Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Why does nobody discuss vagina quality when writing reviews?  (Read 3167 times)

Offline FlaccidChimp

One of the best punts I had was with a girl that just began escorting. She was the tightest girl I ever slept with and it felt great. Usually the girls say something like "ooo it's so big..." but once it gets in a few inches I fall into a black hole. A few times it has been so bad that I have to pick one side of her sugar wall to rub against because its so wide that I wont feel it all around me. It definitely makes a difference during punting.

Offline tangledupinblue

Always do an audit on it,
Inner / outer lips
Vulva
Smell
Did it exceed your expectations
It’s a good point though

Online daviemac

  • Board Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 25,304
  • Likes: 384
  • Reviews: 24
One of the best punts I had was with a girl that just began escorting. She was the tightest girl I ever slept with and it felt great. Usually the girls say something like "ooo it's so big..." but once it gets in a few inches I fall into a black hole. A few times it has been so bad that I have to pick one side of her sugar wall to rub against because its so wide that I wont feel it all around me. It definitely makes a difference during punting.

Maybe the same reason you don't.    :unknown:

Offline Doc Holliday

Usually the girls say something like "ooo it's so big..." but once it gets in a few inches I fall into a black hole....

They clearly lied to you then  ;) :D

... or did you pay for the sci fi experience instead?

Offline Jacques Barstarred

Ever noticed how external appearance is no guide to actual sensation?

I remember well one WG who had a cracking firm athletic body and a small neat shaven slit but once inside, it was like she was hollow. Absolutely no friction at all. No evidence of her having a baby either. Maybe there was no rifling left in the barrel after years of reaming.

Offline thefoxman

The tightest lady I've had was also the one of the fattest, you never can tell  :unknown:

Offline unclepokey

This is not entirely on topic but has one element in point:
Around a dozen years ago I had a MMF with a couple called Red and Raunchy in Hemel Hempstead.
It was a satisfactory encounter. They were a pleasant couple and very open minded. The flat was sparsely furnished with little in the way of carpeting, curtains or furniture apart from a settee and the bed.
We played around a bit but after a while I asked that Raunchy get into 69 above me whilst Red got into her giving her a hard fucking whilst I licked his bits, and Raunchy gave me a nice BJ. Now it might have been my imagination or the acoustics of the room but I discerned a bit of an echo when we spoke. I mentioned this from below and almost immediately realised an implication that what I said was an observation that Raunchy had a totally cavernous vagina. So I quickly said that it in no way was it my intention to imply that Raunchy had a flabby pussy. Thankfully they both laughed mightily which, I think showed just how broad minded they were.
After that we had some DVP – me covered, Red not - and she was tight without doubt then. This was the first time for me and Raunchy took it brilliantly. At some point, without me realising, my condom broke and I think shortly after that Red flooded us both which caused me to cum too. When we pulled I was horrified to see this dead slug, the ring still around the base of my cock the rest flapping around and cum everywhere.
Still though great memories.
Most vaginas I find completely ok providing they are plumbed in to a woman with a pleasant disposition and a love of a good shag.
UP


Offline CoolTiger

  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 15,030
  • Likes: 6
  • Reviews: 10
Why does nobody discuss vagina quality when writing reviews? 

That's cos they're all cunts!!!!  :lol: :lol: :lol:


I'll grab me coat.

Offline willie loman

Not strictly true, if the girl is grippy or unusually loose, many posters will indeed comment.
 
« Last Edit: April 03, 2019, 05:17:54 pm by willie loman »

Offline king tarzan

Not strictly true, if the girl is grippy or unusually loose, many posters will indeed comment.

Agreed 👍
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Waterhouse

Agreed 👍
Maybe you need to add another line after "Physical Construction"... possibly  "Pussy Perfection - 9.7" ?   :lol:

Offline Billy no mates

My reviews will say ‘tight fanny’ if that’s what I found.

Offline Thecunninglinguist

Maybe their should be an addition to the essential punting kit. Cheap watch, punting phone, correct cash.........Speculum.,?

