatar and moniker I saw you more in the rock n' roll paying chicks for some real filthy fun, porno type orgy. I would. I am well aware of many rock n' roll stories; love the one about Keith Moon lining up bent-over prossies to snort coke from their bumholes  Anyways, FYI, you always strike me as coming from that tradition. Never struck me that you are fluffy. Rock n' Roll! 

[smiths]

Not many fluffbags contributing to this thread. Maybe if it keeps going they'll at least read it.

I think some  of them actually compete with each other. Frustrated would-be Mills n Boon writers. Trying to out-superlative the last daft fluffycunt.

For ME the worst thing Marm is where a fluffy not only defends his fave WG or WGs in a negative review of another punter BUT tries to undermine that punters credibility which happened with Bangers and Gash review on Michelle Independent and his negative on another forum darling where he got stick. This shit seriously attempts to undermine UKP in my view, and isn't a good thing to see on here. If the punter is credible like Bangers its a fucking outrage that some tried to undermine him. However good a WG might be a punter has every right to do a negative review on her on here, and speaking for myself if I view the punter as credible I don't question that he thought the punt wasn't good, or was his fault that it wasn't good.

[hendrix]

I don't think your a fluffy myself mate, you just liked it hardcore and as you have posted there was only a limited supply of such WGs available to you so it was good to have reviews on those punts which have helped others.

Cheers smiths  and to be clear, I'm not knocking anyone. I just think some of the ultra fluffy fanboys need to think about whether they're actually doing their favourite prossie a favour by writing in the way they do. Recent events suggest not, as the lunatics pour over every word looking for something to get even more stirred up about.

[hendrix]

I never saw it like that, H. With your avatar and moniker I saw you more in the rock n' roll paying chicks for some real filthy fun, porno type orgy. I would. I am well aware of many rock n' roll stories; love the one about Keith Moon lining up bent-over prossies to snort coke from their bumholes  Anyways, FYI, you always strike me as coming from that tradition. Never struck me that you are fluffy. Rock n' Roll! 

 

I'd have loved to go punting with Keith Moon and Bonzo from Zeppelin   

[yumyum3]

I'd have loved to go punting with Keith Moon and Bonzo from Zeppelin   

Right there with you on that one 

[Marmalade]

For ME the worst thing Marm is where a fluffy not only defends his fave WG or WGs in a negative review of another punter BUT tries to undermine that punters credibility which happened with Bangers and Gash review on Michelle Independent and his negative on another forum darling where he got stick. This shit seriously attempts to undermine UKP in my view, and isn't a good thing to see on here. If the punter is credible like Bangers its a fucking outrage that some tried to undermine him. However good a WG might be a punter has every right to do a negative review on her on here, and speaking for myself if I view the punter as credible I don't question that he thought the punt wasn't good, or was his fault that it wasn't good.

+1 Not usually my area, but I do usually find Bangers' comments on prossies worth reading. I hope any fluffies with teeth out for him on behalf of their stinking goddesses were duly reported.

[SamLP]

Yes every time you punt with a WG is excessive to say the least in my view but I see nothing wrong with reviewing the same WG again after 6 months or a year if her service has been consistent during that period, and of course doing a negative at any time if you had previously given a positive or neutral, both scenarios that I have done.

What happens sometimes on the London review board is a punter punts with a WG 121 but then does a FFM or MMF with her and another WG/punter and maybe various other combinations and does another review that includes that WG, so as that's a different scenario to a 121 fair enough though as you know some punters DO rattle on and on in their reviews.

Reviewing again after 6 months or so is fine, although I haven't done that but when the same punter reviews the same girl many times over a month or two, that takes the biscuit. I've only reviewed the same girl twice when the first was a positive and the second a negative.

As you said bragging or sticking it up someone's face is not right. Most punters will agree that YMMV with any girl. I get along with nearly all the girls I meet. I've had countless number of compliments and gestures but it's nothing to bring here and brag about. Some are obvious attempts to get you to revisit while others can actually be genuine. We're all probably fluffy at heart otherwise we would have some pretty rubbish punts but the review isn't about our relationship with a WG but about her service.

[Marmalade]

the review isn't about our relationship with a WG but about her service.

It's good that at least some people can tell the diference.

In a way it's like going to a popcorn movie: I can almost lose myself in larger than life characters, but I don't come home in the belief that people or pigs can fly.

[shagbambi]

Cheers smiths  and to be clear, I'm not knocking anyone. I just think some of the ultra fluffy fanboys need to think about whether they're actually doing their favourite prossie a favour by writing in the way they do. Recent events suggest not, as the lunatics pour over every word looking for something to get even more stirred up about.

I think Hendrix has brought up a very salient point regarding fluffy reviews that they fuel stalkers and the generally unhinged, for both punters and WG's.

[vw]

I think Hendrix has brought up a very salient point regarding fluffy reviews that they fuel stalkers and the generally unhinged, for both punters and WG's.

Who was it that got upset that someone else's review sounded like the WG had made more effort with the other punter or did i imagine it ?

[hendrix]

Who was it that got upset that someone else's review sounded like the WG had made more effort with the other punter or did i imagine it ?

I'm sure I've read a few of those.

[NightKid]

Indeed. I doubt they've fucked with many women who aren't on the game. Any male or female who's experienced real intimacy will know that paying for it can't be much more than an expensive thrill. It's pretty sad really. They appear pretty desperate with low self-esteem and addictive traits 

Well said. 

[Mr Br1ghts1de]

I admit that I certainly wrote some explicit reviews. Whether they were "fluffy" is up to people to decide, I thought they were factual. Where I wrote multiple reviews on the same girl, they were all (I think) different situations, typically different MFF (or other) variations, overnights with other elements etc..so I thought they were useful. What I didn't do, was turn them into romance novels or make them too personal with lots of chat about "chat" and things that might happen during a punt that don't involve sex.

Obviously, people write as they want, and I can choose to read what I want, but the ultra detailed love letters certainly made some of the lunatics crazier. That, I know for a fact.

I think I've only reviewed 1 girl more than once and that was because I felt all 3 occasions hopefully provided a different perspective on the girl's services.

I have probably been guilty of over personalising some reviews though and will look to modify in future.

[punk]

Indeed. I doubt they've fucked with many women who aren't on the game. Any male or female who's experienced real intimacy will know that paying for it can't be much more than an expensive thrill. It's pretty sad really. They appear pretty desperate with low self-esteem and addictive traits 

Fucking a prossie even when they do GFE, is mostly nothing like being intermit with a real G.f.in a real relationship.