Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Does BB sex feel better than condom sex for females?  (Read 11528 times)

Offline horsa

For me it feels 100 times better and you can drastically notice a difference, is the difference a whole lot better and as noticeable for women?

Not the best place to ask this question on a forum of 99% males. What is your feedback from women?  :hi: :hi:


Offline Trex

I never bareback any girls even with my ex girlfriends I always wear a condom because I don't want to get her pregnant and with escorts probably most likely to get some sort of disease. That's why I never tried.

For females I think you're in a wrong site for asking, not that many females on this site.
I think most females do like it raw in my opinion.

Offline Mr333

For me it feels 100 times better and you can drastically notice a difference, is the difference a whole lot better and as noticeable for women?

Not the best place to ask this question on a forum of 99% males. What is your feedback from women?  :hi: :hi:

Why don't you ask the one you last fucked that was 100 times better?  :unknown:

Offline Lou2019

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 532
  • Likes: 54
I never bareback any girls even with my ex girlfriends I always wear a condom because I don't want to get her pregnant and with escorts probably most likely to get some sort of disease. That's why I never tried.

For females I think you're in a wrong site for asking, not that many females on this site.
I think most females do like it raw in my opinion.

WTAF you’ll probably find you are at less risk of disease with escorts than someone in civvy world!


Offline Ali Katt

  • Board Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,961
  • Likes: 16
  • Reviews: 28
WTAF you’ll probably find you are at less risk of disease with escorts than someone in civvy world!
More to the point why would someone date a civvy if they don't trust them to be faithful or think they are an "AIDS fucker".

Offline RandomGuy99

For me it feels 100 times better and you can drastically notice a difference, is the difference a whole lot better and as noticeable for women?

Not the best place to ask this question on a forum of 99% males. What is your feedback from women?  :hi: :hi:
Perhaps you should book an SP to peg you with and without a condom and see how you find it?

Probably a question you should ask on the other forum although the question has no relevance to punting as everyone should be using protection.

Offline Trex

WTAF you’ll probably find you are at less risk of disease with escorts than someone in civvy world!

Not really, there are escorts do offer bareback or secretly do bareback.

Offline Doc Holliday

Probably a question you should ask on the other forum although the question has no relevance to punting as everyone should be using protection.

Pointless asking the question on any punting forum as hardly anyone will be honest.

The reality is for the majority, not using a condom feels better for both parties.

Offline Beamer

Pointless asking the question on any punting forum as hardly anyone will be honest.

The reality is for the majority, not using a condom feels better for both parties.

+1
Also why extra thin, better feel etc condoms are now taking a bigger market share
« Last Edit: January 02, 2020, 04:40:45 pm by Beamer »

Offline Happylad

After 50 years of a very happy and sexually very active marriage I can assure the OP that one woman at least (and I assume that both WGs and other females would have the same sensory organs) couldn`t wait to get rid of the condoms as soon as the honeymoon was over and take other means of contraception. She always insisted that bare flesh was twice as good as anything with a rubber glove on and with her ministrations I had no inclination whatever to sample any elsewhere.

Some years after she died I had a prostate operation, which left me fully able to have orgasm but not to produce any cum; two regulars that I told about it each promptly said that in that case they would like to do bb  (as one said "All the fun of a fuck and no mess in the vagina") - I took a chance with each, and regular GUM tests have confirmed that my trust in each case was justified (and neither got pregnant).  Both told me that bb was simply far better than anything with a Johnny on, and as far as I`m concerned there simply isn`t any comparison.

The second of the two regulars (who isn`t really a WG at all, but simply `did` for me for pocket money) is still waiting in the wings to service me  again with bb once I get enough energy back.

Having said all of that, I must state that in the case of each girl I knew sufficient about each beforehand to believe the risk was minimal/

Offline Doc Holliday

Pointless asking the question on any punting forum as hardly anyone will be honest.

Happylad's post shows there are exceptions  :D
« Last Edit: January 02, 2020, 06:15:45 pm by Doc Holliday »

Offline The Owl

For me it feels 100 times better and you can drastically notice a difference, is the difference a whole lot better and as noticeable for women?

Not the best place to ask this question on a forum of 99% males. What is your feedback from women?  :hi: :hi:

All my civie sexual partners prefered bareback as soon as alternative contraception was in place. Some liked it when my spunk trickled out of their pussy on to their thighs and others were quick to clean up but all seemed to get more aroused when I came inside them. The additional arousal may have been more mental in the same way that when a woman came on cock it turned me on more.

I only barebacked one escort when the fucking condom broke. Believe me, it wasn't fun at all for either of us have once we realised what had happened, thankfully not long after we started fucking, and had to have the 'what's your sexual health like' conversation.

Online Coriniumstud

Can you give us a list of the wg’s you bb’d so I don’t go anywhere near them  :dash:

Offline Metalgear2018

I never bareback any girls even with my ex girlfriends I always wear a condom because I don't want to get her pregnant and with escorts probably most likely to get some sort of disease. That's why I never tried.

For females I think you're in a wrong site for asking, not that many females on this site.
I think most females do like it raw in my opinion.

What would happen if you get them pregnant?

Offline 20jay

I'm surprised about this question, did the man never had a long-term girlfriend ..? My experience according to the girls, yes, women love sex without a condom as much as we men because it feels more intense.  :hi:

Online scutty brown

A lot of interesting biochemistry goes on in a woman when she gets a shot of spunk
External Link/Members Only

anecdotally swallowing semen also has an effect as well

Offline 20jay

WTAF you’ll probably find you are at less risk of disease with escorts than someone in civvy world!

Agree .... but would still use a condom anyway :thumbsup:

Offline bdyno

anecdotally swallowing semen also has an effect as well
I read somewhere years ago that it's apparently very good for the skin.

Offline Doc Holliday

A lot of interesting biochemistry goes on in a woman when she gets a shot of spunk
External Link/Members Only

anecdotally swallowing semen also has an effect as well

Hate to burst the bubble  ;) :D

External Link/Members Only

Offline OakTree

It feels slightly more pleasurable but I wouldn't say that much. On the rare occasion I've had a condom split or come off I haven't felt a sudden rush of intense pleasure.

When in the past I've fucked girlfriends and the missus without, it's the not fannying about getting a condom on that makes more of a difference. Well lets face it, usually the WG is fucking about trying to find one then she can't rip the packet open because of her nails so you open it for her. She then fucks up putting it on you so you have to take over. By then I'm beginning to lose interest.



Offline winkywanky

I think logically, BB compared with protected would be a bigger difference for the chaps.

Your cock is sliding in and out of her pussy so with a condom you'd lose some of that sensation by covering up. You put a barrier between your cock and her vagina.

From the woman's standpoint, she still gets pretty well the same sensation of friction whether you wear a condom or not, she still feels the shape and size of your cock moving in and out.

Obviously the vagina is chock-full of nerve endings so despite the natural lubrication I guess there may be a small difference for her? But I think her biggest difference is the psychological thrill of being penetrated or fucked, the sheer animal, gay abandon of fucking. It is after all a mating ritual, so the feeling that a bare cock with the potential to put a bun in her oven is probably quite intense for her.

Offline winkywanky

Hate to burst the bubble  ;) :D

External Link/Members Only


Speaking from personal experience, my previous gf was desperate to swallow my spunk while in blowjob mode (she said as much, and frankly it was obvious). She was also keen to snowball the remnants with me, the dirty cow  :D.

And on the occasions I came inside her (I am vasectomised) she would squirm with absolute joy at the feeling of being pumped into, and would revel in the feel of it dribbling down her thigh. Apologies for the detail!

From what I have learned over the years (I dunno, perhaps it's all bollocks - even literally ;)) semen is full of pheromones (the smell is distinctive) and I always figured that the ingested testosterone would be desirable for a lusty woman, after all, we have a lot more than they do  :unknown:. Testosterone is the get-up and go hormone, the driver.

Online webpunter

Am guilty of shagging civvys periodically
Usually nodders go outta the window after the 1st or 2nd time
I do carry out a risk benefit analysis - not always the easiest or accurate when wasted  :lol: :scare:
Mostly milfs so the chances of getting em up the duff diminish significantly
Especially avoiding shootin inside
I much prefer a decent TW HJ OWO CIM finish anyways

Shoot me down in flames for going in Commando
Its hard to resist  :dash:

The feedback i have is that a big difference for burds
Lots of reasons - physical & psychological as WW mentions
They find it much much easier to orgasm when BB

Offline winkywanky


Speaking from personal experience, my previous gf was desperate to swallow my spunk while in blowjob mode (she said as much, and frankly it was obvious). She was also keen to snowball the remnants with me, the dirty cow  :D.

And on the occasions I came inside her (I am vasectomised) she would squirm with absolute joy at the feeling of being pumped into, and would revel in the feel of it dribbling down her thigh. Apologies for the detail!