Offline pythondan

I would normally only comment if a girl's pussy is in some way unusual.

English Rebecca has the tightest pussy I have ever experienced (WG or civvy including a - so tight it actually made some positions awkward but we managed in the end  :)

The visual aspect is a big thing for me - large flaps put me right off as does more than just a whisp of hair or an unpleasent odor.

Some pussies are truly beautiful though - I could eat those all day


Offline Shropslad2008

I’ve also encountered a few slim/athletic girls that seemed to be hollow on the inside too. The fat ones seem to be one extreme or the other, nicely tight or visably like the opening of a bus garage.

Offline Moby Dick

Nobody?

“Her pussy was very wet so not getting much traction or feeling.
She suggested she lay down, and we had a spot of mish. A bit of light kissing, and plenty of eye contact as I thrust back and forth in her sloppy pussy. Although it looked good as I held her legs up, I knew I wouldn't come like this”

mikexxlong

  • Guest
it might be worthy  noting such things in reviews
 along with all the other usual points such as service ,attitude, appearance etc

as for some punters this could be the difference between a good satisfying punt and a fantastic truly  satisfying punt 
and could be the deciding factor in who a punter pays their money to

in my experience with both pro$$i£'s and civvies
some pussys will feel for whatever reason 'slack'  yet others feel 'tight'
 their  looks  ,body shape/type or even the outward appearance of the genitalia
 does not always give any indication on how their vagina is going to feel to the person inserting their penis into it :(

Bertbart

  • Guest
I used to slide between the sheets with a civvy who had the sweetest designer vagina I've ever seen. Could insert 4 fingers inside her with ease though, yet  when I inserted my average sized Cory in her it felt so tight it sometimes hurt me this was down to her vag being really dry .

On the other hand.... I was seeing another civvy at the same time who had a maximum of one finger vag. It was so tight that 2 fingers was a no no. After a few minutes she would self labricate and make a right old mess of the bed, the tightness would be gone and it would feel looser due to the grool, Still only slide one finger in though.

Noticed this with the pro's. They feel a lot tighter and it's more fun until they cover themselves in lube.

Funny old things them vaginas.

Offline Doc Holliday

Re Tightness.

Firstly lets put aside the effects of age and multiple childbirths which may, to a degree, play a part in muscle tone.

Secondly exclude penis sizes at the 'extreme' edges of the spectrum which may also to an extent be a factor for some.

Then we are dealing with the 'majority' situation and then the main factor affecting 'tightness' is purely sexual arousal.

The vagina can double in length when fully aroused and relax in circumference to comfortably accommodate the majority of penises or objects whilst at the same time producing its own lubrication.

If you describe a vagina as feeling 'extremely tight' it will usually mean its owner is not relaxed or aroused sufficiently. In extreme cases this may border on vaginismus.

The more aroused and especially if 'over lubricated' (natural or otherwise) the looser it will 'feel'.

This natural progression with increasing arousal can be negated if the female has good muscle control and with concentration she can contract the musculature deliberately ...even to the point of a vice like grip (fond memories of a couple of those!)

Also at the point of female orgasm contraction is likely to occur spontaneously.

Offline Moby Dick

So a fanny like a bucket means she is turned on?
Note to myself: skip the foreplay, and get first booking of the day.

Re Tightness.

Firstly lets put aside the effects of age and multiple childbirths which may, to a degree, play a part in muscle tone.

Secondly exclude penis sizes at the 'extreme' edges of the spectrum which may also to an extent be a factor for some.

Then we are dealing with the 'majority' situation and then the main factor affecting 'tightness' is purely sexual arousal.

The vagina can double in length when fully aroused and relax in circumference to comfortably accommodate the majority of penises or objects whilst at the same time producing its own lubrication.

If you describe a vagina as feeling 'extremely tight' it will usually mean its owner is not relaxed or aroused sufficiently. In extreme cases this may border on vaginismus.

The more aroused and especially if 'over lubricated' (natural or otherwise) the looser it will 'feel'.

This natural progression with increasing arousal can be negated if the female has good muscle control and with concentration she can contract the musculature deliberately ...even to the point of a vice like grip (fond memories of a couple of those!)

Also at the point of female orgasm contraction is likely to occur spontaneously.

Offline Doc Holliday

So a fanny like a bucket means she is turned on?
Note to myself: skip the foreplay, and get first booking of the day.

 :D

That also assumes that she is actually turned on at some point during the day  :D


mikexxlong

  • Guest
Re Tightness.

Firstly lets put aside the effects of age and multiple childbirths which may, to a degree, play a part in muscle tone.

Secondly exclude penis sizes at the 'extreme' edges of the spectrum which may also to an extent be a factor for some.

Then we are dealing with the 'majority' situation and then the main factor affecting 'tightness' is purely sexual arousal.

The vagina can double in length when fully aroused and relax in circumference to comfortably accommodate the majority of penises or objects whilst at the same time producing its own lubrication.

If you describe a vagina as feeling 'extremely tight' it will usually mean its owner is not relaxed or aroused sufficiently. In extreme cases this may border on vaginismus.

The more aroused and especially if 'over lubricated' (natural or otherwise) the looser it will 'feel'.

This natural progression with increasing arousal can be negated if the female has good muscle control and with concentration she can contract the musculature deliberately ...even to the point of a vice like grip (fond memories of a couple of those!)

Also at the point of female orgasm contraction is likely to occur spontaneously.

not discounting anything you have written
 
it's just not set in stone and as simple as that

 i have experienced as I'm sure others have as well
many a female(s) that have been very 'turned on' enjoying  sex and thoroughly lubricated yet still felt "tight" 
or otherwise just felt vaginally better than others :unknown:

Offline Ali Katt

  • Board Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,961
  • Likes: 16
  • Reviews: 28
The tightest lady I've had was also the one of the fattest, you never can tell  :unknown:
Thanks for all the amazing reviews, foxy, member for 5 years and fuck all in return.

Offline Ali Katt

  • Board Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,961
  • Likes: 16
  • Reviews: 28
I used to slide between the sheets with a civvy who had the sweetest designer vagina I've ever seen. Could insert 4 fingers inside her with ease though, yet  when I inserted my average sized Cory in her it felt so tight it sometimes hurt me this was down to her vag being really dry .

On the other hand.... I was seeing another civvy at the same time who had a maximum of one finger vag. It was so tight that 2 fingers was a no no. After a few minutes she would self labricate and make a right old mess of the bed, the tightness would be gone and it would feel looser due to the grool, Still only slide one finger in though.

Noticed this with the pro's. They feel a lot tighter and it's more fun until they cover themselves in lube.

Funny old things them vaginas.
Breitbart why do you strike me as a serial fantasist? Hmmm.

Offline Doc Holliday

many a female(s) that have been very 'turned on' enjoying  sex and thoroughly lubricated yet still felt "tight" 
or otherwise just felt vaginally better than others :unknown:

Indeed arousal leads to relaxation, lengthening and lubrication of the vagina to normally accommodate whatever size is inserted. That does not mean the vagina keeps getting bigger and bigger beyond what is needed (and resemble 'a bucket') Also as I said the muscles can then contract again and some women have much greater control and ability to do this.

Vaginas are all different but mostly fall within a certain range. Angle/position can make a difference also.

My main point was that when people say she was 'the tightest ever' a likely explanation is lack of arousal, although I accept in some cases it can be exceptional muscle control but with the ability to alternate between contraction and relaxation which can feel truly amazing.

Offline EnglishRebecca121

  • Banned
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 3,924
  • Likes: 0

My main point was that when people say she was 'the tightest ever' a likely explanation is lack of arousal, although I accept in some cases it can be exceptional muscle control but with the ability to alternate between contraction and relaxation which can feel truly amazing.


