Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Creampiecumsluts  (Read 5108 times)

Offline jay0707

I come across this 'group' a lot on AW and noticed they offer bareback sex. I can't help but question how are they still working, are their 'clients's not infected with all sorts or are people just getting lucky and not contracting anything, or if they are, nothing serious?

Offline cueball

The same questions have me scratching my head but with all the barebackers

UKBB

  • Guest
I come across this 'group' a lot on AW and noticed they offer bareback sex. I can't help but question how are they still working, are their 'clients's not infected with all sorts or are people just getting lucky and not contracting anything, or if they are, nothing serious?

Only looked at the first two of your reviews and both mention OWO... Don't you worry about catching anything?

In the dim and distant, before going all the way, I was a covered fuck and OWO man. I then contracted both gonnorhea and chlamydia and it could only have been from a wg giving OWO. I wasn't in a relationship and in the previous 6-months my only possible exposure was through OWO.

For some  months after I gave up fucking whores for a while, and then I realised it was a sad old life. I started vanilla and then one day thought 'fuck it' in for a penny in forva poundf. I now fuck as frequently as I can without any protection. I've fucked high risk and high class - from £60ph Romanian dirtbags to £170on  British  escorts - some covered, all OWO. I've had another dose or two of chlamydia in the period since opting to go bare but never more than chlamydia.

If you balk at bareback, don't go OWO. Stones and glass houses and all that.

Offline jay0707

The risk factor is significantly lower in terms of contraction of chlamydia, hiv etc. The escorts I visit do not offer bareback.
I really can't be bothered giving a thought out explanation, but please don't try compare Wg's offering OWO and protected penetration to women who offer BB anal and vaginal and OWO to all their clients...

Offline jay0707

Basically it comes across that you're saying that if I receive OWO I may as well sack protection off altogether. I can't help but think that sounds fucking ridiculous, to say the least?

UKBB

  • Guest
Basically it comes across that you're saying that if I receive OWO I may as well sack protection off altogether. I can't help but think that sounds fucking ridiculous, to say the least?

That is exactly the conclusion I came to. Nobody has ever provided me with any conclusive evidence that says the risks are disproportionately different. As I said, I've contracted worse from OWO than I have from 50+ bareback fucks with some really high risk whores and that also includes several bareback gangbangs.

Dick4snowqueens

  • Guest
I come across this 'group' a lot on AW and noticed they offer bareback sex. I can't help but question how are they still working, are their 'clients's not infected with all sorts or are people just getting lucky and not contracting anything, or if they are, nothing serious?
Pls can we get a link
I'm curious  :music:

JupitersBurning

  • Guest
We're all at risk regardless because of the abundance of things like bacteria and their propensity for mutation. We're a high risk group but we can do things to prevent infection. As with everything else in life it's down to...I wouldn't say luck but something akin. Two people can smoke for years, one can get lung cancer at 40 the other can puff away and still be going strong past 70.

With BB you're exposing yourself to bacteria and you've less protection. You're also shoving your dick and mouth in a mixture of other people's bodily fluids. There's a reason health professionals have to follow certain practices when dealing with bodily fluids. I could do bareback, I could be fine for years but manage to catch something via oral. I'd rather do what I can to reduce infection risk and routes.


Offline MancSean

That is exactly the conclusion I came to. Nobody has ever provided me with any conclusive evidence that says the risks are disproportionately different. As I said, I've contracted worse from OWO than I have from 50+ bareback fucks with some really high risk whores and that also includes several bareback gangbangs.
I have a question for you. Do you see girls that don't offer bareback and go covered but get owo?

Dick4snowqueens

  • Guest

Offline jay0707

I have a question for you. Do you see girls that don't offer bareback and go covered but get owo?

That's my main concern. To be fair anyone who does do that is a cunt. If you're going to bareback, don't OWO with non-barebackers.

UKBB

  • Guest
I have a question for you. Do you see girls that don't offer bareback and go covered but get owo?

