This post is much better because now it is balanced. Both genders are victim to the social conditioning and societal constraints that has been prevalent through times and shaped the environment that we have to navigate. If you posted this first I would not have said anything from the start. The issue I have is this ongoing narrative being created for women that oh woe is them, they have such a hard time and men are the villians. It's everyone who is having a hard time, both men and women. If it makes it seem I am veering into Andrew Tate territory for highlighting that men also do not have it easy when I have not actually said anything about women in my post that would even lead to an inference that I resent them, then fine so be it. I no longer care if I have to fall into such territory of a person I do not even listen to, for merely trying to balance the fact that men also go through the same issues.
I have not complained about women commenting about being objectified, women that are not in industries/jobs where they knowingly enter with the knowledge that their looks is basically the product and they are being leered at etc yes of course they should object, it is not fair or right. However, a woman that is going into a specific job where her looks is the product and she knows this...then proceeds to be judged on what she is offering as the product ie: her looks.... and then wants to cry don't judge my looks like this etc is more akin to someone applying for a job, knowing the metrics they will be measured on and then complaining about the metrics they are measured on when they fully made the conscious decision to apply for the job knowing what to expect. It's ridiculous to be honest. We all know if a man done the equivalent of what you are trying to defend people will laugh in his face, both men and women. However, due to the ongoing narrative of oh yes woe is women, logic is ignored and equality of outcomes is also suddenly non-existant.
Just to reiterate, I agree with you. It's the lack of balance from a gender standpoint that I see from posts which leads it to seem that men are villians when it's more an ideological issue which yes, men have created but both genders are victim of. So now due to such ongoing narrative that all men are responsible and are "villians" we have a situation where men get ignored or not taken seriously with all there sufferings and then are taking the blame for issues that women deal with that alot of men do not even have anything to do with even perpetuating. In other words, it's more a systemic issue at the core of all of this which impacts both genders, not men just being dickheads towards women in general; that is my point I am trying to make, we also cannot ignore equality of outcome for peoples decisions just to placate them either.
Goodness, there's a lot to unpick from this.
This post is much better because now it is balanced. Both genders are victim to the social conditioning and societal constraints that has been prevalent through times and shaped the environment that we have to navigate. If you posted this first I would not have said anything from the start.
The post you responded to originally (#56) was not worse than my last post (#87) because I wasn't responding to a question whether both men and women are objectified or not. The question from the OP was who do we find sexy (paraphrasing) etc. The problem is that the OP started his question about rating women's attractiveness, thereby giving the impression that we were rating civvy women. He did not mention SPs, sadly he confused some of our members by posting a mix of civvy and sex workers' pictures.
My original post argued against what some members think that we are "wired" in a certain way to like slim women. I also added a little bit of an explanation why some members were uneasy about rating women therefore the objectification issue came along. My bad probably for mixing the two issues in one post. Then you jumped with "What about men!"
The issue I have is this ongoing narrative being created for women that oh woe is them, they have such a hard time and men are the villians. It's everyone who is having a hard time, both men and women. If it makes it seem I am veering into Andrew Tate territory for highlighting that men also do not have it easy when I have not actually said anything about women in my post that would even lead to an inference that I resent them, then fine so be it. I no longer care if I have to fall into such territory of a person I do not even listen to, for merely trying to balance the fact that men also go through the same issues.
Maybe I was being too harsh accusing you of veering into an Andrew Tate territory. You came across as being somewhat resentful of certain experiences with women, not only on this thread but on others. If I misread you then please accept my apologies.
I did like the thread you started about support for men's mental health - I must commend you on that, even though I do not agree 100% with certain things you posted there such as using anger as a motivator.
I have not complained about women commenting about being objectified, women that are not in industries/jobs where they knowingly enter with the knowledge that their looks is basically the product and they are being leered at etc yes of course they should object, it is not fair or right. However, a woman that is going into a specific job where her looks is the product and she knows this...then proceeds to be judged on what she is offering as the product ie: her looks.... and then wants to cry don't judge my looks like this etc is more akin to someone applying for a job, knowing the metrics they will be measured on and then complaining about the metrics they are measured on when they fully made the conscious decision to apply for the job knowing what to expect. It's ridiculous to be honest. We all know if a man done the equivalent of what you are trying to defend people will laugh in his face, both men and women. However, due to the ongoing narrative of oh yes woe is women, logic is ignored and equality of outcomes is also suddenly non-existant.
Honestly, I haven't got a clue as to what the hell you're going on about in this paragraph. It seems to me that you were either falling victim of confirmation bias and whataboutery and jumped to conclusions or didn't read my posts properly - or maybe all of the above.
First of all, you accuse me, wrongly, that I am defending something. I think you mean "I'm defending SPs complaining about being objectified?" If that's what you mean, you're wrong. I haven't defended anyone. I argued that men rather than being 'wired' to like slim women (in Europe/the West) are conditioned to like slimmer women due to current societal trends. I also touched on why some members here feel uneasy about rating civvy women and why most women do not like being objectified.
I didn't defend anyone, I didn't tell anyone 'please don't objectify women,' etc. As a flawed human being I always try not to pontificate, although some people seem to think I was.
Then you go on to paraphrase what I already said in my post #58. I'll rephrase it here for your benefit once again in case you missed it (I was a bit tired that night and posted in a hurry).
So here it goes... about the objectification of sex workers (prostitutes, porn actresses, cam models, etc.) assuming they are working out of their own free will and are not coerced into doing so. Under these conditions and within the transactional context of their jobs, sex workers are objectified and voluntarily choose to be objectified because their commodity is their body/looks. I would even argue that (under the above circumstances) some sex workers feel empowered by making those choices.
So I have no idea why/how you came up with:
However, a woman that is going into a specific job where her looks is the product and she knows this...then proceeds to be judged on what she is offering as the product ie: her looks.... and then wants to cry don't judge my looks like this etc is more akin to someone applying for a job, knowing the metrics they will be measured on and then complaining about the metrics they are measured on when they fully made the conscious decision to apply for the job knowing what to expect. It's ridiculous to be honest.
… because no one on this thread, especially not SPs have said anything of the sort. This is a classic example of someone picking up a few words at random, jumping to conclusions to confirm their bias and then entering into a whataboutery fallacy. Whataboutery usually deflects from the issue we are talking about.
Just to reiterate, I agree with you. It's the lack of balance from a gender standpoint that I see from posts which leads it to seem that men are villians when it's more an ideological issue which yes, men have created but both genders are victim of. So now due to such ongoing narrative that all men are responsible and are "villians" we have a situation where men get ignored or not taken seriously with all there sufferings and then are taking the blame for issues that women deal with that alot of men do not even have anything to do with even perpetuating. In other words, it's more a systemic issue at the core of all of this which impacts both genders, not men just being dickheads towards women in general; that is my point I am trying to make, we also cannot ignore equality of outcome for peoples decisions just to placate them either.
If you want a balanced argument about the objectification of people (both men and women) start a thread and I will be happy to discuss that but please don't accuse me of things that I have/haven't said or that my posts are not balanced when I was sticking to the issue at hand and you decide to jump in with another issue that is not the subject of discussion.
Anyway, I think I have spent far too long on this thread so I will leave you with the last word. I'm off to post some inane shit on other threads.