Wrong .....im tiny down there even when horny and wet.
Banned reason: Ex sex worker with zero useful contribution to make
Banned by: Head1

Offline Ali Katt

  • Board Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,961
  • Likes: 16
  • Reviews: 28

Wrong .....im tiny down there even when horny and wet.
Sorry Becs it's not your place to say.

Offline Laudanum

This is not entirely on topic but has one element in point:
Around a dozen years ago I had a MMF with a couple called Red and Raunchy in Hemel Hempstead.
It was a satisfactory encounter. They were a pleasant couple and very open minded. The flat was sparsely furnished with little in the way of carpeting, curtains or furniture apart from a settee and the bed.
We played around a bit but after a while I asked that Raunchy get into 69 above me whilst Red got into her giving her a hard fucking whilst I licked his bits, and Raunchy gave me a nice BJ. Now it might have been my imagination or the acoustics of the room but I discerned a bit of an echo when we spoke. I mentioned this from below and almost immediately realised an implication that what I said was an observation that Raunchy had a totally cavernous vagina. So I quickly said that it in no way was it my intention to imply that Raunchy had a flabby pussy. Thankfully they both laughed mightily which, I think showed just how broad minded they were.
After that we had some DVP – me covered, Red not - and she was tight without doubt then. This was the first time for me and Raunchy took it brilliantly. At some point, without me realising, my condom broke and I think shortly after that Red flooded us both which caused me to cum too. When we pulled I was horrified to see this dead slug, the ring still around the base of my cock the rest flapping around and cum everywhere.
Still though great memories.
Most vaginas I find completely ok providing they are plumbed in to a woman with a pleasant disposition and a love of a good shag.
UP

I must admit I had to Google MMF and DVP!

Online cunningman

Also at the point of female orgasm contraction is likely to occur spontaneously.
Unlikely to be faking when the cervix comes banging down and whacks you out!
Well, maybe great control and great kegels too.
But I like it - victory!

Offline Doc Holliday


Wrong .....im tiny down there even when horny and wet.

The word 'tiny' can only be applied to describe a vagina in uncommon cases of abnormal development for example a genetic condition like Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome otherwise you vagina will be within the normal range 'dimension' wise.

The degree to which you can then relax and contract the musculature will vary either as an involuntary response to stimulus or voluntary muscle control as I previously posted.

If your vagina could not relax sufficiently to take a wide range of penis sizes you would not be working as a prostitute.

Offline EnglishRebecca121

  • Banned
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 3,924
  • Likes: 0
are you a medical professional?
 :unknown:

Anyhow im tiny i dont care what you say , at my smear test they had to use the spectrum for virgins ie the smallest one as  it was so TINY!
Elephant cocks will not fit inside me and i make that perfectly clear on my aw page.

I do not have any medical reasons why im TINY inside but i havent had children,  am petite and small boned so that may add reasons to it.
Banned reason: Ex sex worker with zero useful contribution to make
Banned by: Head1

Offline getsbettereverytime

This week I found possibly the nicest pussy to suck lick fuck I have ever found on a w/g, slim and young and shaven makes all the difference....
sweet tasting, beautifully shaped, responsive to mouth, fingers and toy.
Normally would not even think to comment on this unless exceptional.

Butt this weeks prize is Not something I want to share yet as I don't want to go back at the weekend and find a Q of you lot waiting up round the block!


Offline Doc Holliday

are you a medical professional?

It's my specialist subject in the pub quiz team and I do still have a full set of speculums does that count?  :)


Anyhow im tiny i dont care what you say , at my smear test they had to use the spectrum for virgins ie the smallest one as  it was so TINY!
Elephant cocks will not fit inside me and i make that perfectly clear on my aw page.

I do not have any medical reasons why im TINY inside but i havent had children,  am petite and small boned so that may add reasons to it.

It’s not easy to measure ‘resting’ vaginal sizes and studies are few and only on a small scale but here is a table from one using MRI scans as the measurement tool.

