I often see people requesting other members to post reviews on here., sometimes polite and sometimes less so. I have a question on this.
When I was going to write a review there was some kind of question about confirmation of booking or something like that. What was all that about? It seemed like that was needed before proceeding.
It's not like AW feedback / reviews that need confirmation following a meeting. Instead it's basically what CT has said above.
It's more about reaching the point where mutual agreement of the booking has occurred, and you can review thereafter. If she doesn't turn up, goes radio silent, cancels late on, etc, or if you arrive and walk because she's not as advertised,or messes you around, etc, you can still review. Reviews of time wasting, false advertising, etc are very useful for other punters.
There is no automatic expectation that you have to prove that a booking was arranged and agreed, but it's useful to keep AW emails, texts, etc in case of disputes. It used to be that you could send proof to Admin or post openly (redact personal details) but I'm not sure what the current approach would be. CT?
