Fake Review - Jess love Wolverhampton barebacker

[MrDeviousD]

External Link/Members Only




I’ve posted on my previous positive review, seen her quite a few times , went for a 1 hour booking as usual a few weeks back this time she put it on me she didn’t want to use condoms during sex and wanted me to cum inside her, I declined and stop the booking on the spot and left in disgust after telling her she is playing with people’s lives and health , she has closed her aw profile and took her face picture’s of her vs profile.

Hidden Image/Members Only

[RedditchJay]

Afternoon, so you say you have seen this SP several times yet never reviewed her ? When you went to the door on you previous review posted just when she came to the door you thought WOW, much better than the photos? Now you claim she is a barebacked in a new review ?? Doesn't add up ? Please explain why you just didn't put all this in the one review you posted as a negative review ?

[MrDeviousD]

I reviewed last year in November

[MrDeviousD]

I’ve posted on my previous review from November which was a positive just to highlight what has since happened . Just to be clear 2 reviews 6 months apart.

[chatbite]

Afternoon, so you say you have seen this SP several times yet never reviewed her ? When you went to the door on you previous review posted just when she came to the door you thought WOW, much better than the photos? Now you claim she is a barebacked in a new review ?? Doesn't add up ? Please explain why you just didn't put all this in the one review you posted as a negative review ?

Unless I'm missing something I don't see where the confusion is here? He reviewed her positively before, has seen her regularly since and had good experiences. Now that she's changed what she's offering he's posted a neg review to let everyone know. I don't get why this doesn't add up??

[MrDeviousD]

Thanks for understanding 

[RedditchJay]

hiya

agree - my error - i didnt see the other review was backdated to November

[watsey]

I’ve posted on my previous review from November which was a positive just to highlight what has since happened . Just to be clear 2 reviews 6 months apart.

Thanks for posting this.
Warnings based upon fresh information are always appreciated.
 

[JontyR]

OP - are you suggesting she deleted her profile because of your response?

[MrDeviousD]

OP - are you suggesting she deleted her profile because of your response?

Yes I am , she is fully aware of ukp ,she showed me the site during the run up to Christmas period , she wasn’t getting much business and she kept asking if I could do a review or multiple reviews to get her more customers and in return I’d get free Owo or dfk . Glad I didn’t the little coke rat is losing the plot.

[MrDeviousD]

She wasn’t/isn’t  aware when she showed me ukp that I was already a member on here,

[Man of steel]

Yes I am , she is fully aware of ukp ,she showed me the site during the run up to Christmas period , she wasn’t getting much business and she kept asking if I could do a review or multiple reviews to get her more customers and in return I’d get free Owo or dfk . Glad I didn’t the little coke rat is losing the plot.

Did she know you did her review on UKP and provide you free services ie OWO and DFK, prior to offering you bare back.

From reading this - she will most likely presume as a regular it is you.

I have seen her when she first started out in Halesowen when she was very young, probably a few times for P&D in a terraced house and then it was a very vanilla service with open mouth kissing. Seems odd she is reverting to different standards the older she has got or desperate for funds.

External Link/Members Only

[JontyR]

Yes I am , she is fully aware of ukp ,she showed me the site during the run up to Christmas period , she wasn’t getting much business and she kept asking if I could do a review or multiple reviews to get her more customers and in return I’d get free Owo or dfk . Glad I didn’t the little coke rat is losing the plot.

Something doesn't quite ring true here. Even if she is aware of UKP why would she delete her profile? There are plenty more punters that don't make use of UKP than do.

[Brumish]

A bizarre set of circumstances and a bit of an own goal here I think

[Man of steel]

External Link/Members Only

Correct link to previous AW reviews.

[alabama1]

I find it hard to believe that she actually wanted to BB you OP, without any prompting. What benefit was it to her if you didn't even request it 
I have seen this WG a few times, and always found that she never even willingly offered OWO unless you paid extra, let alone BB ! As JontyR said, something doesn't ring true here Mr Devious.

[MrDeviousD]

Did she know you did her review on UKP and provide you free services ie OWO and DFK, prior to offering you bare back.

From reading this - she will most likely presume as a regular it is you.

