Reviews

[Sar-Major]

Mmm Well looking at the "Reviews" board of late. It would seem "RED" is the in colour at the minute. 

Are some of these "Girlies" getting a tad complacent with the services they offer, and I don't mean the well respected ladies of the NE.

 Err shall we say just the "Up and Cumming" new starlets of the NE. 

 

[Darlobloke]

I was just about to post about the sea of red Sar

Good that crap punts are being reported though. Most of the red are from new lasses so at least the stars arent leading standards

[daviemac]

Have to agree S-M, too many red's at the minute

[Knight Templar]

Thats a hell if alot of red , thats why this site is great, saves us all alot of money by fellow punters writing these reviews

[Redskin]

Thats a hell if alot of red , thats why this site is great, saves us all alot of money by fellow punters writing these reviews

Got to agree, one or two of them were on my to do list. Not anymore

[Tiger63]

Lesson well and truely learned.

[johnny34]

Lesson well and truely learned.

I hope you have been sat in the corner writing your 100 lines.....

'I must not see Romanian girls in Bensham'   

[Kev3773]

I hope you have been sat in the corner writing your 100 lines.....

'I must not see Romanian girls in Bensham'   

I would make it easier for him. I must not see Romanian girls. 

[foreverchanges]

Must admit I logged onto the Reviews the other day and thought I was on the Scotland forum by mistake ....mind you as we all know a Negative generates far more interest and comments than a Positive.

[Mansell]

Don't log on for a few days and the board goes Red. Must be my fault then 

[AgedCases]

My last punt on Tyneside was in March. Haven't been tempted since. At least I'm saving money, I suppose.

[datwabbit]

When i look at the board i am more interested in negatives and neutrals than positives.

If someone is positive then i know a good time will happen. So it gets logged on my "bear her in mind" list.

If its anything else then i read the review to see what happened. If a negative for comms then i think about the chance it would happen again. If its for other stuff then she's on my "don't bother" list.

So i spend more time looking at the detail of a negative and neutral than a positive. I look at the services mentioned in positives to help make a decision.

[Sar-Major]

Well, Ive just been looking at the reviews page and yet again more negatives and neutrals than positives. 

 

[Kev3773]

Well, Ive just been looking at the reviews page and yet again more negatives and neutrals than positives. 

 

It's all good though, helps weed out the bad ones   

[Sar-Major]

It's all good though, helps weed out the bad ones   

Ya probably right on that one Alfie boy. 

 

[Tiger63]

Its suggesting to me that standards are slipping.
Ive mentioned on UKE that there seems to be a growing number of girls who cant be bothered to reply to a simple message.
Judging by their feedback Iam assuming they are not busy every day so obviously they cant be arsed to post a couple of words.

fair do`s ......the money will go to someone who wants it

[AgedCases]

It's all good though, helps weed out the bad ones   

And saving us all our hard-earned.

[MasterChief]

Its suggesting to me that standards are slipping.
Ive mentioned on UKE that there seems to be a growing number of girls who cant be bothered to reply to a simple message.
Judging by their feedback Iam assuming they are not busy every day so obviously they cant be arsed to post a couple of words.

fair do`s ......the money will go to someone who wants it

I don't think standards are slipping, more that expectations are going up, what would be a positive a few years ago is now a neutral or negative. The easy availability of girls on the internet and sites like this one mean punters expect more, it is no longer enough to just turn up and drop your knickers, we expect more for our money (and rightfully so)

[daviemac]

I don't think standards are slipping, more that expectations are going up, what would be a positive a few years ago is now a neutral or negative. The easy availability of girls on the internet and sites like this one mean punters expect more, it is no longer enough to just turn up and drop your knickers, we expect more for our money (and rightfully so)

I think you might have something there, but I think it's a bit of both, us expecting a higher standard and some girls getting lackadaisical.

All in all it makes TOFTT a lot more risky. I know I've got a very good reg at the minute so it's unlikely I'll be trying others, especially after some recent experiences I've had with massages.

[waynekerr600]

When I first started it was the daily sport with a list of phone numbers and you never had a clue what they looked like. There were a lot more maids then, no one kissed and the price structure was £30/£40/£50 depending on whether you wanted hj/oral/sex. Most girls these days seem an awful lot better but I do think that the expectations are higher.