From what I have learned over the years (I dunno, perhaps it's all bollocks - even literally ;)) semen is full of pheromones (the smell is distinctive) and I always figured that the ingested testosterone would be desirable for a lusty woman, after all, we have a lot more than they do  :unknown:. Testosterone is the get-up and go hormone, the driver.


Or perhaps I'm just (desperately) inadvertently perpetuating the myth of male 'dominance' like a typical bloke would do?  :P

I mean that in a deep-down genetic caveman sense, which obviously modern man (and woman) can enjoy, while also having the modern day knowledge and liberation to be able to have just as much fun with role play/dominance reversal (switch sides, so to speak), perhaps even guy gets pegged etc - and while also recognising that a woman can be your boss at work, and even be CEO of a large, multinational corporation  :cool:.

Offline Bigwilts

For me it feels 100 times better and you can drastically notice a difference, is the difference a whole lot better and as noticeable for women?

Not the best place to ask this question on a forum of 99% males. What is your feedback from women?  :hi: :hi:
I wouldn’t go so far as 100% better, but bare back does feel better than covered.
However - concerns about the risks take the edge off.
I’ll have bareback sex when in a relationship once I am confidence that we are clear of any concerns (once tested and having allowed appropriate time for anything to show), that other contraception is in place and I trust my partner.  In such circumstances I also don’t play away.

With anyone else whether paid or one night stand etc then it’s condom on

Offline The Owl

If this article is to be believed then yes, women prefer sex without condoms for numerous reasons although they may not hate them as much as men.

External Link/Members Only

However that shouldn't be a green light for punters to start asking their favourite prostitute for bareback. Let's be sensible here. If you want bareback the safest option is in a closed relationship where you're both tested first. Don't forget the birth control.

Offline myothernameis

It feels slightly more pleasurable but I wouldn't say that much. On the rare occasion I've had a condom split or come off I haven't felt a sudden rush of intense pleasure.

When in the past I've fucked girlfriends and the missus without, it's the not fannying about getting a condom on that makes more of a difference. Well lets face it, usually the WG is fucking about trying to find one then she can't rip the packet open because of her nails so you open it for her. She then fucks up putting it on you so you have to take over. By then I'm beginning to lose interest.

When I was in my youth, early 20's there was one escort I had bareback on a regular basis, at first it happened by accident, was getting a body to body massage and it slipped in, as a youth didn't care, or even knew the danger

For the next few years, we had bareback sex regularly, and to me it felt kind of silky, the escort didn't need to use lube, as she used to get so wet, and when I pulled my cock, just the look was a turn on

In my mid 30's I began to understand the risk, as escorts became more prominent online, like AW, and for the first time, I had seen likes or dislikes, including BB or unprotected sex

Offline RandomGuy99

+1
Also why extra thin, better feel etc condoms are now taking a bigger market share
Never tried one.

Are they as safe as regular condoms?

I think for piece of mind I'd prefer to use a regular one.
« Last Edit: January 02, 2020, 10:51:01 pm by RandomGuy99 »

Offline James

ppl with partners ask them if uts better with or without
i have always used a condom even with girlfriends.
dont want an unwanted gift can never trust the girl even if shes on the pill. plys pill is not 100 percent
Banned reason: Unhealthy obsession with SP malicious posts out of spite
Banned by: daviemac

Offline mradventures

Never tried one.

Are they as safe as regular condoms?

I think for piece of mind I'd prefer to use a regular one.

on average they would be more likely to break i guess.

of the very few civvy women ive been with, they wanted bb before/more than me. maybe they feel more of the muscley texture without a condom?

Offline Ali Katt

  • Board Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,961
  • Likes: 16
  • Reviews: 28
Not really, there are escorts do offer bareback or secretly do bareback.
I've never been offered BB by an escort. While there are some secret barebackers, I doubt it's anywhere near as widespread as people think.

Offline Strawberry

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 1,790
  • Likes: 47
This is an interesting discussion, for me intercourse without a condom feels smoother, slippery (is slipperier a word!) compared with with but that doesn't change my orgasm and if I remember rightly I didn't particularly like the after dribbles.

My experience outside of paid-for sex is that most men prefer to not use condoms, even had some make me feel ashamed when I whipped the condoms out of my handbag. However a few wanted to use condoms until I was tested, they considered themselves 'clean' because they were a blood donor.

I'm wondering does punting change attitude towards condoms and safety?

