Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Changed to BB status on AW  (Read 1409 times)

Offline Frustrated gentleman

i believe some WG’s check your AW history for any evidence of barebacking, which I get!

Just been challenged by one girl who has identified a historical session, nearly 4 years ago, where the WG’s current AW status clearly shows BB.

I can state, categorically, this was not on the girls status when I saw her but totally understand a reluctance based on the evidence now produced.

Although I’m not overly concerned about this, I wonder if anyone else has had a similar issue with AW bookings?

FG

Offline Steely Dan

Not happened to me, but clearly it could.  Perhaps a downside of too much feedback. I do think it is helpful to have 3 or 4 feedback each year, but more than that is unhelpful for a number of reasons. (e.g. linking with UKP identity) . This adds to the list.

But anyway, no worry.  External Link/Members Only

Offline Foxtail17

i believe some WG’s check your AW history for any evidence of barebacking, which I get!

Just been challenged by one girl who has identified a historical session, nearly 4 years ago, where the WG’s current AW status clearly shows BB.

I can state, categorically, this was not on the girls status when I saw her but totally understand a reluctance based on the evidence now produced.

Although I’m not overly concerned about this, I wonder if anyone else has had a similar issue with AW bookings?

FG

This happened to me a few years ago.

I contacted a lady who refused saying ‘you see barebackers.’ Not ever having knowingly done so, let alone indulged BB, I asked her what ladies she meant. She pointed out only one despite using the plural in her original reply. I went to said lady’s profile and she was indeed offering BB for £1,000 via her FAQ, not mention in her preferences.
It has come and gone from her profile over the years.
What was funny was I looked at the FB of the lady who had refused me and she had seen a chap a couple of my regs had turned down because he hassled them for BB.

In the long term if an escort adds BB after you have seen her there is nothing you can do. No other escort has ever mentioned this supposed BB to me.
« Last Edit: July 10, 2022, 01:33:57 pm by Foxtail17 »

Offline chrisintcov

You can leave a response to feedback you have on AW. You might want to do that to make it clear that she wasn’t advertising it when you saw her.  On the other hand you would then just be drawing attention to it when every other girl you contact has a quick glance at your feedback.

You are in a bit of a bind here and I don’t envy you.  Do you have a STI check result you can offer to show her?

Offline alabama1

I doubt he's that desperate to see her.

Offline Gordon Bennett

I doubt he's that desperate to see her.

Yes. She seems uptight and unreasonable - he's most likely dodged a bullet.

S'funny, a lady I saw 5 or so years ago is now an advertising barebacker. Luckily, she started a new AW profile so the feedback from our meeting is dead and says "member not active". I think that situation made me stop using AW to arrange meets unless it was literally the only way to make a booking.

Offline Frustrated gentleman

Some interesting points.
To ge honest, I understand the girls concern. I’d not touch someone who’d previously been a bb’er.
Just wish I could get rid of the feedback.

Totally agree with SD’s thoughts… POF!