[LydiaAmour]

If my thoughts aren't wanted then I apologise.

Personally I think it could be down to the recent glamorisation/damnation in the media and the growing acceptance. Documentaries left right and centre paint the industry to be one of two extremes, either all smack heads on the street or girls making £5k a night without having sex. So when a certain type of girl gets into the Industry they have these grand ideas and then when they see it's not like the tv they get a bit jaded and perform at subpar levels. I think these to shows inflate expectations too. The over saturated market place and the ease of the internet must have an influence too. We see people like Chloe Khan who started on the X factor as an absolute train wreck and began cramming and reportedly escorting and sugarbaby-ing and girls see the lifestyle she has and want if without thinking about the work that goes into it.

[FLYING BLUE]

If my thoughts aren't wanted then I apologise.

Personally I think it could be down to the recent glamorisation/damnation in the media and the growing acceptance. Documentaries left right and centre paint the industry to be one of two extremes, either all smack heads on the street or girls making £5k a night without having sex. So when a certain type of girl gets into the Industry they have these grand ideas and then when they see it's not like the tv they get a bit jaded and perform at subpar levels. I think these to shows inflate expectations too. The over saturated market place and the ease of the internet must have an influence too. We see people like Chloe Khan who started on the X factor as an absolute train wreck and began cramming and reportedly escorting and sugarbaby-ing and girls see the lifestyle she has and want if without thinking about the work that goes into it.

Very valid IMHO and, very honest to see a WG saying so.

[DaveyJJ]

60 to 120 is a lot of money to spend if you might get a shit experience like I did the last time.. also knocks your confidence abit. looking to punt again but they have to have glowing reputation for me to even bother

[Tiger63]

60 to 120 is a lot of money to spend if you might get a shit experience like I did the last time.. also knocks your confidence abit. looking to punt again but they have to have glowing reputation for me to even bother

Which is why we bang on about reviews mate....the more we get the better the deal for us punters

[datwabbit]

60 to 120 is a lot of money to spend if you might get a shit experience like I did the last time.. also knocks your confidence abit. looking to punt again but they have to have glowing reputation for me to even bother

Inflation and pay restraint is making that figure more harder to risk as a punter whilst as a WG its looking even nicer to earn.

[AgedCases]

Our review section is redder than a bloodied Boro shirt!

[Tiger63]

2 messages sent yesterday to different WGs and  both have been read......no replies though.
2 more for the black list

[Sar-Major]

2 messages sent yesterday to different WGs and  both have been read......no replies though.
2 more for the black list

Total Crap Attitude towards prospective clients..............

 

[The Outsider]

2 messages sent yesterday to different WGs and  both have been read......no replies though.
2 more for the black list

The odd thing is that a number of girls I've seen recently have commented how quiet it is!  Maybe they'd be busier if they answered texts and messages?? Even had a couple of agencies fail to answer the phone last week. 

[Sar-Major]

The odd thing is that a number of girls I've seen recently have commented how quiet it is!  Maybe they'd be busier if they answered texts and messages?? Even had a couple of agencies fail to answer the phone last week.

Their fucking financial LOSS.........................   

 

[datwabbit]

The odd thing is that a number of girls I've seen recently have commented how quiet it is!  Maybe they'd be busier if they answered texts and messages?? Even had a couple of agencies fail to answer the phone last week.

If they are quiet they should offer incalls or drop rates. I know these are issues that affect punting choices.

[catweazle]

As of this morning, on the NE reviews, of the  20 most recently posted, there are 17 positives, 2 negatives and a single neutral.

Maybe the message is getting through.......

[mazbaz72]

I agree reviews are useful ,but to what extent as our good friend catweazle often points out YMMV,as I am sure there is wg,s,that treat guys different depending on looks ,physique etc,yes its human nature ,but shouldn't happen when we paying with our hard earned,so my point is,a young Adonis would probs have different experience to a middle aged overweight guy ,so would that review be that useful,

[daviemac]

I agree reviews are useful ,but to what extent as our good friend catweazle often points out YMMV,as I am sure there is wg,s,that treat guys different depending on looks ,physique etc,yes its human nature ,but shouldn't happen when we paying with our hard earned,so my point is,a young Adonis would probs have different experience to a middle aged overweight guy ,so would that review be that useful,

Of course YMMV but are you saying we shouldn't bother with reviews because of it?  The point of doing reviews is to weed out the type of prossie you're talking about.

