Positive reviews

[Flunt]

Since we are all vary so much in age, physical appearance, views on women and their looks I'm starting to wonder if there is much value to placed in a positive review?

For example. Respected Punter A goes to see GloriousGaynor (doesn't exist on AW) and gives a glowing report on all the services she offers and actually provides them with enthusiasm. A week later Punter B goes to see the same GloriousGaynor and she wouldn't do half the things that A enjoyed, was generally disinterested and B is left £££ out of pocket after a poor punt. The problem is (possibly?) Punter A is a handsome young man, fit body, well presented and charming. Punter B on the other hand is fat, middle aged and balding, stinks of fags and has all the charm of a house brick. In theory they are each paying the same girl for the same service so it shouldn't matter but if the roles were reversed and women were paying me (never going to happen) then, first day fit bird happy days and anything goes, second day in walks the ugliest munter ever and she gets the second class treatment.

[Matium]

A "handsome young man, fit body, well presented and charming" would never need to pay.

There'd be something seriously wrong with the Universe if he couldn't pull civvy girls.

[Flunt]

A "handsome young man, fit body, well presented and charming" would never need to pay.

There'd be something seriously wrong with the Universe if he couldn't pull civvy girls.

I was going for the extremes in the example. Some pro$$ies might prefer the latter and he gets the better service 

[JV547845]

Basically I tend to write AW reviews post coitally  .  I trust AW reviews even less than I trust my own AW reviews, even less than I trust WG's AW reviews of me. 

There's not much you can do apart from look into the reviewer's review history, e.g. to see if they're the sort to only post a revenge reviews or complaints, or only post bragging rights reviews - or whatever pointless excessive pointless fanboying is called- and make your own decision from there.

[Jimmyredcab]

It depends who writes the positive review, some members are very easily pleased.   

[yorkshire123]

It may also surprise some of the "stud muffins" on here that some younger prossies like old cock 

[Watts.E.Dunn]

And of course the girl has no effect on that ;?, compare a lady who's on the "right part" of her monthy cycle to the time she isn't;).

Any ladies agree on that at all?.

FWIW i see on another thread that young lads who can pull seem to prefer pulling a wad of 'arry out of their pockets preferring one already prepared;).

[SirFrank]

Or Gloria gaynor has a bad day and or punter B is a dick? Just so many variables in the punting game. What is important IMO is that UKP members provide well balanced transparent reviews of girls so fellow punters can make an informed decision about whether or not they want to visit the disco queen

[Flunt]

I'm not doubting the truth or integrity of any reviewer, the problem is the consistency of the reviewed. A nice bloke she wants him to come back again and gives a great service. Next bloke she doesn't like so much and really hopes he doesn't come back and he gets the shit punt. Most of my recent punts have been the cheap and cheerful types so not too fussed. Some have been better than others and I've gone back for more. If I'd given a positive for one of those and then another punter goes on my good review and he gets the shit it's not the reviewers fault.

[password02]

I'm not doubting the truth or integrity of any reviewer, the problem is the consistency of the reviewed. A nice bloke she wants him to come back again and gives a great service. Next bloke she doesn't like so much and really hopes he doesn't come back and he gets the shit punt. Most of my recent punts have been the cheap and cheerful types so not too fussed. Some have been better than others and I've gone back for more. If I'd given a positive for one of those and then another punter goes on my good review and he gets the shit it's not the reviewers fault.

+1 very true in the Punting real world

[CupidStunt]

Since we are all vary so much in age, physical appearance, views on women and their looks I'm starting to wonder if there is much value to placed in a positive review?

There's a lot of value in positive reviews.

Reviews are not just to warn of shoddy service and bad attitudes but to shine a light on sp's who operate with the professionalism appropriate to their hourly rate. Also, if you let them know what they're getting right they're more likely to keep doing it and it may even delay that apparently inevitable descent into cynicism and burnout (positive reinforcement etc)

It's not a regulated industry so there's no Competent Person or Chartered standard to judge them by so all we can do is give an honest and fair overview of how any encounter went for us as individuals. I think you can get a good feel for how an individual ukp member is likely to conduct themselves, their preferences etc and I weight their opinions accordingly.

Good service should always be appreciated and the more reviews (good, bad or indifferent) the better.

[CBPaul]

OP - are you referring to positive reviews on here or on AW ?

Positive reviews on AW are generally useless but those on here carry far more weight IMO and go beyond services offered. Things of importance to me include whether the prossie is the one in the profile, if she charges loads of extras, if communications are decent and reliable and so on, things that don't depend on the punters physical appearance.

I'm sure there are cases of punter A getting different service to punter B but it goes beyond age and looks, sure a prossie will always prefer Brad Pitt over Albert Steptoe but being clean, respectful, not clogging her inbox with twatish nonsense and not pushing the boundaries also go a long way to having a good punt.

[Daffodil]

A "handsome young man, fit body, well presented and charming" would never need to pay.

There'd be something seriously wrong with the Universe if he couldn't pull civvy girls.

A bit of a lazy generalisation.

These "handsome young men" may have a partner in tow and value the discretion that fucking prossies provide 

[smiths]

I'm not doubting the truth or integrity of any reviewer, the problem is the consistency of the reviewed. A nice bloke she wants him to come back again and gives a great service. Next bloke she doesn't like so much and really hopes he doesn't come back and he gets the shit punt. Most of my recent punts have been the cheap and cheerful types so not too fussed. Some have been better than others and I've gone back for more. If I'd given a positive for one of those and then another punter goes on my good review and he gets the shit it's not the reviewers fault.

Of course its not the reviewers fault, he gave his opinion on the WG and service she offered him, thats not a guarantee the WG will definitely be the same with other punters.

What a positive review on here can do though is confirm that the WG looks like her free pictures, is the size and approx age stated, offered the services stated at the advertised price and if any unmentioned extras were asked for, and what her attitude was like. All this can help a punter assess whether the WG is one he wishes to punt with.

So in my view positive reviews are very handy.

[smiths]

There's a lot of value in positive reviews.

Reviews are not just to warn of shoddy service and bad attitudes but to shine a light on sp's who operate with the professionalism appropriate to their hourly rate. Also, if you let them know what they're getting right they're more likely to keep doing it and it may even delay that apparently inevitable descent into cynicism and burnout (positive reinforcement etc)

It's not a regulated industry so there's no Competent Person or Chartered standard to judge them by so all we can do is give an honest and fair overview of how any encounter went for us as individuals. I think you can get a good feel for how an individual ukp member is likely to conduct themselves, their preferences etc and I weight their opinions accordingly.

Good service should always be appreciated and the more reviews (good, bad or indifferent) the better.

I am not clear what you mean by operate with the professionalism appropriate to their hourly rate. Personally i expect EVERY WG irrespective of what she charges to offer me a good professional service in exchange for my cash. No excuses. I do agree with the thrust of your post.

[pokenn]

All reviews are worth posting. Negative, positive, neutral. Doesn't matter if it's completely the opposite to a review another punter has given. It's up to us all to just read the review and make up our own minds. I trust some UKP members more than others and take more notice of their reviews, but still useful to read reviews from new or fluffy members.

[Mr Kent (Not AW)]

I have always been straight forward in my reviews and yes they are worth putting up. If a girl is large I will state not ideal for those who want a skinny woman, if she smells of smoke, say she is a smoker...........you do not need to offend but punters can usually guage, I have been on the scene long enough to work out what is genuine and what is drivel when it comes to reviews.............   

[Aspen]

Since we are all vary so much in age, physical appearance, views on women and their looks I'm starting to wonder if there is much value to placed in a positive review?

I hardly ever bother reading them. It's rare that any turn out to be anything like the reviews.

[Flunt]

Thanks for your opinions and more importantly your reviews, good, bad and indifferent. I like the idea of it providing positive reinforcement for any escort that reads them and takes note of what the punters enjoy and hopefully improves the service they offer. I tend to read reviews from various sources, AW reviews I don't have much faith in but it does depend on the reviewer's history. I don't have much to go on for the opinions of reviewers on here yet, you certainly don't pull any punches for the negatives and the fluffy positive ones are ridiculed fairly quickly if the reviewer is not genuine.

[Steely Dan]

As others have said, of course UKP positive reviews have value.  They state an experience on a day.  There are still B&S merchants out there, & girls who look good and offer bad service and so on.  But, UKP makes it hard for them. The risk of bad punt with a prossie with good review is much lower.  But note I said lower not zero. As you point out, results may vary.  This has happened to me. (A member who was factually correct, but his tastes differ to mine - now I know. But she was not a time waster or a PG scam - could have been worse) And maybe you have a bad punt with a girl that I rated positive.  Not my problem, I just report my experience, I'm not her pimp and I'm not vouching for her.

For those of you who have read this thread and never reviewed, please write one now.  We do want to hear your experience.

[Dogfather]

Been considering this subject too.

Is it just about sharing an experience where you had a decent session at a particular time?
You see other girls, you sample new events, positives could be different things.

Breaking a self imposed 'return once' policy was a poor decision for me.

Negatives are vital but positives I'm a bit disillusioned on now.