Yes

UKBB

  • Guest
That's my main concern. To be fair anyone who does do that is a cunt. If you're going to bareback, don't OWO with non-barebackers.

How do you know your 'non-barebacker' is truly a non-barebacker?

Lots of the girls I've barebacked publicly say they don't. One was a very, very vocal anti-barebacker on another forum but we fucked bareback from my second visit to her.

How do you know your non-barebacker isn't fucking all and sundry in the club on a Thursday Friday Saturday - all bareback?

Answer: you don't.

So don't preach to me. Wise-up.

Offline smiths

I come across this 'group' a lot on AW and noticed they offer bareback sex. I can't help but question how are they still working, are their 'clients's not infected with all sorts or are people just getting lucky and not contracting anything, or if they are, nothing serious?

I assume they are still working whether infected or not because they get enough punters for them to continue doing so. I have no doubt BB penetration is popular with some punters, all fucking idiots in my view. Now OWO does NOT hold the same risk to a punter as BB as GUM staff have told me though as always they recommend I don't punt at all but if I do only do OW. I ignore that advice and punt on a risk to reward basis where for ME OWO is worth the risk but BB penetration isn't, and I don't get complacent and think I could never catch something as I could.

Offline smiths

How do you know your 'non-barebacker' is truly a non-barebacker?

Lots of the girls I've barebacked publicly say they don't. One was a very, very vocal anti-barebacker on another forum but we fucked bareback from my second visit to her.

How do you know your non-barebacker isn't fucking all and sundry in the club on a Thursday Friday Saturday - all bareback?

Answer: you don't.

So don't preach to me. Wise-up.

Name and shame these dirtbags so punters are aware.

Offline _Bender_

Name and shame these dirtbags so punters are aware.

UKBB has left some reviews in the East Mids section and already asked him to name WG he's seen BB or not! :bomb:

Offline smiths

UKBB has left some reviews in the East Mids section and already asked him to name WG he's seen BB or not! :bomb:

No harm in re-naming on the main board as more punters will read it, and I am interested to hear who this very very vocal anti-barebacker on another forum was. She is a hypocrite of the highest order and deserves to be named and shamed for that in my view, bearing in mind many WGs might retire and return as proved on here over the years.
« Last Edit: July 27, 2015, 12:07:39 am by smiths »

UKBB

  • Guest
I assume they are still working whether infected or not because they get enough punters for them to continue doing so. I have no doubt BB penetration is popular with some punters, all fucking idiots in my view. Now OWO does NOT hold the same risk to a punter as BB as GUM staff have told me though as always they recommend I don't punt at all but if I do only do OW. I ignore that advice and punt on a risk to reward basis where for ME OWO is worth the risk but BB penetration isn't, and I don't get complacent and think I could never catch something as I could.

Repetition doesn't make a 'fact' accurate. Don't forget, for years we were told saturated fats made us fat and that diet low in fat and high in carbohydrate was the way to go to stay slim.

Offline jay0707

How do you know your 'non-barebacker' is truly a non-barebacker?

Lots of the girls I've barebacked publicly say they don't. One was a very, very vocal anti-barebacker on another forum but we fucked bareback from my second visit to her.

How do you know your non-barebacker isn't fucking all and sundry in the club on a Thursday Friday Saturday - all bareback?

Answer: you don't.

So don't preach to me. Wise-up.

I don't, no-one does, but they are more likely to be a non barebacker. It makes more sense to punt with an escort who says she doesn't bareback, than one who does. Because then, you know it's 100% she does bareback.

Now if you have any decency, you'll name these girls who bareback who you claim who don't offer it, and those escorts who you visit.

johnnyboy61

  • Guest
UKBB started a recent thread asking for a neutral policy on Barebacking and a dedicated Bareback Board. He knows the views of the majority of UKP members, so I wonder if he has started this thread just to rattle the cage again as his other thread has died a natural death after running to 6 pages.

carefree

  • Guest
Yeah come on UKBB, have the minerals to name and shame the skanks you speak of.

