AW Chrome Extension

[kuck]

A genius invention. Thanks mate

 

[kuck]

Screenshot:

Thought I had your previous code still stashed and running in cjs but it's not there.

Looking at your post again - you do still have the old script running as well. You should have only one grey bar at the top.

Hidden Image/Members Only

[Avg_Joe]

ah, i thought this might have been a result of you trying something after i said about the images not going to the alrger versions when you clicked on them, or loaded them below the profile


LLpuntings screenshot does highlight one thing i've been trying to work out how to report.


the expansion of the likes list, to full size no scroll, resulting in an excessively large profile, we've all seen the opposite result on AW, I figured this might have had something to do with the way you are checking for excessively long text in profiles. anyway to find a happy medium, so the likes list doesn't stretch the profile height unnecessarily, but also making sure it doesn't get condensed to like one line 


Edit:
just for the record, i've only ever seen one grey bar at the top.

[kuck]

ah, i thought this might have been a result of you trying something after i said about the images not going to the alrger versions when you clicked on them, or loaded them below the profile


LLpuntings screenshot does highlight one thing i've been trying to work out how to report.


the expansion of the likes list, to full size no scroll, resulting in an excessively large profile, we've all seen the opposite result on AW, I figured this might have had something to do with the way you are checking for excessively long text in profiles. anyway to find a happy medium, so the likes list doesn't stretch the profile height unnecessarily, but also making sure it doesn't get condensed to like one line 


Edit:
just for the record, i've only ever seen one grey bar at the top.

LLPunting has the old script running in parallel for sure.

I've expanded and removed the scroll from the likes list so  all likes make it to screen captures.
The profile screen capture feature is going live tomorrow. When you click "Download All Images", a screen capture of the profile is also saved 
Sample here - https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=281559.msg2926837#msg2926837

Btw really grateful for all your bug reports and feature requests over PM 

[Avg_Joe]

ah, handy, because my screenshot method has been resulting in needing 2 shots joined to capture unprotected sex and the the phone number and location stuff at the bottom of the profile

and no probs, thank you is more appropriate

[90125]

This is a useful add on so I have made the Topic a Sticky.

[kuck]

Thanks Admin! 

[NotATrumpFan]

Just a suggestion to all the people talking about "other people using the machine will see the extension".   Create a second profile.

Top right corner of the screen, click the second icon in from the right (next to the three dots" and you will get the current profile popup.  At the bottom you will see "+ add" just below the guest option.  Add a new profile (call it something innocent like "test" or "backup") and then you will have 2 completely separate profiles.

Basically you just click the profile icon, and select your special profile and it opens a new isolated browser session.

This not only means any installed extensions wont show up, but also your browsing history will be isolated too.

Google removed the requirement for a password to access the second profile for some reason so its not 100% secure, but its a level of abstraction that most people arent aware of so a cursory glance will mean your browser is perfectly punting-free.

Also note this is a useful tip even if you arent using this extension.

Hidden Image/Members Only

[A Decent Fist]

Thanks so much for this. Any chance of a Firefox version anytime soon? I normally use Chrome for all my "clean" browsing and Firefox for the, er, "unclean" kind.

This extension is so very, very useful that I will use it in Chrome's incognito mode, but an FF option would be brilliant.

[kuck]

@A Decent Fist
I'm currently adding features and bug fixes to this version regularly. It wouldn't make sense to have to also maintain a Firefox version at this point. Probably some point in the future.

If you need a different browser for your "dirty" browsing, this extension will install on any browser which is based on the same engine. Brave, Opera, Iron (mentioned earlier in the thread). I've tested on these three, but should really work on any of these - External Link/Members Only

[Helloyou75001]

Wwouuah so great thank you.

Any chance to have it on mobile? I don't use my laptop to access adultwork because its also the one I use for work 

[kuck]

Extensions don't work on mobiles, unfortunately. Afaik, I don't think there's an easy way to do this for a mobile.

[A Decent Fist]

@A Decent Fist
I'm currently adding features and bug fixes to this version regularly. It wouldn't make sense to have to also maintain a Firefox version at this point. Probably some point in the future.

If you need a different browser for your "dirty" browsing, this extension will install on any browser which is based on the same engine. Brave, Opera, Iron (mentioned earlier in the thread). I've tested on these three, but should really work on any of these - External Link/Members Only

Got everything up and running in Iron now. Many thanks for the advice.

[meptalon]

Thanks again for this wondeful extension. It now works like a charm for me and triggers on every searchm including hotslists and saved searches!

[CockMonster]

Kuck = Legend.

