KazXox. Cancelled a £150 incall booking. All for asking for a mobile number

[alansmithee]

NOTE- Never made it past final stage- despite arranging a booking week in advance.

Came across KazXox through reviews on this forum. Initially was impressed by her photos and that shapely Romanian arse did look mighty fine.

Contacted KazXox early in the week through adultwork e-mail. She reserved a slot for me and sent the basic address asking me to text the day before. Noticed she had her mobile number showing on profile at this point.

Day before booking logged in and noticed she had "fully booked today no more bookings" and her mobile number gone. No problem as booking was confirmed just needed to text as KazXox requested. Asked by e-mail if address was still the same and I need her mobile number either by e-mail or text as it wasn't showing on profile since Monday.

At this point I get the feeling my booking is cancelled and the withholding number is stonewalling my request.

2 hours later she e-mails her basic Canary Wharf address again, unnecessarily, but no mobile number. 

I send a "are you going to send me your mobile number then?" adultwork message.

She says sure babe its (and I kid you not) send a line of drivel that was this. Not real number ofc.

%"quote"%+44, 079"quote"445%"quote"+44""228"quote" 248

Now either she is trolling or using a handheld device not compatible ANSI code used in 95% of the world's communication devices.

She signs off this drivel with a guilty undertone message. "Babe how could you imply I was going to stand you up or that I am unprofessional?" Or something like that. (Adultwork is down this morning so I can't copy and paste).

Before I can point out her provided "mobile number" is wrong she sends me an irrelevant "You are blocked and a rude man for implying I cancel on confirmed bookings".

Well I hope you guys have better luck than me cause I got blocked purely for asking for a mobile number. KazXox loses £150 on a booking slot that was probably too early for most punters.

Conclusion

She is not easy to book, her mobile number is no longer on profile (and hasn't been for a week). When you do get a booking she is unreliable and her communications are terrible.

NEGATIVE

External Link/Members Only External Link/Members Only
[Link added by admin]

[alansmithee]

Links

External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only

[anotherwoody69]

Just a thought, but........ on a number of sites they block you send phones numbers, email addresses or web links and one way round this is to mix the number up with text such as £$&(

Perhaps she thinks AW is one of those sites, but she got the number mixed up with all the other text? 

I'm not sticking up for her, just offering a thought as she's been well reviewed here by a number of members who have a solid history on reviews and posts.
You've posted twice really, and the other one was a Romanian as well......
 

[alansmithee]

Perhaps she thinks AW is one of those sites, but she got the number mixed up with all the other text?  .

I never got the opportunity to text KazXox as she made no attempt to send it via ADULTWORK. So this irrelevant.

- She logged into adultwork but simply couldn't be bothered to double check that the mobile number wasn't sent by her
- plus she has my mobile number and could've sent it "unfiltered"- again not reading booking properly.
- I don't know of any major mobile phone networks blocking escort numbers.

I'm not sticking up for her, just offering a thought as she's been well reviewed here by a number of members who have a solid history on reviews and posts.
You've posted twice really, and the other one was a Romanian as well......

Well now she has her first negative. If the admin is unbiased I hoped this poor service gets pinned and the notice it deserves.

I don't go by nationality I go by how fit an escort is and how reliable she is.

Getting abuse from KazXox before we even met is unprofessional. The £150 intended will be given to an escort who actually wants the business.

I think KazXox just couldn't be arsed to get out of bed in the morning.

[SamLP]

Sorry to hear that. Some wg's have a bad attitude, when they can easily resolve any misunderstandings by being nice.

One of her white knights has already reported this twice trying to get the review removed 

[GolfNut]

Sorry to hear that. Some wg's have a bad attitude, when they can easily resolve any misunderstandings by being nice.

One of her white knights has already reported this twice trying to get the review removed 

No White Knighting here SamLP.

Just doesn't quite add up that a WG would block a punter purely for asking for her mobile number does it?

I'm assuming there is more to this than a request for her number. Clearly her pissed her off and she then blocked him.

I've seen her as have other reputable reviewers and found her to have a great attitude.

As has been noted his only other review is for another Romanian girl which could imply he's dodgy and maybe trying to sabotage the competition.

