When people from here first started to use SA, there were tales of successes, overnights for £250-£300 or whatever, and as with experiences from other "dating" sites that were full of bots trying to get your cash by pretending to be horny women, myself included, therefore assumed it was a load of bull. Did take a gamble by paying my membership fee and had some pretty good success with meets ranging from £100-£250, overnights, a few hours etc. with mainly 18-25yo women, who were, in most cases, good fun without the faking etc. from AW.
Tinder on the other hand has been a damp squib for me. Practically zero interest at all and what I did get, died after 1 message.
100s of right swipe likes from me, with 4 matches in return.
Have even seen a few that mentioned they were looking for a SD and nothing back, so are they even seeing me? Maybe something to do with the "ugliness" filter mentioned in earlier posts.
Not saying people don't have some success, exaggerate a bit or a hell of a lot, but things do work out occasionally for some, with others having next to no luck.
As it's been said, Tinder is based upon looks first and foremost. If I look ugly to practically every woman on there, no matter how much cash I've got to blow on them is going to go unnoticed.
No-one sits there reading 1000 bios but instead swipes instantly or within a second or two after making that initial looks based judgement.
Maybe there is a certain sort of young woman on there looking for a SD, a specific look, someone suited up who might convey an image of power and money. I've no idea.
Perhaps I need a headline photo in a suit and tie or lying on a bed of £50 notes etc. to gauge some interest, or it might be that these women only exist in the London area and nowhere outside.