Whilst you may be right to a degree, I think the vast majority of escorts want to remain anonymous to the general public. It’s hard enough doing a job that is so stigmatised in the media and by the general public as it is. We have families and lives outside of this work and very few of us want to walk round our local towns being known by everyone as that prostitute ! After all, if we are known like that, then any clients who are seen with us or entering our homes will also be outed. Rather than all escorts being deceitful, most are trying to be discreet. And on the note of lying, I can’t tell you the amount of lies I hear from clients ! It’s not an issue for me personally, it’s just part of the grand scheme of all things punting.
I think we’re aware of all that.
You’re right inasmuch that you deserve some privacy: but punters also deserve not to be ripped off. Many has been the time that the profile photo looked glamorous and the v-photo showed it was barely the same person — usually someone much older, fatter, and unattractive. Sometimes as well the private gallery stupidly included photos that were too ‘honest’.
There’s no real answer. It is as it is. It is fair IMO that liars — women posing as ten years younger than they are — are exposed to punters to save punters wasting their money. Lying about your age by a couple of years is an almost expected lie, like not giving your real name. Making untrue claims on your likes list is a more substantial lie, and lying
considerably about your looks is a big lie. A punter might give you a false name, but you wouldn’t consider acceptable if he slipped you a fake tenner —
and neither would we. Most SPs fortunately only tell nice lies, ones that have no effect on the service. No, I don’t think they should be exposed (although in that case the v-pictures were a strong recommendation). Unfortunately there is no iron-clad way of stopping the v-pictures being seen by the public as anyone can join. But while you are fighting your end for decent SPs, spare a thought for the punter, who probably earns considerably less than you, has saved up for a punt, only to be ripped off by someone who doesn’t give what has been advertised and agreed (in looks or services).
The other point I’d politely suggest you might consider is that reviews — other than material facts — are about the punter’s experience rather than a judgment on the SP. She might not see it like that, but it’s the only standard that can apply. He’s not paying for a masturbation device: he’s paying to for the service to feel great. If he comes out feeling shit — I know it’s hard to please some people — but he paid for something more. Yes, in some cases one might feel sorry for her if she’s ‘done her best’ and it was a bit crap, even to the extent of not reviewing her, but the good providers are good at reading people, good at judging what turns them on and makes them feel special. Those that think it’s just about a hole are the ones that, were it allowed, should be working on the street. — Nothing wrong with that, but at current prices a punter pays for quality.
So do stop moaning. V-pics are no longer allowed. That’s the rule and it’s not a democracy. So those chips are ‘on your side’ if you like now. Count your chips that most punters on here do actually care about the good SPs and yes, they get praised. But the language is between men, how men talk in male company, and not feminised simply as you’ve popped your nose in dear.