[SamLP]

No White Knighting here SamLP.

Just doesn't quite add up that a WG would block a punter purely for asking for her mobile number does it?

I'm assuming there is more to this than a request for her number. Clearly her pissed her off and she then blocked him.

I've seen her as have other reputable reviewers and found her to have a great attitude.

As has been noted his only other review is for another Romanian girl which could imply he's dodgy and maybe trying to sabotage the competition.

Why would you make a bold assumption? Is it because you've seen her? I've seen wg's I've given positives receive a negative from another punter. I didn't make any assumptions because I had a good time and another got fucked around.
What competition? London is massive, one wg works in E14, the other in WC1N, not exactly direct or even indirect competition there.
If you have more info, maybe she's sent you a message, then spill the beans but to accuse someone's negative on the back of an assumption or hunch and attempting to have it removed is definitely white knighting in my book.

[GolfNut]

Why would you make a bold assumption? Is it because you've seen her? I've seen wg's I've given positives receive a negative from another punter. I didn't make any assumptions because I had a good time and another got fucked around.
What competition? London is massive, one wg works in E14, the other in WC1N, not exactly direct or even indirect competition there.
If you have more info, maybe she's sent you a message, then spill the beans but to accuse someone's negative on the back of an assumption or hunch and attempting to have it removed is definitely white knighting in my book.

You clearly didn't read the report. I never asked for it to be taken down. I asked Admin for his thoughts as the booking appears to have been cancelled after the OP pissed Kaz off. Her prerogative is it not?

[ClarkeOfTheCourse]

If she's gone to the trouble to send back location details that suggests she accepted the booking therefore the negative stands IMO

[SamLP]

You clearly didn't read the report. I never asked for it to be taken down. I asked Admin for his thoughts as the booking appears to have been cancelled after the OP pissed Kaz off. Her prerogative is it not?

Why are you insisting the OP pissed off the wg? Do you know something we don't?

I read both reports. Admin replied, and you clearly weren't happy and reported it again.

Of course it's any wg's prerogative to see someone. We don't know the truth of the comms so the review is the OP's version and his prerogative on reporting his experience. Yet it seems you have a problem with it.

[barnstorm123]

I've seen her as have other reputable reviewers and found her to have a great attitude.

So fuck? What one punter gets isn't always what another gets. The OP reported their experience and others can add it to the rest of her reviews and make their own minds up. Unless you're her pimp or her boyfriend I have no idea what you are doing sneaking off to tell tales to Admin. What's your stake in this?

[GolfNut]

Unless you're her pimp or her boyfriend I have no idea what you are doing sneaking off to tell tales to Admin. What's your stake in this?

Neither obviously 

Like you I'm a punter sharing my experience so others can benefit. I have no qualms about either posting a negative review, or supporting a negative review where it is clearly deserved even if it is for a girl I have seen and reviewed. My posting history will confirm that.

I've taken this review at face value and it appears that he apparently lost his booking after doing something that caused the WG to block him.

On that basis I'd say he was the cause of the problem, so I am not inclined to sympathise with him in this instance. Quite simple really.

[monstar]

Poor form to report a review from a seemingly genuine punter who had a negative experience with booking comms. Let others make up their own mind before rushing to get a review deleted?   

I've not seen Kaz but had only excellent prompt comms through AW email. She did immediately ask for an online booking so perhaps she has changed her booking procedure.

Thanks for the info OP.

[SamLP]

Neither obviously 

Like you I'm a punter sharing my experience so others can benefit. I have no qualms about either posting a negative review, or supporting a negative review where it is clearly deserved even if it is for a girl I have seen and reviewed. My posting history will confirm that.

I've taken this review at face value and it appears that he apparently lost his booking after doing something that caused the WG to block him.

On that basis I'd say he was the cause of the problem, so I am not inclined to sympathise with him in this instance. Quite simple really.

What makes you think he was the cause of the problem without any proof. Again, another white knighting post, unless you have some insider info you're not sharing?