I have seen her when she first started out in Halesowen when she was very young, probably a few times for P&D in a terraced house and then it was a very vanilla service with open mouth kissing. Seems odd she is reverting to different standards the older she has got or desperate for funds.

External Link/Members Only

I reviewed her on my 1st punt back after a long while off from punting, It was on my 4th visit I think she mentioned how slow it was going ( by this time it was early December) and how it was only going to get worse due to Christmas, she had already previously told me she liked coke & weed and also that she was planning a trip back home around new year , which she did go back home for about 6 weeks returning beginning/mid February. I’ve seen her about 10 times maybe 12 in total. After returning from her trip home I’ve seen her 2 times and was getting regular messages if I could come and see her which I ignored , this happened about 4 times and it was always with her saying she needed to pay landlord.

[RandomGuy99]

It sounds like someone may have left some strange feedback on her AW, which is why she took it down.

It all sounds a little odd to me.

[RedditchJay]

That's why i initially questioned it >  sounds like a punt may have gone soar or for some reason they have fallen out as its goes from "fluffy and she was a WOW"  one review to "coked up bitch"  ?

[Brumish]

I reviewed her on my 1st punt back after a long while off from punting, It was on my 4th visit I think she mentioned how slow it was going ( by this time it was early December) and how it was only going to get worse due to Christmas, she had already previously told me she liked coke & weed and also that she was planning a trip back home around new year , which she did go back home for about 6 weeks returning beginning/mid February. I’ve seen her about 10 times maybe 12 in total. After returning from her trip home I’ve seen her 2 times and was getting regular messages if I could come and see her which I ignored , this happened about 4 times and it was always with her saying she needed to pay landlord.

You can see how this looks to the public - you were a regular, who tried to help her out. She probably gave you some freebies, the last time it didn't happen but you tried threatening to reduce her business...it's all conjecture in this case but textbook stuff really.

You mentioned coke-head but don't think you hinted at that in your reviews.
After so many visits, and presumably good ones, she had a decent regular in you....why would she risk that if you werent barebacking at any of your previous meets?
Bit bizarre MrD....can you see how it looks?

[MrDeviousD]

I find it hard to believe that she actually wanted to BB you OP, without any prompting. What benefit was it to her if you didn't even request it 
I have seen this WG a few times, and always found that she never even willingly offered OWO unless you paid extra, let alone BB ! As JontyR said, something doesn't ring true here Mr Devious.

Sorry she did want payment for bb as I’d asked her previously if she wanted to try anal which she refused due to my size and her small frame but it also got me thinking was she trying to get pregnant by me as we had previously spoken about my employment and thought I could be a meal ticket for her or I could be just of being completely overthinking it and she was just trying to bag a extra gram of coke. I’m sorry if I haven’t put every single detail in any of my previous posts and tbh it doesn’t really affect me if she gets a mass influx of customers from this review or if no one ever visits her again or if anyone catches anything from her , there’s always 3 sides to the story, I’ve shared my experience as a regular with her and gave who ever reads this fair warning.Go pay her visit it and show her this get her side or call her and ask her either way I won’t be returning back to her.

[MrDeviousD]

You can see how this looks to the public - you were a regular, who tried to help her out. She probably gave you some freebies, the last time it didn't happen but you tried threatening to reduce her business...it's all conjecture in this case but textbook stuff really.

You mentioned coke-head but don't think you hinted at that in your reviews.
After so many visits, and presumably good ones, she had a decent regular in you....why would she risk that if you werent barebacking at any of your previous meets?
Bit bizarre MrD....can you see how it looks?

I can see how it looks but money isn’t a issue for me so was always happy to pay my 120 for the hour which included 20 for Owo , i think her only extras were Owo £20 and dfk £10. I do like to have anal sex with girls I see but it isn’t a big deal if they don’t like it , as mentioned I did ask her about it before her holiday away but she wasn’t interested, on her return she was very uptight constantly messaging on her phone which I put to a bad day at the office but my last booking was a big no no for me after she offered me bb during sex saying she wanted my cum inside her and for £30 I can. . . Make of this as you want 80/90% of my bookings were really good with her but last 2 were the beginning of the end for me.

[escortman]

That's why i initially questioned it >  sounds like a punt may have gone soar or for some reason they have fallen out as its goes from "fluffy and she was a WOW"  one review to "coked up bitch"  ?