Hidden Image/Members Only

Put more simply and bluntly and in terms of width, for most women the variation between the lower end and upper end of the spectrum will be about a finger width. There’s a Kit Kat joke in there somewhere.  :D

The choice of speculum size by the gynaecologist will normally be based on three groupings

Firstly the sexually inactive (usually age related but not always). Secondly sexually active/experienced and thirdly those who have had at least one vaginal delivery. That’s a little oversimplified but broadly correct
This will mean that within each category the individual will be better able to cope more comfortably with a different sized speculum and manual distension based on their vaginas previous experience of such.

Remember that for most women an examination is not a sexual experience but a very clinical one and so you will not get much relaxation due to arousal.

If you are still on paediatric size speculums and given your degree of sexual activity (assumed) then yes that is unusual. However whilst you may well be at the lower end of the ‘resting’ dimensions, I would be fairly certain you do not fall into the anatomically TINY group or you simply could not do this job at all. This is more likely to be a difficulty in you being able to relax sufficiently and interestingly enough a common finding in patients who suffer from vaginismus is the mistaken perception that they are "tiny down there"



« Last Edit: April 05, 2019, 08:37:25 am by Doc Holliday »

Offline Ali Katt

  • Board Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,961
  • Likes: 16
  • Reviews: 28
are you a medical professional?
 :unknown:

Anyhow im tiny i dont care what you say , at my smear test they had to use the spectrum for virgins ie the smallest one as  it was so TINY!
Elephant cocks will not fit inside me and i make that perfectly clear on my aw page.

I do not have any medical reasons why im TINY inside but i havent had children,  am petite and small boned so that may add reasons to it.
Would you give a full refund if someone booked a 2 hour session and they were too big?

Offline Jacques Barstarred

are you a medical professional?
 :unknown:

Anyhow im tiny i dont care what you say , at my smear test they had to use the spectrum for virgins ie the smallest one as  it was so TINY!
Elephant cocks will not fit inside me and i make that perfectly clear on my aw page.

I do not have any medical reasons why im TINY inside but i havent had children,  am petite and small boned so that may add reasons to it.
A trip down memory lane.

Sinclair Computers ZX 81 Spectrum. Plenty of Virgins used them back in the day. Probably many users still are.

Hidden Image/Members Only

Offline Moby Dick

A trip down memory lane.

Sinclair Computers ZX 81 Spectrum. Plenty of Virgins used them back in the day. Probably many users still are.

Hidden Image/Members Only
Irrelevant to the size of a SPs front hole, and factually incorrect since there is no such thing as a zx81 spectrum

The zx81 and spectrum were 2 different models.

The zx80 cam out first.

Doubt if anyone would use the zx81 nowadays with 1kb of RAM and loading programs via “audio” cassette players.


Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only
« Last Edit: April 06, 2019, 12:58:01 pm by Moby Dick »

Offline Doc Holliday

Irrelevant to the size of a SPs front hole

I assume you did see the typo in the earlier post which prompted the 'spectrum' post in jest?

You are correct though you probably couldn't get a ZX81 in your front bum, let alone a larger spectrum.

A Nokia is another story

Hidden Image/Members Only
« Last Edit: April 06, 2019, 01:48:28 pm by Doc Holliday »

Offline Waterhouse

I assume you did see the typo in the earlier post which prompted the 'spectrum' post in jest?

You are correct though you probably couldn't get a ZX81 in your front bum, let alone a larger spectrum.

A Nokia is another story

Hidden Image/Members Only

A punting phone in the truest sense of the word.  :D

Offline Moby Dick

Nah, I just jumped on incorrectness. Must be in a badder mood today. Need a punt. Apolaogies to Jacques the Barstarred.
I assume you did see the typo in the earlier post which prompted the 'spectrum' post in jest?

You are correct though you probably couldn't get a ZX81 in your front bum, let alone a larger spectrum.