You have history of charging in. Let's not forget you once got banned when you reacted in a similar way to another of your favourites getting a neg and started throwing insults and demanding proof be sent to admin.
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=84378.0

[GolfNut]

What makes you think he was the cause of the problem without any proof. Again, another white knighting post, unless you have some insider info you're not sharing?

You have history of charging in. Let's not forget you once got banned when you reacted in a similar way to another of your favourites getting a neg and started throwing insults and demanding proof be sent to admin.
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=84378.0

I've got the same info you have. This review.

[SamLP]

I've got the same info you have. This review.

I can't see it myself. Maybe I missed that part even though I've reread the review.
Care to elaborate on a previous point that he might be dodgy and wants to sabotage the competition?
Did I also receive the same info as you regarding that point, as I seem to also have missed that part?

[GolfNut]

I can't see it myself. Maybe I missed that part even though I've reread the review.
Care to elaborate on a previous point that he might be dodgy and wants to sabotage the competition?
Did I also receive the same info as you regarding that point, as I seem to also have missed that part?

Speculation based on the fact that his only other review and posts relate to a single Romanian girl.

We've obviously concluded differently based on the same information.

[SamLP]

Speculation based on the fact that his only other review and posts relate to a single Romanian girl.

We've obviously concluded differently based on the same information.

You do seem to speculate a lot and jump to wild conclusions as a result. Attempting to undermine a punter with no evidence is pretty low.
Your theory has no basis and as I pointed out, one is based in E14 and has 8 positive reviews, the other is based in WC1N. Not even geographically close.
So what if they're both Romanian. You've based your attacks on the OP with nothing substantial.

If he has been rude and caused the booking to be cancelled, then I'm sure the wg in question can provide admin with screenshots should she wish to do so, otherwise all you've done is shone a light on a negative review for more people to see.

[GolfNut]

You do seem to speculate a lot and jump to wild conclusions as a result. Attempting to undermine a punter with no evidence is pretty low.
Your theory has no basis and as I pointed out, one is based in E14 and has 8 positive reviews, the other is based in WC1N. Not even geographically close.
So what if they're both Romanian. You've based your attacks on the OP with nothing substantial.

If he has been rude and caused the booking to be cancelled, then I'm sure the wg in question can provide admin with screenshots should she wish to do so, otherwise all you've done is shone a light on a negative review for more people to see.

30 minutes on the tube is hardly the other end of the country

[GolfNut]

If he has been rude and caused the booking to be cancelled, then I'm sure the wg in question can provide admin with screenshots should she wish to do so, otherwise all you've done is shone a light on a negative review for more people to see.

Now who's demanding proof!

[SamLP]

30 minutes on the tube is hardly the other end of the country

30 minutes on the tube anywhere in London and the competition would span out to at least 5,000 wg's. You really are barking up the wrong tree.

[SamLP]

Now who's demanding proof!

Was that your poor attempt to switch the tables, without actually reading my post properly. I didn't demand any proof. I mentioned if the wg had any desire, she could email admin and show him proof, and of course admin can choose to take the review down if he views it as ineligible.

So is there anything else you want to twist? 

[GolfNut]

30 minutes on the tube anywhere in London and the competition would span out to at least 5,000 wg's. You really are barking up the wrong tree.

5,000 well reviewed girls on here?

Where did you manage to find that??

[SamLP]

5,000 well reviewed girls on here?

Where did you manage to find that??

Where did you read the words "well reviewed"

 

[GolfNut]

Was that your poor attempt to switch the tables, without actually reading my post properly. I didn't demand any proof. I mentioned if the wg had any desire, she could email admin and show him proof, and of course admin can choose to take the review down if he views it as ineligible.

So is there anything else you want to twist? 

And if you read the post that I got banned on that you so kindly referred to you will find neither did I demand on that post either 

[GolfNut]

Where did you read the words "well reviewed"

 

Would you punt with any of the 5,000 you are referring to that don't have a review history on here?

I wouldn't so that cuts the number down rather dramatically don't you think?

[SamLP]

And if you read the post that I got banned on that you so kindly referred to you will find neither did I demand on that post either 

Ok

It's inevitable that a girl with 26 positive and no neutral or negatives is going to get a negative or neutral at some point. There are few exceptions. It was just a matter of time.