[LLPunting]

Looking at your post again - you do still have the old script running as well. You should have only one grey bar at the top.

Hidden Image/Members Only

Thanks, not sure what I did to make it not appear in cjs at the time but have now located and disabled. 

[JimmySW]

@A Decent Fist
I'm currently adding features and bug fixes to this version regularly. It wouldn't make sense to have to also maintain a Firefox version at this point. Probably some point in the future.

If you need a different browser for your "dirty" browsing, this extension will install on any browser which is based on the same engine. Brave, Opera, Iron (mentioned earlier in the thread). I've tested on these three, but should really work on any of these - External Link/Members Only

Sorry for being thick - how do you install this on a different browser as it defaults to Chrome? Thanks!

[A Decent Fist]

Sorry for being thick - how do you install this on a different browser as it defaults to Chrome? Thanks!

Good news - the extension has now been approved by google!
It is available for installation here -
External Link/Members Only

Click on the Chrome store link above while using the new browser. If it is one of the Chrome-based ones as recommended earlier it will ask you if you want to add the extension to "Chrome", but actually installs it in the browser you are using. Worked for me with Iron.

[ampithestud1]

This is legendary stuff kuck! Can't thank you enough   

[Avg_Joe]

  .... i got a message yesterday, or the day before, something about needing to agree to updated permissions or terms of use or user agreement, or somethign like that....

oddly, it appeared as an orange circle/spot with an exclamation mark in it, right where the 3 vertical dots would usually be to select the browser menu from, checked what it was asking for, seemed to just be permission to access all adultwork sites, clicked ok and it went away... not exactly stealthy lol (i have the tray icon for it hidden in the browser to avoid awkward screenshot explanations)

[Xtro]

Well done kuck.   

This has actually prompted me to re look at my overall browsing/security experience. 

[kuck]

This is legendary stuff kuck! Can't thank you enough   

Well done kuck.   

This has actually prompted me to re look at my overall browsing/security experience.

Thanks 
It has been fun to code, and now great to know that people find it useful.

.... i got a message yesterday, or the day before, something about needing to agree to updated permissions or terms of use or user agreement, or somethign like that....

This was because I changed the External Link/Members Only. I didn't ask for more website permissions, just changed the format. Chrome flagged it anyway.

[Avg_Joe]

This was because I changed the External Link/Members Only. I didn't ask for more website permissions, just changed the format. Chrome flagged it anyway.

   thought it would be something like that!

[kuck]

The UKP search button from the extension doesn't seem to work anymore. Reviews search still works. Seems something changed after UKP came back up...




Hidden Image/Members Only

[Avg_Joe]

not just that, it seems to only be half working for me, i have it working in profiles, but on switching back to AW home page or escorts subsection, nothing, no banner or reconfigured layout 


EDIT:
loading search results form one of my hotlists seems to work fine though.... banner now has a show only those with phone numbers tick box

and from that page both UKP and UKP Reviews buttons work

[kuck]

Ah works now. I had to log out of UKP and log back in.

  Avg Joe

[JimmySW]

Click on the Chrome store link above while using the new browser. If it is one of the Chrome-based ones as recommended earlier it will ask you if you want to add the extension to "Chrome", but actually installs it in the browser you are using. Worked for me with Iron.

Sadly it just sends me to download Chrome - this is on the "Brave" browser.

Hidden Image/Members Only

[kuck]

Are you on the latest Brave version?

Works for me on the latest Brave on Mac.

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

[kuck]

New feature - Whatsapp links added to phone numbers.


Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

[Marmalade]

Loaded it into my MacBook a few days ago. One click and it worked. Pretty neat.

Tried it on the iMac and it really doesn’t want to download, even after activating developer mode. Guess I can use my MacBook.

One question ... why a chrome app rather than Firefox/Greasemonkey?

Other concern, what are people’s thoughts on the whatsapp feature? For use on punting phone or very private computer only I guess... I hear some people use it for overseas p4p, but I’m disinclined to use it even for that unless it’s the only option.

[kuck]

Loaded it into my MacBook a few days ago. One click and it worked. Pretty neat.

Tried it on the iMac and it really doesn’t want to download, even after activating developer mode. Guess I can use my MacBook.

One question ... why a chrome app rather than Firefox/Greasemonkey?

Other concern, what are people’s thoughts on the whatsapp feature? For use on punting phone or very private computer only I guess... I hear some people use it for overseas p4p, but I’m disinclined to use it even for that unless it’s the only option.

Odd that it wouldn't load on your iMac - are you on the latest Chrome? Did you try restarting?

