Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Little_Miss_Ireland - bareback on offer - Clapham Junction  (Read 3548 times)

Offline bluegene

Little_Miss_Ireland - was looking for a nice body

URL
: External Link/Members Only

£200 for 60min incall

About the escorts physical appearance and personality: Stated age: 32, nice body, natural breasts 36C, fully shaved,  irish.

Arranging the meeting
: I call the number on her profile (currently not listed) and agree a booking; she is only available in the evenings and weekends; while reading the feedback others left I realise 2 guys seen escorts that have bareback on offer; she doesn't have that offered but had "unprotected sex" listed (now removed); during the conversation unprotected sex is also offered to me;

Meeting:

Did not take place.


Positives:
1. None;

Negatives
:
1.  Offers bareback;

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Offline Ivor Hunch

shame- because she certainly does have a good body. 

great work though.

Offline Ivor Hunch

what a disappointing way to bring up the double ton


Offline webpunter


Offline Ivor Hunch

you seem to have been on a bit of a bad run-  glad the luck has turned by the sounds of it.

Do like the look of PiperWoods, though.  Are her photos reasonably recent?

Offline Stevelondon

So the OP was making an enquiry about a booking and BB was offered.

Have I got that right ?


Of course it is……silly me.  Duh !!!
« Last Edit: December 18, 2023, 08:05:38 pm by Stevelondon »

Online Iloveoral

  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,840
  • Likes: 239
  • Reviews: 382
Was a booking actually made and confirmed?

It does read as you were enquiring and she mentioned BB so you didn’t proceed?

Offline PumpDump

Was a booking actually made and confirmed?

It does read as you were enquiring and she mentioned BB so you didn’t proceed?

It says in the review that the meeting did not take place.

Offline webpunter

Reck intel like this is way more valuable than the barebackers threads
As on most of the SP profiles BB is showing
Its when it aint advertised that problems start happening
Even if a punter gets rubbered up the infection risks skyrocket
& a pretty sure sign of a crap session at best
Imagine having paid the SP for whatever booking duration it is, you get started & then BB for +£xx gets offered
A blood draining feeling ensues, including from the obvious area
Now shall i risk a HJ / HE ?, as the engines are started & paid up  :scare:

Offline PumpDump


Even if a punter gets rubbered up the infection risks skyrocket


Stop making shit up


Offline JustaPunter

You are beyond clueless, bless  :rolleyes:

He isn’t really wrong.

The risk remains the same.

Your perception of the risk is now different.

But the risk was the same regardless


Offline webpunter

He isn’t really wrong.

The risk remains the same.

Your perception of the risk is now different.

But the risk was the same regardless

So you [along with @PD] think that as long as you get rubbered up the risks are the same engaging in the usual FS punting activities whether the SP does or doesnt do BB with punters ?

Offline toddroman456

It does read like you are saying that condoms are useless and don't work.

Which will be interesting if you prove they are only a contraceptive.

Genuinely interested not trolling or antagonising this chat

Offline JustaPunter

So you [along with @PD] think that as long as you get rubbered up the risks are the same engaging in the usual FS punting activities whether the SP does or doesnt do BB with punters ?

I did have a reply to your drivel but I have deleted it.

You are not worth the time as you have zero ability to understand facts
« Last Edit: December 20, 2023, 08:19:45 pm by JustaPunter »

Offline PumpDump

So you [along with @PD] think that as long as you get rubbered up the risks are the same engaging in the usual FS punting activities whether the SP does or doesnt do BB with punters ?

That is not what I said. You said if the girl barebackers then even with a condom the "infection risks skyrocket". I said you made that up. If you didn't then prove it with some references.

Offline webpunter

That is not what I said. You said if the girl barebackers then even with a condom the "infection risks skyrocket". I said you made that up. If you didn't then prove it with some references.

My point is that a BB'er is a potential walking temperature controlled petri dish of STIs

You ain't gonna catch the big one
Which doesnt transmit easily, so nodder breakages for example whilst referenced on here causing alarm & panic are pretty low risk
Unless you carry on for donkeys, which is unlikely to happen
Or are extremely unlucky [too much wanking abrasions on the knob & the SP has just caught it so a high viral load]
I know having had a private health check where some Q&A's on various things, expensive enough to warrant more than just a blood test etc
& there are numerous threads on here containing useful intel

However a cocktail of fanny batter & potentially harry [a strain or three maybe] is a different ball game
At some point a BB SP will catch something for sure & nodders dont usually go all the way down so allows some genital to genital contact
You'd have to be a bit unlucky however genital warts on the SPs flaps which may be pretty much invisible or in their infancy can cause a problem
Then there's other activities incl. OWO / fingering / RO / pussy slides etc
Hence IMO a BB SP presents a much higher risk than usually the case than with FS SPs who take sensible precautions