The issue for me is not that she's had a negative, it's that this review coincided with another negative from what turned out to be a malicious stalker, and the meeting apparently happened "a few months back". The timing does indeed seem a little suspicious.

Also the OP can't seem to get his facts straight. One minute he's saying she's 35-39, then in the next breath he's moved to 32, or 35-35. Is he an age expert I ask??

He also states that the girl he saw was considerably older than the girl in the blurred angel photo, which I know to be Emily, as it was taken only a couple of weeks ago during her duo day with Michelle.

So I can only conclude that either he hasn't actually seen Emily, or like the banned Stalker perhaps he has something to hide.

Given that Emily tends to take her first timer bookings via AW, might be pertinent to ask the OP to supply proof of the meeting for Admin to validate.

This was admins post after you were banned

You tell them be careful how they react to a negative review about one of their prossies and be respectful of a fellow punter's bad experience.
They seem to understand.
But then a negative appears.
Then all of it is forgotten and they become a whole different person.

[GolfNut]

Ok

This was admins post after you were banned

And if you read this review you will see that I was in fact correct on her age after Julius confirmed he'd seen her ID

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=86722.0

[SamLP]

Would you punt with any of the 5,000 you are referring to that don't have a review history on here?

I wouldn't so that cuts the number down rather dramatically don't you think?

Unlike you, I punt a lot of wg's with no review history.

Also I normally punt in the NW, HA & W postcodes and there's a huge variety of wg's that can be seen.
There's no real competition in London as it's heavily populated. The only reason a wg can be out of business is if her service isn't up to scratch or she's priced herself too high in correlation with what services are on offer. Someone in WC1N won't give two flying fingers about someone in E14.

[SamLP]

And if you read this review you will see that I was in fact correct on her age after Julius confirmed he'd seen her ID

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=86722.0

What does that have to do with attempting to make out the OP was lying and hadn't seem the wg? You're deflecting the real reason you were banned in the first place. 

Another punter confirming something isn't confirmation at all. It's a claim.

[GolfNut]

Unlike you, I punt a lot of wg's with no review history.

Hence your disproportionately high rate of negative and neutrals. Unlike you I don't have money to waste.

[GolfNut]

Another punter confirming something isn't confirmation at all. It's a claim.

In that case you've answer the argument for me!

Contradiction or what?

QED methinks!

[SamLP]

Hence your disproportionately high rate of negative and neutrals. Unlike you I don't have money to waste.

Oh, so you wanna play that card now.

I don't review all my positives. I've probably reviewed half my punts if not less, so don't get carried away with your theories.
If you also read the negatives, you'll find quote a lot were either b&s, or I didn't get to see them as they fucked me around on arrival, so there was no money being wasted.
On the flip side I've discovered many gems with my system. However, this debate isn't about how I punt, and again you've tried to deflect your poor argument by trying show me in a poor light. 

[SamLP]

In that case you've answer the argument for me!

Contradiction or what?

QED methinks!

You don't make any sense, and again you've turned the debate into something that no-one has any interest in discussing. Another deflection.

Maybe in your mind, you think you've made a point, but in reality you've twisted the yarn so much you don't know head from tail anymore.

[GolfNut]

Oh, so you wanna play that card now.

I don't review all my positives. I've probably reviewed half my punts if not less, so don't get carried away with your theories.
If you also read the negatives, you'll find quote a lot were either b&s, or I didn't get to see them as they fucked me around on arrival, so there was no money being wasted.
On the flip side I've discovered many gems with my system. However, this debate isn't about how I punt, and again you've tried to deflect your poor argument by trying show me in a poor light. 

Sam I really think you have a bit of a complex.

My point was more to do with the fact that I don't have money to waste and so research my punts which clearly you don't. That's not a slur on you, just reflects different punting methodologies.

You're starting to bore me now so I'm out of this thread. 

[SamLP]

Sam I really think you have a bit of a complex.

My point was more to do with the fact that I don't have money to waste and so research my punts which clearly you don't. That's not a slur on you, just reflects different punting methodologies.

