Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Are there any sites that do porn photo galleries around the net?  (Read 5596 times)

Offline catweazle

"Videos without consent" certainly is repugnant, offensive  and immoral, but is hardly "dangerous" except to your sales bottom line.
The guy is a prat and needs to be called out, but only for the right reasons: "very dangerous" isn't so far one of  them

Sorry  but I disagree.  Videos without consent are dangerous, potentially  'outing' an SP who for myriad reasons wishes to keep her occupation  private.

Offline sensualencounter

"Videos without consent" certainly is repugnant, offensive  and immoral, but is hardly "dangerous" except to your sales bottom line.
The guy is a prat and needs to be called out, but only for the right reasons: "very dangerous" isn't so far one of  them
Potentially outing someone IS dangerous. There's not much I agree with Louise on but this is one of them.

Offline lillythesavage

"Videos without consent" certainly is repugnant, offensive  and immoral, but is hardly "dangerous" except to your sales bottom line.
The guy is a prat and needs to be called out, but only for the right reasons: "very dangerous" isn't so far one of  them


Maybe not him being physically dangerous, could be very mentally dangerous for the person involved  :unknown:,

There is enough evidence to suggest the OP is involved in unacceptable behaviour, his silence is golden and the thread has evidence he has logged in and had a right of reply, do we need repugnant posters?

The forum has changed views on private, verification and pictures not in the public domain, this twat has been posting video, quite likely without consent, to porn websites and this forum which is at odds with the new rules.  :unknown:

Obviously we cannot prove one way or the other whether consent was gained, there is some evidence it may not have been, the amount of video that has been removed after his postings here says something, if it cannot be proved one way or another should the OP be given the benefit of the doubt?

His silence says no to me.

Offline Whiteknight


should the OP be given the benefit of the doubt?

His silence says no to me.

+1  :thumbsup:

Offline KatieEdinburgh

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 63
  • Likes: 42
"Videos without consent" certainly is repugnant, offensive  and immoral, but is hardly "dangerous" except to your sales bottom line.

I’m pretty sure it’s also illegal now to do this, not just offensive or immoral :thumbsdown:

When we upload content to AW or any big porn platform you need signed consent and also ID of anyone involved. It didn’t use to be like that. But uploading videos without consent and revenge porn is both now against the law (rightfully so).

Offline Lou2019

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 533
  • Likes: 55
"Videos without consent" certainly is repugnant, offensive  and immoral, but is hardly "dangerous" except to your sales bottom line.
The guy is a prat and needs to be called out, but only for the right reasons: "very dangerous" isn't so far one of  them

You’ve gone very quiet on the subject now  :unknown: did you realise I had a valid point (for a change lol)

Online scutty brown

You’ve gone very quiet on the subject now  :unknown: did you realise I had a valid point (for a change lol)

Quiet because I've been working. Busy capturing data and inserting it into reports.
But also because I've made my point, you can either agree or disagree, that's  fine by me. I'm not going to bring myself down to your level of inanity by endlessly labouring and repeating the point. I've said what I think, repeating myself would be superfluous.






Offline Lou2019

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 533
  • Likes: 55
Quiet because I've been working. Busy capturing data and inserting it into reports.

Enjoy  :lol:

Offline PepeMAGA

Sorry  but I disagree.  Videos without consent are dangerous, potentially  'outing' an SP who for myriad reasons wishes to keep her occupation  private.
Is there evidence of him recording video without consent or is it sharing videos from paid AW video galleries?

Offline Ashley_M

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 37
  • Likes: 16
Is there evidence of him recording video without consent or is it sharing videos from paid AW video galleries?

As far as I'm aware, it was sharing without consent, not recording, that was the issue previously on his XHamster account (and wherever else he was uploading content.) I don't know where the content was obtained from or whether he is still doing it. Finding that out would require deep diving into all his uploads and checking with every featured WG where he got the content and whether consent was given. I'm happy to protect other WGs but I don't think any of us have the time to be sitting combing through all that unfortunately.

This thread does raise alarm bells that he's still at it though and never had any intention of posting a new review.

Offline Ashley_M

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 37
  • Likes: 16

Obviously we cannot prove one way or the other whether consent was gained, there is some evidence it may not have been, the amount of video that has been removed after his postings here says something, if it cannot be proved one way or another should the OP be given the benefit of the doubt?

His silence says no to me.