Also suspect it depends on each individual rather than a block based on gender, however I would guess there's a whole tranche of the population influenced by the AIDS warnings in the 1980s - although I do know from experience that some people who went through that period do have the 'AIDS is a gay disease' blinkers on belief. Being in a room with someone who is keen to use vaseline as a lubricant for anal, who has that response when you advise that could weaken the condom is a little alarming.


« Last Edit: January 03, 2020, 09:32:12 am by Strawberry »

Offline Hobbit

I've never been offered BB by an escort. While there are some secret barebackers, I doubt it's anywhere near as widespread as people think.

It's probably not as widespread in the business but most escorts are barebacking someone whether it's a client, boyfriend or pimp. It has all been discussed before so no point debating again.

Offline Doc Holliday

I would guess there's a whole tranche of the population influenced by the AIDS warnings in the 1980s - although I do know from experience that some people who went through that period do have the 'AIDS is a gay disease' blinkers on belief.

In the early days of HIV in the eighties many front line health care workers thought we would be lucky to survive the next decade from work related exposure, let alone sexual contact!!

However the fears were largely unfounded and we survived to draw our pensions  :)

The reality is that in the UK there is still some basis for it being a 'gay disease' although ethnicity (Afro-Caribbean) and geography (London) are also important factors.

External Link/Members Only





Offline winkywanky

It makes sense, even from the viewpoint of a 'casual observer', watching just the everyday TV News.

BB anal sex is the most likely means of HIV transmission because the lining of the rectum is doing a job it's not designed for, it tears and abrades easily and coming into direct contact with semen carries a high risk of infection. So gay men are at highest risk.

And there are higher rates of HIV in Africa due to various factors, poverty, ignorance, lack of education and various religious/cultural customs. That's bound to be seen in Africans who come to this country.

Offline Doc Holliday

And there are higher rates of HIV in Africa due to various factors, poverty, ignorance, lack of education and various religious/cultural customs. That's bound to be seen in Africans who come to this country.

It's considerably more complex than that  ;) ... and whilst well recognised the reasons are not really fully understood.

Going way off at a tangent here but only follow links if you are remotely interested  :)

External Link/Members Only

External Link/Members Only

Offline winkywanky

So in addition to those other factors, sexual activity being predominantly within your own ethnic group, your own 'pool' would exacerbate infection rates within race? That makes sense.

But then heterosexual infection rates in the UK (predominantly amongst ethnic whites) are lower than many African countries, and our 'pool' is smaller?

So surely this would suggest that initial and 'intrinsic' infection rates in poorer countries (with lower education standards and a less open and liberal society) are bound to be higher?

I guess there would be other factors at play too, like there being more social mobility in the UK compared with Africa?

Offline winkywanky

Conclusions seem to be:

"STIs in the UK are unevenly distributed. Among heterosexual men and women, individuals of black Caribbean ethnicity are disproportionately affected by STIs.

In our questionnaire-based study, a history of STI was reported more frequently by men and women of black/mixed Caribbean ethnicity, compared with white men and women. This was not explained by reported sexual behaviours.

Sexual history and outcomes are likely to be influenced by factors beyond the individual, including partner behaviour and sexual networks."


For my (fairly) small brain that's somewhat conflicting information.

In particular black women report having less unprotected sex, with less partners, than their white sisters. Yet they have higher infection rates. I guess there may be variations in honesty when giving answers to questions from health professionals but would this fully account for this? From what I can make out the sexual behaviours of black and white men are fairly similar (ie they're all just 'typical blokes').

I may have missed it, but is a distinction made between Black African and Black Afro-Caribbean in this analysis?


Offline munterhunter

WTAF you’ll probably find you are at less risk of disease with escorts than someone in civvy world!
I think that depends on who you are fucking in the civvy world. I accept that responsible service providers are checked on a regular basis whereas most civvies are not. However I've seen SP's  who say they are strictly no bb punt with prolific barebackers if you look at their feedback all you need there is a split condom or owo and an sti can be passed on. I've seen women advertise bb "if you can show a recent sti clinic certificate. Well that's like a car MOT innit means the car was roadworthy when it was tested. Your sti results take a few days to come through so depending on what the punter or wg has been doing after being tested then the certificate is meaningless. Punting is a risky business for punters and service providers alike its all about what risks people are willing to take.
No doubt in my mind bareback sex is far better than sex with a condom. Would I take a chance with a WG or a civvy I'd recently met? NOT A CHANCE!

Online scutty brown

So in addition to those other factors, sexual activity being predominantly within your own ethnic group, your own 'pool' would exacerbate infection rates within race? That makes sense.

