Parlours, Agencies ans Independents

[Bud$]

It seems that the lines between are blurred. It makes a difference. There are lots of girls on AW who are really working in parlours (Hungarians - Golders Green; Romanians - Farnborough). Some agency girls, the Thai ones anyway, are not getting good comments on the 'sites' that matter like this one. The parlour girls get rave feedback on AW but indifferent ones on here. A girl who works for an agency or in a parlour is surely not going to be as enthusiastic as a proper indie because she's giving a large portion of her income to the owner. In London I'm sure a lot are barely making the rent. Am I being extreme? I've nearly always had a better time with a true indie and an even better time with a WG who has another job as well, so she doesn't have to see that many punters. Why do people think?

[endomorph]

There are no hard and fast rules. One of my best half hours was with Alex/Louise at HOD, one of my worst with an indie with a lovely flat and super looks who had forgotten to remove a tampon from her cunt. That is why it is always a punt: sometimes you win and sometimes you lose. The form book that is ukpunting is only a guide. Different blokes have different tastes. I have walked way from SP's who other punters have raved about.

[yorkshire123]

Some of the best punting fucks I've had have been in parlours/brothels, there's something about the seediness that I found quite appealing.

[cueball]

To be honest I've never done any punting in parlours, I've always podged indies.

I'm not attracted to the waiting room environment, not from an embarrassment stance though, just the waiting to be seen like at the dentist.

There are plenty on here that prefer parlours though and I'm not knocking em for that.

[bobbles1945]

Well it all depends…..parlour girls certainly have to pay a proportion of their fee to the management. A sauna girl I knew a few years back working in London explained the set up.

 The sauna took the £10 sauna entry fee (remember the pretence is you are going for a sauna and massage) and then wanted £30 from the first client (in those days the going rates for sex were £65 per half hour £120 per hour) and then something like £10-20 per client thereafter .At that time there were four girls per shift. Since the woman I knew was stunning and popular and set her own fees (at least 50%more than the going rate) which clients were happy to pay she seldom cleared less than £1000  for one 12 hour shift pw. The sauna was happy she was happy. In the sauna she met well-off punters who would become private clients and book her for dinner dates, overnight and foreign trips etc paying megabucks for the privilege.

 The upside was that she did her shift and then the rest of the time was hers to look after her children and socialize with friends. She did not have to advertise, wait by a dusty phone  all that was taken care of. Now this is the exception, but a good sauna or parlour girl could make significant amounts of money. I suspect with the decline of saunas (due to the internet etc) and a “don’t care” attitude from the provider this is not so much the case. Maybe those familiar with how saunas operate in other towns can add there two-pence worth.

Agencies (of which I have no experience) do take a large chunk of the fees-but an agency worker can always turn clients she meets to private clients and get the full fee plus she learns the ropes of the business and make the calculation whether the agency is providing a reasonable service (screening clients, getting bookings providing drivers, flats to work from etc) for the fee they take (usually not) and then set up as indies. However good looking girls on the books of a number of agencies might do well.

 Being an indie is a lot of work, maintaining a profile on AW setting up their websites and constantly advertising touring etc, those that just set up an AW profile then wait will not do well. (it is no surprise that the largest thread on the SAAFE forum for escorts is “slow at the minute or just me”).Usually the aim is to make their weekly target (to cover living expenses and then some)But good providers who work hard and have a good number of regulars and tour  can also make considerable amounts of money

[smiths]

It seems that the lines between are blurred. It makes a difference. There are lots of girls on AW who are really working in parlours (Hungarians - Golders Green; Romanians - Farnborough). Some agency girls, the Thai ones anyway, are not getting good comments on the 'sites' that matter like this one. The parlour girls get rave feedback on AW but indifferent ones on here. A girl who works for an agency or in a parlour is surely not going to be as enthusiastic as a proper indie because she's giving a large portion of her income to the owner. In London I'm sure a lot are barely making the rent. Am I being extreme? I've nearly always had a better time with a true indie and an even better time with a WG who has another job as well, so she doesn't have to see that many punters. Why do people think?

What makes a good WG is her attitude NOT where she happens to work as I know from punting with good WGs at parlours/brothels/parties and with so called Indies. I say so called because as a punter ANY WG could have a pimp and I wouldn't necessarily know. Like some others your post is a generalisation, I treat a WG as the individual they are.

UKP is now the ONLY punting site that matters, and A/W feedback is unreliable and often made up.

[Tiger63]

What makes a good WG is her attitude NOT where she happens to work as I know from punting with good WGs at parlours/brothels/parties and with so called Indies. I say so called because as a punter ANY WG could have a pimp and I wouldn't necessarily know. Like some others your post is a generalisation, I treat a WG as the individual they are.

UKP is now the ONLY punting site that matters, and A/W feedback is unreliable and often made up.

mines not...I genuinely can give girls multiple orgasms with my massive cock....I think

[Sonny Crockett]

I much prefer independents to parlour girls. I feel the service is much better.

[Cuntminion]

I will always to the best of my ability try to punt Indy

Hidden Image/Members Only

[rg41]

I have always seen Independent

[slow and low]

I have seen agency girls that have blown indies out of the water.

[johnnyboy61]

Pre-AW I used to punt quite a lot in parlours and in the better ones the girls felt safe and secure and many were quite enthusiastic. I think one of the problems is that nowadays parlours can attract quite a lazy type of punter and consequently the girls also get quite lazy and work unenthusiastically through a set routine.

After a long break from parlours I visited one out of desperation as there was nothing looking good on AW. I was ready to walk if I didn't find the girls attractive, but the one I was shown was young, slim and pretty. She was obviously a little pissed off at the rough way her previous client had treated her and was quite pleased to find that I requested a GFE. No massage, lots of kissing and touching and then slow sensual oral both ways followed by sex for as long as I could make it last. She was so responsive that she was more than a little embarrassed.

I asked her afterwards why she didn't go independent. Her response was that as a young mum, she only wanted to work a couple of days a week, so it was uneconomical to rent a flat, but she didn't want to have clients in her home. She also couldn't get her head around AW, so it was much easier and more convenient for her to let the parlour cover that side of things and that it was also safer than working on her own. So there are some gems to be found in the parlour scene, who can be as good as the indies, although I do recognise that I was lucky and won't be hurrying back to find another, although I will certainly return to visit this one some time.

As for agencies, I cannot entertain outcalls and their cut is even greater than that of the parlour owners, so for the majority of my punts it has to be indies.