I had a Greasemonkey script earlier, and people seemed to be using different versions. There are ways to have Greasemonkey script update from a remote repository automatically, but I think as a chrome extension it updates more reliably. The extension has seen 28 updates already, both bug fixes and enhancements.

I've so far only used the Whatsapp feature to check profile pictures. Whatsapp on my computer is not connected to my punting phone.

[Marmalade]

Odd that it wouldn't load on your iMac - are you on the latest Chrome? Did you try restarting?

No but it's working now that I went to 'Civilizer'. Guess I missed that before

I had a Greasemonkey script earlier, and people seemed to be using different versions. There are ways to have Greasemonkey script update from a remote repository automatically, but I think as a chrome extension it updates more reliably. The extension has seen 28 updates already, both bug fixes and enhancements.

Thanks for the explanation. I wonder how long it will take AW to screw it up? (if they can be bothered).

I've so far only used the Whatsapp feature to check profile pictures. Whatsapp on my computer is not connected to my punting phone.

I guess I trust WhatsApp about as much as I trust a coke addicted p4p that never stops talking. But that's just me.

[JimmySW]

Actually I'm an idiot I use Brave for day to day stuff but Firefox for this stuff - my bad!

[LLPunting]

If I leave "Only show results with a phone" unchecked then the display uses a really narrow location column.

Hidden Image/Members Only

 If I check the filter then it displays locations  more correctly but the right hand column of profiles has a more cramped location column. 


Hidden Image/Members Only

[kuck]

Thanks LL 

This is now fixed in version 0.31. I've submitted to the Chrome web store for approval. Once approved, your browser will auto update it. ETA a few hours.

[Putin]

@kuck This is a superb extension. It perfectly compliments the previous scripts   

Thanks for the great work and big ups    

[kuck]

  @Putin

(I do hope your handle is ironic  )

[sparkus]

@Putin

(I do hope your handle is ironic  )

He just wants to put in

[Marmalade]

It’s really a great time-saver and possibly the best script plug-in we’ve had so far. Thank you for spending the time writing and submitting it.

It’s reassuring these days that not all technology is bad.

Perhaps one day we’ll have a plug-in called ‘crap-sifter’ or similar.* There’s one for Amazon you may have seen that runs reviews through an algorithm (one click, once installed) and adjusts the ratings after deducting fluffie vomit (it has a long list — one-off reviewers, sycophants using unbelievable vocabulary, overlapping reviews, EAS or ‘brand addiction blahblahblah).

For AW it could, in our dreams, also include ‘has photo been photoshopped’, age discrepancy, ASCII addiction, Romanian, unclear pricing, offers bareback, has changed escort name to escape bad reviews, and so on. With facial technology now, it wouldn’t by impossible to add “rating adjusted for disproportionate and misleading use of terms like [attractive.”
 


*”ReviewMeta”.

[kuck]

It’s really a great time-saver and possibly the best script plug-in we’ve had so far. Thank you for spending the time writing and submitting it.

  Marmalade 

For AW it could, in our dreams, also include ‘has photo been photoshopped’, age discrepancy, ASCII addiction, Romanian, unclear pricing, offers bareback, has changed escort name to escape bad reviews, and so on. With facial technology now, it wouldn’t by impossible to add “rating adjusted for disproportionate and misleading use of terms like [attractive.”
 

I started displaying Romanian in bold red, and Brazilian in light red. And only then noticed how many actually fantastic Romanian WGs there are. I undid the change and version 0.33 which is pending approval from google accidentally still makes Romanian bold in the search results.

Sentiment analysing and text mining reviews might get a useful summary of tags, though, but these things while easy to implement are hard to get right (accurate and useful).

[JayEZ2K]

Kuck, this is incredible!  I actually had ideas and sketches to improve and integrate AW searches with UKP, but I was going to have to learn how to actually program and code first before I could even build it. You've already done it! This will really speed up time required to perform searches, which will help us to spend more time punting and reviewing.

[LLPunting]

Kuck, this is incredible!  I actually had ideas and sketches to improve and integrate AW searches with UKP, but I was going to have to learn how to actually program and code first before I could even build it. You've already done it! This will really speed up time required to perform searches, which will help us to spend more time punting and reviewing.

I suspect you might be being a tad too optimistic there!
More like more time searching more widely.

