Is it 'fair' that WGs who are popular pick & choose (+ignore) their punters?

[west8]

After just 10 minutes on here today, I've seen two threads complaining about two popular London girls that seem impossible to book. They're not.

Both owe their ridiculous popularity to the reviews they have accumulated on here over the past 3-6 months. No need to name them.

Now, it does seem (from my experience) that the girls in question are being very, very picky in who they see for a first meet and (more interestingly) who they see once, but then (for no apparent reason) refuse to see a second time.

We all know girls are fussy and prefer the easygoing / less strenuous type of customer as it makes for easier money.

But is actually fair and reasonable that punters are being ignored by said girls when it's blatantly fucking obvious that those same girls are available, but are actively choosing to ignore the majority of comms?

[306]

clear as mud its  their choice
to  see or answer you or not
simple they choose ,

[smiths]

Its entirely up to a WG who she wishes to punt with or not. If she were polite she would reply to her comms, some couldn't care less about doing so as they only think of the short-term and may be fully booked up in that period. Some others just couldn't care less at all.

I don't punt with WGs who dictate to me because its ME that's the one paying so on principle I avoid these WGs like Platinum Cindy who requires or did punters to have A/W feedback. I punt to suit ME not WGs. I find it utterly ridiculous that for such WGs to deign to punt with me I need A/W FB. Stuff that bollocks.

Not much that can be done about forum darlings, they are bound to become more and more popular and busier and some will raise their prices as well to cash in while they can. That's a possible consequence of getting good reviews on here. What a punter can choose to do which I do sometimes is punt with a WG and either tell no one, or tell some off the open forum and only when I get bored or know I wont be punting with her again soon let others know on the forum.

[madeinwales56]

No comment.

[cueball]

I've had a couple of prossies ignore my emails (I do try to word them politely), to be honest I don't give it much thought, my money spend quite easily with the girls that's answer.

[sparkymark0001]

It is annoying but its life, their body so they have the right to choose who they share it with.

Annoying the wg's who refuse to see certain races but  we have to accept it. So if you have seen Platinum Cindy be happy as i will never get the chance to. Not even once lol

[lordsnooty]

I guess the law of supply & demand comes into play. If they are getting the level of trade that they require then why accept any additional bookings. When the phone starts getting dusty they may have to re-think their strategy.

[sparkymark0001]

Yeh by then it would be too late! Pissed off too many punters!

[Cupcake X]

West8-  Yes it is entirely down to the individual wg who she will see/not see- her choice at the end of the day.

I don't punt with WGs who dictate to me because its ME that's the one paying so on principle I avoid these WGs like Platinum Cindy who requires or did punters to have A/W feedback. I punt to suit ME not WGs. I find it utterly ridiculous that for such WGs to deign to punt with me I need A/W FB. Stuff that bollocks.

I understand what you say here Smiths although I do think wgs try to avoid timewasters with 0 feedback which can be filtered out.

[Type_O_Negative]

Its entirely up to a WG who she wishes to punt with or not. If she were polite she would reply to her comms, some couldn't care less about doing so as they only think of the short-term and may be fully booked up in that period. Some others just couldn't care less at all.

I don't punt with WGs who dictate to me because its ME that's the one paying so on principle I avoid these WGs like Platinum Cindy who requires or did punters to have A/W feedback. I punt to suit ME not WGs. I find it utterly ridiculous that for such WGs to deign to punt with me I need A/W FB. Stuff that bollocks.

Not much that can be done about forum darlings, they are bound to become more and more popular and busier and some will raise their prices as well to cash in while they can. That's a possible consequence of getting good reviews on here. What a punter can choose to do which I do sometimes is punt with a WG and either tell no one, or tell some off the open forum and only when I get bored or know I wont be punting with her again soon let others know on the forum.