But then heterosexual infection rates in the UK (predominantly amongst ethnic whites) are lower than many African countries, and our 'pool' is smaller?

So surely this would suggest that initial and 'intrinsic' infection rates in poorer countries (with lower education standards and a less open and liberal society) are bound to be higher?

I guess there would be other factors at play too, like there being more social mobility in the UK compared with Africa?

Its more to do with living  standards
Low standard way of life (and Black Africa is among the lowest on the low) means poor healthcare, poor nutrition from birth, more general disease and suppressed immune systems.
Couple that with survival-level prostitution especially along arterial transport routes (high turnover, bareback) and common use of shared needles for drug abuse and you have a perfect storm of combined high risk factors.
Don't forget HIV is a disease of opportunity: it often needs another disease to weaken the victim first before it can attack. For instance in the earliest Californian reports the casualties were often showing symptoms of syphilis as well - would would immune suppress, and also cause anal lesions in gay men

Offline winkywanky

Yes, I should imagine the 'quality' of your immune system must play some part, and that will surely be affected by overall living standards.

I wonder whether there are any subtle differences in Black and White immune systems in any case, at a genetic level? In a way that would make sense because various races around the world have developed separately over 10,000s of years, a case in point is when Europeans first arrived and settled in the Americas, and wiped out a large part of the indigenous population with their strange European diseases which they had no natural defence against (apart from all the other shit 'we' have inflicted upon them). Whether that is a factor here I have no idea.




« Last Edit: January 03, 2020, 01:04:37 pm by winkywanky »

Offline Doc Holliday


For my (fairly) small brain that's somewhat conflicting information.


I doubt you have a small brain but I did say it was complex .. beyond my pay grade :D

Like many studies it does kind of go around in inconclusive circles.


I may have missed it, but is a distinction made between Black African and Black Afro-Caribbean in this analysis?

I found this which suggests a distinction should perhaps be made?  External Link/Members Only

I've only scan read it as my small brain is starting to hurt  ;)

Offline Doc Holliday

I wonder whether there are any subtle differences in Black and White immune systems in any case, at a genetic level?

There has been some suggestion of this some years ago External Link/Members Only

Going way off topic now  :D

Offline Hobbit

There has been some suggestion of this some years ago External Link/Members Only

Going way off topic now  :D

Yes you are.  :D

Firstly, I think education is the key here. Many of these people in these countries are not aware of what sexual diseases are out there and the more we educate people the more safer they will be.

Secondly, people should be able to talk about bareback sex without the fear of being judged or condemned. Even on this forum. Girls also have a part to play and rather than adding statements on their profiles like "if you ask for bareback, you will be blocked" et cetera doesn't help the situation. If you want to educate people, it has to be done in a compassionate, non-judgemental space and that's the only way you will see change. :hi:

Offline redfox_uk

I did inadvertently briefly BB a WG last year. The condom slipped off - we only noticed when I withdrew to change positions and she had to fish around to retrieve the condom from her pussy.
In this case she hadn't noticed the difference between covered and BB. Obviously both got checked and results came back clean.

Offline Doc Holliday


Secondly, people should be able to talk about bareback sex without the fear of being judged or condemned. Even on this forum.

Totally agree, but as previously mentioned, it is such a taboo subject with massive associated stigma to the point of outrage, that an honest and realistic discussion isn't going to happen.

Offline Hobbit

Totally agree, but as previously mentioned, it is such a taboo subject with massive associated stigma to the point of outrage, that an honest and realistic discussion isn't going to happen.

Well it should be, if society wants to improve themselves and others and live in a healthy state of life. The taboo and stigma is based on the fear of death and yet nobody ever wants to discuss death even though we cannot hide from it.

Anyway I'll shut up now before I get called morbid.  :D

Offline wylie anchor

she had to fish around to retrieve the condom from her pussy.

Thanks, now got a mental picture I can't unsee!  :scare:  :D :lol:

Offline Happylad


Secondly, people should be able to talk about bareback sex without the fear of being judged or condemned. Even on this forum.. :hi:

I did just that, and, to be honest, I then sat back and waited for the howls of abuse and (metaphorically speaking) the arrival of the lynch mob, instead of which I rather get the feeling that quite a number have already sampled the illicit pleasures of bb and would be delighted to indulge in it more, and others who haven`t would probably like to give it a try, if only they could be guaranteed that (a) they were in absolutely no danger whatever of catching anything nasty, and (b) it wouldn`t result in a nasty paternity case in the courts.

As one young lady I knew always termed it - `au naturel`