Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Party_RogueGFE - Any views on this hotty anyone  (Read 1075 times)

StikiWiki

  • Guest
Seen the pictures of this girl, limited pictures, some positive feedback on AW and a lot of services and I think pretty good pricing.

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Any feedback would be helpful please guys. She looks foxy as fuck to me

Offline guns

TOFTT and let us know . Sounds too good to be true .

Offline baranabus96

Haven't seen her but...

1) AW feedback is completely meaningless. One of the guys leaves feedback for her twice on the same day a couple of minutes apart, it doesn't matter if they have 1 or 100 a lot of it is going to be worthless. Also keep in mind that positive =/= really good, think of how many positive reviews there are on here where they are bordering on neutral, context is key.

2) her only pictures are of her face to one side, she also doesn't mention her weight or size anywhere so she is clearly either very lazy or hiding something. She's showing her face so she doesn't care about who knows what she does but hides every other part of her body.

3) Her profile is a mess, she claims to be submissive at one point yet has humiliation and domination (giving ticked). She mentions just about ever service other than BB and methinks it's to hook in as many punters as possible while looking clean about it.

4) Romanian, decent price and incall only. Quite likely that she is in a house somewhere being pimped out by Sergei.

Offline scutty brown

37 year old Romanian?

how much are you willing to get taken for? She'll be hunting down a meal ticket

Offline NigelF

Haven't seen her but...

1) AW feedback is completely meaningless. One of the guys leaves feedback for her twice on the same day a couple of minutes apart, it doesn't matter if they have 1 or 100 a lot of it is going to be worthless. Also keep in mind that positive =/= really good, think of how many positive reviews there are on here where they are bordering on neutral, context is key.

2) her only pictures are of her face to one side, she also doesn't mention her weight or size anywhere so she is clearly either very lazy or hiding something. She's showing her face so she doesn't care about who knows what she does but hides every other part of her body.

3) Her profile is a mess, she claims to be submissive at one point yet has humiliation and domination (giving ticked). She mentions just about ever service other than BB and methinks it's to hook in as many punters as possible while looking clean about it.

4) Romanian, decent price and incall only. Quite likely that she is in a house somewhere being pimped out by Sergei.

I agree with everything you said but the AW reviews by the same guy only minutes apart can be legit. The timestamp is only based on when the review was submitted, not when it took place. There also needs to be two bookings made for two feedbacks to be left (excluding "feedback only"). I myself for example have left two reviews just seconds apart but they were for separate bookings (days apart). Still, as you say, AW is pretty much completely meaningless anyway.

Offline baranabus96

It's possible but unlikely, the guy in question looks like he has a history of visiting the same escort again on the day/within a couple of days and then not seeing them again but there isn't much there.


StikiWiki

  • Guest
All good points, only in Glasgow for a couple of days so may knock on someone elses door.
Antonnia Lovely seems to be a pretty good bet.
Have to say I have got a thing for Brunettes, and that usually means East Europeans so any other recommendatios would be gratefully received.

Offline tazman1002001

All good points, only in Glasgow for a couple of days so may knock on someone elses door.
Antonnia Lovely seems to be a pretty good bet.
Have to say I have got a thing for Brunettes, and that usually means East Europeans so any other recommendatios would be gratefully received.

Antonia  :thumbsup:
Banned reason: White-knight abusing facility to change another punters negative review and then getting abusive after his touting and white-knighting is exposed. Previously banned for similar reasons.
Banned by: