Escort Amber in Bournemouth

[samsmith101]

Saw an escort called Amber in the southbourne part of bournemouth a few years ago, lovely slim brunette girl living not far from the beach. Seems to have dissappeared, anyone know if she is still around ?

[Fuzzyduck]

Saw an escort called Amber in the southbourne part of bournemouth a few years ago, lovely slim brunette girl living not far from the beach. Seems to have dissappeared, anyone know if she is still around ?

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=343462.msg3559665#msg3559665

[samsmith101]

useless rude person. this is a discussion page

[Fuzzyduck]

useless rude person. this is a discussion page

Where is your review of her?

[southcoastpunter]

yes samsmith this is a discussion section of the forum (and we do have a number of guys who seem to like "playing Mods" rather than leave it to the real Mods) but looking back at your posts - many, many questions about different ladies and only a little contribution from you along the lines of "seen her" but no reviews in the nearly 4 years you have been here.

You can't be too surprised at the response!

[houseboot]

yes samsmith this is a discussion section of the forum (and we do have a number of guys who seem to like "playing Mods" rather than leave it to the real Mods) but looking back at your posts - many, many questions about different ladies and only a little contribution from you along the lines of "seen her" but no reviews in the nearly 4 years you have been here.

You can't be too surprised at the response!

Pot ..... Kettle ..... Black

[daviemac]

useless rude person. this is a discussion page

You've been here 4 years and done nothing but ask questions, any reason you haven't bothered to post any reviews as is required under the rules, or is there any reason I shouldn't ban you.      Don't say you don't use the site because I know that would be a lie.

BTW members who contribute and are useful members of the forum are quite entitled to call a long time lurker like him out. He may have been able to give a rational explanation and saved the mods getting involved.   

[joninbristol]

Observation:
11 of his 18 posts have been asking questions, 13 questions in total.
That's 72% of all posts, just ask, ask, ask. Plus a couple of insults.
Three meets mentioned during membership period, not including the one mentioned above, but zero reviews.

Quite impressive for someone who's been on here for nearly four years.....yet still has the nerve to call a Forum Helper with 66 reviews
a "useless rude person", and brazen enough to point out that is a discussion page.

Sam Smith: Discussion is normally defined by the two-way exchange of information.
Unless you have an alternative definition?  (Damn, I've added to my own question count ! )

[daviemac]

Observation:
11 of his 18 posts have been asking questions, 13 questions in total.
That's 72% of all posts, just ask, ask, ask. Plus a couple of insults.
Three meets mentioned during membership period, not including the one mentioned above, but zero reviews.

Quite impressive for someone who's been on here for nearly four years.....yet still has the nerve to call a Forum Helper with 66 reviews
a "useless rude person", and brazen enough to point out that is a discussion page.

Sam Smith: Discussion is normally defined by the two-way exchange of information.
Unless you have an alternative definition?  (Damn, I've added to my own question count ! )

Your point being? 

[joninbristol]

That the data backs up that he (Sam Smith) is taking a lot of information from the forums without giving anything in return.
Not to mention having an unprovoked crack at forum helpers who give their own time freely to police them, when one calls him out for not reviewing an SP he's seen by his own admission. Then labelling him as "useless" and "rude" as a defence - which is evidently not the case.

[daviemac]

That the data backs up that he (Sam Smith) is taking a lot of information from the forums without giving anything in return.
Not to mention having an unprovoked crack at forum helpers who give their own time freely to police them, when one calls him out for not reviewing an SP he's seen by his own admission. Then labelling him as "useless" and "rude" as a defence - which is evidently not the case.

Why do you feel the need to comment like that when a moderator is dealing with it.

Sometimes southcoastpunter's post #4 rings true.

[joninbristol]

Why do you feel the need to comment like that when a moderator is dealing with it.

Sometimes southcoastpunter's post #4 rings true.

Noted.
I'll let moderators deal with it in future.