Established parlour v Adultwork and Vivastreet

[Lazydog]

I have lost my faith in Adultwork and Vivastreet with its high pricing, fake profiles and unreliable photos etc to name a few, I’ve used both these sites over the years but now it’s so hit and miss

I haven’t punted much in the last year , 4 in total but all have been in well run established parlours, The girls have been as per the photo’s and their descriptions, and all delivered the services as listed,  the girls seemed to enjoy their work and willing to satisfy,

Massage-Northampton- Louisa £60 , 30 mins OW, RO no kissing
Victoria House Lutterworth - Tori £15 door fee + £80 in room 30 mins , OWO, CIM, RO, DFK
Annabellas - Milton Keynes - Apple £120, 1 hour, OWO, CIM, RO, DFK
Annabellas - Milton Keynes - Elle £90, 45mins, OWO, CIM, RO, DFK

Obviously these places were only open in line with government guidelines and its frustrating that there currently closed but I think they offer a great selection of girls,  good value for money, no bait and switch , well run and safe environments,

I’ll certainly be returning to all of these places once allowed as apposed to trying my luck on Adultwork or Vivastreet - however never say never

[CoolTiger]

I could be wrong here, but AFAIR some of these parlours have posted fake pics??

Perhaps some of the regulars to these establishments could confirm/correct this.

[Lazydog]

Hi CT,
The girls I have met have been a true reflection of their profile , maybe I’ve just been lucky in my choice as I'm sure they’ll be a few fake profiles  , I hope my luck doesn’t run out but  I would be prepared to walk

[mr.bluesky]

I could be wrong here, but AFAIR some of these parlours have posted fake pics??

Perhaps some of the regulars to these establishments could confirm/correct this.

Having only been to Victoria House in Lutterworth  I can say the girls profile photo's are 100% genuine. Some perhaps have tattoo's air brushed off. Having seen Tori at VH her photos are true.  They also have framed photos of the girls on the walls inside the establishment . 

[Mickyboy]

I’d agree that the girls pictures on VH are genuine however I have it on good authority that an element of photoshop is used by some. A girl from Club Classique/oasis doesn’t look anything like her profile pictures and I’ve seen the pictures on a porn actress but in the main I would say parlours are a better representation of the girls than AW and certainly VS. That’s just my opinion and experience, I’m sure others will possibly disagree.

[HornyHemel]

I could be wrong here, but AFAIR some of these parlours have posted fake pics??

Perhaps some of the regulars to these establishments could confirm/correct this.

In my experience of using all 4 of these agencies, the pics have been genuine.   However, the vast majority are heavily airbrushed.  Personally, I always check their respective twitter feeds for more natural pictures! 

[Itsnotshy]

Personally I always go for a parlour. You can usually tell if the pics are dodgy and most parlours will have some airbrushed or out of date photos.
Main benefits are not having to book beforehand with all the emails, texts, phone calls, cancellations etc and you're not going to meet an irate boyfriend hiding in another room.
Downside, less choice than with adultwork.
So it comes down to more choice or less hassle imo.

[Hotpocket]

I could be wrong here, but AFAIR some of these parlours have posted fake pics??

Perhaps some of the regulars to these establishments could confirm/correct this.

I've been a regular at massage northampton for last 10+ years, all the girls i have seen looked like the pictures but may be airbrushed a little.

[MajorPayne]

I've been a regular at massage northampton for last 10+ years, all the girls i have seen looked like the pictures but may be airbrushed a little.

That has not always been my experience.

I've seen several girls over the years at Massage Northampton that had little resemblance to their photographs.

Never had a problem with Annabellas in Milton Keynes.

[Hotpocket]

That has not always been my experience.

I've seen several girls over the years at Massage Northampton that had little resemblance to their photographs.

Never had a problem with Annabellas in Milton Keynes.

Thats strange, I've seen alot of girls at this establishment and they were always the girl pictured, the only one that was questionable was Karolina but that was due to weight gain and growing/dying her hair, let her off though as she was pure filth.

[decadentd]

This is reassuring as my last two attempts in Crewe were way off the description.  Age does not worry me too much as the 'professional' age is usually minus five/ten years the actual age, but it's thing like clearly fake physical attributes that can be disappointing. 

[MajorPayne]

Thats strange, I've seen alot of girls at this establishment and they were always the girl pictured, the only one that was questionable was Karolina but that was due to weight gain and growing/dying her hair, let her off though as she was pure filth.

Yes my experience also, however there were at least two occasions where the photographs bore little resemblance to the girl I met.

[Sir Robin]

Everyone will have different experiences but generally I think sites like Vivastreet & Crazyoz are the biggest gamble you have to view all ads with scepticism and a large dose of salt but occasionally they pay off.
AW I find a bit more reliable but still some issues not to mention filtered photos, older pics, B&S etc. Parlours tend to be far more reliable as they require local reputation and repeat visits.
I’m always far more cautious with tourers as they can seem different and exciting but they don’t have requirement for a great service and repeat customer as they’re already planning to move on.