Just because you have no regard for your own health, at least have the decency to tell the rest of us which filthy skanks to avoid. :hi:

Offline smiths

Repetition doesn't make a 'fact' accurate. Don't forget, for years we were told saturated fats made us fat and that diet low in fat and high in carbohydrate was the way to go to stay slim.

I see you replied to this post but not mine where I asked you to name and shame these dirtbags who offered you BB, especially the one you say was very very anti BB on another forum, up to you of course but i find it very strange you haven't.



Offline MancSean

I see you replied to this post but not mine where I asked you to name and shame these dirtbags who offered you BB, especially the one you say was very very anti BB on another forum, up to you of course but i find it very strange you haven't.
UKBB seems like a self righteous selfish fella.
He might be ok with barebacking and then getting his nob sucked by women who don't bareback.
If he was a decent bloke he would name them and if he does I won't be seeing any of those lasses.
Sad thing is that he seems to get a kick out of this topic because whilst he wants to stick his dick up diseased twats and justifies it's ok to everybody else by saying owo is just as risky without knowing all the facts disgraceful behaviour

Offline stevedave

Agreed with all the above - UKBB, this is a forum for sharing information, not gloating that you've fucked WG's BB when they don't offer it.

The most fair thing for you to do, would be to name these WG' s and let other punters make an informed decision about whether they want to see them. Irrespective of whether you've caught no worse than chlamydia (but that's still pretty bad), the next punter she saw after you may have infected her with something worse.

If women offer BB then fine, that's their prerogative. The ones that don't but do it are the worry.

And frankly, I don't want to risk having your sloppy seconds. So well done, you've had your moment and got one over on non barebackers, but have the humility to name them please.

Offline Daffodil

I do feel there is hypocrisy when punters do owo, but chastise those who do bareback. The only difference is the degree of risk, and I feel that they're probably closer in terms of risk than we'd like to imagine.

I have heard far more tales on here of punters catching STDs from oral sex than from bareback sex. That's not to say that I think bareback is safer than owo, it likely represents the fact barebackers are fewer in number than those who do owo and also that barebackers are less likely to talk openly about it, but STDs are caught through oral sex.

I also think it's naive to assume a prostitute doesn't do bareback sex because she says she doesn't do bareback sex. A lot do it with punters, off the record. I've been directly and indirectly offered it. Prossies also tend to be promiscuous by nature and are probably fucking all sorts on a Friday night.

It's fine to avail yourselves of the risks and make a choice that feels right for you. I, myself, have started erring towards covered oral. But try to do it on real risks, rather than perceived risks, and be careful in your glass houses.

Offline jay0707

I do feel there is hypocrisy when punters do owo, but chastise those who do bareback. The only difference is the degree of risk, and I feel that they're probably closer in terms of risk than we'd like to imagine.

I have heard far more tales on here of punters catching STDs from oral sex than from bareback sex. That's not to say that I think bareback is safer than owo, it likely represents the fact barebackers are fewer in number than those who do owo and also that barebackers are less likely to talk openly about it, but STDs are caught through oral sex.

I also think it's naive to assume a prostitute doesn't do bareback sex because she says she doesn't do bareback sex. A lot do it with punters, off the record. I've been directly and indirectly offered it. Prossies also tend to be promiscuous by nature and are probably fucking all sorts on a Friday night.

It's fine to avail yourselves of the risks and make a choice that feels right for you. I, myself, have started erring towards covered oral. But try to do it on real risks, rather than perceived risks, and be careful in your glass houses.

I agree, regardless of myself always going for OWO. I mean we can never truly tell if an escort offers bareback to people regardless of her stating it. But I tend to think that the girls (regulars) I visit don't because after a handful of meets and more with regulars haven't offered it directly or indirectly to me yet. But that's merely anecdotal assumption.