Totally agree R J 

[MrDeviousD]

R J completely read it wrong which he admitted at not looking at dates 

[Brumish]

I can see how it looks but money isn’t a issue for me so was always happy to pay my 120 for the hour which included 20 for Owo , i think her only extras were Owo £20 and dfk £10. I do like to have anal sex with girls I see but it isn’t a big deal if they don’t like it , as mentioned I did ask her about it before her holiday away but she wasn’t interested, on her return she was very uptight constantly messaging on her phone which I put to a bad day at the office but my last booking was a big no no for me after she offered me bb during sex saying she wanted my cum inside her and for £30 I can. . . Make of this as you want 80/90% of my bookings were really good with her but last 2 were the beginning of the end for me.

Once coke/addiction becomes part of the coping mechanism, then I suppose all bets are off.

[alibirmingham]

After reading all this is does sound odd. Seen these kind of stories many times now where op has a good regular relations with a sp and for whatever reason it goes south. Usually one party expecting more from the other. Not saying it’s the case here but all to suspect.

On this occasion I’d take things with a pinch of salt. Unless op can provide some kind of proof it’s all a bit hearsay.

[MrDeviousD]

Probably best taken with a pinch of salt then , no odds to me 

[Brumish]

Probably best taken with a pinch of salt then , no odds to me 

No odds to you perhaps, but you are potentially destroying an otherwise pretty well received service provider. It's not all about you is it? Or is it?

[MrDeviousD]

No odds to you perhaps, but you are potentially destroying an otherwise pretty well received service provider. It's not all about you is it? Or is it?

If I’d read previous reviews I would not of seen her as her hygiene was questionable and your correct it’s not all about me .

[MrDeviousD]

Brilliant I’ve actually just refreshed my mind and looked back on reviews and there is another bb warning which I completely missed, oh well never mind , it must be all about me 

[MrDeviousD]

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=184082.msg1931670#msg1931670   Hygiene

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=175882.msg1861468#msg1861468 Bb

[escortman]

Mr D i have to be honest this reads like a lovers tiff or a woman scorned actions.. You saw her many times yet now you want to find so many things wrong with her.. The one for me it took you weeks to tell us about the bb offer and months for free owo nearly four months ago if you give a positive review.


  with popcorn.

[alabama1]

Probably best taken with a pinch of salt then , no odds to me 

I am going to go further (and will probably get some flack for saying it),but i personally do not believe a word of this review. Drugs, coke, weed, BB, trying to get pregnant for a 'meal ticket', making unwelcome calls to the OP. I have seen this WG three or four times maybe, and there was not a hint of her taking drugs, smoking weed, offering BB, making unsolicited calls to clients (me), and as for trying to get pregnant ? All these conversations you had with her?. In all my meeting with her she hardly said a word, just very meek, mild, and conducted her business with a smile and no drama. Had she blocked you by any chance 

[MrDeviousD]

I am going to go further (and will probably get some flack for saying it),but i personally do not believe a word of this review. Drugs, coke, weed, BB, trying to get pregnant for a 'meal ticket', making unwelcome calls to the OP. I have seen this WG three or four times maybe, and there was not a hint of her taking drugs, smoking weed, offering BB, making unsolicited calls to clients (me), and as for trying to get pregnant ? All these conversations you had with her?. In all my meeting with her she hardly said a word, just very meek, mild, and conducted her business with a smile and no drama. Had she blocked you by any chance 

Previous reports of bb & hygiene , message her ask her if she likes to partyyyyy

[MrDeviousD]

I am going to go further (and will probably get some flack for saying it),but i personally do not believe a word of this review. Drugs, coke, weed, BB, trying to get pregnant for a 'meal ticket', making unwelcome calls to the OP. I have seen this WG three or four times maybe, and there was not a hint of her taking drugs, smoking weed, offering BB, making unsolicited calls to clients (me), and as for trying to get pregnant ? All these conversations you had with her?. In all my meeting with her she hardly said a word, just very meek, mild, and conducted her business with a smile and no drama. Had she blocked you by any chance 

So your 15 minutes with her you got to no what habits she’s got and your negative review of wasting your time you’ve come to the conclusion I’m making it all up. 