+1 

[Quesadilla]

It's the same in many types of private enterprise. If business is brisk you can afford to pick and choose which customers you take. If business is slow you may have to deal with any twat who has cash. Some customers are always more trouble than they're worth.

Absolutely fair in any walk of life but most especially prostitution which is a very intimate and also potentially risky line of work.

[Type_O_Negative]

I understand what you say here Smiths although I do think wgs try to avoid timewasters with 0 feedback which can be filtered out.

Only because you have 0 feedback it doesn't make you a time waster. I do not have AW profile so i must be time waster of the highest order then. It doesn't work like that.

My message to WGs who require AW feedback - fuck off.
Anyway - i don't fancy these two.

[tristen92]

I've only noticed this when people moan about unavailability yet another member posts a review a couple of hours later. I do think they're within their right to choose tbh; any of us would do the same in their situation. I'm sure they see it as they've done the hard work and now they can earn good money spending time with their more appealing clients.

[fredpunter]

Which two?

[Jay-Jay]

Never had a problem but then I'm massively wealthy,handsome and dapper with impecable hygiene and am blessed with a wang like a whale. I invariably cum within minutes and am a one-pop man yet book two hours and fuck off after 5 minutes. The perfect punter.

Jay

[smiths]

West8-  Yes it is entirely down to the individual wg who she will see/not see- her choice at the end of the day.



I understand what you say here Smiths although I do think wgs try to avoid timewasters with 0 feedback which can be filtered out.

And its up to said WGs to work as they choose Natasha, they just wont be getting my business.

[306]

jay jay you cum far too much you must limit yourself .

[yourgent]

Is it fair that Brad Pitt can choose what films he works on
Is it fair that Lionel Messi can choose what club he plays for

those at the top will always hold the power for the short time they are there.

[azrael]

I go by the three strike rule, contact is done 3 times if she doesnt respond or let you down in that period i move on to another w.g.  My money there loss 

[smiths]

I've only noticed this when people moan about unavailability yet another member posts a review a couple of hours later. I do think they're within their right to choose tbh; any of us would do the same in their situation. I'm sure they see it as they've done the hard work and now they can earn good money spending time with their more appealing clients.

Unless a review states when the punt took place a review being posted up doesn't mean the punt happened that day, so one punter moaning about availability while another posts a review on the WG up could well be just  a co-incidence.

[smiths]

Is it fair that Brad Pitt can choose what films he works on
Is it fair that Lionel Messi can choose what club he plays for

those at the top will always hold the power for the short time they are there.

What do you mean by those at the top in this context?

[yourgent]

What do you mean by those at the top in this context?

The most popular, the most gifted, the best, or the ones that can get away with it

[UberX]

Actually there are various reasons of ignoring in second time. Such as a client has a very big cock, smelly, dirty  so automatically the girl will ignore that client on second booking with false excuse. and it is easy for them to identfy client mainly because they save their number like this------

big black..
dirty Indian
smelly English..

 

[smiths]

The most popular, the most gifted, the best, or the ones that can get away with it

Thanks.

[Cupcake X]

Only because you have 0 feedback it doesn't make you a time waster. I do not have AW profile so i must be time waster of the highest order then. It doesn't work like that.

My message to WGs who require AW feedback - fuck off.
Anyway - i don't fancy these two.

Yes the highest order Type_O_Negative 

Talking in general terms if a client has 0 feedback. It is different if accompanied by an email that may be explanatory.

[Cupcake X]

And its up to said WGs to work as they choose Natasha, they just wont be getting my business.

That's fair enough.

[Bikerboy]

clear as mud its  their choice
to  see or answer you or not
simple they choose ,

+1
It would be odd if it was the other way around; they do do that in some countries, it's called slavery.
Some countries cut any pretence of free choice and go the full hog, that's a Dictatorship.

I am left wondering why the question in this thread arises? It's like saying escorts should choose which of them should see punters?!?! West 8 has gone to ground....