For all we know barebackers might be safer to fuck assuming they'll be more health concious getting regular tests as they know they have more exposure to std's etc than people whore fuck covered. But that's not something I want to assume, merely another way of looking at the issue.

Offline jsparky

For all we know barebackers might be safer to fuck assuming they'll be more health concious getting regular tests as they know they have more exposure to std's etc than people whore fuck covered. But that's not something I want to assume, merely another way of looking at the issue.

You're making the wrong assumptions, the barebackers are definitely the less health conscious, they  know if they are infected its because they got it from punters/pro$$ies alike; to them its only fair game they infect other punters/pro$$ies.

If you read the post on forums by barebackers carefully and you'll realized this is the kind of attitudes shown by the barebackers.

Offline jay0707

Yeah likely is the wrong assumption.

To be fair kinda clicked on from UKBB's posts. He won't state who is barebacking, because it's probably a little game to him to send people off thinking they might be fucking a WG who he fucked bareback. Or he's frauding. Either way, being a prick.

Offline MancSean

Yeah likely is the wrong assumption.

To be fair kinda clicked on from UKBB's posts. He won't state who is barebacking, because it's probably a little game to him to send people off thinking they might be fucking a WG who he fucked bareback. Or he's frauding. Either way, being a prick.
He's just a cunt no other way to describe the fucker

Offline Smoking joe

Agreed with all the above - UKBB, this is a forum for sharing information, not gloating that you've fucked WG's BB when they don't offer it.

The most fair thing for you to do, would be to name these WG' s and let other punters make an informed decision about whether they want to see them. Irrespective of whether you've caught no worse than chlamydia (but that's still pretty bad), the next punter she saw after you may have infected her with something worse.

If women offer BB then fine, that's their prerogative. The ones that don't but do it are the worry.

Agreed, bloke is an idiot. Will he carry on if/ when he is HIV positive?  Moron.

And frankly, I don't want to risk having your sloppy seconds. So well done, you've had your moment and got one over on non barebackers, but have the humility to name them please.
Banned reason: Undesirable white knight troll
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Thr0bbing_Hood

UKBB might be trying to whined us all up or maybe not but I think its pretty safe to say that there are plenty of BB punters out there who don't admit to it, keeping it hidden and are probably shagging all the highly rated non-BB WIGs out there as well.

for example:
UKBB claims he has seen External Link/Members Only she doesn't offer BB but due to her not being as popular as many other wigs no one is really going to care but what happens if he goes and sees say tiffany snow or ava grace et

Also OWO is not risk free either but plenty of Punters do it so god knows whats being passed on there.

Reality is, this is a very risky game even, if you are trying to be careful there's no guarantees the wig has been as careful in choosing her clients. It's probably her only source of income so she will take on majority of people who contact her and not question their punting history.


BTW I think UKBB is Leicester based majority of the girls he has talked about are based in Leicester or have toured there so you could avoid Leicester in general but, all of this is relative, as I have said we don't know who a WIG has BB'd with or the clients she has seen and OWO is no less risky than BB

Offline munterhunter

Repetition doesn't make a 'fact' accurate. Don't forget, for years we were told saturated fats made us fat and that diet low in fat and high in carbohydrate was the way to go to stay slim.

No repetition doesn't but the fact that it is a "fact" does!!! Doing BB with a WG is your choice the fact that in the hundreds of BB fucks you've had you've only caught Chlamydia indicates you're lucky. Ive had hundreds of fucks too and never caught anything because I avoid women who advertise they do BB. I'm choosy about who I punt with and I practice safe sex when I punt. It is a FACT that unprotected sex carries a higher risk of an STI being transmitted and for the majority of people on here that's an unacceptable risk!

Ben4454

  • Guest

For me it is strictly protected sex and oral WITH.

Offline Thr0bbing_Hood

UKBB has finally done it, he's gone and seen Mandy of Leicester, who is probably the best thing out there and is now ruined. we can all grill him but that's pointless, start warning the Leicester girls they have a real threat out there to their business