[chatbite]

I guess reading the rest of these comments I can see why people may take the timing of the review as odd. I personally would have posted the neg review in pretty quick order, some folks wouldn't though if they don't want to be outed to the SP based on the timing of it.

One thing I've always noticed on this site is that more often than not we will just take the word of other punters on a positive review, but write a neg (particularly on what seems to be a popular girl) and people are demanding granular detail or its written off as bullshit. I don't understand why we don't scrutinise all reviews that way if that's they type of proof we want before believing them.

Im not invested either way as I've never met either the punter or the girl in question so just making an observation   

[Brumish]

I guess reading the rest of these comments I can see why people may take the timing of the review as odd. I personally would have posted the neg review in pretty quick order, some folks wouldn't though if they don't want to be outed to the SP based on the timing of it.

One thing I've always noticed on this site is that more often than not we will just take the word of other punters on a positive review, but write a neg (particularly on what seems to be a popular girl) and people are demanding granular detail or its written off as bullshit. I don't understand why we don't scrutinise all reviews that way if that's they type of proof we want before believing them.

Im not invested either way asI've never met either the punter or the girl in question so just making an observation   

I'm afraid arranging meets via the site is against the rules so you'll just have to search for his profile elsewhere 

[Brumish]

On a serious note it's a good observation Chatbite..I think it's more of a case of alleged bareback than anything else, I feel. I could be wrong in those observations but I think this is the go to for any disgruntled punter to maximise the harm to a wg's earnings. As allegations of STDs aren't allowed this is the next best thing.

[alibirmingham]

I guess reading the rest of these comments I can see why people may take the timing of the review as odd. I personally would have posted the neg review in pretty quick order, some folks wouldn't though if they don't want to be outed to the SP based on the timing of it.

One thing I've always noticed on this site is that more often than not we will just take the word of other punters on a positive review, but write a neg (particularly on what seems to be a popular girl) and people are demanding granular detail or its written off as bullshit. I don't understand why we don't scrutinise all reviews that way if that's they type of proof we want before believing them.

Im not invested either way as I've never met either the punter or the girl in question so just making an observation   

You make a good point chatbite but as burnish said (and I agree) it’s more the BB and all the other allegations. We have all seen it where a punter scorned tries to take it out on the SP via the site and it’s questionable here with this review.

As for the scrutiny I think this comes down to credibility and honesty more than anything. I’ve come across many neg reviews of very popular wgs and almost all them have been backed up by other punters who have seen the wg and agree on the negative points. for example of a wg was to clock watch or rush a punter others would come out and say Yh, I’ve Experienced that. But here it’s the total opposite.

When it comes to calling a wg as a bb’er or drug user etc that can destroy her business and if she’s put a lot of work into building it up she stands to loose a lot so think it’s only right we call out suspect review and allegations and scrutinise them. Best case the review stands up and we all learn. Worst case it’s a fake and we just saved a genuine sp from the scrap heap.

Positives only serve to increase a wgs business and fake positives are very easy to call out as others who go to see her will soon speak up.

[chatbite]

I'm afraid arranging meets via the site is against the rules so you'll just have to search for his profile elsewhere 

Busted 

[alabama1]

So your 15 minutes with her you got to no what habits she’s got and your negative review of wasting your time you’ve come to the conclusion I’m making it all up. 

Yes. Oh, and why do you call yourself Mr. Devious 

[JontyR]

Im not invested either way as I've never met either the punter or the girl in question so just making an observation   

Me neither.

One thing I've always noticed on this site is that more often than not we will just take the word of other punters on a positive review, but write a neg (particularly on what seems to be a popular girl) and people are demanding granular detail or its written off as bullshit. I don't understand why we don't scrutinise all reviews that way if that's they type of proof we want before believing them.

Nah.

I think that there are lots of cases where a fluffy review has been called out. But similarly there has to be a recognition that a career or reputation can be destroyed by a suitably damning review...especially as there will be plenty of folks prepared to comment on someones review of an SP who has at somepoint advertised BB.

There is also the matter of folks that seemingly want to attract specific attention to their reviews. Both to positives and to negatives. I think when this happens there is also extra scrutiny on them and a cynical eye applied.