I suspect he's staying quiet just now until this thread disappears off page 1 of the forum and gets buried. I guarantee the second it does he'll be back to posting as usual, hoping it'll be forgotten about.

Online Waterhouse

I suspect he's staying quiet just now until this thread disappears off page 1 of the forum and gets buried. I guarantee the second it does he'll be back to posting as usual, hoping it'll be forgotten about.
No need to suspect or speculate… You’re bang on the money.  He’s usually very active on the Escort’s Free Vids and NBA threads, but since being called out here, has gone silent in the hope it will blow over.  It won’t.  Class A tossers like him always get found out eventually.

Offline jay121


Also if you bothered to check with me or the xhasmter account, I have not posted any videos for the past year or so. That and a few escorts (one or two I believe) PM me on xhamster to tell me not post any videos of them or at least make it super private as leeches from UKP (with no reviews and reason why some became a member on here was the videos) wanted to download the videos and share them which I stopped. 

from the guy himself escorts contacted him to tell him not to post their videos

Offline hungrypunt

"very dangerous" isn't so far one of  them
,
no,I think Im the one who initially called him stalker vibes on this thread. I wouldnt say dangerous vibes came over, more sad and creepy, with disregard for others privacy.
« Last Edit: June 09, 2022, 03:36:01 am by hungrypunt »

Offline lillythesavage

from the guy himself escorts contacted him to tell him not to post their videos


Quite how he could stop " UKP leeches " downloading stuff he has posted links to I have no idea, is that possible?

So he has been at it for years, had run ins before on here obviously, did he go quiet and reappear after the last run in?  If so he is only using this site for his own gain and to cause problems :unknown:

Offline Keema

As far as I'm aware, it was sharing without consent, not recording, that was the issue previously on his XHamster account

I've seen galleries on XHamster that took content (mostly photos) from the UKEscorting galleries, but that was from a few years ago tbh. 

Offline hungrypunt

As far as I'm aware, it was sharing without consent, not recording,
I thought sharing without conesnt was just passing ov PVT stuff.
I assumed (possibly wrongly) that if it was posted on the internet it was a free for all in the public domain.

Online scutty brown

I thought sharing without conesnt was just passing ov PVT stuff.
I assumed (possibly wrongly) that if it was posted on the internet it was a free for all in the public domain.


Posting on the internet does not make it "free for all in  the public domain". Copyright restrictions apply at all times unless  the copyright holder has specifically waived his copyright, or released the images under a public domain licence.
Just reposting is copyright theft

Offline hungrypunt


Posting on the internet does not make it "free for all in  the public domain". Copyright restrictions apply at all times unless  the copyright holder has specifically waived his copyright, or released the images under a public domain licence.
Just reposting is copyright theft
I see,
so lets say for instance someone copies something as simple as your or mine avatar and uses it elsewhere, is that the same?

Offline Ashley_M

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 37
  • Likes: 16
I thought sharing without conesnt was just passing ov PVT stuff.
I assumed (possibly wrongly) that if it was posted on the internet it was a free for all in the public domain.

When I say, "sharing without consent" I'm talking about sharing content that was pay-per-view and not out there for free in this case (as an example, paid for Adultwork videos). Collecting up and hoarding all the free content that escorts post from all corners of the internet is creepy enough in itself... but we're talking about stolen PPV content here that was mixed in with whatever free stuff he collected from Twitter etc.

The rules and laws around sharing adult content online are a lot stricter recently and you can't upload to most content sites now without proof of consent from all participants in the videos/pictures. This has possibly caused an issue for Mace with using XHamster for his stash the way he did previously, so he's posted this thread looking for alternatives.


Edit to add: I really wouldn't get yourself too bogged down in the intricacies of online copyright when it comes to sharing free content! That isn't what the issue is here.
« Last Edit: June 10, 2022, 12:45:21 am by Ashley_M »

Online scutty brown

I see,
so lets say for instance someone copies something as simple as your or mine avatar and uses it elsewhere, is that the same?

