Very useful forensic contributions to this investigation, Mr Notebook and Mr Dashing!
Your point, Mr Dashing, about her taking "regulars" is well made, since Leah never stays long in one place.
And it is certainly very odd, Mr Notebook, that Leah has left scoring feedback for three individuals who have left only non-scoring feedback for her.
However I’m afraid that you are in error when you write this: “With these [her non-scoring feedbacks] she appears to have left f/b first and then deleted the booking so that in order to leave f/b the punter had no choice but to use the non scoring type."
In fact it is only in the case of Greekstav88 that Leah left her scoring feedback before non-scoring feedback was left for her.
In the case of Irish Expat and Con8901 their non-scoring feedback was left before she left scoring feedback for them.
Very odd.
What, however, I have overlooked until now is this, which appears in the heading of her profile: "EXPLICIT PICS THRU TXT ONCE YOU HAVE BOOKED ONLY!"
So what may be happening in some cases is this. Punters make a booking. They receive their “explicit pics”. Feedback is exchanged. The booking never takes place.
But it still seems strange that no-one has left feedback – either scoring or non-scoring – to indicate that something fishy is going on.
Except, of course, that there is the risk of attracting spiteful retaliatory feedback from Leah. Who, it is just possible, is not as nice as she looks?
Or, indeed, does not in the real world look anything like she looks (in the photos). For Leah may fall short by a factor of three in the vaginal and bazonga departments, and in fact be a dead ringer for, say, Harvey Weinstein?
Would it, I wonder, be contrary to either the letter or the spirit of UKP rules if I were to e-mail Leah to apprise her / him of this thread and invite her / him to contribute?