Here I just found it odd that the OP seems to apply a kudos and influence to UKP that is rarely suggested by posters here. The suggestion of leverage through this site be it either Punter or SP lead is a flag too. Also I never believed the journos in the News of the World made their excuses and left, I find it difficult to believe the response he gave in his post.

Fuck if I had the horn enough to get to the punt handed over the cash and was offered BB, I'd turn it down, but I would get a handjob for my money. I can understand some asking for their money back. But to come over all outraged, try to give some serious life lessons before leaving just sounds like utter bollocks.

[Cryton123]

The point of an SP being outed or accused of offering BB is a double edged sword.

On one hand there’ll be plenty of UKP members who’ll avoid her, but also be plenty who will suddenly be interested.  And the bonus for the SP is she’ll almost certainly never be reviewed on here again. Any UKP member who reviews a girl who offers (or has been accused of offering) BB would get hammered by the forum so they’ll probably not bother.  So the SP is suddenly free to do as she pleases knowing she’ll never get reviewed.

I’ve mentioned this in threads before. I really don’t think creating uproar when BB is mentioned helps punters at all. I for one welcome any BB reviews as I’d like to know who to avoid, but the constant uproar every time it’s mentioned drives it underground.

Not helpful at all in my opinion 

[alabama1]

The point of an SP being outed or accused of offering BB is a double edged sword.

On one hand there’ll be plenty of UKP members who’ll avoid her, but also be plenty who will suddenly be interested. And the bonus for the SP is she’ll almost certainly never be reviewed on here again. Any UKP member who reviews a girl who offers (or has been accused of offering) BB would get hammered by the forum so they’ll probably not bother.  So the SP is suddenly free to do as she pleases knowing she’ll never get reviewed.

I’ve mentioned this in threads before. I really don’t think creating uproar when BB is mentioned helps punters at all. I for one welcome any BB reviews as I’d like to know who to avoid, but the constant uproar every time it’s mentioned drives it underground.

Not helpful at all in my opinion 

You reckon that's a bonus.  Personally, i have seen her, and may or may not choose to see her again, not that fussed either way really. What i hate though is a fake review, and i guess this is one.

[Cryton123]

You reckon that's a bonus.  Personally, i have seen her, and may or may not choose to see her again, not that fussed either way really. What i hate though is a fake review, and i guess this is one.

I didn’t mean this SP specifically, I was talking about any SP associated with BB.

And from my experience most SP’s generally hate UKP so not being reviewed on here is surely a bonus for them 

[MrDeviousD]

Yes. Oh, and why do you call yourself Mr. Devious 

Favourite D.J

[MrDeviousD]

I guess reading the rest of these comments I can see why people may take the timing of the review as odd. I personally would have posted the neg review in pretty quick order, some folks wouldn't though if they don't want to be outed to the SP based on the timing of it.

One thing I've always noticed on this site is that more often than not we will just take the word of other punters on a positive review, but write a neg (particularly on what seems to be a popular girl) and people are demanding granular detail or its written off as bullshit. I don't understand why we don't scrutinise all reviews that way if that's they type of proof we want before believing them.

Im not invested either way as I've never met either the punter or the girl in question so just making an observation   

I would of posted earlier but been busy with work, also she disappeared and reappeared and with not working over the bank holiday had time to post, I was back at the establishment she work’s yesterday seeing another girl who I’ve seen quite a few times to.

[southern boy]

Thanks for the review

[just_me]

Been reading the thread for a while and really not sure why the op getting a bit of flack and everyone saying it's a fake review, even backed it up with evidence previously of warning of potentially being bb. Think anyone previously seen her should take head out the sand and realise they prob seen someone who does bb. Quick 5 min search and found at least 6/7 people say she does bb both on adultworks and on here and many users who have a lot of reviews and posts. Thanks for the review anyway op, personally I would never see as would never book a rom anyway

[alabama1]

Been reading the thread for a while and really not sure why the op getting a bit of flack and everyone saying it's a fake review, even backed it up with evidence previously of warning of potentially being bb. Think anyone previously seen her should take head out the sand and realise they prob seen someone who does bb. Quick 5 min search and found at least 6/7 people say she does bb both on adultworks and on here and many users who have a lot of reviews and posts. Thanks for the review anyway op, personally I would never see as would never book a rom anyway

Maybe you should try one, as judging by your review ratings, you don't have much success with any other nationality.