Until Kuck bolts in the AI to find reliable, real photo girls at sticker price and with reliable reviews things won't be easier or faster.  Oh and the "concierge" tool will need to cross-check other listing sights to verify current state of body, tits, tats, state of undergrowth, drug taking and colour of hair.      Kuck should be done around ver 6.1   

[sparkus]

Does this extension count as 'sextech': External Link/Members Only

[kuck]

Kuck, this is incredible!  I actually had ideas and sketches to improve and integrate AW searches with UKP, but I was going to have to learn how to actually program and code first before I could even build it. You've already done it! This will really speed up time required to perform searches, which will help us to spend more time punting and reviewing.

Thanks for the kind words.
 

Do you want to share your sketches? Or you can add to the External Link/Members Only

[CockMonster]

I started displaying Romanian in bold red, and Brazilian in light red. And only then noticed how many actually fantastic Romanian WGs there are. I undid the change and version 0.33...

Request to put this feature back - would definitely like to see these highlighted.  I'll agree there are 'some' good Rom and Braz providers but they are the exception rather than the rule iMO; and this feature would be appreciated. maybe a turn on / off kind of feature?.

Furthermore the classic Rom/Braz tactic of placing one fake 'british' profile in amongst the many Rom profiles when touring would actually be more obvious imo, as they'll suddenly appear in amongst the sea of red and then disappear again on tour.

[kuck]

@monster

I feel that it'd be unfair to the likes of:
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only

A simple nationality based flag does not seem reasonable. Perhaps a red flag needs to be based on multiple parameters. What are the parameters on a profile that an algorithm can better target?

[Marmalade]

Romanian (for those who like to avoid Romanian)

i) it's simple enough to add 'excluding Romanian' to any normal AW search by ticking the nationality box.
ii) excluding Romanian, whether by normal AW search or script, is no guarantee of course if, as is not infrequently the case, the p4p has listed her nationality as Italian or some other rubbish.

No objections if our intrepid programmer wants to add though! 

From the AW help pages:

Searching Nationality - Advice for Service Seekers

When searching for Service Providers using the nationality filter you have 2 options, you can either choose to include the specified nationality only, or exclude that particular nationality.

We have tried to make this as easy to use as possible, however not all Service Providers will have their nationality displayed so please take the following into consideration when reviewing your search results:

    When looking for a specific nationality: Anyone who has not got their nationality set on their profile will be excluded from your search results. This could mean that you are missing providers matching the rest of your search criteria.
     
    When excluding a specific nationality from your search: It is only members with a nationality set that will be searched, then those with the selected nationality will be excluded. This means that providers without a nationality set will also be excluded. Again, this could mean that you do not see the full extent of your search results.

[CockMonster]

A simple nationality based flag does not seem reasonable. Perhaps a red flag needs to be based on multiple parameters. What are the parameters on a profile that an algorithm can better target?

Yes a flag based system that highlights nationality would be great.

Romanian (for those who like to avoid Romanian)

i) it's simple enough to add 'excluding Romanian' to any normal AW search by ticking the nationality box.

Everyone on here loves to point this out all the time yet it is impossible to exclude more than one nationality; and with Brazillians becoming as prolific as Romanians at the bait & switch and various scams, it's not really a solution any more.   Having prominent flags seems like a good solution.

[Marmalade]

Yes a flag based system that highlights nationality would be great.

Everyone on here loves to point this out all the time yet it is impossible to exclude more than one nationality; and with Brazillians becoming as prolific as Romanians at the bait & switch and various scams, it's not really a solution any more.   Having prominent flags seems like a good solution.

This is true. The AW excluding all non-nationality-stated profiles (if I read it correctly) would be another good reason to have as a flag. It's easier for me as there are not a million to choose from in my area once I've eliminated the old saggy-titted loverlies. 

[JayEZ2K]

Thanks for the kind words.
 

Do you want to share your sketches? Or you can add to the External Link/Members Only

I was thinking a cross between a porn thumbnail gallery and a External Link/Members Only. But in this case the stats would be review score and services. And maybe a skills bar for services, like blow jobs, anal, kissing, etc. But that's probably more complicated than it needs to be. What you've done will be super helpful for searching, and you've also added a lot of great features I hadn't thought about. Some suggestions which would be helpful:

* Removing their profile description/bio would make scanning faster with less distraction, since that info is usually junk space-filler, and we could always read their bio by clicking their page.

* Removing their sexual orientation. This would remove more visual noise from the page to make scanning faster. We could always get this from their actual page, but in all honesty, 200+ girls and I've never once cared to read their sexual orientation.

* If possible, filling in the blank space by sorting the profiles into 3 columns? But if that was too difficult, maybe their info could be moved to the right of the photo, so that more girls could be fit on each page, vertically.



Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only



Hidden Image/Members Only