I'd like to think that with my track record on here i'm hardly squeamish

In summary does a SP doing BB present a different risk:
1/ lower
2/ the same [as @JAP seems to think - tho he needn't worry 10 reviews in 3 years  :rolleyes: :D]
3/ higher
4/ much higher

IMO 3 a dead cert, 4 very most likely
Each to their own as to what risks are acceptable / not
Hopefully this answers your post

& not forgetting that the OP provided one of the most valuable reviews [even tho meet not completed] with BB being on the menu tho not on the Awank profile

Thats me done for now, me thinks we should wait for UKP's in-house doc to cast his view before further comment

Offline PumpDump

My point is that a BB'er is a potential walking temperature controlled petri dish of STIs

You ain't gonna catch the big one
Which doesnt transmit easily, so nodder breakages for example whilst referenced on here causing alarm & panic are pretty low risk
Unless you carry on for donkeys, which is unlikely to happen
Or are extremely unlucky [too much wanking abrasions on the knob & the SP has just caught it so a high viral load]
I know having had a private health check where some Q&A's on various things, expensive enough to warrant more than just a blood test etc
& there are numerous threads on here containing useful intel

However a cocktail of fanny batter & potentially harry [a strain or three maybe] is a different ball game
At some point a BB SP will catch something for sure & nodders dont usually go all the way down so allows some genital to genital contact
You'd have to be a bit unlucky however genital warts on the SPs flaps which may be pretty much invisible or in their infancy can cause a problem
Then there's other activities incl. OWO / fingering / RO / pussy slides etc
Hence IMO a BB SP presents a much higher risk than usually the case than with FS SPs who take sensible precautions

I'd like to think that with my track record on here i'm hardly squeamish

In summary does a SP doing BB present a different risk:
1/ lower
2/ the same [as @JAP seems to think - tho he needn't worry 10 reviews in 3 years  :rolleyes: :D]
3/ higher
4/ much higher

IMO 3 a dead cert, 4 very most likely
Each to their own as to what risks are acceptable / not

Hopefully this answers your post

& not forgetting that the OP provided one of the most valuable reviews [even tho meet not completed] with BB being on the menu tho not on the Awank profile

Thats me done for now, me thinks we should wait for UKP's in-house doc to cast his view before further comment

Ok, so it was just your opinion, nothing backed up by any kind of stats or studies. Fine.

Offline webpunter

Ok, so it was just your opinion, nothing backed up by any kind of stats or studies. Fine.

Only going to see a private doc as mentioned & numerous things on here

What i've only just noticed from your reviews is that you have a penchant for BB
Hence for you reading my post things are the wrong way round from where you are looking
The higher the risk the better
Silly me  :dash:

When it comes to stats / studies for example its generally considered not a good idea to look down the barrel of a gun
Whether or not its loaded
I can't find any analysis / stats / studies on this online
Therefore you can take doing this to be perfectly safe, crack on & good luck

Offline JustaPunter

Only going to see a private doc as mentioned & numerous things on here

What i've only just noticed from your reviews is that you have a penchant for BB
Hence for you reading my post things are the wrong way round from where you are looking
The higher the risk the better
Silly me  :dash:

When it comes to stats / studies for example its generally considered not a good idea to look down the barrel of a gun
Whether or not its loaded
I can't find any analysis / stats / studies on this online
Therefore you can take doing this to be perfectly safe, crack on & good luck

So no actual hard facts then?


Interesting you mention looking down the barrel of a gun.

Because your perception of the risk will be the same whether it’s loaded or not.

The actually risk will be very different whether it’s loaded or not.

Thats the interesting thing about how somebody perceives risk when compared to the actual risk.

« Last Edit: December 27, 2023, 03:15:27 pm by JustaPunter »

Offline JustaPunter

That is not what I said. You said if the girl barebackers then even with a condom the "infection risks skyrocket". I said you made that up. If you didn't then prove it with some references.

He seems to like to make up his own facts to suit his opinion

Offline JustaPunter

It does read like you are saying that condoms are useless and don't work.

Which will be interesting if you prove they are only a contraceptive.

Genuinely interested not trolling or antagonising this chat

Who are you replying to?

Online jamiekinkxxx

He seems to like to make up his own facts to suit his opinion

Indeed!

As webpunter has called out PP is a unapologetic BB'er, he throws the dice. Glad I don't frequent his circles!  :vomit: