So you want us to believe someone who hasn't written a review about the contested SP under any of her aliases (and may not have written any others)?
It's up to readers to make a decision on what they believe or not believe and then decide if they want to see the WG
As mentioned previously in this case I have written a review previously
If you have time to read and post here then you have time to write enough of a review so that the proper mechanism enables searching. Only the earliest post in this thread would be surfaced in a search about any name or profile and any clearing of name may well be pages later.
This is not quite how the search mechanism work from my experience using the site.
The search brings up the posts(not threads) that contain the search item, in the case AW Id.
Also reviews are not the only source of information that can be derived from this site when researching and trying to make a decision to see a SP.
The general discussion threads contain a lot of information.
Also any accusation would be worthless without the photos matching the real SP behind an ad and once the SP changes name, number, photos and profile/site the entry is lost until someone with a reliable memory of all the posts here happens to make the connection when they attempt a visit or after a bad outcome.
Hence why the thread asks for photos to be posted
What of SPs with patchy reps, loved by some, blacklisted by others e.g. Katalina of Norf London? Just another flame war.
Racist SPs who otherwise provide a good service?
Nothing is black and white. Every SP has their fanboys regardless of how bad they may be
It's good to have challenge as well. It provides more information for readers to make their own decision
What do you mean by racist
If a SP racially abuses a punter then goes on to give them a great blowjob and a good fuck then that SP gives good blowjobs and is a good fuck, but, they have a bad attitude and have provided a bad service as a result of expressing racist behaviour towards the client
As PeterMisc said, post an update with new attributable details (number, name, profile id, ad link) to an existing conclusive thread or review. THAT makes it searchable and attributable to direct evidence NOT landing it at some random point in an ongoing debate about multiple SPs.
As mentioned several times (for the 1st profile posted) I cannot find the original reviews on the old profile either written by myself or others that saw this SP via the old profile.
It's likely this scenario applies to others
There is no point debating the value of the thread as ultimately this will be determined by the number of posts it gets. If there is no value in the thread then it will gather no traction but its out there now for anyone that sees value in it