Nothing wrong with that.

we're in the same boat. I tend to go for more vfm girls and book them for half an hour, with the odd 1 hour punt if I want to.
I don't splash out on 2 hour punts with a more high priced girl.

At the same time, I enjoy seeing many different wg's in all their varieties, and enjoy the satisfaction of seeing a non-reviewed wg which i can can share with other punters. There's nothing complex about it, but it does mean I may encounter a higher percentage of scammers and timewasters. However, your point read as a slur.

[SamLP]

You're starting to bore me now so I'm out of this thread. 

You bored the fuck out of me ages ago, but good idea. Your shovel does need a rest.

[Dicky]

While you guys were fighting, I was with Kaz and it was a fantastic punt. Review to follow. For whatever its worth, I made the booking with Kaz earlier this week, she gave me her phone number the next day and was in constant touch, replying to any questions I had (dress requests, best way to reach her digs, etc) right through till just before the punt. She is very good at her comms - ar least with me. I cannot speak for the OP and his case but I have a feeling there might be her side to the story as well.  OP and others, review read, move on

[Bangers and Gash]

Congratulations to the knight in shining armour for killing off a valid review.

Hidden Image/Members Only

[NightKid]

Obvious white knight is obvious. 

[smiths]

Oh, so you wanna play that card now.

I don't review all my positives. I've probably reviewed half my punts if not less, so don't get carried away with your theories.
If you also read the negatives, you'll find quote a lot were either b&s, or I didn't get to see them as they fucked me around on arrival, so there was no money being wasted.
On the flip side I've discovered many gems with my system. However, this debate isn't about how I punt, and again you've tried to deflect your poor argument by trying show me in a poor light. 

Indeed, its a well known fact on here with punters with brain cells that some of us don't review all our good punts but do all our bad ones so the ratio of positive to negative reviews might not be a true reflection of a punters punting experiences overall.

[Tony_Red]

Sorry to hear OP. I was considering her as I do like Romanian Indies but I won't be taking a risk with her after speaking to another punter +  after reading this review (comms issues).

[Trav]

Sorry OP for your experience.
Just wanted to say that there will always be good and bad reviews. It's like a book or a movie. You see the cover, you read reviews, but you don't know until you read or watch it yourself. Everyone is different and there are different situations as well. If she had only bad reviews, then it's a different story.
What I can say at the moment is that she is very nice at comms. I haven't seen her yet, but after chatting with her, I can see that she cares about her customers very well. Going to see her soon. Will see if my opinion changes.
Have a nice weekend everyone!
 

[threechilliman]

No White Knighting here SamLP.

Of course not Golfie, and not the first time you've opened with that kind of statement. You react to any less than favourable review of one of your favourites......

tcm

[James999]

I'd say he was the cause of the problem,

Hidden Image/Members Only

[alansmithee]

With admins permission I'd like to post some screen captures of the full adultwork e-mail exchange with KazXox.

This will put to rest any doubt that, I never said anything rude to the escort, she confirmed a booking was happy to see me and this review is genuine.

Ofc I'll black out any confidential info either from my end or KazXox so no info is openly revealed that wouldn't be otherwise.

Warning in advance, some posters, who like this escort, will see how rude she can be via e-mail. This is uncalled for just because she couldn't supply a mobile number in a readable format.

So do you still want this proof or not?

[James999]

So do you still want this proof or not?

Yep 

[Eddie Chapman]

Never doubted your review was genuine from the 1st post. Golf geezer said in his own earlier reviews he was head over heals fluffed up so any defending of wg from him should be taken in context of his mindset.
No need to prove anything imo, some will have great experiences others won't.

[Tony_Red]

Never doubted your review was genuine from the 1st post. Golf geezer said in his own earlier reviews he was head over heals fluffed up so any defending of wg from him should be taken in context of his mindset.
No need to prove anything imo, some will have great experiences others won't.

Exactly. Personally, I am out but i'm sure there will be plenty of positive reviews, most probably very soon as is often the case.

[Belgarion]

Thanks for sharing the review OP and commiserations for being fucked around.

Not sure why people are having a go at you.

Poor comms give an insight into the inner workings of a WGs mind.

She may have bumped you for another punter and used the query as an excuse 

It may explain the post reports