[Siadwel]

Its entirely up to a WG who she wishes to punt with or not. If she were polite she would reply to her comms, some couldn't care less about doing so as they only think of the short-term and may be fully booked up in that period. Some others just couldn't care less at all.

I don't punt with WGs who dictate to me because its ME that's the one paying so on principle I avoid these WGs like Platinum Cindy who requires or did punters to have A/W feedback. I punt to suit ME not WGs. I find it utterly ridiculous that for such WGs to deign to punt with me I need A/W FB. Stuff that bollocks.

Not much that can be done about forum darlings, they are bound to become more and more popular and busier and some will raise their prices as well to cash in while they can. That's a possible consequence of getting good reviews on here. What a punter can choose to do which I do sometimes is punt with a WG and either tell no one, or tell some off the open forum and only when I get bored or know I wont be punting with her again soon let others know on the forum.

+1 again.

Basically, I don't want to see a hooker who doesn't want to see me. Her loss, not mine, there's always a thousand others.

End of.

[PumpAction]

 Life isn't fair.

[BeesKnees]

I don't think it's fairness, it's a case of their own business prerogative. When the wgs get too popular too quick, they fail to manage the volume of requests they receive.

Being self employed, they should always chase new business. Despite having regulars, a regular can always take a break and see someone else who is the current forum darling and that wg would lose business.

[SamLP]

It's up to them. Nothing can be done about it. Like Smiths and other punters, I only punt with a girl who displays a number. I don't use the AW system.

It can be unfair to me as I don't punt some of the more popular girls who ask for bookings to be made through that system or those who go a step further and require x amount of positive feedback, but they're willing to jump through hoops while I'm not.

I've tried booking Michelle several times but never been able to. I understand she's a very popular girl but she does display her number even though she's always fully booked. She either doesn't reply to calls or texts or it's a quick "I'm fully booked" reply. Any enquiry for availability on other days is also ignored or "fully booked all week" reply which makes you think she's been booked through AW and won't be accepting bookings over the phone especially from new customers. It doesn't bother me as there are plenty of other girls to see, especially in London so yes it may be unfair but just get over it by choosing another girl.

[yorkshire123]

I pick & choose what customers I deal with so I'm in no position to criticise a prossie for doing so, however I also realise that the chances of said customer ever wanting to deal with me in the future would be pretty slim.

Also the more popular a prossie becomes on here the less interested I become 

[Type_O_Negative]

I pick & choose what customers I deal with so I'm in no position to criticise a prossie for doing so, however I also realise that the chances of said customer ever wanting to deal with me in the future would be pretty slim.

Also the more popular a prossie becomes on here the less interested I become 

+1

[BeesKnees]

To be devil's advocate, or even slightly siding with the wgs, maybe they don't want the massive amount of business? Possibly they're happy only seeing 3-4 punters a day so that's their version of fully booked? Obviously we have no way of knowing.

To me, fucking 25 guys a week and pretending you're their gf sounds pretty tiring. Having too many bookings may lead to burnout and them becoming jaded. We all don't want that now do we?!

[BeesKnees]

Also the more popular a prossie becomes on here the less interested I become 

+2

[Siadwel]

<SNIP>

Also the more popular a prossie becomes on here the less interested I become 

+3

[west8]

I am left wondering why the question in this thread arises? It's like saying escorts should choose which of them should see punters?!?! West 8 has gone to ground....

Because I think it's a pertinent topic of conversation, given that at least 4/5 current forum favorites are experiencing the pitfalls of Uber UKP popularity (apparently).

It's also interesting to see how many respected members on here have no problems meeting some girls, whilst others do complain about having difficulties arranging a meeting with those same girls.

I'd love to know precisely what it is (or indeed is not) that makes a WG respond to some, but blank others. There seems to be little consistency or logic.

[306]

Have anyone on here heard the term
light the blue touch paper and stand back for the fireworks
to start.
Think snake 8 has




After just 10 minutes on here today, I've seen two threads complaining about two popular London girls that seem impossible to book. They're not.