The book my avatar comes from was published in the 1600's and is long out of copyright.
Copyright in your avatar will be held either by the photographer or his licencing agent. You've probably broken copyright yourself by using it

Offline SpaceRaiderDave

The book my avatar comes from was published in the 1600's and is long out of copyright.
Copyright in your avatar will be held either by the photographer or his licencing agent. You've probably broken copyright yourself by using it

The photo used by hungrypunt looks as if it was taken long enough ago to covered by the pre 1988 legislation so probably isn't in copyright.
Banned reason: Previously banned member TinMan69
Banned by: 90125

Offline hungrypunt

The photo used by hungrypunt looks as if it was taken long enough ago to covered by the pre 1988 legislation so probably isn't in copyright.

so?.....
lets say I took a picture of my dog, and used it as my avater, and you copied it?
is that a breach even though my dog pic isnt covered by any copyright?
and the fact that my dog loves being flashed round tinterweb  :cool:

Offline Lou2019

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 533
  • Likes: 55
so?.....
lets say I took a picture of my dog, and used it as my avater, and you copied it?
is that a breach even though my dog pic isnt covered by any copyright?
and the fact that my dog loves being flashed round tinterweb  :cool:

Have a read on the .gov website, gives the basics regarding copyright

Offline LLPunting

so?.....
lets say I took a picture of my dog, and used it as my avater, and you copied it?
is that a breach even though my dog pic isnt covered by any copyright?
and the fact that my dog loves being flashed round tinterweb  :cool:

Copyright is automatically attributed to the creator of the work, you don't have to register it.  Whether you choose to exert your rights is another matter.
Posting something you created into the public domain, especially in the Internet age, is considered to permit limited reproduction by others without risk e.g. directly requoting/sharing without prejudice or misattribution, provided they are not gaining materially without your consent nor causing harm, especially where that might associate you with their actions e.g. your dog is famous and identified on the Internet and your pic is used to support an insulting/threatening message that you do not support, or a doggie daycare re-quotes it to advertise their services on a social media site "Awww, so cute, all our doggie clients are made to feel just as awesome, check out our services External Link/Members Only"

Offline sensualencounter

Copyright or not, this guy is a fucking creep.

Offline MissWolf

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 341
  • Likes: 137

Offline Thephoenix

The book my avatar comes from was published in the 1600's and is long out of copyright.
Copyright in your avatar will be held either by the photographer or his licencing agent. You've probably broken copyright yourself by using it


As my avatar is a genuine picture of me, I assume it's ok???

Offline hungrypunt


Offline Home Alone


As my avatar is a genuine picture of me, I assume it's ok???

Good job my walking stick has a curved handle, Phoenix, or I'd have been suing!! ;)  :D

Online Waterhouse

Copyright or not, this guy is a fucking creep.
He’s still not raised his creepy head above the parapet, despite all the comments that he’s no doubt read here while logging in but staying schtum and hoping it will blow over.

Offline puntingpumping1920

When I say, "sharing without consent" I'm talking about sharing content that was pay-per-view and not out there for free in this case (as an example, paid for Adultwork videos). Collecting up and hoarding all the free content that escorts post from all corners of the internet is creepy enough in itself... but we're talking about stolen PPV content here that was mixed in with whatever free stuff he collected from Twitter etc.

The rules and laws around sharing adult content online are a lot stricter recently and you can't upload to most content sites now without proof of consent from all participants in the videos/pictures. This has possibly caused an issue for Mace with using XHamster for his stash the way he did previously, so he's posted this thread looking for alternatives.


Edit to add: I really wouldn't get yourself too bogged down in the intricacies of online copyright when it comes to sharing free content! That isn't what the issue is here.
 
 
TBF, OP never uploaded those videos on his Xhamster account 

He likes Porn so he created Xhamster/ Spankbang account to save his favourite videos that are widely available online
Banned reason: Mr £500k go and buy some fucking manners
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline puntingpumping1920

 
TBF, OP never uploaded those videos on his Xhamster account 


 
I must be tripping lol
 
I meant he never uploaded those videos online
 
Banned reason: Mr £500k go and buy some fucking manners
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline Doc Holliday

 
 
TBF, OP never uploaded those videos on his Xhamster account 

He likes Porn so he created Xhamster/ Spankbang account to save his favourite videos that are widely available online

No, those videos have all been uploaded by the account holder to his account. Normally the videos are then available to view by anyone accessing X hamster. You can restrict access if you wish and in this case the account holder has done so. They may or may not exist elsewhere, but have been specifically uploaded to the account.

You can save a list of your favourite x hamster videos to your account, but that is not the same thing as is only visible to the account holder.