A Nokia is another story

Hidden Image/Members Only
« Last Edit: April 06, 2019, 01:57:40 pm by Moby Dick »

Offline Moby Dick

Does anyone mention how TINY your cunt is in your 82reviews?
(73 positive, 4 neutral, 5 negative)
I can’t be arsed to read any of them.
Maybe you aren’t busy and can enlighten us.

are you a medical professional?
 :unknown:

Anyhow im tiny i dont care what you say , at my smear test they had to use the spectrum for virgins ie the smallest one as  it was so TINY!
Elephant cocks will not fit inside me and i make that perfectly clear on my aw page.

I do not have any medical reasons why im TINY inside but i havent had children,  am petite and small boned so that may add reasons to it.

Offline EnglishRebecca121

  • Banned
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 3,924
  • Likes: 0
Banned reason: Ex sex worker with zero useful contribution to make
Banned by: Head1

Offline Doc Holliday

yes most of them

When I read some of them they actually used the word tight not tiny  ;)

Offline threechilliman

A punting phone in the truest sense of the word.  :D

Now there's an idea......

Offline threechilliman



Doubt if anyone would use the zx81 nowadays with 1kb of RAM and loading programs via “audio” cassette players.


Hidden Image/Members Only

That takes me back.

Offline Moby Dick

That takes me back.

Delicate things with the dodgy power cables, turned it self off more than my ex.
No internet whores back then. No internet, just the fanny mags and dodgy videos.

Still had a misspent youth which continued into adulthood and middle age, I expect to the grave

Offline darkdeep

It's not just tightness - it's also how pneumatic their pussy is.
This Chinese girl (well 32 years old but looked 19) had tightness AND her pussy was so pneumatic - not so much deliberate voluntary squeezing - it just squeezed and massaged anything in there.  Just fantastic.


Offline Doc Holliday

It's not just tightness - it's also how pneumatic their pussy is.
This Chinese girl (well 32 years old but looked 19) had tightness AND her pussy was so pneumatic - not so much deliberate voluntary squeezing - it just squeezed and massaged anything in there.  Just fantastic.

Did you not find the noise of the compressor a bit off putting?

Offline GreyDave

 :hi: I have found that there is not any way of pre guessing how tight one will be  :(  mind you 3 and  3/4inches aint gonna be that filling :( :(

That said some of the Gym Bunny Type WG`s are pretty good at the clamp and squezze game Lisa ff springs to mind  :drinks:
« Last Edit: April 20, 2019, 02:04:54 pm by GreyDave »

Offline NickA

When it comes to any woman's internal 'size', it's impossible to gauge. A big, lippy pussy doesn't imply a cavernous box any more than smaller lips means a small, tight one.

I've had sex with experienced WGs in their forties who still felt nice and tight. Back in the day, as a young man, I remember pulling a girl in a club in her early twenties, and it was really was like throwing a cocktail sausage down Oxford Street. All bodies are made different.

My strangest, big-box encounter was with an Italian WG in the old Latino parlour above Richer Sounds in Croydon, about ten years ago. She was a gorgeous looking girl, clearly in her mid twenties, slim, small boobs with one inverted nipple. I went down on her - average-sized lips and clitoris - to which she responded most favourably. I carried on going and she became wetter and wetter, in went one finger, and then another… and another… and so on. I'd encountered the vaginal equivalent of a Tardis. This signorina was positively cavernous.

The Italian seemed lost in the moment, sopping wet and happy for me to carry on. So I did. I ended up with all four fingers and a thumb inside, closing the digits up into that sort of 'duck's beak' shape always recommended for fisting. This was the first time I'd ever 'fisted' a WG. I got off on the novelty factor and the fact it was so unexpected. Not a word was said, while this went on. We ended up with me bringing her off - so she claimed, who knows? - before I came on her face and breasts.

Afterwards, I briefly regretted not fucking her, but she was so huge inside I couldn't imagine feeling very much.

Certainly not what I'd expected from a skinny lass in her twenties. But you live and learn…