Positive, Negative and Neutral reviews.... and pricing.

[Punter121212]

Ive read so many reviews and learned a lot from other punters on this forum, Ive visited girls I would normally have avoided (and they've turned out to be real gems) and I have avoided a few I had on my hot list because of negative reviews on here.

Each review thats posted is of course based on the punters own experience on the day, likes, dislikes and expectations all of which I try and take into account when reading but one thing that is consistent for me is when I get to the part in the review where the prices are mentioned,  if the price is within my budget I carry on reading, if not I stop reading and move on.

In the last year alot of the girls on my hot list have gone from under the £120ph mark to £150+ph so due to the recent increases in price I was wondering if there was some way we could establish a protocol where by the pricing was a dominant factor in the 'positive / negative / neutral' classification.

For example this is my thinking regarding girls and their pricing:

a) Standard rate =£60/£70 for half an hour and £100ph
b) Offers something different/special/unique:  =£70/£90 for half an hour and £120ph (young looking, stunning looks..etc)
c) Provides a service that is off the charts =£90/£100 for half an hour and £150ph

Ive only ever met one girl who I felt fell into the 3rd group (off the charts) and that was a couple of months before I started using this site, it turned out alot of the punters here had already discovered her and she was well reviewed so her service seemed to be consistent and not a one off. 

Most of the time we get a good service during the punt but is that enough to warrant a positive review (is the bar too low). The next girl im booking charges £120 an hour which is the right pricing for her and ill be judging her and comparing her against the girls that charge less and those that charge more. If I think Im getting value for money i will give her a positive review, if not it will be neutral, if its a bad experience she will get a negative, for example:

good service which was value for money = positive
good service but not value for money = neutral
shit punt/waste of time = negative

Previously ive given a positive review because the service itself was good however I never factored in the 'value for money' aspect in relation to what others provide and charge, if I had of applied this logic in the past I think 2 of my 4 positive reviews would have been a neutral (a 50% change in position). So I have to ask...

1) If review ratings are all based on 'value for money' in relation to what others provide at higher/lower rates, could this approach help to stop the silly rate rises?

2) Could it go further and help guide certain girls to price their services more accordingly?

3) Am I just talking out of my arse?

 

[James999]

3) Am I just talking out of my arse?

Yes, didn't even bother reading your post in full, it's not meant to be war and peace, need to make your posts shorter, nore to the point and thus more interesting 

[Punter121212]

Yes, didn't even bother reading your post in full, it's not meant to be war and peace, need to make your posts shorter, nore to the point and thus more interesting 

how about...

''Could focusing our reviews primarily on the 'value for money aspect' in relation to what other girls charge and the service they provide, help them to price their services more inline with our expectations, and hopefully bring an end to the recent price increases?'' 

 

[smiths]

Ive read so many reviews and learned a lot from other punters on this forum, Ive visited girls I would normally have avoided (and they've turned out to be real gems) and I have avoided a few I had on my hot list because of negative reviews on here.

Each review thats posted is of course based on the punters own experience on the day, likes, dislikes and expectations all of which I try and take into account when reading but one thing that is consistent for me is when I get to the part in the review where the prices are mentioned,  if the price is within my budget I carry on reading, if not I stop reading and move on.

In the last year alot of the girls on my hot list have gone from under the £120ph mark to £150+ph so due to the recent increases in price I was wondering if there was some way we could establish a protocol where by the pricing was a dominant factor in the 'positive / negative / neutral' classification.

For example this is my thinking regarding girls and their pricing:

a) Standard rate =£60/£70 for half an hour and £100ph
b) Offers something different/special/unique:  =£70/£90 for half an hour and £120ph (young looking, stunning looks..etc)
c) Provides a service that is off the charts =£90/£100 for half an hour and £150ph

Ive only ever met one girl who I felt fell into the 3rd group (off the charts) and that was a couple of months before I started using this site, it turned out alot of the punters here had already discovered her and she was well reviewed so her service seemed to be consistent and not a one off. 

Most of the time we get a good service during the punt but is that enough to warrant a positive review (is the bar too low). The next girl im booking charges £120 an hour which is the right pricing for her and ill be judging her and comparing her against the girls that charge less and those that charge more. If I think Im getting value for money i will give her a positive review, if not it will be neutral, if its a bad experience she will get a negative, for example:

good service which was value for money = positive
good service but not value for money = neutral
shit punt/waste of time = negative

Previously ive given a positive review because the service itself was good however I never factored in the 'value for money' aspect in relation to what others provide and charge, if I had of applied this logic in the past I think 2 of my 4 positive reviews would have been a neutral (a 50% change in position). So I have to ask...

1) If review ratings are all based on 'value for money' in relation to what others provide at higher/lower rates, could this approach help to stop the silly rate rises?

2) Could it go further and help guide certain girls to price their services more accordingly?

3) Am I just talking out of my arse?

Admin runs UKP, if he wants a protocol he will bring one in. What IS it with some who want to make changes to what has been working great for years, don't fix something that isn't broken is my view. Punters are free to put what they like in their reviews.

As to VFM if I get a good service then its VFM to me as I have already decided I was prepared to pay the WGs price, I wouldn't give a Neutral to a WG who charges me a rate I have chosen to pay who then offers me a good service, but may be expensive. I would just punt with cheaper WGs if I don't wish to pay the more expensive ones prices.

I also don't equate price charged with how good any WG may because what makes a good and bad WG is her attitude NOT what she charges as over 30 years of punting has proved to me. I have had good punts at £60 an hour and average at £350 an hour years ago, an amount I wont be paying again for an hours punt.

[Rockhead]

how about...

''Could focusing our reviews primarily on the 'value for money aspect' in relation to what other girls charge and the service they provide, help them to price their services more inline with our expectations, and hopefully bring an end to the recent price increases?'' 

I do share your concern about how expensive it can be, particularly recently, but hopefully a well considered review on here should reflect VFM as a matter of course - rather it did that, than change an established and successful system.

My last two punts have both been at £150 per hour - something I have not entered into lightly. It means I can only do this once a month, simple as that. The only way costs will come down is if people vote with their feet (i.e. Tontober), but if a woman can charge £150 per hour and still get all the work she wants, I guess you can't blame her.

The reason I paid £150 is because I was hugely attracted to both girls, and both had great reviews. I consider that both were VFM - but sadly at that price it's a treat that I cannot have very often.

[vt]

What you are proposing is an attempt at price-rigging, hard to make that work in a fluid market such as punting. It will always find its level as a balance of supply & demand.

Are you really seeing an increase in average pricing overall or is it just the phenomenon that happens when girls that offer great service get more business and gradually position themselves at higher pricepoints to stem/balance the demand they are attracting? I'm not really seeing overall price increases in my search area, though some girls put prices up as they get good reps. The supply seems greater than ever and seems to be keeping up with demand.

I think guys already factor in some kind of VFM element when writing reviews, the more that is charged, the more that is expected of the girls in terms of looks, attitude or services.

[Bangers and Gash]

Yes, didn't even bother reading your post in full, it's not meant to be war and peace, need to make your posts shorter, nore to the point and thus more interesting 

Agreed. I got to the 2nd paragraph and thought, ''this guy over thinks things and has too much time on his hands''

[The_Don]

There no correlation, between price and quality, when it comes to W/G (IMO). I've punted a few (W/G) priced @ £180+ PH that were far worse than some £60 P/H in terms of service and attitude. Beauty is very subjective and ranks lower than service and attitude when I punt. So, its down to what a punter considers true VFM.

And as smiths has stated:

Admin runs UKP, if he wants a protocol he will bring one in. What IS it with some who want to make changes to what has been working great for years, don't fix something that isn't broken is my view. Punters are free to put what they like in their reviews.

[OakTree]

VFM is a subjective thing anyway.

60-70 notes per half hour might be the absolute max for oneperson where as someone else is happy throwing money at them as we've seen in the tipping thread.

I already have my parameters on what I'd pay and therefore judge for myself wether it's value for money no matter how good she might be.

[mrhappypants]

Yep, crap idea. 

King Tarzan can continue to bang on about how he is getting great value for money with his £200 ph honeys and I will continue to wonder if he has eaten one too many bananas.  'Nuf said.

[stampjones]

What you are basically saying OP is "can everyone change their review styles to suit me". Answer:no

[Marmalade]

Basically when paying UK whore rates I expect to come out feeling fucking great. I don't pay them to be 'ok'. So if I don't feel great on the way home, it's s negative. If I feel great it's a positive. Good with some nagging doubts = neutral. I only punt within a certain price range as I think that any more (in the UK anyway) is just money thrown away. So a tenner either way doesn't come into it unless she was charging above average and gave a shit time, in which case I'm a bit more angry, just as when I paid for a VIP seat to watch that heap of junk film Dunkirk that everyone's raving about.

If other punters want to know what you mean by 'positive' or 'neutral' or 'negative' they can just compare your reviews (unless you're a silly fucker that gives everyone a positive unless they rob your granny and let your tires down).   

[smiths]

Agreed. I got to the 2nd paragraph and thought, ''this guy over thinks things and has too much time on his hands''

Indeed, reminds me of Vorian, or Dorian as James used to call him. Though I am not saying they are Vorian.

[smiths]

What you are basically saying OP is "can everyone change their review styles to suit me". Answer:no

Yes well put.

[Newtothisstuff]

It won't work.
Everything depends on punter expectations and budget. If you have to struggle to find the £50 and girl charges for a half hour, you are never going to think someone is worth £150+ an hour no matter how good or bad they are.

[Silver Birch]

As to VFM if I get a good service then its VFM to me as I have already decided I was prepared to pay the WGs price, I wouldn't give a Neutral to a WG who charges me a rate I have chosen to pay who then offers me a good service, but may be expensive.

This is exactly how I view my punting. Only if she failed to deliver something that I was expecting would I think she deserved neutral or negative.

[Sparta Prada]

Note to xtype11:

Entirely up to each punter how we review on here. Value for money is a pertinent question but I'd imagine this is covered where the rating is Positive, Neutral or Negative. However if the question of value for money is so important to the OP why does none of your reviews actually state what you have paid?

[Steely Dan]

Most of us do what you are saying.  If she was not worth the money then we wont repeat and we give the review a neutral or negative.  If you gave a girl a positive in spite of the fact that she was not worth the money, then we forgive you.  But try harder next time.

But in fact we do have a clear rule for rating. I think it works well.  'Your review your rating.'

[cueball]

I'm perfectly happy with the current system. I can't see a problem to fix really.

Rating is only a small part of any review... the devil's in the detail.

[king tarzan]

Yep, crap idea. 

King Tarzan can continue to bang on about how he is getting great value for money with his £200 ph honeys and I will continue to wonder if he has eaten one too many bananas.  'Nuf said.

To be honest the £200+ honeys I go for have to fit a very high standard physical criteria
Service has to be gfe... dfk..owo...reverse oral and sex protection 2 times...
"Dream beauty " as I classify them as...
I evaluate there beauty on the basis if they were in a nightclub, top restaurants, casino, fashion parade would they stand out as the "TOP BEAUTY ECHELON HONEY"
the answer is a BIG FAT YES..

But that said I have drilled stacy summer and hot cristal 4 u ( unbalanced attitude) at £100  and £120 respectively..
Let's face facts stacy summer should of charged more as she was extremely good looking and provided great service..
If hot cristal 4 u took her whore job seriously she would of been near £400 per hour
( both retired so I can write that now)

I will admit you do hunt down GVFM...fair play....

[l4at]

Slightly confusing post OP but looking at it, it seems you do get too bogged down with the pricing whereas punting in general has so many different other aspects to it which determines whether it's a positive or negative experience.

[Malvolio]

The price shouldn't come into the rating you give as each punter will have his own price he's prepared to pay.  A good punt is a good punt regardless of whether you paid £30 or £300 for it.

[bigmanbigman]

Set your price
Search for wgs in that range
Check u.k.p.
Check feed back
Check field reports
Check who has seen wg
High feed back punters
Then book or move on repeat as required.