Offline puntingpumping1920

No, those videos have all been uploaded by the account holder to his account. Normally the videos are then available to view by anyone accessing X hamster. You can restrict access if you wish and in this case the account holder has done so. They may or may not exist elsewhere, but have been specifically uploaded to the account.

You can save a list of your favourite x hamster videos to your account, but that is not the same thing as is only visible to the account holder.

 
I tried to correct myself
 
Those videos he has on Xhamster account are videos widely available from other sites
 
People like him are the reason we have free porn. Someone uploads a video online and people like OP reshare it
 
I guarantee you, Adam22 did not consent for his video to be freely available like this --- External Link/Members Only
 
If you genuinely have an issue with what Mace is doing then you should pay for the porn you watch
Banned reason: Mr £500k go and buy some fucking manners
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline puntingpumping1920

I'm not supporting anyone that uploads porn flicks of which you are not the copyright owner to free tube sites 
 
Xhamster is making millions from people like OP....It's a dirty game
 
People should pay for porn if you have a problem with what Mace is doing
Banned reason: Mr £500k go and buy some fucking manners
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline Ashley_M

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 37
  • Likes: 16

 
I tried to correct myself
 
Those videos he has on Xhamster account are videos widely available from other sites
 


When I posted earlier in the thread, I was referring to content he uploaded back around 2019. WGs complained at the time that he was uploading their content without their consent. He was then forced to remove some of that content. He has also admitted as much himself in his own posts.
I don't know if he's still uploading to sites like XHamster without permission, but it did happen in the past. The issue in question is whether he is still doing this now. This thread raises alarm bells that he might be. As has been pointed out already, the law and rules on most content websites have changed and many now require evidence of consent for any adult content being uploaded.

I get you might be trying to defend a friend here, but have you personally been monitoring all his uploads and checking with WGs where he got it all and whether he had permission to use it? If you have and can say without a shadow of doubt that what he's doing is both legal and not screwing over WGs who create content, then fair enough. But what he's done in the past is wrong - my concern is whether he is still at it.
I contributed what I know to this thread so it would be taken into consideration should anything dodgy transpire and a "paper-trail" is needed. It's important to let dickheads know that their behaviour isn't acceptable and that some of us are well aware of it, otherwise they think they can do whatever they want.


 
People like him are the reason we have free porn. Someone uploads a video online and people like OP reshare it


People like him are the reason content creators have a nightmare time trying to keep track of their content online. It's just taking the absolute piss out of creators and out of the people who do actually pay for our content (of which there are many on UKP).

Offline jay121

Ok guys. I uploaded some videos on my x hamster profile. Some of the WG’s you know, some you won’t know at all.

The password of all the videos is: kop671k

External Link/Members Only

Enjoy while they are available.

Think this is the time Ashley has highlighted before and i think he may have known they would be taken down as he does say 'enjoy while they are available'

Offline puntingpumping1920


When I posted earlier in the thread, I was referring to content he uploaded back around 2019. WGs complained at the time that he was uploading their content without their consent. He was then forced to remove some of that content. He has also admitted as much himself in his own posts.
I don't know if he's still uploading to sites like XHamster without permission, but it did happen in the past. The issue in question is whether he is still doing this now. This thread raises alarm bells that he might be. As has been pointed out already, the law and rules on most content websites have changed and many now require evidence of consent for any adult content being uploaded.

I get you might be trying to defend a friend here, but have you personally been monitoring all his uploads and checking with WGs where he got it all and whether he had permission to use it? If you have and can say without a shadow of doubt that what he's doing is both legal and not screwing over WGs who create content, then fair enough. But what he's done in the past is wrong - my concern is whether he is still at it.
I contributed what I know to this thread so it would be taken into consideration should anything dodgy transpire and a "paper-trail" is needed. It's important to let dickheads know that their behaviour isn't acceptable and that some of us are well aware of it, otherwise they think they can do whatever they want.


People like him are the reason content creators have a nightmare time trying to keep track of their content online. It's just taking the absolute piss out of creators and out of the people who do actually pay for our content (of which there are many on UKP).

 
I fully agree with you
 


Banned reason: Mr £500k go and buy some fucking manners
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline jay121

I am writing my review on a WG I have seen recently and I was wondering if you know any sites that do porn photo galleys like xhamster (before that site went downhill with posting videos/photos)?
I got some photos of the WG to share but don't just want to dump tons of photos on my review.

Anyways hope to hear from you guys soon thanks.

Guess you not had time to write the review