Both owe their ridiculous popularity to the reviews they have accumulated on here over the past 3-6 months. No need to name them.

Now, it does seem (from my experience) that the girls in question are being very, very picky in who they see for a first meet and (more interestingly) who they see once, but then (for no apparent reason) refuse to see a second time.

We all know girls are fussy and prefer the easygoing / less strenuous type of customer as it makes for easier money.

But is actually fair and reasonable that punters are being ignored by said girls when it's blatantly fucking obvious that those same girls are available, but are actively choosing to ignore the majority of comms?

[west8]

Have anyone on here heard the term
light the blue touch paper and stand back for the fireworks
to start.
Think snake 8 has

It seemed the thread was progressing well. A sensible discussion which has revealed a consensus of opinion that is rare on this forum.

Thank you for derailing it by going off topic with your trolling comment (again).

[Cupcake X]

I'd love to know precisely what it is (or indeed is not) that makes a WG respond to some, but blank others. There seems to be little consistency or logic.

There could be any number of reasons ie client using threatening tone or making WG feel unsafe, timewasters with stupid questions with no intention of booking. Usually If the client communicates clearly in a reasonable manner there should be no problem but if the WG is uneasy for some reason then for peace of mind her safety must come first.

[claretandblue]

getting back to the original post its basic supply and demand and natural that heavily in demand girls can be selective with who they choose to see.

I have never had a problem but could understand if my booking was bumped for someone who was going to stay considerably longer/pay more and also not work them as hard...

[west8]

getting back to the original post its basic supply and demand and natural that heavily in demand girls can be selective with who they choose to see.

I have never had a problem but could understand if my booking was bumped for someone who was going to stay considerably longer/pay more and also not work them as hard...

That would actually seriously piss me off. I don't think there is any justification for the above. After all, an hour can easily be extended and there's no way for any WG to know which punter on any given day might be 'easier work'.

[306]

clear as mud its  their choice
to  see or answer you or not
simple they choose ,

think this said it all before  supply and demand
pick only what is best for yourself
think every one does this ?

[claretandblue]

That would actually seriously piss me off. I don't think there is any justification for the above. After all, an hour can easily be extended and there's no way for any WG to know which punter on any given day might be 'easier work'.

they know its easier work if its a booking with a regular who books them for 4hours plus,buys them champagne and then only wants a cuddle and to go in the jacuzzi,a well reviewed wg told me that was a regular scenario with a couple of her regulars not so long ago...

[west8]

they know its easier work if its a booking with a regular who books them for 4hours plus,buys them champagne and then only wants a cuddle and to go in the jacuzzi,a well reviewed wg told me that was a regular scenario with a couple of her regulars not so long ago...

Sounds nice 

[Type_O_Negative]

they know its easier work if its a booking with a regular who books them for 4hours plus,buys them champagne and then only wants a cuddle and to go in the jacuzzi,a well reviewed wg told me that was a regular scenario with a couple of her regulars not so long ago...

 

[Cupcake X]

If a WG has a choice of two clients she is going to choose the one she enjoys being with the most. Human nature 

[west8]

If a WG has a choice of two clients she is going to choose the one she enjoys being with the most. Human nature 

That assumes she has met them both before. Judging by the comments on other popular WG threads, many members are having difficulty booking a WG they haven't met before.

But as others have said, always better the devil you know. I'm sure WGs think the same.

[charming_red]

Its entirely a WGs choice who she sees. If she has regulars filling her schedule up then its probably easier to see them as she is more comfortable with them and probably knows how to make him come quicker making her job a lot easier!

And it clearly seems quite a few WG owe their rising popularity to UKP.

[306]

like in a garage they turn away the hard and unknow jobs
if you can fill it with easy to do jobs from known customers
or if you are full of work you dont take any more on.