Your claim that a 'young Adonis' type would get a better service is not always correct, they're harder work for the prossie. They want an easy life and there's an abundance of young ones who are more than happy to see old gits like me. Take Delilah she's 40 years my junior but her standard of service was second to none, it could not have been better. All prossies I punt with are younger than me and I have never been refused a repeat booking.

All genuine reviews are valid and show that the standards are maintained by the prossie concerned and that they are consistent in the service they provide be that good, bad or indifferent. 

[Sar-Major]

Of course YMMV but are you saying we shouldn't bother with reviews because of it?  The point of doing reviews is to weed out the type of prossie you're talking about.

Your claim that a 'young Adonis' type would get a better service is not always correct, they're harder work for the prossie. They want an easy life and there's an abundance of young ones who are more than happy to see old gits like me. Take Delilah she's 40 years my junior but her standard of service was second to none, it could not have been better. All prossies I punt with are younger than me and I have never been refused a repeat booking.

All genuine reviews are valid and show that the standards are maintained by the prossie concerned and that they are consistent in the service they provide be that good, bad or indifferent.

Totally agree with you on that one DM. Like you, "Every WG" I see is a fekin good bit younger than me. Say what you will, my age hasn't had any effect on the service given by these girls, or them refusing to have another "Bash at me Bishop". We all need to keep doing reviews, so as to keep the "Chaff from the Wheat". However long, short, or humorous, that review may be.   

 

[Tiger63]

I agree reviews are useful ,but to what extent as our good friend catweazle often points out YMMV,as I am sure there is wg,s,that treat guys different depending on looks ,physique etc,yes its human nature ,but shouldn't happen when we paying with our hard earned,so my point is,a young Adonis would probs have different experience to a middle aged overweight guy ,so would that review be that useful,

I dare say some WGs are like that but certainly none of the ones Ive seen.
When Tori Taylor bends over and tells you to " fucking ruin me" or Amelia Andrews impales herself on you face and tells you"youre in big trouble"...or maybe when Victoria demands an anal session from you.....those girls are not holding back services

[Mansell]

I dare say some WGs are like that but certainly none of the ones Ive seen.
When Tori Taylor bends over and tells you to " fucking ruin me" or Amelia Andrews impales herself on you face and tells you"youre in big trouble"...or maybe when Victoria demands an anal session from you.....those girls are not holding back services

Oh so true Tiger 

[Sar-Major]

I dare say some WGs are like that but certainly none of the ones Ive seen.
When Tori Taylor bends over and tells you to " fucking ruin me" or Amelia Andrews impales herself on you face and tells you"youre in big trouble"...or maybe when Victoria demands an anal session from you.....those girls are not holding back services

Well that's a +1 from me, and +1 from Uncle Dick...................

 

[datwabbit]

I am bumping this in response to the Summer review.

The behaviour of the WG has bits that sounds similar with other negatives. Its like they see it as civvie sex for money. Maybe they need a training course!

[daviemac]

I am bumping this in response to the Summer review.

The behaviour of the WG has bits that sounds similar with other negatives. Its like they see it as civvie sex for money. Maybe they need a training course!

Or just sacked by the agency as Summer has been, no doubt she's re-appear somewhere under a different guise giving just as shit a service. 

[CELICA GT]

Or just sacked by the agency as Summer has been, no doubt she's re-appear somewhere under a different guise giving just as shit a service.

Aye DM, maybe as Winter of discontent and with her reviews we wouldn't end up with a spring in our step either!

[Sar-Major]

I am bumping this in response to the Summer review.

The behaviour of the WG has bits that sounds similar with other negatives. Its like they see it as civvie sex for money. Maybe they need a training course!

May be I should run the course's for them.................        "Fekin Civvies"     

 

[datwabbit]

May be I should run the course's for them.................        "Fekin Civvies"     

 

Basic Training?

[Sar-Major]

Basic Training?

Yeh..............Very Fekin Basic Training,        I'll whip them lazy fekers into shape